* Updates inside controlled events (onChange) are sync even in async mode
This guarantees the DOM is in a consistent state before we yield back
to the browser.
We'll need to figure out a separate strategy for other
interactive events.
* Don't rely on flushing behavior of public batchedUpdates implementation
Flush work as an explicit step at the end of the event, right before
restoring controlled state.
* Interactive updates
At the beginning of an interactive browser event (events that fire as
the result of a user interaction, like a click), check for pending
updates that were scheduled in a previous interactive event. Flush the
pending updates synchronously so that the event handlers are up-to-date
before responding to the current event.
We now have three classes of events:
- Controlled events. Updates are always flushed synchronously.
- Interactive events. Updates are async, unless another a subsequent
event is fired before it can complete, as described above. They are
also slightly higher priority than a normal async update.
- Non-interactive events. These are treated as normal, low-priority
async updates.
* Flush lowest pending interactive update time
Accounts for case when multiple interactive updates are scheduled at
different priorities. This can happen when an interactive event is
dispatched inside an async subtree, and there's an event handler on
an ancestor that is outside the subtree.
* Update comment about restoring controlled components
* Convert EventPlugin{Hub,Registry} to named exports
* Convert EventPluginUtils to named exports
* Convert EventPropagators to named exports
* Convert ReactControlledComponent to named exports
* Convert ReactGenericBatching to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeRTComponentTree to named exports
* Convert FallbackCompositionState to named exports
* Convert ReactEventEmitterMixin to named exports
* Convert ReactBrowserEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMEventListener to named exports
* Convert DOMMarkupOperations to named exports
* Convert DOMProperty to named exports
* Add suppression for existing Flow violation
Flow didn't see it before.
* Update sizes
* Update transforms to handle ES modules
* Update Jest to handle ES modules
* Convert react package to ES modules
* Convert react-art package to ES Modules
* Convert react-call-return package to ES Modules
* Convert react-test-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-cs-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-rt-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-noop-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-dom/server to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/{client,events,test-utils} to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/shared to ES modules
* Convert react-native-renderer to ES modules
* Convert react-reconciler to ES modules
* Convert events to ES modules
* Convert shared to ES modules
* Remove CommonJS support from transforms
* Move ReactDOMFB entry point code into react-dom/src
This is clearer because we can use ES imports in it.
* Fix Rollup shim configuration to work with ESM
* Fix incorrect comment
* Exclude external imports without side effects
* Fix ReactDOM FB build
* Remove TODOs I don’t intend to fix yet
* Use relative paths in packages/react
* Use relative paths in packages/react-art
* Use relative paths in packages/react-cs
* Use relative paths in other packages
* Fix as many issues as I can
This uncovered an interesting problem where ./b from package/src/a would resolve to a different instantiation of package/src/b in Jest.
Either this is a showstopper or we can solve it by completely fobbidding remaining /src/.
* Fix all tests
It seems we can't use relative requires in tests anymore. Otherwise Jest becomes confused between real file and symlink.
https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/3830
This seems bad... Except that we already *don't* want people to create tests that import individual source files.
All existing cases of us doing so are actually TODOs waiting to be fixed.
So perhaps this requirement isn't too bad because it makes bad code looks bad.
Of course, if we go with this, we'll have to lint against relative requires in tests.
It also makes moving things more painful.
* Prettier
* Remove @providesModule
* Fix remaining Haste imports I missed earlier
* Fix up paths to reflect new flat structure
* Fix Flow
* Fix CJS and UMD builds
* Fix FB bundles
* Fix RN bundles
* Prettier
* Fix lint
* Fix warning printing and error codes
* Fix buggy return
* Fix lint and Flow
* Use Yarn on CI
* Unbreak Jest
* Fix lint
* Fix aliased originals getting included in DEV
Shouldn't affect correctness (they were ignored) but fixes DEV size regression.
* Record sizes
* Fix weird version in package.json
* Tweak bundle labels
* Get rid of output option by introducing react-dom/server.node
* Reconciler should depend on prop-types
* Update sizes last time
