This PR suggests adding some models to `cpu_skip_list` which are currently being run in TIMM and Torchbench.
The suggested models takes a long time which leads to the benchmark runs being `timeout`. [benchmark runs for aarch64](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/workflows/inductor-perf-test-nightly-aarch64.yml)
• The issue stems from unoptimized groupwise convolution (BF16 /F16 dtype) kernels for aarch64 platforms , which significantly slow down execution leading to the timeout.
**Action:**
• An optimized BF16 groupwise convolution kernel is currently being developed in oneDNN, targeted for release in Q4 2025.
To maintain dashboard consistency and signal clarity, I’ve skipped the affected tests in:
* timm benchmarks
* torchbench benchmarks
As suggested, skip is applied at the CPU - arch level, explicitly branching for aarch64 and adding models which needs to be skipped. This keeps the logic clean, but:
• An alternative considered was increasing shard counts for aarch64 runners, but given the known performance bottleneck, skipping avoids wasted compute cycles. Suggestions around this will be appreciated.
Benchmark does not timeout after the suggested change: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/16447200138
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/158842
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
We need to increase the tolerance slightly to ensure that certain models pass the accuracy check on the XPU device.
This pull request preserves the original tolerance threshold for CUDA/CPU devices and introduces a new key, higher_bf16_xpu, which only affects the XPU device.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/156920
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
PT2 benchmark scripts has a pattern like:
```
def forward_and_backward_pass(self, mod, inputs, collect_outputs=True):
cloned_inputs = clone_inputs(inputs)
self.optimizer_zero_grad(mod)
with self.autocast(**self.autocast_arg):
pred = mod(**cloned_inputs)
loss = self.compute_loss(pred)
self.grad_scaler.scale(loss).backward()
self.optimizer_step()
if collect_outputs:
return collect_results(mod, pred, loss, cloned_inputs)
return None
```
for training.
The collect_outputs argument is True only for accuracy testing and it's false for performance testing.
For HF benchmark suite, a model usually returns tuple (loss, logits). For performance testing, even though the logits is never used anywhere, dynamo has to keep it due to the control flow.
A few bad things if we keep logits here
1. the peak memory will be higher since the logits is large and we can not release its memory earlier.
2. we can not do optimization like chunking for the logits because the tensor needs to be returned from the pre-grad graph
Actually I think it's fine to not return logits at all.
- For training cases, checking loss and gradients for accuracy is good enough. It's hard to see two runs have mismatch logits but matching loss/gradients.
- Also, discarding logits as soon as possible for perf benchmarking makes it more fair for us.
On the other hand, it may be interesting to let dynamo support something like dynamo.constexpr (similar to tl.constexpr). A variable annotated as dynamo.constexpr will be specialized at compile time and we can do more optimization (DCE e.g.) at compile time. (A small [repro](https://gist.github.com/shunting314/0912a8947028a904c34f361021b8024d))
Benchmark results here [link](https://hud.pytorch.org/benchmark/compilers?dashboard=torchinductor&startTime=Fri%2C%2004%20Apr%202025%2018%3A03%3A26%20GMT&stopTime=Fri%2C%2011%20Apr%202025%2018%3A03%3A26%20GMT&granularity=hour&mode=training&dtype=amp&deviceName=cuda%20(h100)&lBranch=gh/shunting314/204/head&lCommit=fe25dab3f65e1b0e9db0af03f7664af70fcc9c66&rBranch=main&rCommit=55e62ff74ad5614faf80b060c7bfc551e3b7af5a)
- HF 15% (1.51 -> 1.66 compression ratio) peak memory improvement
- I also see 5% (2.74 -> 2.79x) perf win for HF. It could be true. We may generate more efficient kernels since we don't need keep logits and return it from the pre-grad graph. But I'll double check
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151075
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison, https://github.com/jansel
tts_angular with cudagraph is flaky. Its speedup varies from .05 to 1.01. This PR disables cudagraph for tts_angular to avoid the noise. Since tts_angular shows ~1x speedup while other torchbench models show ~2x speedup, skipping tts_angular would wrongly bump the cudagraph speedup. So this PR only disables cudagraph for tts_angular instead of skipping tts_angular.
[Dashboard ](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/13597394087)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148221
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
This turns on AOTAutogradCache for all inductor tests. It clears AOTAutogradCache on each test as well, by virtue of the local cache using the same directory to store cache entries.
I've also tested with INDUCTOR_TEST_DISABLE_FRESH_CACHE=1, running all the tests. AOTAutogradCache successfully caches 99% of these. There are a few tests that use view_replay and therefore save functional tensors, which cause AOTAutogradCache to fail to pickle its result. Will look into next steps there, but for now, it seems okay if the cache just misses on those cases where it can't serialize the result. It would be better to check before pickling, though.
I've made the following small bugfixes to get this working:
- Inductor is sometimes used in a standalone mode without dynamo, which leads to attribute errors in check_can_cache. In general, we should *never* crash in cache checking, only bypass. So I change a try catch to check Exception instead of just a specific exception.
- Add extra structured logging for metadata on cache hits
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140890
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Add to relative path search in benchmark. This enables user to run `torchbench.py` inside the `pytorch/benchmark/dynamo` folder when `torchbench` repo is cloned in the same level as `pytorch`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134871
Approved by: https://github.com/FindHao
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/pytorch/benchmark/pull/2388
We can enable accuracy checks at Diff time since it is not a performance metric.
* Refactor the existing diff time test to use the new PT2 Benchmark Runner.
* Deprecate the speedup tests and enable the accuracy tests only. We rely on ServiceLab to perform performance testing and regression detection.
Test Plan:
Sandcastle CI
Or buck test command:
```
buck2 test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//pytorch/benchmark/fb/test_gpu:run_test_gpu -- test_training_resnet50_accuracy
```
Test UI: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/testinfra/testrun/1688850102375429
Reviewed By: oulgen
Differential Revision: D59825601
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/131266
Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen
This PR batch the fix for a few accuracy failures issues during training by raising tolerance. I do that only for models that I think it fails not due to real issue.
## sebotnet33ts_256
The accuracy test for this model start to fail around June 05 [link](https://hud.pytorch.org/benchmark/timm_models/inductor_with_cudagraphs?dashboard=torchinductor&startTime=Sun%2C%2002%20Jun%202024%2007%3A19%3A38%20GMT&stopTime=Tue%2C%2002%20Jul%202024%2007%3A19%3A38%20GMT&granularity=day&mode=training&dtype=amp&lBranch=main&lCommit=04a0d856207d83c2031e4b9cb6825ba3e0092850&rBranch=main&rCommit=e62925930f6a62f6aeeb1fe1a661a9bd3352b53d&model=sebotnet33ts_256).
I can not repro locally, but from the log from the dashboard:
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.09441, (ref-fp64): 0.02971 and shape=torch.Size([1536]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.040000
```
raising the tolerance should fix it.
## DebertaForQuestionAnswering
This model fails accuracy test on the dashboard only in max-autotune mode. I can not repro locally by command:
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/huggingface.py --accuracy --no-translation-validation --training --amp --backend inductor --device cuda --only DebertaForQuestionAnswering
```
From error message on the dashboard:
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.01803, (ref-fp64): 0.00537 and shape=torch.Size([2]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.010000
```
0.02 tolerance should suppress this error.
## gluon_inception_v3
This model fail on the dashboard in max-autotune mode. I can not repro locally by command
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/timm_models.py --accuracy --training --amp --backend inductor --disable-cudagraphs --device cuda --only gluon_inception_v3
```
From error message on the dashboard
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.02798, (ref-fp64): 0.00730 and shape=torch.Size([384]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.010000
Accuracy failed for key name Mixed_7c.branch3x3dbl_3a.bn.running_var
```
raising tolerance should suppress this error.
# mobilenetv3_large_100
Fail in MA model. I can not repro locally by command
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/timm_models.py --accuracy --training --amp --backend inductor --disable-cudagraphs --device cuda --only
```
The error message on the dashboard is
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.29754, (ref-fp64): 0.05205 and shape=torch.Size([]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.040000
```
The tensor is so small that the noise can be high. I use larger multiplier for smaller tensor in torch._dynamo.utils.same.
# yolov3
Fail on dashboard with error
```
Error on the dashboard: RMSE (res-fp64): 0.01278, (ref-fp64): 0.00246 and shape=torch.Size([256]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.001000
```
Fix it by using a larger multiplier for smaller tensors and raising the tolereance.
# timm_efficientdet
Fail on the dashboard with error
```
E0623 18:37:43.638000 139924418725056 torch/_dynamo/utils.py:1468] RMSE (res-fp64): 0.00096, (ref-fp64): 0.00009 and shape=torch.Size([2]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.001000
```
But I can not repro locally with command
```
time python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --backend inductor --amp --performance --only timm_efficientdet --training
```
Raise the tolerance should fix.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129941
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #129996
This PR batch the fix for a few accuracy failures issues during training by raising tolerance. I do that only for models that I think it fails not due to real issue.
## sebotnet33ts_256
The accuracy test for this model start to fail around June 05 [link](https://hud.pytorch.org/benchmark/timm_models/inductor_with_cudagraphs?dashboard=torchinductor&startTime=Sun%2C%2002%20Jun%202024%2007%3A19%3A38%20GMT&stopTime=Tue%2C%2002%20Jul%202024%2007%3A19%3A38%20GMT&granularity=day&mode=training&dtype=amp&lBranch=main&lCommit=04a0d856207d83c2031e4b9cb6825ba3e0092850&rBranch=main&rCommit=e62925930f6a62f6aeeb1fe1a661a9bd3352b53d&model=sebotnet33ts_256).
I can not repro locally, but from the log from the dashboard:
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.09441, (ref-fp64): 0.02971 and shape=torch.Size([1536]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.040000
```
raising the tolerance should fix it.
## DebertaForQuestionAnswering
This model fails accuracy test on the dashboard only in max-autotune mode. I can not repro locally by command:
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/huggingface.py --accuracy --no-translation-validation --training --amp --backend inductor --device cuda --only DebertaForQuestionAnswering
```
From error message on the dashboard:
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.01803, (ref-fp64): 0.00537 and shape=torch.Size([2]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.010000
```
0.02 tolerance should suppress this error.
## gluon_inception_v3
This model fail on the dashboard in max-autotune mode. I can not repro locally by command
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/timm_models.py --accuracy --training --amp --backend inductor --disable-cudagraphs --device cuda --only gluon_inception_v3
```
From error message on the dashboard
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.02798, (ref-fp64): 0.00730 and shape=torch.Size([384]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.010000
Accuracy failed for key name Mixed_7c.branch3x3dbl_3a.bn.running_var
```
raising tolerance should suppress this error.
# mobilenetv3_large_100
Fail in MA model. I can not repro locally by command
```
TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 time python benchmarks/dynamo/timm_models.py --accuracy --training --amp --backend inductor --disable-cudagraphs --device cuda --only
```
The error message on the dashboard is
```
RMSE (res-fp64): 0.29754, (ref-fp64): 0.05205 and shape=torch.Size([]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.040000
```
The tensor is so small that the noise can be high. I use larger multiplier for smaller tensor in torch._dynamo.utils.same.
# yolov3
Fail on dashboard with error
```
Error on the dashboard: RMSE (res-fp64): 0.01278, (ref-fp64): 0.00246 and shape=torch.Size([256]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.001000
```
Fix it by using a larger multiplier for smaller tensors and raising the tolereance.
# timm_efficientdet
Fail on the dashboard with error
```
E0623 18:37:43.638000 139924418725056 torch/_dynamo/utils.py:1468] RMSE (res-fp64): 0.00096, (ref-fp64): 0.00009 and shape=torch.Size([2]). res.dtype: torch.float32, multiplier: 3.000000, tol: 0.001000
```
But I can not repro locally with command
```
time python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --backend inductor --amp --performance --only timm_efficientdet --training
```
Raise the tolerance should fix.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129941
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
ghstack dependencies: #129996
The `usort` config in `pyproject.toml` has no effect due to a typo. Fixing the typo make `usort` do more and generate the changes in the PR. Except `pyproject.toml`, all changes are generated by `lintrunner -a --take UFMT --all-files`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127126
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
The `usort` config in `pyproject.toml` has no effect due to a typo. Fixing the typo make `usort` do more and generate the changes in the PR. Except `pyproject.toml`, all changes are generated by `lintrunner -a --take UFMT --all-files`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127126
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
ghstack dependencies: #127122, #127123, #127124, #127125
We encountered some model accuracy failures as the tolerance is critical. In general, we align with CUDA practice. This PR intends to adjust the tolerance for Torchbench models for training mode on Intel GPU devices and aligns with CUDA.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125213
Approved by: https://github.com/desertfire
Biggest movement is 4% HF inference, 9% TIMM inference. Note, this is max-autotune mode so we are more tolerant of compilation increases. We could improve compilation time by limiting:
```
# Take how many of the top triton kernels to benchmark epilogue
max_epilogue_benchmarked_choices = 3
```
There is a hf_Whisper failure which you can repro on main without this stack with `TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE_GEMM_BACKENDS=TRITON TORCHINDUCTOR_MAX_AUTOTUNE=1 python benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --backend inductor --amp --accuracy --training --only hf_Whisper`. When you turn off epilogue fusion, it fixes the accuracy. I bisected the failure to an epilogue, however when you compare the results of that epilogue with the corresponding separate kernels the results of the output are equivalent.
Inference:
<img width="1686" alt="image" src="https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/assets/11477974/0b240080-cd33-4c08-89d3-583103b1fb0c">
Training:
<img width="1329" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-16 at 6 16 30 PM" src="https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/assets/11477974/db0afcc9-7288-4c27-84ce-4fc1a5690788">
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124031
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee, https://github.com/shunting314
ghstack dependencies: #124030, #122642, #123229, #122825
torchrec_dlrm training fail the accuracy check when max-autotune is enabled.
I found there is no real issue in PT2. We fail to get fp64 reference results for the accuracy check. In max-autotune mode numerical may change a bit and cause the cosine similarity check fail. Using fp64 baseline is more reliable and make the test pass.
The reason why we are not using a fp64 baseline earlier is because torchrec uses a dataclass [Batch](99e6e669b5/torchrec/datasets/utils.py (L28)) to represent the input. We use pytree to cast model and inputs to fp64. pytree can not look into a dataclass. My fix is to convert the dataclass to namedtuple to be more pytree friendly
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/122012
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/eellison
After this, the sam_fast benchmark can now be run in the pytorch repo:
```
SEGMENT_ANYTHING_FAST_USE_FLASH_4=0 benchmarks/dynamo/torchbench.py --inference --amp --performance --backend=inductor --explain --only sam_fast
```
sam_fast is designed for inference only, with cuda and amp on. The code adds these restrictions to the benchmark.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/121420
Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen, https://github.com/msaroufim
Fix https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/120545 . The reason why these models fail accuracy test with freezing is due to the conv-batchnorm fusion. Conv-batchnorm fusion causes relative big numerical churn.
For the failed TIMM models, raising the tolerance to `8 * 1e-2` can make the test pass.
For the failed TB models, the numerical difference is too large. Having a discussion with @eellison , we decided to skip them with freezing for now.
One the other hand, we probably should dig more why the conv-bn fusion cause such large numerical difference.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/121054
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
This PR moves other aspects of torchbench's model configuration (e.g. batch size,
tolerance requirements, etc.) into a new YAML file: `torchbench.yaml`. It also merges the
recently added `torchbench_skip_models.yaml` file inside the `skip` key.
This is an effort so that external consumers are able to easily replicate the performance
results and coverage results from the PyTorch HUD.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120299
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
