Modules that belong to one fork should not import modules that belong to
the other fork.
Helps make sure you correctly update imports when syncing changes across
implementations.
Also could help protect against code size regressions that might happen
if one of the forks accidentally depends on two copies of the same
module.
* Replace all warning/lowPriWarning with console calls
* Replace console.warn/error with a custom wrapper at build time
* Fail the build for console.error/warn() where we can't read the stack
* prep for codemod
* prep warnings
* rename lint rules
* codemod for ifs
* shim www functions
* Handle more cases in the transform
* Thanks De Morgan
* Run the codemod
* Delete the transform
* Fix up confusing conditions manually
* Fix up www shims to match expected API
* Also check for low-pri warning in the lint rule
* Replace Babel plugin with an ESLint plugin
* Fix ESLint rule violations
* Move shared conditions higher
* Test formatting nits
* Tweak ESLint rule
* Bugfix: inside else branch, 'if' tests are not satisfactory
* Use a stricter check for exactly if (__DEV__)
This makes it easier to see what's going on and matches dominant style in the codebase.
* Fix remaining files after stricter check
* Don't bother including `unstable_` in error
The method names don't get stripped out of the production bundles
because they are passed as arguments to the error decoder.
Let's just always use the unprefixed APIs in the messages.
* Set up experimental builds
The experimental builds are packaged exactly like builds in the stable
release channel: same file structure, entry points, and npm package
names. The goal is to match what will eventually be released in stable
as closely as possible, but with additional features turned on.
Versioning and Releasing
------------------------
The experimental builds will be published to the same registry and
package names as the stable ones. However, they will be versioned using
a separate scheme. Instead of semver versions, experimental releases
will receive arbitrary version strings based on their content hashes.
The motivation is to thwart attempts to use a version range to match
against future experimental releases. The only way to install or depend
on an experimental release is to refer to the specific version number.
Building
--------
I did not use the existing feature flag infra to configure the
experimental builds. The reason is because feature flags are designed
to configure a single package. They're not designed to generate multiple
forks of the same package; for each set of feature flags, you must
create a separate package configuration.
Instead, I've added a new build dimension called the **release
channel**. By default, builds use the **stable** channel. There's
also an **experimental** release channel. We have the option to add more
in the future.
There are now two dimensions per artifact: build type (production,
development, or profiling), and release channel (stable or
experimental). These are separate dimensions because they are
combinatorial: there are stable and experimental production builds,
stable and experimental developmenet builds, and so on.
You can add something to an experimental build by gating on
`__EXPERIMENTAL__`, similar to how we use `__DEV__`. Anything inside
these branches will be excluded from the stable builds.
This gives us a low effort way to add experimental behavior in any
package without setting up feature flags or configuring a new package.
* Lint rule for unminified errors
Add a lint rule that fails if an invariant message is not part of the
error code map.
The goal is to be more disciplined about adding and modifiying
production error codes. Error codes should be consistent across releases
even if their wording changes, for continuity in logs.
Currently, error codes are added to the error code map via an automated
script that runs right before release. The problem with this approach is
that if someone modifies an error message in the source, but neglects to
modify the corresponding message in the error code map, then the message
will be assigned a new error code, instead of reusing the existing one.
Because the error extraction script only runs before a release, people
rarely modify the error code map in practice. By moving the extraction
step to the PR stage, it forces the author to consider whether the
message should be assigned a new error code. It also allows the reviewer
to review the changes.
The trade off is that it requires more effort and context to land new
error messages, or to modify existing ones, particular for new
contributors who are not familiar with our processes.
Since we already expect users to lint their code, I would argue the
additional burden is marginal. Even if they forget to run the lint
command locally, they will get quick feedback from the CI lint job,
which typically finishes within 2-3 minutes.
* Add unreleased error messages to map
* Use %s in the console calls
* Add shared/warningWithStack
* Convert some warning callsites to warningWithStack
* Use warningInStack in shared utilities and remove unnecessary checks
* Replace more warning() calls with warningWithStack()
* Fixes after rebase + use warningWithStack in react
* Make warning have stack by default; warningWithoutStack opts out
* Forbid builds that may not use internals
* Revert newly added stacks
I changed my mind and want to keep this PR without functional changes. So we won't "fix" any warnings that are already missing stacks. We'll do it in follow-ups instead.
* Fix silly find/replace mistake
* Reorder imports
* Add protection against warning argument count mismatches
* Address review
* Runs a lint rule on tests only that errors if it sees `fdescribe` or `fit` calls.
* Changes `file:` to `link:` for our custom, internal rules (just to simplify updating these in the future).
* Updates `eslint` from 3.10 -> 4.1 and `babel-eslint` from 7.1 -> 8.0 so that we can run this new rule only against tests.
* use different eslint config for es6 and es5
* remove confusing eslint/baseConfig.js & add more eslint setting for es5, es6
* more clear way to run eslint on es5 & es6 file
* seperate ESNext, ES6, ES6 path, and use different lint config
* rename eslint config file & update eslint rules
* Undo yarn.lock changes
* Rename a file
* Remove unnecessary exceptions
* Refactor a little bit
* Refactor and tweak the logic
* Minor issues
* Extract Jest config into a separate file
* Refactor Jest scripts directory structure
Introduces a more consistent naming scheme.
* Add yarn test-bundles and yarn test-prod-bundles
Only files ending with -test.public.js are opted in (so far we don't have any).
* Fix error decoding for production bundles
GCC seems to remove `new` from `new Error()` which broke our proxy.
* Build production version of react-noop-renderer
This lets us test more bundles.
* Switch to blacklist (exclude .private.js tests)
* Rename tests that are currently broken against bundles to *-test.internal.js
Some of these are using private APIs. Some have other issues.
* Add bundle tests to CI
* Split private and public ReactJSXElementValidator tests
* Remove internal deps from ReactServerRendering-test and make it public
* Only run tests directly in __tests__
This lets us share code between test files by placing them in __tests__/utils.
* Remove ExecutionEnvironment dependency from DOMServerIntegrationTest
It's not necessary since Stack.
* Split up ReactDOMServerIntegration into test suite and utilities
This enables us to further split it down. Good both for parallelization and extracting public parts.
* Split Fragment tests from other DOMServerIntegration tests
This enables them to opt other DOMServerIntegration tests into bundle testing.
* Split ReactDOMServerIntegration into different test files
It was way too slow to run all these in sequence.
* Don't reset the cache twice in DOMServerIntegration tests
We used to do this to simulate testing separate bundles.
But now we actually *do* test bundles. So there is no need for this, as it makes tests slower.
* Rename test-bundles* commands to test-build*
Also add test-prod-build as alias for test-build-prod because I keep messing them up.
* Use regenerator polyfill for react-noop
This fixes other issues and finally lets us run ReactNoop tests against a prod bundle.
* Run most Incremental tests against bundles
Now that GCC generator issue is fixed, we can do this.
I split ErrorLogging test separately because it does mocking. Other error handling tests don't need it.
* Update sizes
* Fix ReactMount test
* Enable ReactDOMComponent test
* Fix a warning issue uncovered by flat bundle testing
With flat bundles, we couldn't produce a good warning for <div onclick={}> on SSR
because it doesn't use the event system. However the issue was not visible in normal
Jest runs because the event plugins have been injected by the time the test ran.
To solve this, I am explicitly passing whether event system is available as an argument
to the hook. This makes the behavior consistent between source and bundle tests. Then
I change the tests to document the actual logic and _attempt_ to show a nice message
(e.g. we know for sure `onclick` is a bad event but we don't know the right name for it
on the server so we just say a generic message about camelCase naming convention).
* Inline getTestDocument into test cases
* Remove mention of mock file we do not use
* Remove unused configuration entries
* Move eslint-rules package into the scripts/ folder
