## Summary
Right now, `react-compiler-healthcheck` flags `mobx` as a "known
incompatible library". But it's not precisely *MobX* that's
incompatible. It's the observer HOC that comes from `mobx-react` and
`mobx-react-lite`.
I've been working on
[mst-use-observable](https://github.com/coolsoftwaretyler/mst-use-observable),
which makes MobX-State-Tree compatible with the compiler. However,
projects that use `mobx-state-tree` and `mst-use-observable` will still
depend on `mobx` as a dependency.
And there [have been efforts in the past to write a hook for
observability](https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx/discussions/2566). So it's
possible that MobX could become compatible, so long as authors access it
with a hook, rather than the HOC.
I would like to propose updating the health check to be a little more
precise and flag the HOC dependencies, rather than MobX itself.
Thanks in advance for your consideration!
## How did you test this change?
`npx react-compiler-healthcheck` shouldn't flag on `mobx` in
dependencies, but will for `mobx-react-lite` and `mobx-react`.
Test suites, formatting, linting, all passed.
---------
Co-authored-by: lauren <poteto@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently in the `compiler` workspace, we invoke esbuild directly to
build most packages (with the exception of `snap`). This has been mostly
fine, but does not allow us to do things like generate type declaration
files.
I would like #32416 to be able to consume the merged
eslint-plugin-react-compiler from source rather than via npm, and one of
the things that has come up from my exploration in that stack using the
compiler from source is that babel-plugin-react-compiler is missing type
declarations. This is primarily because React's build process uses
rollup + rollup-plugin-typescript, which runs tsc. So the merged plugin
needs to typecheck properly in order to build. An alternative might be
to migrate to something like babel with rollup instead to simply strip
types rather than typecheck before building. The minor downside of that
approach is that we would need to manually maintain a d.ts file for
eslint-plugin-react-hooks. For now I would like to see if this PR helps
us make progress rather than go for the slightly worse alternative.
[`tsup`](https://github.com/egoist/tsup) is esbuild based so build
performance is comparable. It is slower when generating d.ts files, but
it's still much faster than rollup which we used prior to esbuild. For
now, I have turned off `dts` by default, and it is only passed when
publishing on npm.
If you want to also generate d.ts files you can run `yarn build --dts`.
```
# BEFORE: build all compiler packages (esbuild)
$ time yarn build
✨ Done in 15.61s.
yarn build 13.82s user 1.54s system 96% cpu 15.842 total
# ---
# AFTER: build all compiler packages (tsup)
$ time yarn build
✨ Done in 12.39s.
yarn build 12.58s user 1.68s system 106% cpu 13.350 total
# ---
# AFTER: build all compiler packages and type declarations (tsup)
$ time yarn build --dts
✨ Done in 30.69s.
yarn build 43.57s user 3.20s system 150% cpu 31.061 total
```
I still need to test if this unblocks #32416 but this stack can be
landed independently though as we could probably just release type
declarations on npm. No one should be using the compiler directly, but
if they really wanted to, lack of type declarations would not stop them
(cf React secret internals).
Note that I still kept esbuild as we still use it directly for forgive.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32550).
* #32551
* __->__ #32550
## Summary
PR https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/31963 migrated the bundler
from Rollup to esbuild, but the `react-compiler-healthcheck` script
lacks a shebang, leading to issues with `npx` not being able to execute
it.
dc7578290f/compiler/packages/react-compiler-healthcheck/rollup.config.js (L60-L78)9eabb37338/compiler/packages/react-compiler-healthcheck/scripts/build.js (L38-L53)
## How did you test this change?
**Before**
(fail)
```shell
(main)> npx --version
10.5.0
(main)> npx react-compiler-healthcheck
/home/jeremy/.npm/_npx/67b118a83a29962c/node_modules/.bin/react-compiler-healthcheck: line 1: /bin: Is a directory
/home/jeremy/.npm/_npx/67b118a83a29962c/node_modules/.bin/react-compiler-healthcheck: line 2: syntax error near unexpected token `('
/home/jeremy/.npm/_npx/67b118a83a29962c/node_modules/.bin/react-compiler-healthcheck: line 2: ` * Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.'
```
**After**
```shell
(main)> npx react-compiler-healthcheck
Successfully compiled 108 out of 146 components.
StrictMode usage not found.
Found no usage of incompatible libraries.
```
This migrates the compiler's bundler to esbuild instead of rollup.
Unlike React, our bundling use cases are far simpler since the majority
of our packages are meant to be run on node. Rollup was adding
considerable build time overhead whereas esbuild remains fast and has
all the functionality we need out of the box.
### Before
```
time yarn workspaces run build
yarn workspaces v1.22.22
> babel-plugin-react-compiler
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && rollup --config --bundleConfigAsCjs
src/index.ts → dist/index.js...
(!) Circular dependencies
# ...
created dist/index.js in 15.5s
✨ Done in 16.45s.
> eslint-plugin-react-compiler
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && rollup --config --bundleConfigAsCjs
src/index.ts → dist/index.js...
(!) Circular dependencies
# ...
created dist/index.js in 9.1s
✨ Done in 10.11s.
> make-read-only-util
yarn run v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
$ tsc
✨ Done in 1.81s.
> react-compiler-healthcheck
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && rollup --config --bundleConfigAsCjs
src/index.ts → dist/index.js...
(!) Circular dependencies
# ...
created dist/index.js in 8.7s
✨ Done in 10.43s.
> react-compiler-runtime
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && rollup --config --bundleConfigAsCjs
src/index.ts → dist/index.js...
(!) src/index.ts (1:0): Module level directives cause errors when bundled, "use no memo" in "src/index.ts" was ignored.
# ...
created dist/index.js in 1.1s
✨ Done in 1.82s.
> snap
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && concurrently -n snap,runtime "tsc --build" "yarn --silent workspace react-compiler-runtime build --silent"
$ rimraf dist && rollup --config --bundleConfigAsCjs --silent
[runtime] yarn --silent workspace react-compiler-runtime build --silent exited with code 0
[snap] tsc --build exited with code 0
✨ Done in 5.73s.
✨ Done in 47.30s.
yarn workspaces run build 75.92s user 5.48s system 170% cpu 47.821 total
```
### After
```
time yarn workspaces run build
yarn workspaces v1.22.22
> babel-plugin-react-compiler
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
✨ Done in 1.02s.
> eslint-plugin-react-compiler
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
✨ Done in 0.93s.
> make-read-only-util
yarn run v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
✨ Done in 0.89s.
> react-compiler-healthcheck
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
✨ Done in 0.58s.
> react-compiler-runtime
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
✨ Done in 0.48s.
> snap
yarn run v1.22.22
$ rimraf dist && concurrently -n snap,runtime "tsc --build" "yarn --silent workspace react-compiler-runtime build"
$ rimraf dist && scripts/build.js
[runtime] yarn --silent workspace react-compiler-runtime build exited with code 0
[snap] tsc --build exited with code 0
✨ Done in 4.69s.
✨ Done in 9.46s.
yarn workspaces run build 9.70s user 0.99s system 103% cpu 10.329 total
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/31963).
* #31964
* __->__ #31963
* #31962
Updates the prettier config to format all `.ts` and `.tsx` files in the
repo using the existing defaults and removing overrides.
The first commit in this PR contains the config changes, the second is
just the result of running `yarn prettier-all`.
user's pipeline
When the user app has a babel.config file that is missing the compiler,
strange things happen as babel does some strange merging of options from
the user's config and in various callsites like in our eslint rule and
healthcheck script. To minimize odd behavior, we default to not reading
the user's babel.config
Fixes#29135
ghstack-source-id: d6fdc43c5c
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29211
After this is merged, I'll add it to .git-blame-ignore-revs. I can't do
it now as the hash will change after ghstack lands this stack.
ghstack-source-id: 054ca869b7
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29214
## Summary
Closes#29130
## How did you test this change?
Run the healthcheck in the compiler playground and the nodejs.org repo
for the next config with a `.mjs` extension. Sanity with Vite React
template.
Signed-off-by: abizek <abishekilango@protonmail.com>
Previously, we only checked for StrictMode by searching for
`<StrictMode>` but we should also check for the namespaced version,
`<React.StrictMode>`.
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/29075
Don't really have time to implement the react-compiler/healthcheck
version of this script, so for now i propose we just publish this as
react-compiler-healthcheck
the command for running this would be
```
$ npx react-compiler-healthcheck --src 'whatever/**/*.*'
```
ghstack-source-id: e2c443a912
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-forget/pull/2956
