We can't patch the row. We could give these their own "built-in" stack
frame since they're conceptually HoCs. However, from a debugging
perspective this is not very useful meta data and quite noisy. So I'm
just going to exclude them.
Some of our internal reconciler types have leaked into other packages.
Usually, these types are treated as opaque; we don't read and write
to its fields. This is good.
However, the type is often passed back to a reconciler method. For
example, React DOM creates a FiberRoot with `createContainer`, then
passes that root to `updateContainer`. It doesn't do anything with the
root except pass it through, but because `updateContainer` expects a
full FiberRoot, React DOM is still coupled to all its fields.
I don't know if there's an idiomatic way to handle this in Flow. Opaque
types are simlar, but those only work within a single file. AFAIK,
there's no way to use a package as the boundary for opaqueness.
The immediate problem this presents is that the reconciler refactor will
involve changes to our internal data structures. I don't want to have to
fork every single package that happens to pass through a Fiber or
FiberRoot, or access any one of its fields. So my current plan is to
share the same Flow type across both forks. The shared type will be a
superset of each implementation's type, e.g. Fiber will have both an
`expirationTime` field and a `lanes` field. The implementations will
diverge, but not the types.
To do this, I lifted the type definitions into a separate module.
* Add feature flag
* Split stack from current fiber
You can get stack from any fiber, not just current.
* Refactor description of component frames
These should use fiber tags for switching. This also puts the relevant code
behind DEV flags.
* We no longer expose StrictMode in component stacks
They're not super useful and will go away later anyway.
* Update tests
Context is no longer part of SSR stacks. This was already the case on the
client.
forwardRef no longer is wrapped on the stack. It's still in getComponentName
but it's probably just noise in stacks. Eventually we'll remove the wrapper
so it'll go away anyway. If we use native stack frames they won't have this
extra wrapper.
It also doesn't pick up displayName from the outer wrapper. We could maybe
transfer it but this will also be fixed by removing the wrapper.
* Forward displayName onto the inner function for forwardRef and memo in DEV
This allows them to show up in stack traces.
I'm not doing this for lazy because lazy is supposed to be called on the
consuming side so you shouldn't assign it a name on that end. Especially
not one that mutates the inner.
* Use multiple instances of the fake component
We mutate the inner component for its name so we need multiple copies.
