As part of the new inference model we updated to (correctly) treat
destructuring spread as creating a new mutable object. This had the
unfortunate side-effect of reducing precision on destructuring of props,
though:
```js
function Component({x, ...rest}) {
const z = rest.z;
identity(z);
return <Stringify x={x} z={z} />;
}
```
Memoized as the following, where we don't realize that `z` is actually
frozen:
```js
function Component(t0) {
const $ = _c(6);
let x;
let z;
if ($[0] !== t0) {
const { x: t1, ...rest } = t0;
x = t1;
z = rest.z;
identity(z);
...
```
#34341 was our first thought of how to do this (thanks @poteto for
exploring this idea!). But during review it became clear that it was a
bit more complicated than I had thought. So this PR explores a more
conservative alternative. The idea is:
* Track known sources of frozen values: component props, hook params,
and hook return values.
* Find all object spreads where the rvalue is a known frozen value.
* Look at how such objects are used, and if they are only used to access
properties (PropertyLoad/Destructure), pass to hooks, or pass to jsx
then we can be very confident the object is not mutated. We consider any
such objects to be frozen, even though technically spread creates a new
object.
See new fixtures for more examples.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34900).
* __->__ #34900
* #34887
In my previous PR I fixed some cases but broke others. So, new approach.
Two phase algorithm:
* First pass is forward data flow to determine all usages of macros.
This is necessary because many of Meta's macros have variants that can
be accessed via properties, eg you can do `macro(...)` but also
`macro.variant(...)`.
* Second pass is backwards data flow to find macro invocations (JSX and
calls) and then merge their operands into the same scope as the macro
call.
Note that this required updating PromoteUsedTemporaries to avoid
promoting macro calls that have interposing instructions between their
creation and usage. Macro calls in general are pure so it should be safe
to reorder them.
In addition, we're now more precise about `<fb:plural>`, `<fbt:param>`,
`fbt.plural()` and `fbt.param()`, which don't actually require all their
arguments to be inlined. The whole point is that the plural/param value
is an arbitrary value (along with a string name). So we no longer
transitively inline the arguments, we just make sure that they don't get
inadvertently promoted to named variables.
One caveat: we actually don't do anything to treat macro functions as
non-mutating, so `fbt.plural()` and friends (function form) may still
sometimes group arguments just due to mutability inference. In a
follow-up, i'll work to infer the types of nested macro functions as
non-mutating.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34887).
* #34900
* __->__ #34887
This is a great validation, so let's enable by default. Changes:
* Move the validation logic into ValidateUseMemo alongside the new check
that the useMemo result is used
* Update the lint description
* Make the void memo errors lint-only, they don't require us to skip
compilation (as evidenced by the fact that we've had this validation
off)
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34882).
* #34855
* __->__ #34882
Two additional validations for useMemo:
* Disallow reassigning to values declared outside the useMemo callback
(always on)
* Disallow unused useMemo calls (part of the validateNoVoidUseMemo
feature flag, which in turn is off by default)
We should probably enable this flag though!
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34868).
* #34855
* #34882
* __->__ #34868
## Summary
When upgrading to `babel-plugin-react-compiler@1.0.0` in a project that
uses `zod@3` we are running into TypeScript errors like:
```
node_modules/babel-plugin-react-compiler/dist/index.d.ts:435:10 - error TS2694: Namespace '"/REDACTED/node_modules/zod/v3/external"' has no exported member 'core'.
435 }, z.core.$strip>>>;
~~~~
```
This problem seems to be related to
d6eb735938, which introduced zod v3/v4
compatibility. Since `zod` is bundled into the compiler source this does
not cause runtime issues and only manifests as TypeScript errors. My
proposed solution is this PR is to use zod's [subpath versioning
strategy](https://zod.dev/v4/versioning?id=versioning-in-zod-4) which
allows you to support v3 and v4 APIs on both major versions.
Changes in this PR include:
- Updated `zod` import paths to `zod/v4`
- Bumped min `zod` version to `^3.25.0` for zod which guarantees the
`zod/v4` subpath is available.
- Updated `zod-validation-error` import paths to
`zod-validation-error/v4`
- Bumped min `zod-validation-error ` version to `^3.5.0`
- Updated `externals` tsup configuration where appropriate.
Once the compiler drops zod v3 support we could optionally remove the
`/v4` subpath from the imports.
## How did you test this change?
Not totally sure the best way to test. I ran `NODE_ENV=production yarn
workspace babel-plugin-react-compiler run build --dts` and diffed the
`dist/` folder between my change and `v1.0.0` and it looks correct. We
have a `patch-package` patch to workaround this for now and it works as
expected.
```diff
diff --git a/node_modules/babel-plugin-react-compiler/dist/index.d.ts b/node_modules/babel-plugin-react-compiler/dist/index.d.ts
index 81c3f3d..daafc2c 100644
--- a/node_modules/babel-plugin-react-compiler/dist/index.d.ts
+++ b/node_modules/babel-plugin-react-compiler/dist/index.d.ts
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
import * as BabelCore from '@babel/core';
import { NodePath as NodePath$1 } from '@babel/core';
import * as t from '@babel/types';
-import { z } from 'zod';
+import { z } from 'zod/v4';
import { NodePath, Scope } from '@babel/traverse';
interface Result<T, E> {
```
Co-authored-by: Henry Q. Dineen <henryqdineen@gmail.com>
We now do a single pass over the HIR, building up two data structures:
* One tracks values that are known macro tags or macro calls.
* One tracks operands of macro-related instructions so that we can later
group them.
After building up these data structures, we do a pass over the latter
structure. For each macro call instruction, we recursively traverse its
operands to ensure they're in the same scope. Thus, something like
`fbt('hello' + fbt.param(foo(), "..."))` will correctly merge the fbt
call, the `+` binary expression, the `fbt.param()` call, and `foo()`
into a single scope.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34865).
* #34855
* __->__ #34865
In InferTypes when we infer types for properties during destructuring,
we were breaking out of the loop when we encounter a hole in the array.
Instead we should just skip that element and continue inferring later
properties.
Closes#34748
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34847).
* #34855
* __->__ #34847
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Fixes a syntax error causing the Compiler playground to crash. Resolves
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34622.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
Tested locally and added a test.
<img width="1470" height="836" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 8 13 07 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29473682-94c3-49dc-9ee9-c2004062aaea"
/>
Renames the `recommended` property on LintRule to `preset`, to allow
exporting rules for different presets. For now the `Recommended` and
`RecommendedLatest` presets are the same, but in the next PR I will
enable more rules for the latest preset.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34782).
* #34783
* __->__ #34782
Partial redo of #34710. The changes there tried to use `z.function(args,
return)` to be compatible across Zod v3 and v4, but Zod 4's function API
has completely changed. Instead, I've updated to just use `z.any()`
where we expect a function, and manually validate that it's a function
before we call the value. We already have validation of the return type
(also using Zod).
Co-authored-by: kolvian <eliot@pontarelli.com>
Fixed two small issues with the config panel in the compiler playground:
1. Object descriptions were being confined in the config box and most of
it would not be visible upon hover
2. Changed it so that "Applied Configs" would only display a valid set
of configs, rather than switching between "Invalid Configs" and the set
of options. This would be less visually jarring for users as the Output
panel already displays errors. Additionally, if users want to see the
list of config options but have a currently broken config, they would
previously not know how to fix it.
Object hover before:
<img width="702" height="481" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 10 41 03 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b2ddec2f-16ba-41a1-be1f-96211f46764c"
/>
Hover after:
<img width="702" height="481" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 10 40 37 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dc713a22-4710-46a8-a5d7-485060cc9074"
/>
Applied Configs always displays the last valid set of configs:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2fb9232f-7388-4488-9b7a-bb48bf09e4ca
This rule was a leftover from a while ago and doesn't actually lint
anything useful. Specifically, you get a lint error if you try to opt
out a component that isn't already bailing out. If there's a bailout the
compiler already safely skips over it, so adding `'use no memo'` there
is unnecessary.
Fixes#31407
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34703).
* __->__ #34703
* #34700
This enables `@enablePreserveExistingMemoizationGuarantees` by default.
As of the previous PR (#34503), this mode now enables the following
behaviors:
- Treating variables referenced within a `useMemo()` or `useCallback()`
as "frozen" (immutable) as of the start of the call. Ie, the compiler
will assume that the values you reference are not mutated by the body of
the useMemo, not are they mutated later. Directly modifying them (eg
`var.property = true`) will be an error.
- Similarly, the results of the useMemo/useCallback are treated as
frozen (immutable) after the call.
These two rules match the behavior for other hooks: this means that
developers will see similar behavior to swapping out `useMemo()` for a
custom `useMyMemo()` wrapper/alias.
Additionally, as of #34503 the compiler uses information from the manual
dependencies to know which variables are non-nullable. Even if a useMemo
block conditionally accesses a nested property — `if (cond) { log(x.y.z)
}` — where the compiler would not usually know that `x` is non-nullable,
if the user specifies `x.y.z` as a manual dependency then the compiler
knows that `x` and `x.y` are non-nullable and can infer a more precise
dependency.
Finally, this mode also ensures that we always memoize function calls
that return primitives. See #34343 for more details.
For now, I've explicitly opted out of this feature in all test fixtures
where the behavior changed.
The `@enablePreserveExistingMemoizationGuarantees` mode can still fail
to preserve manual memoization due to mismtached dependencies.
Specifically, where the user's dependencies are more precise than the
compiler infers bc the compiler is being conservative about what might
be nullable. In this mode though we're intentionally using information
from the manual memoization and can also rely on the deps as a signal
for what's non-nullable.
The idea of the PR is that we treat manual memo deps just like other
inferred-as-non-nullable objects during PropagateScopeDeps. We're
careful to not treat the full path as non-nullable, only up to the last
property index. So `x.y.z` as a manual dep treats `x` and `x.y` as
non-nullable, allowing us to preserve a conditional dependency on
`x.y.z`.
Optionals within manual dependencies are a bit trickier and aren't
handled yet, but hopefully that's less common and something we can
improve in a follow-up. Not handling them just means that developers may
hit false positives on validating existing memoization if they use
optional chains in manual dependencies.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34503).
* #34689
* __->__ #34503
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Added `<ViewTransition>` for when the "Show Internals" button is toggled
for a basic fade transition. Additionally added a transition for when
tabs are expanded in the advanced view of the Compiler Playground to
display a smoother show/hide animation.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c706b337-289e-488d-8cd7-45ff1d27788d
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Utilized `<ViewTransition>` to introduce a sliding animation upon
switching between the Output and SourceMap tabs in the default
playground view.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ac93482-8104-4f9a-887e-6adca3537dca
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Introduced `<ViewTransition>` to the React Compiler Playground. Added an
initial animation on the config panel opening/closing to allow for a
smoother visual experience. Previously, the panel would flash in and out
of the screen upon open/close.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9dc77a6b-d4a5-4a7a-9d81-007ebb55e8d2
There was a bug in the Compiler Playground related to the "Show
Internals" toggle due to a useEffect that was causing the tab names to
flicker from a rerender. Rewritten instead with a `<Suspense>` boundary
+ `use`.
We previously always generated import statements for any modules that
had to be required, notably the `import {c} from
'react/compiler-runtime'` for the memo cache function. However, this
obviously doesn't work when the source is using commonjs. Now we check
the sourceType of the module and generate require() statements if the
source type is 'script'.
I initially explored using
https://babeljs.io/docs/babel-helper-module-imports, but the API design
was unfortunately not flexible enough for our use-case. Specifically,
our pipeline is as follows:
* Compile individual functions. Generate candidate imports,
pre-allocating the local names for those imports.
* If the file is compiled successfully, actually add the imports to the
program.
Ie we need to pre-allocate identifier names for the imports before we
add them to the program — but that isn't supported by
babel-helper-module-imports. So instead we generate our own require()
calls if the sourceType is script.
@eps1lon flagged this case. Inlined useCallback has an extra LoadLocal
indirection which caused us not to add a name. While I was there I added
some extra checks to make sure we don't generate names for a given node
twice (just in case).
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Added more tests for the compiler playground with the addition of the
new config editor and "Show Internals" button. Added testing to check
for incomplete store params in the URL, toggle functionality, and
correct errors showing for syntax/validation errors in the config
overrides.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Made many small changes to the compiler playground to improve user
experience. Removed any "Loading" indicators that would flash in before
a component would finish loading in. Additionally, before users would
see the "Show Internals" button toggling from false to true if they had
set it at true previously. I was able to refactor the URL/local storage
loading so that the `Store` would be fully initialized before the
components would load in.
Attempted to integrate `<Activity>` into showing/hiding these different
editors, but the current state of [monaco
editors](https://github.com/suren-atoyan/monaco-react) does not allow
for this. I created an issue for them to address:
https://github.com/suren-atoyan/monaco-react/issues/753
Added a debounce to the config editor so every key type wouldn't cause
the output panel to respond instantly. Users can type for 500 ms before
an error is thrown at them.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
Here is what loading the page would look like before (not sure why its
so blurry):
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58f4281a-cc02-4141-b9b5-f70d6ace12a2
Here is how it looks now:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/40535165-fc7c-44fb-9282-9c7fa76e7d53
Here is the debouncing:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4ab29e4-1afd-4249-beca-671fb6542f5e
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
--> The React Compiler rejected a default parameter that contains a
TSInstantiationExpression with the todo message that the expression
cannot be safely reordered. This change teaches the reorder check in
BuildHIR.ts to treat TSInstantiationExpression as reorderable. This is
safe because TypeScript instantiation only affects types and is erased
at runtime, so it has no side effects and does not change semantics.
## How did you test this change?
```
Set-Content testfilter.txt 'ts-instantiation-default-param'
yarn test --filter --update
yarn test --filter
```
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
--> I added a fixture:
>
compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src/__tests__/fixtures/compiler/ts-instantiation-default-param.js
Some components accept a union of a ref callback function or ref object.
In this case we may infer the type as a function due to the presence of
invoking the ref callback function. In that case, we currently report a
"Hint: name `fooRef` as "ref" or with a "-Ref" suffix..." even though
the variable is already named appropriately — the problem is that we
inferred a non-ref type. So here we check the type and don't report this
hint if we inferred another type.
Calling setState functions during render can lead to extraneous renders
or even infinite loops. We also have runtime detection for loops, but
static detection is obviously even better.
This PR adds an option to infer identifers as setState functions if both
the following conditions are met:
- The identifier is named starting with "set"
- The identifier is used as the callee of a call expression
By inferring values as SetState type, this allows our existing
ValidateNoSetStateInRender rule to flag calls during render, disallowing
examples like the following:
```js
function Component({setParentState}) {
setParentState(...);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Error: Cannot call setState in render
}
```
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Added an "Applied Configs" section under the Config Overrides panel.
Users will now be able to see the full list of configs applied to the
compiler in the playground. Adds greater discoverability for config
options to override as well. Updated the default config as well to be a
commented config option, so users will start with empty overrides.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a57b2d5-0405-4fc8-9990-1747c30181c0
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Updated the UI of the React compiler playground. The config, Input, and
Output panels will now span the viewport width when "Show Internals" is
not toggled on. When "Show Internals" is toggled on, the old vertical
accordion tabs are still used. Going to add support for the "Applied
Configs" tabs underneath the "Config Overrides" tab next.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8eab028-f58c-4cb9-a8b2-0f098f2cc262
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Removed the old `OVERRIDE` pragma to make the source of truth for config
overrides in the left-hand pane. Now, it will automatically update the
output pane each time there is an edit to the config. The old pragma
format is still supported, but it will be overwritten by the config pane
if they are modifying the same flags. Removed the gating on the config
panel so now all users will automatically be able to view it, but it
will be initially collapsed.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d4512b9-e203-4ce0-ae95-dd96ff03bbc1
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
Two small QoL improvements inspired by feedback:
* `if (ref.current === undefined) { ref.current = ... }` is now allowed.
* `if (!ref.current) { ref.current = ... }` is still disallowed, but we
emit an extra hint suggesting the `if (!ref.current == null)` pattern.
I was on the fence about the latter. We got feedback asking to allow `if
(!ref.current)` but if your ref stores a boolean value then this would
allow reading the ref in render. The unary form is also less precise in
general due to sketchy truthiness conversions. I figured a hint is a
good compromise.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34449).
* __->__ #34449
* #34424
@stipsan found this issue where the compiler would bailout on the
`useLayoutEffect` examples in the React docs. While setState in an
effect is typically an anti-pattern due to the fact that it hurts
performance through cascading renders, the one scenario where it _is_
allowed is if the value being set flows from a ref.
This was fun. We previously added the MaybeAlias effect in #33984 in
order to describe the semantic that an unknown function call _may_ alias
its return value in its result, but that we don't know this for sure. We
record mutations through MaybeAlias edges when walking backward in the
data flow graph, but downgrade them to conditional mutations. See the
original PR for full context.
That change was sufficient for the original case like
```js
const frozen = useContext();
useEffect(() => {
frozen.method().property = true;
}, [...]);
```
But it wasn't sufficient for cases where the aliasing occured between
operands:
```js
const dispatch = useDispatch();
<div onClick={(e) => {
dispatch(...e.target.value)
e.target.value = ...;
}} />
```
Here we would record a `Capture dispatch <- e.target` effect. Then
during processing of the `event.target.value = ...` assignment we'd
eventually _forward_ from `event` to `dispatch` (along a MaybeAlias
edge). But in #33984 I missed that this forward walk also has to
downgrade to conditional.
In addition to that change, we also have to be a bit more precise about
which set of effects we create for alias/capture/maybe-alias. The new
logic is a bit clearer, I think:
* If the value is frozen, it's an ImmutableCapture edge
* If the values are mutable, it's a Capture
* If it's a context->context, context->mutable, or mutable->context,
count it as MaybeAlias.
The previous PR added name hints for anonymous functions, but didn't
handle the case of outlined functions. Here we do some cleanup around
function `id` and name hints:
* Make `HIRFunction.id` a ValidatedIdentifierName, which involved some
cleanup of the validation helpers
* Add `HIRFunction.nameHint: string` as a place to store the generated
name hints which are not valid identifiers
* Update Codegen to always use the `id` as the actual function name, and
only use nameHint as part of generating the object+property wrapper for
debug purposes.
This ensures we don't conflate synthesized hints with real function
names. Then, we also update OutlineFunctions to use the function name
_or_ the nameHint as the input to generating a unique identifier. This
isn't quite as nice as the object form since we lose our formatting, but
it's a simple step that gives more context to the developer than `_temp`
does.
Switching to output the object+property lookup form for outlined
functions is a bit more involved, let's do that in a follow-up.
Alternative to #34276
---
(Summary taken from @josephsavona 's #34276)
Partial fix for #34262. Consider this example:
```js
function useInputValue(input) {
const object = React.useMemo(() => {
const {value} = transform(input);
return {value};
}, [input]);
return object;
}
```
React Compiler breaks this code into two reactive scopes:
* One for `transform(input)`
* One for `{value}`
When we run ValidatePreserveExistingMemo, we see that the scope for
`{value}` has the dependency `value`, whereas the original memoization
had the dependency `input`, and throw an error that the dependencies
didn't match.
In other words, we're flagging the fact that memoized _better than the
user_ as a problem. The more complete solution would be to validate that
there is a subgraph of reactive scopes with a single input and output
node, where the input node has the same dependencies as the original
useMemo, and the output has the same outputs. That is true in this case,
with the subgraph being the two consecutive scopes mentioned above.
But that's complicated. As a shortcut, this PR checks for any
dependencies that are defined after the start of the original useMemo.
If we find one, we know that it's a case where we were able to memoize
more precisely than the original, and we don't report an error on the
dependency. We still check that the original _output_ value is able to
be memoized, though. So if the scope of `object` were extended, eg with
a call to `mutate(object)`, then we'd still correctly report an error
that we couldn't preserve memoization.
Co-authored-by: Joe Savona <joesavona@fb.com>
Eslint is expecting a map of [string] => RuleModule. Before we were
passing {rule: RuleModule, severity: ErrorSeverity} which was breaking
legacy Eslint configurations
Adds a `@enableNameAnonymousFunctions` feature to infer helpful names
for anonymous functions within components and hooks. The logic is
inspired by a custom Next.js transform, flagged to us by @eps1lon, that
does something similar. Implementing this transform within React
Compiler means that all React (Compiler) users can benefit from more
helpful names when debugging.
The idea builds on the fact that JS engines try to infer helpful names
for anonymous functions (in stack traces) when those functions are
accessed through an object property lookup:
```js
({'a[xyz]': () => {
throw new Error('hello!')
} }['a[xyz]'])()
// Stack trace:
Uncaught Error: hello!
at a[xyz] (<anonymous>:1:26) // <-- note the name here
at <anonymous>:1:60
```
The new NameAnonymousFunctions transform is gated by the above flag,
which is off by default. It attemps to infer names for functions as
follows:
First, determine a "local" name:
* Assigning a function to a named variable uses the variable name.
`const f = () => {}` gets the name "f".
* Passing the function as an argument to a function gets the name of the
function, ie `foo(() => ...)` get the name "foo()", `foo.bar(() => ...)`
gets the name "foo.bar()". Note the parenthesis to help understand that
it was part of a call.
* Passing the function to a known hook uses the name of the hook,
`useEffect(() => ...)` uses "useEffect()".
* Passing the function as a JSX prop uses the element and attr name, eg
`<div onClick={() => ...}` uses "<div>.onClick".
Second, the local name is combined with the name of the outer
component/hook, so the final names will be strings like `Component[f]`
or `useMyHook[useEffect()]`.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34410).
* #34434
* __->__ #34410
The compiler playground was crashing at any small syntax errors in the
`Input` panel due to updating the `CompilerErrorDetailOptions` type in
#34401. Updated the option to take in a `ErrorCategory` instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: lauren <poteto@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Added a "Show Internals" toggle switch to either show only the Config,
Input, Output, and Source Map tabs, or these tabs + all the additional
compiler options. The open/close state of these tabs will be preserved
(unless on page refresh, which is the same as the currently
functionality).
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8eb0f69e-360c-4e9b-9155-7aa185a0c018
Adds missing locations to all the statement kinds that we produce in
codegenInstruction(), and adds generic handling of source locations for
the nodes produced by codegenInstructionValue(). There are definitely
some places where we are still missing a location, but this should
address some of the known issues we've seen such as missing location on
`throw`.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34406).
* #34394
* __->__ #34406
* #34346
