mirror of
https://github.com/zebrajr/pytorch.git
synced 2025-12-06 12:20:52 +01:00
Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45264 Context for why we are porting to gtest in: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45018. This PR completes the process of porting and removes unused files/macros. Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: ZolotukhinM Differential Revision: D23901392 Pulled By: suo fbshipit-source-id: 89526890e1a49462f3f77718f4ee273c5bc578ba
98 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
98 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "test/cpp/jit/test_utils.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "torch/csrc/jit/passes/common_subexpression_elimination.h"
|
|
#include "torch/csrc/jit/passes/utils/subgraph_utils.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace torch {
|
|
namespace jit {
|
|
|
|
TEST(SubgraphUtilsTest, Basic) {
|
|
auto graph = build_lstm();
|
|
EliminateCommonSubexpression(graph);
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Node*> originalNodes(
|
|
graph->nodes().begin(), graph->nodes().end());
|
|
|
|
// Merge everything into a single subgraph
|
|
bool first = true;
|
|
Node* subgraph;
|
|
for (auto it = graph->nodes().rbegin(); it != graph->nodes().rend();) {
|
|
if (first) {
|
|
subgraph = SubgraphUtils::createSingletonSubgraph(
|
|
*it, prim::DifferentiableGraph);
|
|
it = ++subgraph->reverseIterator();
|
|
first = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SubgraphUtils::mergeNodeIntoSubgraph(*it, subgraph);
|
|
it = ++subgraph->reverseIterator();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Unmerge and compare with original node listing
|
|
SubgraphUtils::unmergeSubgraph(subgraph);
|
|
EliminateCommonSubexpression(graph);
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Node*> newNodes(graph->nodes().begin(), graph->nodes().end());
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(originalNodes.size(), newNodes.size());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(SubgraphUtilsTest, Vmap) {
|
|
auto graph = std::make_shared<Graph>();
|
|
|
|
std::unordered_map<std::string, Value*> parse_map;
|
|
parseIR(
|
|
R"IR(
|
|
graph(%a : Tensor, %b : Tensor, %c : Tensor):
|
|
%x : Tensor = aten::tanh(%a)
|
|
%y : Tensor = aten::mul(%a, %b)
|
|
|
|
%p : Tensor = aten::div(%c, %b)
|
|
%q : Tensor = aten::mul(%p, %a)
|
|
return (%x, %y, %q))IR",
|
|
&*graph,
|
|
parse_map);
|
|
|
|
std::unordered_map<Value*, Value*> vmap1;
|
|
|
|
Node* subgraph1 = SubgraphUtils::createSingletonSubgraph(
|
|
parse_map.at("y")->node(), prim::DifferentiableGraph);
|
|
SubgraphUtils::mergeNodeIntoSubgraph(
|
|
parse_map.at("x")->node(), subgraph1, vmap1);
|
|
// vmap should have two entries: a mapping for the '%x' value - the output of
|
|
// the node we merged in, and a mapping for the '%a' value - the input of the
|
|
// node.
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(vmap1.size(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Check that after mergeNodeIntoSubgraph we can still access the node
|
|
// corresponding to the original node "%x = aten::tanh(%a)".
|
|
//
|
|
// Note that parse_map["x"] points to a destroyed Value after the
|
|
// mergeNodeIntoSubgraph call - we cannot access its content anymore, but
|
|
// still can use it as a key in the value map to find the value it was moved
|
|
// to.
|
|
Node* new_tanh = vmap1.at(parse_map.at("x"))->node();
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(new_tanh->kind() == aten::tanh);
|
|
|
|
Node* subgraph2 = SubgraphUtils::createSingletonSubgraph(
|
|
parse_map["q"]->node(), prim::DifferentiableGraph);
|
|
SubgraphUtils::mergeNodeIntoSubgraph(parse_map.at("p")->node(), subgraph2);
|
|
|
|
std::unordered_map<Value*, Value*> vmap2;
|
|
Value* new_tanh_out = new_tanh->output();
|
|
SubgraphUtils::mergeNodeIntoSubgraph(subgraph1, subgraph2, vmap2);
|
|
// vmap should have 6 entries, since we moved 4 values into the graph (the
|
|
// values correspond to the original values '%a', '%b', '%x', and '%y').
|
|
// and we map the node outputs for '%x' and '%y'
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(vmap2.size(), 6);
|
|
|
|
// Check that after mergeNodeIntoSubgraph we can still access the node
|
|
// corresponding to the original node, even if the toMerge node had a subgraph
|
|
// as well
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(vmap2.at(new_tanh_out)->node()->kind() == aten::tanh);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace jit
|
|
} // namespace torch
|