* Rename lowPriorityWarning to lowPriorityWarningWithoutStack
This maintains parity with the other warning-like functions.
* Duplicate the toWarnDev tests to test toLowPriorityWarnDev
* Make a lowPriorityWarning version of warning.js
* Extract both variants in print-warning
Avoids parsing lowPriorityWarning.js itself as the way it forwards the
call to lowPriorityWarningWithoutStack is not analyzable.
* Add Event Replaying Infra
* Wire up Roots and Suspense boundaries, to retry events, after they commit
* Replay discrete events in order in a separate scheduler callback
* Add continuous events
These events only replay their last target if the target is not yet
hydrated. That way we don't have to wait for a previously hovered
boundary before invoking the current target.
* Enable tests from before
These tests were written with replaying in mind and now we can properly
enable them.
* Unify replaying and dispatching
* Mark system flags as a replay and pass to legacy events
That way we can check if this is a replay and therefore needs a special
case. One such special case is "mouseover" where we check the
relatedTarget.
* Eagerly listen to all replayable events
To minimize breakages in a minor, I only do this for the new root APIs
since replaying only matters there anyway. Only if hydrating.
For Flare, I have to attach all active listeners since the current
system has one DOM listener for each. In a follow up I plan on optimizing
that by only attaching one if there's at least one active listener
which would allow us to start with only passive and then upgrade.
* Desperate attempt to save bytese
* Add test for mouseover replaying
We need to check if the "relatedTarget" is mounted due to how the old
event system dispatches from the "out" event.
* Fix for nested boundaries and suspense in root container
This is a follow up to #16673 which didn't have a test because it wasn't
observable yet. This shows that it had a bug.
* Rename RESPONDER_EVENT_SYSTEM to PLUGIN_EVENT_SYSTEM
* prevent firefox marking required textareas invalid
Bug was caused by an IE10/IE11 bugfix dealing with the placeholder attribute and textContent. Solved by avoiding the IE bugfix when textContent was empty.
Closes#16402
* more explicit conditional check for textContent
re: @philipp-spiess code review
* clarify textarea test fixture's expected result
better describe the behavior we are testing for
re: @philipp-spiess code review
* Add trusted types to react on client side
* Implement changes according to review
* Remove support for trusted URLs, change TrustedTypes to trustedTypes
* Add support for deprecated trusted URLs
* Apply PR suggesstions
* Warn only once, remove forgotten check, put it behind a flag
* Move comment
* Fix PR comments
* Fix html toString concatenation
* Fix forgotten else branch
* Fix PR comments
If we find a Container that might mean that we're on a node that is inside
a Suspense boundary that is directly inside the Container root.
Imagine the div is a Container and the span is a dehydrated instance:
```
<div>
<!--$-->
<span />
<!--/$-->
</div>
```
There's no way to tests this yet since I'm not actually utilizing
the return value yet.
The solution is to just use the same path to check for a Suspense boundary
as if we find a parent instance.
* Don't invoke listeners on parent of dehydrated event target
* Move Suspense boundary check to getClosestInstanceFromNode
Now getClosestInstanceFromNode can return either a host component,
host text component or suspense component when the suspense
component is dehydrated.
We then use that to ignore events on a suspense component.
* Attach the HostRoot fiber to the DOM container
This lets us detect if an event happens on this root's subtree before it
has rendered something.
* Add todo
The approach of checking isFiberMounted answers if we might be in an
in-progress hydration but it doesn't answer which root or boundary
might be in-progress so we don't know what to wait for.
This needs some refactoring.
* Refactor isFiberMountedImpl to getNearestMountedFiber
We'll need the nearest boundary for event replaying so this prepares for
that.
This surfaced an issue that we attach Hydrating tag on the root but normally
this (and Placement) is attached on the child. This surfaced an issue
that this can lead to both Placement and Hydrating effects which is not
supported so we need to ensure that we only ever use one or the other.
* Add todo for bug I spotted
* Cache tags
* Check the ContainerInstanceKey before the InstanceKey
The container is inside the instance, so we must find it before the
instance, since otherwise we'll miss it.
This is a partial replacement for the 'Press' responder:
1. `useTap` is scoped to pointers (no keyboard support). Our current thinking is
that "responders" should be limited to working with pointers, and that they can
be combined with 'useKeyboard' in user-space. For example, we might create a
'usePress' hook in user-space that combines 'useTap' with 'useKeyboard' to react
to both pointers and keyboard interactions.
2. `useTap` cancels the gesture once the pointer moves over an element that is
not within the responder target's subtree. This differs from `usePress` (and
React Native), where the gesture remains active after the pointer exits the
target's subtree and is restarted once the pointer reenters. One of the
drawbacks with the `usePress` behavior is that it requires repeatedly measuring
DOM elements (which can cause jank) to perform hit region tests. `useTap` avoids
doing this and relies on `document.elementFromPoint` only to support the
TouchEvent fallbacks.
3. `useTap` calls `onTapUpdate` when the active gesture's state changes,
`onTapEnd` when the gesture successfully completes. and `onTapCancel` when it
fails. There is no `onTap` callback. `usePress` did not explicitly report back
when the gesture failed, and product developers were confused about the
difference between `onPress` and `onPressEnd`.
4. `useTap` explicitly separates the PointerEvent implementation from the
MouseEvent/TouchEvent fallback.
5. `useTap` has better unit test coverage . All pointer types and the fallback
environment are tested. The shape of the gesture state object is also defined
and tested.
* Refactor a bit to use less property access
* Add test for invoking an event before mount
* Add Hydration effect tag
This is equivalent to a "Placement" effect in that it's a new insertion
to the tree but it doesn't need an actual mutation.
It is only used to determine if a subtree has actually mounted yet.
* Use the Hydration flag for Roots
Previous roots had a Placement flag on them as a hack for this case but
since we have a special flag for it now, we can just use that.
* Add Flare test
The semantics of 'button' on events differs between PointerEvent and
MouseEvent, whereas they are the same for 'buttons'. Furthermore, 'buttons'
allows developers to determine when multiple buttons are pressed as the same
time.
https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#the-button-property
Provides partial support for React.lazy() components from the existing PartialRenderer server-side renderer.
Lazy components which are already resolved (or rejected), perhaps with something like `react-ssr-prepass`, can be continued into synchronously. If they have not yet been initialized, they'll be initialized before checking, opening the possibility to exploit this capability with a babel transform. If they're pending (which will typically be the case for a just initialized async ctor) then the existing invariant continues to be thrown.
* Test that we can suspend updates while waiting to hydrate
* Attempt hydration at a higher pri first if props/context changes
* Retrying a dehydrated boundary pings at the earliest forced time
This might quickly become an already expired time.
* Mark the render as delayed if we have to retry
This allows the suspense config to kick in and we can wait for much longer
before we're forced to give up on hydrating.
If we get an insertion after a boundary, that has not yet been hydrated,
we take our best guess at which state the HTML is showing.
isSuspenseInstancePending means that we're still waiting for more server
HTML before we can hydrate. This should mean that we're showing the
fallback state.
isSuspenseInstanceFallback means that we want to client render something.
That most likely means that the server was unable to render and is
displaying a fallback state in this slot.
Adds tests to ensure that dehydrated components don't consider the force
flag.
* Move dehydrated to be child of regular SuspenseComponent
We now store the comment node on SuspenseState instead and that indicates
that this SuspenseComponent is still dehydrated.
We also store a child but that is only used to represent the DOM node for
deletions and getNextHostSibling.
* Move logic from DehydratedSuspenseComponent to SuspenseComponent
Forked based on SuspenseState.dehydrated instead.
* Retry logic for dehydrated boundary
We can now simplify the logic for retrying dehydrated boundaries without
hydrating. This is becomes simply a reconciliation against the dehydrated
fragment which gets deleted, and the new children gets inserted.
* Remove dehydrated from throw
Instead we use the regular Suspense path. To save code, we attach retry
listeners in the commit phase even though technically we don't have to.
* Pop to nearest Suspense
I think this is right...?
* Popping hydration state should skip past the dehydrated instance
* Split mount from update and special case suspended second pass
The DidCapture flag isn't used consistently in the same way. We need
further refactor for this.
* Reorganize update path
If we remove the dehydration status in the first pass and then do a second
pass because we suspended, then we need to continue as if it didn't
previously suspend. Since there is no fragment child etc.
However, we must readd the deletion.
* Schedule context work on the boundary and not the child
* Warn for Suspense hydration in legacy mode
It does a two pass render that client renders the content.
* Rename DehydratedSuspenseComponent -> DehydratedFragment
This now doesn't represent a suspense boundary itself. Its parent does.
This Fiber represents the fragment around the dehydrated content.
* Refactor returns
Avoids the temporary mutable variables. I kept losing track of them.
* Add a comment explaining the type.
Placing it in the type since that's the central point as opposed to spread
out.
These were discovered by @SimenB in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/16332. We weren't making actual assertions on some values. This PR makes the assertions, and fixes the tests.
In a previous version of act(), we used a dummy dom element to flush effects. This doesn't need to exist anymore, and this PR removes it. The warning doesn't need to be there either (React will fire a wrong renderer act warning if needed).
When React detects a deprectated/unsafe lifecycle method, the warning points to a page with more details on the why/what of the warning. However, the actual link (https://fb.me/react-async-component-lifecycle-hooks) uses the phrase "lifecycle-hooks" which is confusing since it doesn't have anything to do with hooks. This PR changes the link to something less confusing - https://fb.me/react-unsafe-component-lifecycles.
