Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63496
This PR adds a (private) enable_python_mode context manager.
(see torch/utils/_python_dispatch.py).
enable_python_mode accepts the type of a __torch_dispatch__ object
as its argument. Whenever an operator gets called inside of the
context manager, it dispatches to the __torch_dispatch__ of
the passed-in type.
Example usage:
```
with enable_python_mode(LoggingTensor):
z = torch.empty([])
assert isinstance(z, LoggingTensor)
```
There are quite a few changes that were made to support this.
First, we added TorchDispatchTypeObject, a C++ struct that represents the
type of a `__torch_dispatch__` object (e.g. LoggingTensor).
It holds both the PyObject* representing the class and a PyInterpreter*
so we know which Python interpreter it came from.
Next, we updated the concrete_dispatch_fn in python_variable.cpp to accept
a `const std::shared_ptr<TorchDispatchTypeObject>&` argument. When this
is null, dispatching happens as usual. When it is non-null, we prepend
the TorchDispatchTypeObject's PyObject* to the overloaded args list so that
it is considered first for dispatch.
To get that to work, we changed how `handle_torch_dispatch_no_python_arg_parser`
works. The "overloaded args list" previously only consisted of Tensor PyObjects,
but now it can have types in addition to Tensors!
- We renamed `append_overloaded_arg` to `append_overloaded_arg`
- We added a new `append_overloaded_type` that appends a type to
overloaded_args
- We added special handling in `handle_torch_dispatch_no_python_arg_parser`
and `append_overloaded_arg` to handle types in addition to Tensors.
Then, there is PythonMode and PythonModeTLS.
- We reuse the DispatchKey::Python dispatch key as a mode key
- We use PythonMode::enter and PythonMode::exit to enable/disable
DispatchKey::Python and set the PythonModeTLS.
- PythonModeTLS stores a TorchDispatchTypeObject as metadata.
- PythonMode is in libtorch_python, and PythonModeTLS is in ATen.
This split is due to the libtorch_python library boundary (because we need
to save TLS in ATen/ThreadLocalState)
- We modify the PythonFallbackKernel to look up
the relevant TorchDispatchTypeObject (if Python Mode is active) and
dispatch using it.
There are two more miscellaneous changes:
- internal_new_from_data (torch/csrc/utils/tensor_new.cpp) gets an
exclude guard. enable_python_mode currently does not handle
torch.tensor and the exclude guard is to prevent a bug.
Future:
- This PR does not allow for the nesting of Python modes. In the future we
should be able to enable this with a more sane no_dispatch API and by changing
the TLS to a stack. For now I did not need this for CompositeImplicitAutograd testing.
Test Plan: - new tests
Reviewed By: malfet, albanD
Differential Revision: D30543236
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: ef5444d96a5a957d1657b7e37dce80f9a497d452
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63411
In order to get this behavior, you have to use append_overloaded,
which I forgot to use in the previous implementation. I exposed
an internal helper function which is more appropriate for dispatch
to Python where we know that an argument is definitely a Tensor (and
this test no longer needs to be done).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D30374489
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 43b08c00d1958c9b26d82a025d19f0b67bb85590
Summary:
This PR suppresses clang-tidy warnings in the codebase (for now) so that we can re-enable clang-tidy checks on master.
I ran this script to add the `NOLINTNEXTLINE` comments (on a devserver):
```bash
python3 setup.py develop
# Uses same script that's run on CI and adds the -j (parallel), -s (add comments), -k (continue if diagnostic errors are found) options
python3 tools/clang_tidy.py \
-j \
-s \
-k \
-v \
--paths torch/csrc/ \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/passes/onnx/helper.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/passes/onnx/shape_type_inference.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/serialization/onnx.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/serialization/export.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/serialization/import.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/serialization/import_legacy.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/onnx/init.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/cuda/nccl.*" \
-g"-torch/csrc/cuda/python_nccl.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/autograd/FunctionsManual.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/generic/*.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/jit/codegen/cuda/runtime/*" \
-g"-torch/csrc/deploy/interpreter/interpreter.cpp" \
-g"-torch/csrc/deploy/interpreter/interpreter.h" \
-g"-torch/csrc/deploy/interpreter/interpreter_impl.h" \
-g"-torch/csrc/deploy/interpreter/test_main.cpp"
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60649
Test Plan: Verified changes by re-running the script (without the `-s` option) and seeing no warnings/errors.
Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99
Differential Revision: D29504258
Pulled By: 1ntEgr8
fbshipit-source-id: 78310b30ee8213b73ddb4771ad874665323e7a4e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59760
See https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/59049
There are some moving parts to this PR, I'll structure this explanation so the straightforward parts go first, and then the less straightforward parts.
**The actual dispatch to Python.** The core logic of dispatch to Python lives in `concrete_dispatch_fn` in `torch/csrc/autograd/python_variable.cpp`. It takes the input IValue stack, scans all the arguments for Tensor arguments, and defers most of the heavy lifting to `handle_torch_function_no_python_arg_parser` which actually does all of the logic for calling out to torch dispatch (in particular, this function handles multiple dispatch situations for you). Because we have a different function name than regular `__torch_function__` handling, `handle_torch_function_no_python_arg_parser` is generalized to accept a magic method name to look for when testing if Tensors have custom handling or not. Unlike `__torch_function__`, by default there is no `__torch_dispatch__` on Tensor classes.
**Maintaining the Python dispatch key.** In order to get to the dispatch to Python logic, we must tag Tensors with the `__torch_dispatch__` magic method with the newly added Python dispatch key (separated from PythonFuncTorch to allow for a transitional period while they migrate to this mechanism). We expose a new private property `_is_python_dispatch` that assists in debugging if a Tensor is participating in Python dispatch or not. We apply the Python dispatch key the first time a PyObject for a Tensor is constructed (THPVariable_NewWithVar), testing if `__torch_dispatch__` exists with then newly added `check_has_torch_dispatch`.
**Shallow copy and detach.** For the simple examples tested in this PR, most creations of Tensor route through the dispatcher. The exception to this is `shallow_copy_and_detach`, which bypasses the dispatcher and is used when saving tensors for backwards. When a Tensor is Python dispatch, we override the behavior of `shallow_copy_and_detach` to instead directly call into `__torch_dispatch__` to perform a `detach` operation (in the same way it would be invoked if you called `detach` directly). Because this Python call is triggered directly from c10::TensorImpl, it must be indirected through `PyInterpreter::detach`, which is the general mechanism for dynamic dispatching to the Python interpreter associated with a TensorImpl.
**torchdeploy compatibility.** The dispatch to Python logic cannot be directly registered to the dispatcher as it is compiled in the Python library, which will get loaded multiple times per torchdeploy interpreter. Thus, we must employ a two phase process. First, we register a fallback inside a non-Python library (aten/src/ATen/core/PythonFallbackKernel.cpp). Its job is to determine the appropriate PyInterpreter to handle the Python dispatch by going through all of the arguments and finding the first argument that has a PyObject/PyInterpreter. With this PyInterpreter, it makes another dynamic dispatch via "dispatch" which will go to the correct torchdeploy interpreter to handle dispatching to actual Python.
**Testing.** We provide a simple example of a LoggingTensor for testing, which can be used to generate TorchScript-like traces to observe what operations are being called when a Tensor is invoked. Although a LoggingTensor would be better implemented via an is-a relationship rather than a has-a relationship (as is done in the test), we've done it this way to show that arbitrarily complex compositions of tensors inside a tensor work properly.
**Known limitations.**
* We haven't adjusted any operator code, so some patterns may not work (as they lose the Python subclass in an unrecoverable way)
* `__torch_function__` must be explicitly disabled with `_disabled_torch_function_impl` otherwise things don't work quite correctly (in particular, what is being disabled is default subclass preservation behavior.)
* We don't ever populate kwargs, even when an argument is kwarg-only
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Differential Revision:
D29017912
D29017912
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a67714d9e541d09203a8cfc85345b8967db86238
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/55799
I'm going to change the implementation of cdata soon so I need to
abstract over cdata access with a function. Additionally, many
users are casting manually casting to THPVariable to access
the member so I can remove these unsafe casts in the client code
(the implementation, of course, is still doing an unsafe cast.)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D27712130
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 95fcc013bf3913d67f2c634068eb5b3aab144cb3
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53583
`Scalar` takes 32 bytes due to `c10::complex<double>`
requires aligning to 16 bytes. Passing Scalar by reference
shows about 1% improvements on instruction count.
All the changes in this commit are codemoded except for
the following 4 files (which code-gen signatures):
```
tools/codegen/api/cpp.py
tools/codegen/api/native.py
tools/codegen/api/structured.py
caffe2/contrib/aten/gen_op.py
```
# Codemode
## Main Step
For the codemod part, here is the main command used:
```
fastmod --extensions h '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const Scalar& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions h '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)optional<Scalar> (\w+)' '${1}const optional<Scalar>& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions cpp '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const Scalar& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions cpp '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)optional<Scalar> (\w+)' '${1}const optional<Scalar>& ${2}'
```
As you can tell, it codemods both `Scalar` and `optional<Scalar>`. Apply these commands iteratively until reaching a fix-point (since one method signature might contain multiple `Scalar` parameter).
In retrospect, excluding `thrid_party` and `torch/csrc/jit` would be a good idea. (I revert it manually later, see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53479 as an reference).
## Pre-Step
Prior to applying the main command, as some `Scalar` are presented as `at::Scalar` or `c10::Scalar`, so I codemod some of them in advance. Here is an incomplete list:
```
fastmod --extensions h '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)at::Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const at::Scalar& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions cpp '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)at::Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const at::Scalar& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions h '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)c10::optional<Scalar> (\w+)' '${1}const c10::optional<Scalar>& ${2}'
fastmod --extensions cpp '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)c10::optional<Scalar> (\w+)' '${1}const c10::optional<Scalar>& ${2}'
```
## Fixup
There are a couple of post codemod fixup. For example, `const Scalar` will be codemoded into `const const Scalar&`. `at:Scalar` will be codemoded into `at::const Scalar&` (if `Pre-step` is not done comprehensively). Here is an incomplete list:
```
fastmod --extensions cpp 'const const Scalar' 'const Scalar'
fastmod --extensions h 'const const c10::optional<Scalar>' 'const c10::optional<Scalar>'
fastmod --extensions cpp 'const const c10::optional<Scalar>' 'const c10::optional<Scalar>'
fastmod 'at::const Scalar&' 'const at::Scalar&'
```
## Supplementary
`cu` and `mm` files also need to be codemoded, for example:
```
fastmod --extensions cu 'at::const Scalar&' 'const at::Scalar&'
fastmod --extensions mm '([a-zA-Z_+]\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const Scalar& ${2}'
```
Function pointers are not codemoded. Here is an incomplete list:
```
# Cover case: using index_fill_fn = void(*)(TensorIterator & iter, int64_t dim, int64_t self_dim_size, int64_t self_dim_stride, Scalar source);
fastmod --extensions h '(void\s*\(\s*\*\s*\)\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar (\w+)' '${1}const Scalar& ${2}'
# Cover case: using softplus_fn = void (*)(TensorIterator&, Scalar, Scalar);
fastmod --extensions h '(void\s*\(\s*\*\s*\)\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar([, \)])' '${1}const Scalar&${2}'
fastmod --extensions cpp '(void\s*\(\s*\*\s*\)\([^)]*,?\s*)Scalar([, \)])' '${1}const Scalar&${2}'
fastmod --extensions h '(void\s*\(\s*\*\s*\)\([^)]*,?\s*)optional<Scalar>([, \)])' '${1}const optional<Scalar>&${2}'
```
Some corner cases needs to be manually fixed.
ghstack-source-id: 123970306
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: smessmer
Differential Revision: D26904445
fbshipit-source-id: 8d8a002af4b5125f153a32f03c6956be7ae5671d
Summary:
Move NumPy initialization from `initModule()` to singleton inside
`torch::utils::is_numpy_available()` function.
This singleton will print a warning, that NumPy integration is not
available, rather than fails to import torch altogether.
The warning be printed only once, and will look something like the
following:
```
UserWarning: Failed to initialize NumPy: No module named 'numpy.core' (Triggered internally at ../torch/csrc/utils/tensor_numpy.cpp:66.)
```
This is helpful if PyTorch was compiled with wrong NumPy version, of
NumPy is not commonly available on the platform (which is often the case
on AARCH64 or Apple M1)
Test that PyTorch is usable after numpy is uninstalled at the end of
`_test1` CI config.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52794
Reviewed By: seemethere
Differential Revision: D26650509
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: a2d98769ef873862c3704be4afda075d76d3ad06
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48965
This PR pulls `__torch_function__` checking entirely into C++, and adds a special `object_has_torch_function` method for ops which only have one arg as this lets us skip tuple construction and unpacking. We can now also do away with the Python side fast bailout for `Tensor` (e.g. `if any(type(t) is not Tensor for t in tensors) and has_torch_function(tensors)`) because they're actually slower than checking with the Python C API.
Test Plan: Existing unit tests. Benchmarks are in #48966
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D25590732
Pulled By: robieta
fbshipit-source-id: 6bd74788f06cdd673f3a2db898143d18c577eb42
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49138
See for details: https://fb.quip.com/QRtJAin66lPN
We need to model optional types explicitly, mostly for schema inference. So we cannot pass a `Tensor?[]` as `ArrayRef<Tensor>`, instead we need to pass it as an optional type. This PR changes it to `torch::List<c10::optional<Tensor>>`. It also makes the ops c10-full that were blocked by this.
## Backwards Compatibility
- This should not break the Python API because the representation in Python is the same and python_arg_parser just transforms the python list into a `List<optional<Tensor>>` instead of into a `List<Tensor>`.
- This should not break serialized models because there's some logic that allows loading a serialized `List<Tensor>` as `List<optional<Tensor>>`, see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49138/files#diff-9315f5dd045f47114c677174dcaa2f982721233eee1aa19068a42ff3ef775315R57
- This will break backwards compatibility for the C++ API. There is no implicit conversion from `ArrayRef<Tensor>` (which was the old argument type) to `List<optional<Tensor>>`. One common call pattern is `tensor.index({indices_tensor})`, where indices_tensor is another `Tensor`, and that will continue working because the `{}` initializer_list constructor for `List<optional<Tensor>>` can take `Tensor` elements that are implicitly converted to `optional<Tensor>`, but another common call pattern was `tensor.index(indices_tensor)`, where previously, the `Tensor` got implicitly converted to an `ArrayRef<Tensor>`, and to implicitly convert `Tensor -> optional<Tensor> -> List<optional<Tensor>>` would be two implicit conversions. C++ doesn't allow chaining. two implicit conversions. So those call sites have to be rewritten to `tensor.index({indices_tensor})`.
ghstack-source-id: 119269131
Test Plan:
## Benchmarks (C++ instruction counts):
### Forward
#### Script
```py
from torch.utils.benchmark import Timer
counts = Timer(
stmt="""
auto t = {{op call to measure}};
""",
setup="""
using namespace torch::indexing;
auto x = torch::ones({4, 4, 4});
""",
language="cpp",
).collect_callgrind(number=1_000)
print(counts)
```
#### Results
| Op call |before |after |delta | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--------|-------|------|
|x[0] = 1 |11566015 |11566015|0 |0.00% |
|x.index({0}) |6807019 |6801019 |-6000 |-0.09%|
|x.index({0, 0}) |13529019 |13557019|28000 |0.21% |
|x.index({0, 0, 0}) |10677004 |10692004|15000 |0.14% |
|x.index({"..."}) |5512015 |5506015 |-6000 |-0.11%|
|x.index({Slice(None, None, None)}) |6866016 |6936016 |70000 |1.02% |
|x.index({None}) |8554015 |8548015 |-6000 |-0.07%|
|x.index({false}) |22400000 |22744000|344000 |1.54% |
|x.index({true}) |27624088 |27264393|-359695|-1.30%|
|x.index({"...", 0, true, Slice(1, None, 2), torch::tensor({1, 2})})|123472000|123463306|-8694|-0.01%|
### Autograd
#### Script
```py
from torch.utils.benchmark import Timer
counts = Timer(
stmt="""
auto t = {{op call to measure}};
""",
setup="""
using namespace torch::indexing;
auto x = torch::ones({4, 4, 4}, torch::requires_grad());
""",
language="cpp",
).collect_callgrind(number=1_000)
print(counts)
```
Note: the script measures the **forward** path of an op call with autograd enabled (i.e. calls into VariableType). It does not measure the backward path.
#### Results
| Op call |before |after |delta | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|--------|-------|------|
|x.index({0}) |14839019|14833019|-6000| 0.00% |
|x.index({0, 0}) |28342019|28370019|28000| 0.00% |
|x.index({0, 0, 0}) |24434004|24449004|15000| 0.00% |
|x.index({"..."}) |12773015|12767015|-6000| 0.00% |
|x.index({Slice(None, None, None)}) |14837016|14907016|70000| 0.47% |
|x.index({None}) |15926015|15920015|-6000| 0.00% |
|x.index({false}) |36958000|37477000|519000| 1.40% |
|x.index({true}) |41971408|42426094|454686| 1.08% |
|x.index({"...", 0, true, Slice(1, None, 2), torch::tensor({1, 2})}) |168184392|164545682|-3638710| -2.16% |
Reviewed By: bhosmer
Differential Revision: D25454632
fbshipit-source-id: 28ab0cffbbdbdff1c40b4130ca62ee72f981b76d
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/48114
Before:
```
>>> torch.empty(2 * 10 ** 20)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: empty(): argument 'size' must be tuple of ints, but found element of type int at pos 1
```
After fix:
```
>>> torch.empty(2 * 10 ** 20)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RuntimeError: Overflow when unpacking long
```
Unclear whether we need a separate test for this case, I can add one if it's necessary...
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48250
Reviewed By: linbinyu
Differential Revision: D25105217
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a5aa7c0266945c8125210a2fd34ce4b6ba940c92
Summary:
I don't think this method is used anywhere, so I don't know how to test it. But the diff should justify itself.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43841
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D24696505
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: f2a249ae2e078b16fa11941a048b7d093e60241b
Summary:
The record_stream method was hard coded for CUDA device. Define the record_stream in the native_functions.yaml to enable the dynamic dispatch to different end device.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/36556
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44301
Reviewed By: glaringlee
Differential Revision: D23763954
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: e6d24f5e7892b56101fa858a6cad2abc5cdc4293
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45665Fixes#43944
Note that the codegen doesn't use a proper parser so, in the same way as with lists, the string `, ` cannot appear in defaults or it will be interpreted as a splitting point between arguments.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D24141835
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 578127861fd2504917f4486c44100491a2c40343
Summary:
In this PR:
1) Added binary operations with ScalarLists.
2) Fixed _foreach_div(...) bug in native_functions
3) Covered all possible cases with scalars and scalar lists in tests
4) [minor] fixed bug in native_functions by adding "use_c10_dispatcher: full" to all _foreach functions
tested via unit tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44743
Reviewed By: bwasti, malfet
Differential Revision: D23753711
Pulled By: izdeby
fbshipit-source-id: bf3e8c54bc07867e8f6e82b5d3d35ff8e99b5a0a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44684
The ad-hoc quantization benchmarking script in D23689062 recently highlighted that quantized ops were surprisingly slow after the introduction of support for custom ops in torch.fx in D23203204 (f15e27265f).
Using strobelight, it's immediately clear that up to 66% of samples were seen in `c10::get_backtrace`, which is descends from `torch::is_tensor_and_apppend_overloaded -> torch::check_has_torch_function -> torch::PyTorch_LookupSpecial -> PyObject_HasAttrString -> PyObject_GetAttrString`.
I'm no expert by any means so please correct any/all misinterpretation, but it appears that:
- `check_has_torch_function` only needs to return a bool
- `PyTorch_LookupSpecial` should return `NULL` if a matching method is not found on the object
- in the impl of `PyTorch_LookupSpecial` the return value from `PyObject_HasAttrString` only serves as a bool to return early, but ultimately ends up invoking `PyObject_GetAttrString`, which raises, spawning the generation of a backtrace
- `PyObject_FastGetAttrString` returns `NULL` (stolen ref to an empty py::object if the if/else if isn't hit) if the method is not found, anyway, so it could be used singularly instead of invoking both `GetAttrString` and `FastGetAttrString`
- D23203204 (f15e27265f) compounded (but maybe not directly caused) the problem by increasing the number of invocations
so, removing it in this diff and seeing how many things break :)
before:
strobelight: see internal section
output from D23689062 script:
```
$ ./buck-out/gen/scripts/v/test_pt_quant_perf.par
Sequential(
(0): Quantize(scale=tensor([0.0241]), zero_point=tensor([60]), dtype=torch.quint8)
(1): QuantizedLinear(in_features=4, out_features=4, scale=0.017489388585090637, zero_point=68, qscheme=torch.per_tensor_affine)
(2): DeQuantize()
)
fp 0.010896682739257812
q 0.11908197402954102
```
after:
strobelight: see internal section
output from D23689062 script:
```
$ ./buck-out/gen/scripts/v/test_pt_quant_perf.par
Sequential(
(0): Quantize(scale=tensor([0.0247]), zero_point=tensor([46]), dtype=torch.quint8)
(1): QuantizedLinear(in_features=4, out_features=4, scale=0.012683945707976818, zero_point=41, qscheme=torch.per_tensor_affine)
(2): DeQuantize()
)
fp 0.011141300201416016
q 0.022639036178588867
```
which roughly restores original performance seen in P142370729
UPDATE: 9/22 mode/opt benchmarks
```
buck run //scripts/x:test_pt_quant_perf mode/opt
Sequential(
(0): Quantize(scale=tensor([0.0263]), zero_point=tensor([82]), dtype=torch.quint8)
(1): QuantizedLinear(in_features=4, out_features=4, scale=0.021224206313490868, zero_point=50, qscheme=torch.per_tensor_affine)
(2): DeQuantize()
)
fp 0.002968311309814453
q 0.5138928890228271
```
with patch:
```
buck run //scripts/x:test_pt_quant_perf mode/opt
Sequential(
(0): Quantize(scale=tensor([0.0323]), zero_point=tensor([70]), dtype=torch.quint8)
(1): QuantizedLinear(in_features=4, out_features=4, scale=0.017184294760227203, zero_point=61, qscheme=torch.per_tensor_affine)
(2): DeQuantize()
)
fp 0.0026655197143554688
q 0.0064449310302734375
```
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D23697334
fbshipit-source-id: f756d744688615e01c94bf5c48c425747458fb33
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43248
We add the support of __torch_function__ override for C++ custom op. The logic is the same as the other components, like torch.nn.Module.
Refactored some code a little bit to make it reusable.
Test Plan: buck test //caffe2/test:fx -- test_torch_custom_ops
Reviewed By: bradleyhd
Differential Revision: D23203204
fbshipit-source-id: c462a86e407e46c777171da32d7a40860acf061e
Summary:
According to pytorch/rfcs#3
From the goals in the RFC:
1. Support subclassing `torch.Tensor` in Python (done here)
2. Preserve `torch.Tensor` subclasses when calling `torch` functions on them (done here)
3. Use the PyTorch API with `torch.Tensor`-like objects that are _not_ `torch.Tensor`
subclasses (done in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30730)
4. Preserve `torch.Tensor` subclasses when calling `torch.Tensor` methods. (done here)
5. Propagating subclass instances correctly also with operators, using
views/slices/indexing/etc. (done here)
6. Preserve subclass attributes when using methods or views/slices/indexing. (done here)
7. A way to insert code that operates on both functions and methods uniformly
(so we can write a single function that overrides all operators). (done here)
8. The ability to give external libraries a way to also define
functions/methods that follow the `__torch_function__` protocol. (will be addressed in a separate PR)
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Adds the `self` argument to the arg parser.
2. Dispatches on `self` as well if `self` is not `nullptr`.
3. Adds a `torch._C.DisableTorchFunction` context manager to disable `__torch_function__`.
4. Adds a `torch::torch_function_enabled()` and `torch._C._torch_function_enabled()` to check the state of `__torch_function__`.
5. Dispatches all `torch._C.TensorBase` and `torch.Tensor` methods via `__torch_function__`.
TODO:
- [x] Sequence Methods
- [x] Docs
- [x] Tests
Closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/28361
Benchmarks in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37091#issuecomment-633657778
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37091
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D22765678
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 53f8aa17ddb8b1108c0997f6a7aa13cb5be73de0
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41947
Previously, if an op took an optional `Tensor?` argument, the C++ frontend (i.e. `at::op()` and `Tensor::op()`)
were generated to take `Tensor`. A previous PR (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41610) changed the kernels
to be written with `c10::optional<Tensor>` instead of `Tensor`, but that did not touch the C++ frontend yet.
This PR changes the C++ frontend API to take `c10::optional<Tensor>` instead of `Tensor` as well.
This should be mostly bc conserving. Since `Tensor` implicitly converts to `c10::optional<Tensor>`, any old code
calling an op with a `Tensor` would still work. There are likely corner cases that get broken though.
For example, C++ only ever does *one* implicit conversion. So if you call an op with a non-tensor object
that gets implicitly converted to a `Tensor`, then that previously worked since the API took a `Tensor` and
C++ allows one implicit conversion. Now it wouldn't work anymore because it would require two implicit conversions
(to `Tensor` and then to `c10::optional<Tensor>`) and C++ doesn't do that.
The main reasons for doing this are
- Make the C++ API more sane. Those arguments are optional and that should be visible from the signature.
- Allow easier integration for XLA and Autocast. Those backends generate code to wrap operators and forward
operator arguments to calls to at::op(). After https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41610, there was
a mismatch because they had to implement operators with `optional<Tensor>` but call `at::op()` with `Tensor`,
so they had to manually convert between those. After this PR, they can just forward the `optional<Tensor>`
in their call to `at::op()`.
ghstack-source-id: 108873705
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewed By: bhosmer
Differential Revision: D22704832
fbshipit-source-id: f4c00d457b178fbc124be9e884a538a3653aae1f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41575
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/34294
This updates the C++ argument parser to correctly handle `TensorList` operands. I've also included a number of updates to the testing infrastructure, this is because we're now doing a much more careful job of testing the signatures of aten kernels, using the type information about the arguments as read in from `Declarations.yaml`. The changes to the tests are required because we're now only checking for `__torch_function__` attributes on `Tensor`, `Optional[Tensor]` and elements of `TensorList` operands, whereas before we were checking for `__torch_function__` on all operands, so the relatively simplistic approach the tests were using before -- assuming all positional arguments might be tensors -- doesn't work anymore. I now think that checking for `__torch_function__` on all operands was a mistake in the original design.
The updates to the signatures of the `lambda` functions are to handle this new, more stringent checking of signatures.
I also added override support for `torch.nn.functional.threshold` `torch.nn.functional.layer_norm`, which did not yet have python-level support.
Benchmarks are still WIP.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34725
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D22357738
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 0e7f4a58517867b2e3f193a0a8390e2ed294e1f3
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37175
ghstack-source-id: 106938114
Test Plan: Upcoming diffs use this for upsampling.
Differential Revision: D21209994
fbshipit-source-id: 1a71c07e45e28772a2bbe450b68280dcc0fe2def
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37174
ghstack-source-id: 106938112
Test Plan: Upcoming diffs use this for upsampling.
Differential Revision: D21210002
fbshipit-source-id: d6a55ab6420c05a92873a569221b613149aa0daa
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35614
Python 2 has reached end-of-life and is no longer supported by PyTorch.
Now we can clean up a lot of cruft that we put in place to support it.
These changes were all done manually, and I skipped anything that seemed
like it would take more than a few seconds, so I think it makes sense to
review it manually as well.
Test Plan: CI
Differential Revision: D20842876
Pulled By: dreiss
fbshipit-source-id: 18abf0d324ed2185ec6d27c864e935d856dcc6ad
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36232
The purpose of this PR is to replace `at::Generator generator = nullptr` with `c10::optional<at::Generator> = c10::nullopt` all over the code
* #36230 Replace std::shared_ptr with c10::intrusive_ptr in at::Generator
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20943603
Pulled By: pbelevich
fbshipit-source-id: 65d335990f01fcc706867d5344e73793fad68ae6
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34468
This PR prepares `at::Generator` for pybind11's `type_caster<at::Generator>` which is required to implement custom RNG in python. The following changes are done:
1. `at::Generator` was moved to `c10::GeneratorImpl` (similar to `c10::TensorImpl`)
2. `at::Generator` was recreated as a holder of `std::shared_ptr<c10::GeneratorImpl>` (similar to `at::Tensor` that holds `c10::intrusive_ptr<c10::TensorImpl>`)
3. Most of `at::Generator*` usages were replaced with `at::Generator`
TBD: replacing `Generator generator = nullptr` with `{}` requires JIT changes(adding Generator to IValue?)
Differential Revision: D20549420
Pulled By: pbelevich
fbshipit-source-id: 4c92a40eab8f033b359bb6c93f4cd84b07ee8d4e
Summary:
This adds `__torch_function__` support for all functions in `torch.functional` and `torch.nn.functional`.
The changes to C++ code and codegen scripts are to facilitate adding `__torch_function__` support for the native functions in `torch._C._nn`. Note that I moved the `handle_torch_function` C++ function to a header that both `python_torch_functions.cpp` and `python_nn_functions.cpp` include. The changes to `python_nn_functions.cpp` mirror the changes I made to `python_torch_functions.cpp` when `__torch_function__` support was first added in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27064. Due to the somewhat different way the `torch._C` and `torch._C._nn` namespaces are initialized I needed to create a new static reference to the `torch._C._nn` namespace (`THPNNVariableFunctions`). I'm not sure if that is the best way to do this. In principle I could import these namespaces in each kernel and avoid the global variable but that would have a runtime cost.
I added `__torch_function__` support to the Python functions in `torch.nn.functional` following the approach in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/32194.
I re-enabled the test that checks if all functions in the `torch` namespace are explicitly tested for `__torch_function__` support. I also generalized the check to work for `torch.functional` and `torch.nn.functional` as well. This test was explicitly disabled in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30730 and I'm happy to disable it again if you think that's appropriate. I figured now was as good a time as any to try to re-enable it.
Finally I adjusted the existing torch API tests to suppress deprecation warnings and add keyword arguments used by some of the code in `torch.nn.functional` that were missed when I originally added the tests in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27064.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32799
Differential Revision: D19956809
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 40d34e0109cc4b9f3ef62f409d2d35a1d84e3d22
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32907
All op-specific information used in this logic was available to the
parser itself, so the check can be done in that context, no codegen
needed.
No change in the warning behavior itself, mod minor formatting tweak -
passes existing tests. Saves like ~275K binary size on mac:
```
-rwxr-xr-x 1 bhosmer 1876110778 16502064 Feb 1 00:43 torch/lib/libtorch_python.dylib
-rwxr-xr-x 1 bhosmer 1876110778 16247888 Feb 1 00:44 torch/lib/libtorch_python.dylib
```
[codegen diff](https://github.com/bhosmer/scratch/compare/deprecation_warning_before...deprecation_warning_after)
More important than the size savings is the minimization of codegen. Ideally the generated artifact should express distinctive per-op properties in as minimal a form as practically possible - e.g. here instead of generating check-and-warn behavior into every binding, we generate only the data that triggers the behavior in the parser. (And actually we were generating it already.)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19679928
Pulled By: bhosmer
fbshipit-source-id: cf0140573118430720c6b797c762fe5be98acd86
Summary:
Continuation of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/31514, fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/28430
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32009
Test Plan:
I verified that the deprecation warnings only occur once on a relevant workflow. Built with:
```
buck build mode/opt //vision/fair/detectron2/tools:train_net
```
Ran with:
```
DETECTRON2_ENV_MODULE=detectron2.fb.env ~/local/train_net.par --config-file configs/quick_schedules/retinanet_R_50_FPN_instant_test.yaml --num-gpus 1 SOLVER.IMS_PER_BATCH 2
```
Inspected log:
```
[01/14 07:28:13 d2.engine.train_loop]: Starting training from iteration 0
buck-out/opt/gen/caffe2/generate-code=python_variable_methods.cpp/python_variable_methods.cpp:1299: UserWarning: This overload of add is deprecated:
add(Number alpha, Tensor other)
Consider using one of the following signatures instead:
add(Tensor other, Number alpha)
buck-out/opt/gen/caffe2/generate-code=python_variable_methods.cpp/python_variable_methods.cpp:1334: UserWarning: This overload of add_ is deprecated:
add_(Number alpha, Tensor other)
Consider using one of the following signatures instead:
add_(Tensor other, Number alpha)
[01/14 07:28:25 d2.utils.events]: eta: 0:00:10 iter: 19 total_loss: 1.699 loss_cls: 1.185 loss_box_reg: 0.501 time: 0.5020 data_time: 0.0224 lr: 0.000100 max_mem: 3722M
[01/14 07:28:35 fvcore.common.checkpoint]: Saving checkpoint to ./output/model_final.pth
```
Differential Revision: D19373523
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 75756de129645501f43ecc4e3bf8cc0f78c40b90
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/28430
The unpythonic signatures for functions such as `torch.addcdiv` are already seperated in [`deprecated.yaml`] and the signatures marked as deprecated in `PythonArgParser`. However, nothing was done with this information previously. So, this now emits a warning when the deprecated signatures are used.
One minor complication is that if all arguments are passed as keyword args then there is nothing to differentiate the deprecated overload. This can lead to false warnings being emitted. So, I've also modified `PythonArgParser` to prefer non-deprecated signatures.
[`deprecated.yaml`]: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/tools/autograd/deprecated.yaml
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/31514
Differential Revision: D19298735
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 03cb78af17658eaab9d577cd2497c6f413f07647
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/31517
This is going to be used by upsample (which currently uses magic values to represent optionals).
For now, we just introduce a fake function for testing (torch._test_optional_float(x)).
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19198721
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 0a1382fde0927c5d277d02d62bfb31fb574b8c74
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/31117
After this diff, we will have completely removed the named tensor
feature flagging. This means that named tensors are always on and that
there is no mechanism to turn them off. There should be no more follow-up
diffs.
I performed the deletion of the header with
```
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '/#include
<ATen\/core\/EnableNamedTensor.h>/d'
```
Test Plan: - wait for CI
Differential Revision: D18934952
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 253d059074b910fef15bdf885ebf71e0edf5bea5
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30894
This PR begins the process of removing BUILD_NAMEDTENSOR macros. There
will be followups.
Reasons for removing the macros:
- BUILD_NAMEDTENSOR is always on and has been on since pytorch 1.3.0.
- Since we don't test building without it, it is useless to keep around.
- Code becomes nicer to read without the macros
Reasons for not removing the macros:
- potential for feature flagging
Now, I argue against needing to feature flag. The main reason why we
might want to feature flag is if we need to disable the feature.
We'd need a fast switch to disable the feature if someone discovers
in the future that named tensors caused some regression in some existing workflows.
In https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25798, I did a variety of
macro- and micro- benchmarks to determine the performance impact of named
tensors on regular tensors.
[The
microbenchmarks](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25798#issuecomment-529014810)
were not very stable, and running the
microbenchmarks for more iterations doesn't actually help because the
noise is not distributed in a nice way. Instead of microbenchmarks I ran
a [profiler
(perf)](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25798#issuecomment-555707645)
to estimate how much overhead named tensors add to unnamed code. I
estimated the overhead to be less than 100ns for `add` and even smaller
for `mm`; there are ways to optimize even futher if we find this to be a
problem.
[Initial
macrobenchmarks](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25798#issuecomment-530539104)
were also not very stable. I ran imagenet for some number of epochs. To
make them more stable, I got rid of the data loading (which seemed to
vary between runs). [In some benchmarkers without data
loading](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25798#issuecomment-562214053),
we can see that the results are less noisy now. These results support
no noticeable regressions in speed.
Test Plan: - wait for CI
Differential Revision: D18858543
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 08bf3853a9f506c6b084808dc9ddd1e835f48c13
Summary:
This is a re-do of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27064, which was reverted (b8792c0438). This was landed at the same time as other work that added new operators to the `torch` namespace so the check for whether the `torch` namespace is exhaustively checked for overridability was triggering test failures.
I've temporarily disabled that check and added an explanatory comment that the check will be re-enabled in a future PR that will be merged during a time when the commit velocity on PyTorch is lower.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30730
Differential Revision: D18813270
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 70477c4656dca8fea6e7bc59259555041fcfbf68
