Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sebastian Markbåge
ab859e31be
[Flight] Build Node.js Web Streams builds for Turbopack and Parcel (#33457)
Same as #33456 and #33442 but for Turbopack and Parcel.
2025-06-06 11:07:40 -04:00
Josh Story
8b08ee08a1
[Flight] reorganize code for forked entrypoints (#30702)
This commit updates the file locations and bulid configurations for
flight in preparation for new static entrypoints. This follows a
structure similar to Fizz which has a unified build but exports methods
from different top level entrypoints. This PR doesn't actually add the
new top level entrypoints however, that will arrive in a later update.
2024-08-14 18:10:40 -07:00
Sebastian Markbåge
60144a04da
Split out Edge and Node implementations of the Flight Client (#26187)
This splits out the Edge and Node implementations of Flight Client into
their own implementations. The Node implementation now takes a Node
Stream as input.

I removed the bundler config from the Browser variant because you're
never supposed to use that in the browser since it's only for SSR.
Similarly, it's required on the server. This also enables generating a
SSR manifest from the Webpack plugin. This is necessary for SSR so that
you can reverse look up what a client module is called on the server.

I also removed the option to pass a callServer from the server. We might
want to add it back in the future but basically, we don't recommend
calling Server Functions from render for initial render because if that
happened client-side it would be a client-side waterfall. If it's never
called in initial render, then it also shouldn't ever happen during SSR.
This might be considered too restrictive.

~This also compiles the unbundled packages as ESM. This isn't strictly
necessary because we only need access to dynamic import to load the
modules but we don't have any other build options that leave
`import(...)` intact, and seems appropriate that this would also be an
ESM module.~ Went with `import(...)` in CJS instead.
2023-02-21 13:18:24 -05:00
Sebastian Markbåge
189f70e17b
Create a bunch of custom webpack vs unbundled node bundles (#26172)
We currently have an awkward set up because the server can be used in
two ways. Either you can have the server code prebundled using Webpack
(what Next.js does in practice) or you can use an unbundled Node.js
server (what the reference implementation does).

The `/client` part of RSC is actually also available on the server when
it's used as a consumer for SSR. This should also be specialized
depending on if that server is Node or Edge and if it's bundled or
unbundled.

Currently we still assume Edge will always be bundled since we don't
have an interceptor for modules there.

I don't think we'll want to support this many combinations of setups for
every bundler but this might be ok for the reference implementation.

This PR doesn't actually change anything yet. It just updates the
plumbing and the entry points that are built and exposed. In follow ups
I'll fork the implementation and add more features.

---------

Co-authored-by: dan <dan.abramov@me.com>
2023-02-16 11:01:52 -05:00