This is a proof-of-concept of how we could serialize a guard and deserialize it back from the bytes.
The main behavioral change introduced in this diff is on CheckFunctionManager:
```
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph, guards_serialization_mode="save")
guards_state: bytes = check_fn_manager.guards_state
```
Once `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `save`, CheckFunctionManager will return an addtional `bytes` object called `guards_state` which should contain all the information needed for deserializing guards later.
When we load back guards state, we will set `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `load`:
```
output_graph_state = pickle.loads(guards_state)
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph_state, guards_serialization_mode="load")
```
# TENSOR_MATCH
Since we have many types of guards to support, we will break the work into small diffs instead of a single diff to support every guards.
We kick off the work from TENSOR_MATCH from this diff.
# Testing
For each type of guard we will test it like the following:
1. Use guard_filter_fn to select 1 type of guard each time.
2. Call InstructionTranslator directly on an example function to get OutputGraph and CheckFunctionManager (reference guard manager)
3. Serialize->deserialize the output graph state and re-build the guards with a new CheckFunctionManager (loaded guard manager)
4. Throw a set of example inputs to both reference and loaded guard manager to see if their behavior match.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151318
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/anijain2305
This is a proof-of-concept of how we could serialize a guard and deserialize it back from the bytes.
The main behavioral change introduced in this diff is on CheckFunctionManager:
```
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph, guards_serialization_mode="save")
guards_state: bytes = check_fn_manager.guards_state
```
Once `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `save`, CheckFunctionManager will return an addtional `bytes` object called `guards_state` which should contain all the information needed for deserializing guards later.
When we load back guards state, we will set `guards_serialization_mode` is set to `load`:
```
output_graph_state = pickle.loads(guards_state)
check_fn_manager = CheckFunctionManager(code, output_graph_state, guards_serialization_mode="load")
```
# TENSOR_MATCH
Since we have many types of guards to support, we will break the work into small diffs instead of a single diff to support every guards.
We kick off the work from TENSOR_MATCH from this diff.
# Testing
For each type of guard we will test it like the following:
1. Use guard_filter_fn to select 1 type of guard each time.
2. Call InstructionTranslator directly on an example function to get OutputGraph and CheckFunctionManager (reference guard manager)
3. Serialize->deserialize the output graph state and re-build the guards with a new CheckFunctionManager (loaded guard manager)
4. Throw a set of example inputs to both reference and loaded guard manager to see if their behavior match.
Differential Revision: [D72987485](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D72987485/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151318
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/anijain2305
[dynamo] Deprecate enable_cpp_framelocals_guard_eval config variable - default: True
Reading the feature enabling param `enable_cpp_framelocals_guard_eval `at the CPP level is time consuming and slows down the operation of the dynamo as it is done every time the function using this param is called. Reading the value only once at init isn’t an option as it would disable the modification of this param at the runtime. Since this feature is enabled by default for some time and it doesn’t cause known issues, the `enable_cpp_framelocals_guard_eval `configuration param will be deprecated by this commit and its value is hardcoded to true.
Local microbenchmark dynamo_guard_eval.py:
- 931.9 us -> 538.9 us (3.10)
@williamwen42 @jansel @anijain2305
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151008
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
Doing this removes the need of collecting `id` and therefore facilitates serialization. It also improves readability with recompilations. Earlier, recompile message will just show the `id`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149228
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Doing this removes the need of collecting `id` and therefore facilitates serialization. It also improves readability with recompilations. Earlier, recompile message will just show the `id`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149228
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
As title, this enables `nonstrict_trace`-ed function to take in object
whose type has been `pytree.register_constant`-ed, as long as the object
existed outside the `torch.compile` region. This also forces Dynamo to
emit a `EQUALS_MATCH` guard on the object.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148007
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #148385
This is for "for some large number Z, make sure the error messages are readable English." - beginning to audit all `unimplemented` sites and making sure that all messages are at least English-readable. Hints may not necessarily be provided.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/147385
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This PR adds support for list subclasses. Among other things are
1) Tracking the mutations on internal vts like `_dict_vt` and `_list_vt` using sources. This helps identify if there was a mutation in the underlying data structures, and we need to reconstruct it.
2) `UserDefinedObjectVariable` now has a new method - `is_modified` which `side_effect` infra relies upon to check mutations in the underlying vts (like `_dict_vt`).
3) `reconstruction` logic ensures that we use `dict.__getitem__` and `list.__getitem__` methods. This is super important because we don't want to call the overridden `__getitem__` methods.
If this PR is hard to review, please let me know. I can break it into several small PRs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146819
Approved by: https://github.com/StrongerXi, https://github.com/jansel
In hinsight, we never needed a DICT_SUBCLASS_GUARD_MANAGER, because Dynamo would inline through the overridden keys method. In this PR, we ensure that while creating guards and constructing variable trackers, we get the `d.keys()` value by using `dict.keys(d)`. This ensures that we do not call overridden keys method. Therefore, the C++ guard can use `PyDict_Next` directly to check the guards.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143722
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
