Eslint now allows us to use a different parser, which allows us to use
esprima-fb explicitly. This means we don't have to wait for espree to add
things like rest-param parsing. Though we do need eslint to upgrade its rules
to handle that AST.
I had hoped to enable parsing of our tests but we can't do that until we
change esprima-fb's XJS nodes to JSX.
While I was here, I also enabled the no-unused-vars rule since eslint
understands template strings. I also made the single quote enforcement
actually fail instead of just warn.
Instead of putting the shared code in a base class method, we use a wrapper
call around all invokations. That way they're free to add code before AND
after the non-shared code.
That way we ensure that component extensions don't need to implement
ReactComponentMixin and do super() calls into it. This helps to create a
tighter API for custom component extensions.
This provides the first step towards moving these methods to static
methods which allows to use a different dispatch mechanism instead of
virtual method calls. E.g. pattern matching.
Summary:
After #2570, `mountDepth` is only used to enforce that `setProps` and `replaceProps` is only invoked on the top-level component. This replaces `mountDepth` with a simpler `isTopLevel` boolean set by `ReactMount` which reduces the surface area of the internal API and removes the need to thread `mountDepth` throughout React core.
Reviewers: @sebmarkbage @zpao
Test Plan:
Ran unit tests successfully:
```
npm run jest
```
Summary:
Changes the way we instrument methods for `ReactPerf` so that developer tools can assign implicit method names to measured functions.
Reviewers: @zpao @sebmarkbage
We currently have three DOM specific hooks that get injected. I move those
out to ReactComponentEnvironment. The idea is to eventually remove this
injection as the reconciler gets refactored.
There is also a BackendIDOperation which is specific to the DOM component
itself so I move this injection to be more specific to the DOMComponent.
E.g. it makes sense for it to be injectable for cross-worker DOM operations
but it doesn't make sense for ART components.
We currently make a copy of .style because we support mutating the style object in place. Instead of storing it back on props, store it separately on the component instance so that we don't mutate props anywhere. This is gross but should all be cleaned up after #2008 is resolved.
Test Plan: jest
...unless they already have a wrapper. Also, add tagName to every wrapper.
This ensures that refs are consistent. They always look like composite
components. This effectively hides the internal implementation details of
real DOM components since you can no longer get a ref to one.
In the future we might want to drop this wrapper and have refs refer
directly to the DOM node.
I currently use a hacky way of auto-wrapping inside of ReactNativeComponent
so that any given string can be wrapped. Better suggestions are welcome.
Fixes#1392.
Previously, ReactComponent.updateComponent set the new props and owner and updated the component's refs. Because it did the actual props assignment, it had to be called by ReactCompositeComponent between componentWillMount and componentDidMount, meaning that it was skipped if shouldComponentUpdate returned false. Now, updateComponent takes the old and new descriptors and only updates refs, allowing a subclass to call updateComponent at a convenient time (specifically, it can be before `this._descriptor` is updated if the subclass also overrides performUpdateIfNecessary).
The new update cycle for composites is:
- receiveComponent is called which stores `this._pendingDescriptor` and calls performUpdateIfNecessary directly or a state update is enqueued, in which case ReactUpdates will call performUpdateIfNecessary
- performUpdateIfNecessary ensures that an update is still pending (which might no longer be the case if an update is queued for a subcomponent that was updated through a parent's reconciliation) and calls updateComponent with the old and new descriptors
- updateComponent calls super to update refs, then calls componentWillReceiveProps (if applicable) and shouldComponentUpdate -- if shouldComponentUpdate returns false, `this._descriptor`, `this.props`, and `this.state` are updated and the update is skipped; else, _performComponentUpdate is called
- _performComponentUpdate calls componentWillUpdate and _updateRenderedComponent, and enqueues the componentDidUpdate call (in that order)
- _updateRenderedComponent calls render and updates the rendered component appropriately
For DOM components (essentially unchanged):
- receiveComponent is called which does a short-circuit check for descriptor equality and delegates to super (which stores `this._pendingDescriptor` and calls performUpdateIfNecessary)
- performUpdateIfNecessary (not overridden) sets new values for `this.props`, etc. and calls updateComponent
- updateComponent does the DOM property and children updates (some synchronously, some queued for the transaction close)
For text and ART components (unchanged):
- receiveComponent updates the DOM or ART directly based on the new props
- updateComponent is never called
Notable changes:
- When shouldComponentUpdate returns false, refs are still updated
- ReactDefaultPerf now includes lifecycle methods in component timings
- updateComponent's signature changed (technically this is part of the public API, though we've never documented it)
Test Plan: jest
Same for <pre> and <listing>. Browsers are crazy.
Test Plan: jest, verify in Chrome that starting textareas with a value starting with two newlines renders both newlines instead of one newline, as it did before.
Because the JS community's polyfilling infrastructure sucks and we'll
have to fix it for them before we require this.
JSX spread uses React.__spread
(which might get special behavior for key/ref, not sure yet)
This never uses the native implementation and throws for prototype chains.
Once the native implementations are faster, we'll start using them.
Because we're using innerHTML to generate DOM Elements, we need to make
sure that the tag is sane and doesn't try to do injection.
This wouldn't be an issue if we used document.createElement instead.
This makes it easier to contribute without having to learn a bunch of
slightly different helpers and remember their slightly different
signatures and semantics.
We'll probably start using ES7 spread properties instead of merge in the
future when at least one more transpiler supports it.
This makes ReactDOM a simple helper for creating ReactElements with the string tag as the type. The actual class is internal and created by instantiateReactComponent. Configurable using injection.
There's not a separate class for each tag. There's just a generic ReactDOMComponent which could take any tag name.
Invididual tags can be wrapped. When wrapping happens you can return the same tag again. If the wrapper returns the same string, then we fall back to the generic component. This avoids recursion in a single level wrapper.
For boolean-like objects, I've added hasOwnProperty checks in addition to the existing truthiness check even though for most of these dicts, we leave out false keys instead of setting them explicitly to false.
In DOMPropertyOperations, we don't need to check hasOwnProperty if the property is in isStandardName because (with the exception of getPossibleStandardName) the dicts on DOMProperty will now be consistently populated with every valid attribute.
`renderComponent(<div style={invalidType}/>, container)` throws correctly,
but not when it's called a second time (i.e. updating rather than mounting).
It goes through `ReactDOMComponent.updateComponent` but there wasn't a
props assertion there.
(Removed the assertion in `receiveComponent`)
