TODO:
- [x] Add handling for when forward is invoked multiple times without invoking backward, so that the fwd/backward states are out of sync
- [x] Update rng state initialization to take from correct device
- [x] Tests
- [x] handling of retain_graph
- [x] respect fallback random
Fix for https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/130123.
Updates the aot_eager and cudagraph compilation of `run_and_save_rng_state` to use the new mechanism added by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114068 for CUDAGraph safe rng states.
We have a pair of rng states for the fwd and backward respectively. In both forward and backward the rng op will get run with `graphsafe_run_with_rng_state` which takes in RNG state and it hooks onto the current RNG generator before running the operator. The rng states for fwd/backward are initialized with the same value. We ensure that for any given run of the forward, the corresponding backward run will have the same rng states for the op as was observed in the forward.
```
===== Forward graph 1 =====
/data/users/eellison/pytorch/torch/fx/_lazy_graph_module.py class GraphModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, primals_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", primals_2: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", fwd_rng_state_0):
sin: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0" = torch.ops.aten.sin.default(primals_1)
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
graphsafe_run_with_rng_state = torch.ops.higher_order.graphsafe_run_with_rng_state(torch.ops.aten.rand.default, [4, 4], dtype = torch.float32, device = device(type='cuda', index=0), pin_memory = False, rng_state = fwd_rng_state_0); fwd_rng_state_0 = None
...
===== Backward graph 1 =====
def forward(self, primals_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", primals_2: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", tangents_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", bwd_rng_state_0):
sin: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0" = torch.ops.aten.sin.default(primals_1)
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
graphsafe_run_with_rng_state = torch.ops.higher_order.graphsafe_run_with_rng_state(torch.ops.aten.rand.default, [4, 4], dtype = torch.float32, device = device(type='cuda', index=0), pin_memory = False, rng_state = bwd_rng_state_0); bwd_rng_state_0 = None
```
There is some extra complication when a user either calls backward with retain_graph, or calls the backward in a different order as they called the forward. If a user has state fwd_rng_state0, bwd_rng_state0 and calls:
- fwd0: fwd_rng_state0 -> fwd_rng_state1
- fwd1: fwd_rng_state1 -> fwd_rng_state2
- bwd1
- bwd0
Then naively, when bwd1 is invoked the bwd rng states would not be equal to the same states that were observed in fwd1. I added handling of this in the aot runtime wrappers to detect pending backward invocations, and the current position of the bwd rng states, and to update when necesssary.
Other notes:
Because nodes which appear later in the forward appear earlier in the backward, we need a separate rng state for each operator. If we reused the rng across ops, the forward and backward would be run with different rng states. I.e., not applied in the same order.
Questions for reviewers:
This does change numerics, bc the rng of the op is now taken from the input rng state instead of whatever the rng would be midway through running the graph. Technically, we only need this for cuda graph. But, I'd prefer to not have a rng divergence just for cudagraph. I am making it respect `fallback_random`.
Edit: decided to apply to non cudagraphs as well, so long as fallback_random is not set
I'm initializing the rng states by cloning the current state. If you had something like 5 different rands in the model with the same shape, theyd all get the same value. This doesn't seem great. I could use some other initialization scheme like taking seed from graph position, or etc etc. Not sure. Let me know thoughts.
Edit: updated to be taken from randint()
Update: initializing rng states from torch.randint..
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146878
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305, https://github.com/bdhirsh
TODO:
- [x] Add handling for when forward is invoked multiple times without invoking backward, so that the fwd/backward states are out of sync
- [x] Update rng state initialization to take from correct device
- [x] Tests
- [x] handling of retain_graph
- [x] respect fallback random
Fix for https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/130123.
Updates the aot_eager and cudagraph compilation of `run_and_save_rng_state` to use the new mechanism added by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114068 for CUDAGraph safe rng states.
We have a pair of rng states for the fwd and backward respectively. In both forward and backward the rng op will get run with `graphsafe_run_with_rng_state` which takes in RNG state and it hooks onto the current RNG generator before running the operator. The rng states for fwd/backward are initialized with the same value. We ensure that for any given run of the forward, the corresponding backward run will have the same rng states for the op as was observed in the forward.
```
===== Forward graph 1 =====
/data/users/eellison/pytorch/torch/fx/_lazy_graph_module.py class GraphModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, primals_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", primals_2: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", fwd_rng_state_0):
sin: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0" = torch.ops.aten.sin.default(primals_1)
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
graphsafe_run_with_rng_state = torch.ops.higher_order.graphsafe_run_with_rng_state(torch.ops.aten.rand.default, [4, 4], dtype = torch.float32, device = device(type='cuda', index=0), pin_memory = False, rng_state = fwd_rng_state_0); fwd_rng_state_0 = None
...
===== Backward graph 1 =====
def forward(self, primals_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", primals_2: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", tangents_1: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0", bwd_rng_state_0):
sin: "f32[4, 4][4, 1]cuda:0" = torch.ops.aten.sin.default(primals_1)
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
graphsafe_run_with_rng_state = torch.ops.higher_order.graphsafe_run_with_rng_state(torch.ops.aten.rand.default, [4, 4], dtype = torch.float32, device = device(type='cuda', index=0), pin_memory = False, rng_state = bwd_rng_state_0); bwd_rng_state_0 = None
```
There is some extra complication when a user either calls backward with retain_graph, or calls the backward in a different order as they called the forward. If a user has state fwd_rng_state0, bwd_rng_state0 and calls:
- fwd0: fwd_rng_state0 -> fwd_rng_state1
- fwd1: fwd_rng_state1 -> fwd_rng_state2
- bwd1
- bwd0
Then naively, when bwd1 is invoked the bwd rng states would not be equal to the same states that were observed in fwd1. I added handling of this in the aot runtime wrappers to detect pending backward invocations, and the current position of the bwd rng states, and to update when necesssary.
Other notes:
Because nodes which appear later in the forward appear earlier in the backward, we need a separate rng state for each operator. If we reused the rng across ops, the forward and backward would be run with different rng states. I.e., not applied in the same order.
Questions for reviewers:
This does change numerics, bc the rng of the op is now taken from the input rng state instead of whatever the rng would be midway through running the graph. Technically, we only need this for cuda graph. But, I'd prefer to not have a rng divergence just for cudagraph. I am making it respect `fallback_random`.
Edit: decided to apply to non cudagraphs as well, so long as fallback_random is not set
I'm initializing the rng states by cloning the current state. If you had something like 5 different rands in the model with the same shape, theyd all get the same value. This doesn't seem great. I could use some other initialization scheme like taking seed from graph position, or etc etc. Not sure. Let me know thoughts.
Edit: updated to be taken from randint()
Update: initializing rng states from torch.randint..
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146878
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305, https://github.com/bdhirsh
* Automatically applies ruff rule 401. Turns loops into equivalent list comprehensions which are faster and do not leak the scope of the loop variables.
* list comprehensions not only often have better typing, but are 50+% faster than for loops on overhead. They also preserve length information etc and are better for the interpreter to optimize.
* Manually went back and made mypy happy after the change.
* Also fixed style lints in files covered by flake8 but not by pyfmt
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140980
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Take intersection of all the tags for corresponding aten op overloads. Previously, some of the rng ops not having tags caused issues with constant folding (they should get decomposed but thats a separate issue).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130367
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Update ruff to 0.4.1 .
This version fixes a lot false negatives/false positives, is 20-40% faster, and has various other bug fixes.
Below is a before and after table showing the execution time of ruff lint and ruff format in milliseconds courtesy of https://astral.sh/blog/ruff-v0.4.0
| Repository | Linter (v0.3) | Linter (v0.4) | Formatter (v0.3) | Formatter (v0.4) |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|------------------|------------------|
| [pytorch/pytorch](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch) | 328.7 | 251.8 | 351.1 | 274.9 |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124549
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Given the following code/dynamo graph:
```
class GraphModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, L_x_ : torch.Tensor):
l_x_ = L_x_
_print = torch.ops.aten._print('moo')
res = l_x_ + l_x_; l_x_ = None
_print_1 = torch.ops.aten._print('moo')
return (res,)
```
AOTAutograd will trace the following program, threading tokens from the inputs, through the effectful operator calls (torch.ops.aten._print), and as an output:
```
class <lambda>(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, arg0_1: "f32[0]", arg1_1: "f32[2, 3]"):
with_effects = torch._higher_order_ops.effects.with_effects(arg0_1, torch.ops.aten._print.default, 'moo'); arg0_1 = None
getitem: "f32[0]" = with_effects[0]; with_effects = None
add: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.add.Tensor(arg1_1, arg1_1); arg1_1 = None
with_effects_1 = torch._higher_order_ops.effects.with_effects(getitem, torch.ops.aten._print.default, 'moo'); getitem = None
getitem_2: "f32[0]" = with_effects_1[0]; with_effects_1 = None
return (getitem_2, add)
```
However when we get to inductor, since we want the inductor generated code to not have any token inputs/outputs for better readability, we want to modify the aten graph by removing the tokens from inputs, and creating them through `torch.ops.aten._make_dep_token`, and sinking them through the `torch.ops.aten._sink_tokens` operators.
This has to be done *after* the partitioner, otherwise the partitioner will add the make_token/sink_token operators to the backwards graph.
```
class <lambda>(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, arg1_1: "f32[2, 3]"):
_make_dep_token_default: "f32[0]" = torch.ops.aten._make_dep_token.default()
with_effects = torch._higher_order_ops.effects.with_effects(_make_dep_token_default, torch.ops.aten._print.default, 'moo'); _make_dep_token_default = None
getitem: "f32[0]" = with_effects[0]; with_effects = None
add: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.add.Tensor(arg1_1, arg1_1); arg1_1 = None
with_effects_1 = torch._higher_order_ops.effects.with_effects(getitem, torch.ops.aten._print.default, 'moo'); getitem = None
getitem_2: "f32[0]" = with_effects_1[0]; with_effects_1 = None
_sink_tokens_default = torch.ops.aten._sink_tokens.default((getitem_2,)); getitem_2 = None
return (add,)
```
When doing inductor lowering, we convert `with_effects` calls to an `EffectfulKernel`, which just a `FallbackKernel` but with a pointer to previous effectful operator's call. During scheduling, we will create a `StarDep` between the EffectfulKernel and its previous EffectfulKernel so that they don't get reordered. The inductor generated python code looks like:
```
def call(args):
arg1_1, = args
args.clear()
assert_size_stride(arg1_1, (2, 3), (3, 1))
# Source Nodes: [_print], Original ATen: []
buf2 = aten._print.default('moo')
# Source Nodes: [_print_1], Original ATen: []
buf3 = aten._print.default('moo')
buf4 = empty_strided_cpu((2, 3), (3, 1), torch.float32)
cpp_fused_add_0(arg1_1, buf4)
del arg1_1
return (buf4, )
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/122347
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
