* Update tests to not warn due to moved PropTypes and shallowRenderer
We added some warnings in v15.5 for calling `React.PropTypes` and
calling the shallow renderer from the wrong place. These warnings were
causing test failures, and now they are fixed.
Most of these were for the `React.PropTypes` change.
* tweak from running prettier
* Final tweaks to get tests passing
**what is the change?:**
Updated 'PropTypes' and 'shallow renderer' syntax in a couple more
places to get tests passing.
**why make this change?:**
In order to verify any changes to the 15.6 and 15.* branches in general
we should have tests passing.
**test plan:**
`npm run test`
**issue:**
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/9410
* devDependencies: add core-js and es6-symbol polyfill for tests
* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)
* Add npm v4.0.0 support (#8082)
* Add support for node v7 (#8135)
* Upgrade ESLint and dependencies, fix new lint errors, switch Travis to Yarn (#8309)
* Update ESLint to 3.10.2
Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value.
Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow.
* Update yarn.lock after the eslint update.
* Fix all new eslint failures
Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline.
* Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm
* Update all Jest packages to 17.x (#8327)
* Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms
* Remove the caching
Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary. The bottleneck is executors, not build time.
* Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner
* Regenerate yarn lockfile
* Update Flow to 0.37.0 (#8608)
Nothing really changes.
* Update to Jest 18 (#8621)
* mockImpl -> mockImplementation
D4329549
* Fixed linting errors
* circle.yml and circleci scripts
* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)
* Fixed flow errors
* Updated shrinkwrap
* Removed unnecessary change
* Added jest --runInBand flag
* Removed ReactDOMFiber changes
* took codes.json from the 15-dev branch
* fixed react:extract-errors task in gulpfile
* generated error codes
* Revert "generated error codes"
This reverts commit b8f3aeed9d8f0d469edd5f6623fa6090930594d8.
* Added a README for the error code system
This should be more of a fair A/B test so the timings aren't affected by having different load on your system when testing the two alternatives.
(cherry picked from commit c0007d56e9)
* Introduce facts-tracker
We want to be able to track various things like number of files that are flowified, number of tests passing with Fiber...
This introduces a tool that lets you do that. The API is very simple, you execute the script with a list of tuples [key value] and it's going to create a `facts` branch and put a txt file for each fact and values over time.
```
node scripts/facts-tracker/index.js \
"flow-files" "$COUNT_WITH_FLOW/$COUNT_ALL_FILES"
```
Test Plan:
This is tricky to test because Travis only exposes the private variables (github token) when it processes a committed file and not on branches. The reason is that otherwise anyone could send a pull requests that does `echo $GITHUB_TOKEN` and steal your token.
Given this constraint, I did all the work using two of my repos:
- https://github.com/vjeux/facts-tracker
- https://github.com/vjeux/facts-tracker-test
and am sending this pull request that should work as is /fingers crossed/, but we won't be able to test it out until it is committed.
Note that once this lands, I'm going to kill those two repos.
* Update with all the suggested changes
* Branch on a flow type in travis.yml
* Use $GITHUB_TOKEN
* properly escape it
(cherry picked from commit dbd9c4b205)
We currently write all our tests against the DOM implementation.
I need a way to run the Fiber tests against it. But I don't want
to take on any package dependencies on Fiber modules yet.
There's a problem with jest right now where you can't globally
mock modules that already exist. So I have to add a global call
to jest.mock.
Luckily we already have a way to test the useCreateElement paths
using a feature flag. I won't activate this flag in travis until
it passes, but the idea is to run all three variants in travis.
I'm not sure that invoking rAF and rIC synchronously is the best
way to test this since it doesn't capture the backwards
compatibility aspect. I.e. the fact that people might be relying
on the synchronous nature in real apps too. It's a start.
Ideally, jest would have these built-in.
(cherry picked from commit c06a68a10b)
Previously, the extract-components script would create the same number of layers of composites as the page it captures, but it would output a new class for each time any composite is used (since we don't want to replicate all the component logic).
I changed the script to output a single type for each type in the input -- and each generated component takes an index for which output it should return. This should be closer to how the original code behaves, especially with respect to VM function call lookups where the amount of polymorphism makes a difference.
I re-recorded the benchmarks with the new scripts. They run significantly faster:
```
Comparing old.txt (control) vs new.txt (test)
Significant differences marked by ***
% change from control to test, with 99% CIs:
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_jsc_jit
% change: -41.73% [-43.37%, -40.09%] ***
means: 39.3191 (control), 22.9127 (test)
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_jsc_nojit
% change: -44.24% [-46.69%, -41.80%] ***
means: 45.8646 (control), 25.5764 (test)
* ssr_pe_cold_ms_node
% change: -45.61% [-47.38%, -43.85%] ***
means: 90.1118 (control), 49.0116 (test)
```
This is probably in part due to the changes here, but also the page I captured has changed somewhat in the meantime and there seem to be slightly fewer components in the hierarchy, so they're not really comparable. But going forward we can use this benchmark which should be more accurate. I also included an identical copy that uses stateless functional components so we can test optimizations to those later.
(cherry picked from commit e5513eceff)
Test Plan: Changed the preprocessor to log the output of babel.transform and saw
```
var _jsxFileName = 'src/isomorphic/modern/element/__tests__/ReactJSXElementValidator-test.js';
```
in the resulting output, instead of an absolute path.
(cherry picked from commit 6afd51061a)
Running this is left as an exercise for the reader, since my measure.py isn't designed for this at present. But something like this might work:
```diff
diff --git a/scripts/bench/measure.py b/scripts/bench/measure.py
index 4cedf47..627ec97 100755
--- a/scripts/bench/measure.py
+++ b/scripts/bench/measure.py
@@ -79,15 +79,12 @@ def _measure_ssr_ms(engine, react_path, bench_name, bench_path, measure_warm):
if (typeof React !== 'object') throw new Error('React not laoded');
report('factory_ms', END - START);
- globalEval(readFile(ENV.bench_path));
- if (typeof Benchmark !== 'function') {
- throw new Error('benchmark not loaded');
- }
+ globalEval("bm = (function(){" + readFile("bench-createclass-madman.js") + "})");
+ bm();
var START = now();
- var html = React.renderToString(React.createElement(Benchmark));
- html.charCodeAt(0); // flatten ropes
+ bm();
var END = now();
- report('ssr_' + ENV.bench_name + '_cold_ms', END - START);
+ report('cc_' + ENV.bench_name + '_cold_ms', END - START);
var warmup = ENV.measure_warm ? 80 : 0;
var trials = ENV.measure_warm ? 40 : 0;
@@ -119,7 +116,7 @@ def _main():
return 1
react_path = sys.argv[1]
- trials = 30
+ trials = 60
sys.stderr.write("Measuring SSR for PE benchmark (%d trials)\n" % trials)
for i in range(trials):
for engine in [
@@ -132,7 +129,7 @@ def _main():
sys.stderr.flush()
sys.stderr.write("\n")
- trials = 3
+ trials = 0#3
sys.stderr.write("Measuring SSR for PE with warm JIT (%d slow trials)\n" % trials)
for i in range(trials):
for engine in [
```
