Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36232
The purpose of this PR is to replace `at::Generator generator = nullptr` with `c10::optional<at::Generator> = c10::nullopt` all over the code
* #36230 Replace std::shared_ptr with c10::intrusive_ptr in at::Generator
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20943603
Pulled By: pbelevich
fbshipit-source-id: 65d335990f01fcc706867d5344e73793fad68ae6
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36223
Previously #35714
There are a lot of unboxed only defs. We're committed to removing
them at the end of the half but as I am about to do a lot of porting
to the new API, let's get them into a form where they're easy to
remove. This is a new overload impl_UNBOXED that will pass
the function pointer straight to CppFunction::makeUnboxedOnly
I don't attempt to make the _UNBOXED API complete; in particular,
catchall declarations don't get this sugar (as there are very few
of them).
To get some coverage of _UNBOXED API for code analysis, I switched
one of our unboxed tests to be an impl rather than a def. This
shouldn't materially affect coverage.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20929259
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 72d2061b6c8a6afbcd392b47f53ade18de2f9184
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36222
Reland of #35706, with fixes to code analyzer.
It is extremely common to define implementations of operators at a
specific dispatch key, so we add an overload to impl specifically for
this case. I then delete most uses of torch::dispatch
dispatch_autograd call sites can't make use of this overload. So
instead the new preferred way to specify something as autograd is to
pass kAutograd as the dispatch key (short form, analogous to kCPU/kCUDA
which we support today).
I flip flopped about whether or not kAutograd should have the type
DispatchKey or some other type (to help better encapsulate the
DispatchKey enum); this is more direct and I can't think of any
BC problems from this usage.
Some other reorganization I did:
- I renamed all of the worker functions in op_registration to have
a leading underscore and made them private, just to make it more
clear what the public versus private API were (the private API
shouldn't be used by users because it doesn't come with && overloads)
Note that this means I needed to adjust the regex in the
code analyzer, because
- In a few places where I was touching lines already, I replaced
full DispatchKey typed out enums with shorter kFoo names, similar
to kAutograd but I didn't publish these globally.
- Code analyzer now prints a unified diff, and in the other order
(because I tend to think of the diff as reporting how the /new/ result
is different)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20929256
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: c69b803d2b3a1a8aff70e14da33d3adec5239f13
Summary:
The original behavior of pytorch c10d only supports built-in c10d backends, such as
nccl/gloo/mpi. This patch is used to extend the c10d capability to support dynamically
loading 3rd party communication libraries which are derived from ProcessGroup base class.
related RFC is in: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27955
Through this way, user just need specify a 3rd party c10d backend name when invoking
torch.distributed.init_process_group(). The proposed logic will try to load corresponding
c10d backend cpp extension automatically. as for how to develop a new 3rd party c10d backend
through cpp extension, pls refer to test/cpp_extensions/cpp_c10d_extension.cpp
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28068
Differential Revision: D19174838
Pulled By: agolynski
fbshipit-source-id: 3409a504a43ce7260e6f9d1207c00e87471fac62
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35714
There are a lot of unboxed only defs. We're committed to removing
them at the end of the half but as I am about to do a lot of porting
to the new API, let's get them into a form where they're easy to
remove. This is a new overload impl_UNBOXED that will pass
the function pointer straight to CppFunction::makeUnboxedOnly
I don't attempt to make the _UNBOXED API complete; in particular,
catchall declarations don't get this sugar (as there are very few
of them).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20775782
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: c5e804c69f5961c9d4862f6c5dbbe4c524cc32cc
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35706
It is extremely common to define implementations of operators at a
specific dispatch key, so we add an overload to impl specifically for
this case. I then delete most uses of torch::dispatch
dispatch_autograd call sites can't make use of this overload. So
instead the new preferred way to specify something as autograd is to
pass kAutograd as the dispatch key (short form, analogous to kCPU/kCUDA
which we support today).
I flip flopped about whether or not kAutograd should have the type
DispatchKey or some other type (to help better encapsulate the
DispatchKey enum); this is more direct and I can't think of any
BC problems from this usage.
Some other reorganization I did:
- I renamed all of the worker functions in op_registration to have
a leading underscore and made them private, just to make it more
clear what the public versus private API were (the private API
shouldn't be used by users because it doesn't come with && overloads)
- In a few places where I was touching lines already, I replaced
full DispatchKey typed out enums with shorter kFoo names, similar
to kAutograd but I didn't publish these globally.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20775783
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: e45b289e5d1f86c180b24cf14c63cf4459ab5337
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35398
This disables namespaced c10::import which is broken with custom
mobile op builds. This is to help prevent people from accidentally
breaking the custom mobile build in a mysterious way; if they use
the longform version it will work. Fixing the analyzer is tracked
in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/35397
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20680519
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a18ac8df7e72bf399807870beedb828131273e48
Summary:
Reland of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35061 ; removed
the get qualified type name magic from debug strings to work around
MSVC 2017 bug.
Main points of the new API:
- You can register implementations (impl) without having to specify a schema.
- Registrations are commutative, so no matter what order your static
initializers run, you end up with the same end result.
op_registration_test.cpp contains a reasonably comprehensive accounting
for the available API surface
How does this implementation proceed? The basic concept is to relax the
internal invariants of Dispatcher data structures to allow the
possibility that a FunctionSchema is not specified in an Operator.
- DispatchKeyExtractor has an uninitialized state where it doesn't look
for dispatch keys in any arguments of the stack. It can have a
schema (de)registered to itself post facto with
registerSchema/unregisterSchema.
- DispatchTable has a new constructor taking only an OperatorName for
the uninitialized state. It can have a schema (de)registered to itself
post facto with registerSchema/unregisterSchema
- OperatorDef maintains counts of both defs and well as defs_and_impls.
defs_and_impls keeps track of the outstanding impl registrations; you
may have impl registrations but no defs. If there are no defs (no
schema), the operator is not returned by findSchema. A new
findOperatorByName fucntion unconditionally returns the OperatorHandle
even if there's no schema. OperatorHandle::hasSchema can be used
to check if the operator has schema.
- Replaced 'registerKernel' with 'registerImpl', which is the new
interface for directly registering kernels without implementations.
- Because 'registerImpl' no longer requires an OperatorHandle, change
'registerDef' to only return a RegistrationHandleRAII. This is marginally
less efficient (since we're doing two hash table lookups on a registration
now), but this won't matter in the long term, and probably doesn't
matter now either.
- Rename registerBackendFallbackKernel to registerFallback (this exposed
a bunch of places where we're improperly directly interfacing with Dispatcher;
we need to add this capability to the true public API)
- All code generated internal registrations are switched to use the new
API. This includes VariableType registrations (which previously
weren't converted) and the mobile autograd stuff
- Switch the new-style def()/impl() APIs to interact directly with Dispatcher,
rather than indirecting through the old API
- We deleted alias analysis kind merging entirely. As a nod to BC, it's
possible to define a full schema with alias analysis kind, and then
later do another full schema def with missing alias analysis kind, but
the opposite direction is not allowed. We can remove this entirely
following the plan at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/35040
- Schema matching is moved inside the dispatcher, because we might not
be able to immediately schema match at the point of an impl() (because
we don't have the schema yet). To do this, we store the inferred
function schema inside a KernelEntry, so we can check it when we get
the real schema.
- Registered kernel functions now store a debug string which
can be used to more easily identify them. Tests use this to
distinguish between multiple distinct registrations; regular
invocations get only very basic information.
Because we need our static initializers to work no matter what order
they're run, the testing strategy on this PR is quite involved.
The general concept:
- Bind a (very gimped) version of the dispatcher API from Python,
so that we can easily write a more complex testing harness
using expect tests.
- For series of registrations we want to test, exhaustively
test every possible permutation of registrations (and
deregistrations), and show that the intermediate states
agree no matter what path is taken.
- Intermediate states are rendered using a new dumpState()
debugging method that prints the internal state of the
dispatcher. This method may be generally useful for people
who want to see what's in the dispatcher.
- Simultaneously, add a new invariant testing function which
checks that the internal invariants of the dispatcher are
upheld (so we don't have to print internal implementation
details of the dispatcher)
The testing framework found a few bugs in development. For example,
here is a case where we registered schema too early, before checking
if it was valid:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 164, in test_def_impl_schema_mismatch
], raises=True)
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 135, in commute
results=results, raises=raises)
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 83, in run_permutation
.format(ctor_order[:i], op_ix))
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 59, in check_invariants
.format(expected_provenance, actual_provenance)
AssertionError: 'name[16 chars]ema: (none)\ncatchall: boxed unboxed :: (Tenso[18 chars]0)\n' != 'name[16 chars]ema: test::foo(Tensor x, Tensor y) -> (Tensor)[53 chars]0)\n'
name: test::foo
- schema: (none)
+ schema: test::foo(Tensor x, Tensor y) -> (Tensor)
catchall: boxed unboxed :: (Tensor _0) -> (Tensor _0)
: expected from running ctors (1,); actual from running ctors (1,) and then failing to run ctor 0 (did this failure leave the dispatcher in a wedged state? it shouldn't!)
```
There are also C++ smoketests for the API. These tests comprehensively
cover the C++ API surface of the new operator registration API, but
don't check very hard if the API does the right thing (that's what
test_dispatch.py is for)
Some miscellaneous changes which could have been split into other
PRs, but I was too lazy to do so:
- Add torch::jit::parseName (mirroring parseSchema/parseSchemaOrName)
- Add cloneWithName functionality to FunctionSchema
- Unconditionally generate schema registration, even when type_method_dispatch
is a dict. The one exception is for manual registrations....
- Add fallback, CppFunction::makeFallthrough and
CppFunction::makeFromBoxedFunction to public API of op_registration, so we can
stop calling internal registerImpl directly
- Add new syntax sugar dispatch_autograd for registering autograd kernels
- Minor OperatorName cleanup, storing OperatorName in DispatchTable
and defining operator<< on OperatorName
- Refactored the op registration API to take FunctionSchema directly.
We now do namespacing by post facto fixing up the OperatorName
embedded in FunctionSchema. This also means that you can
now do torch::import("ns1").def("ns2::blah") and have the ns2
override ns1 (although maybe this is not the correct behavior.)
- New torch::schema public API, for attaching alias analysis kind
annotation kinds. This meant we had to template up some function
signatures which previously took const char*. There's now a nice
comment explaining this strategy.
- torch::import now takes std::string which means we can use
the namespacing from Python
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35629
Differential Revision: D20724551
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: befa46a1affb4ec4ae1fb39e3564a63695a6ca41
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35061
Main points of the new API:
- You can register implementations (impl) without having to specify a schema.
- Registrations are commutative, so no matter what order your static
initializers run, you end up with the same end result.
op_registration_test.cpp contains a reasonably comprehensive accounting
for the available API surface
How does this implementation proceed? The basic concept is to relax the
internal invariants of Dispatcher data structures to allow the
possibility that a FunctionSchema is not specified in an Operator.
- DispatchKeyExtractor has an uninitialized state where it doesn't look
for dispatch keys in any arguments of the stack. It can have a
schema (de)registered to itself post facto with
registerSchema/unregisterSchema.
- DispatchTable has a new constructor taking only an OperatorName for
the uninitialized state. It can have a schema (de)registered to itself
post facto with registerSchema/unregisterSchema
- OperatorDef maintains counts of both defs and well as defs_and_impls.
defs_and_impls keeps track of the outstanding impl registrations; you
may have impl registrations but no defs. If there are no defs (no
schema), the operator is not returned by findSchema. A new
findOperatorByName fucntion unconditionally returns the OperatorHandle
even if there's no schema. OperatorHandle::hasSchema can be used
to check if the operator has schema.
- Replaced 'registerKernel' with 'registerImpl', which is the new
interface for directly registering kernels without implementations.
- Because 'registerImpl' no longer requires an OperatorHandle, change
'registerDef' to only return a RegistrationHandleRAII. This is marginally
less efficient (since we're doing two hash table lookups on a registration
now), but this won't matter in the long term, and probably doesn't
matter now either.
- Rename registerBackendFallbackKernel to registerFallback (this exposed
a bunch of places where we're improperly directly interfacing with Dispatcher;
we need to add this capability to the true public API)
- All code generated internal registrations are switched to use the new
API. This includes VariableType registrations (which previously
weren't converted) and the mobile autograd stuff
- Switch the new-style def()/impl() APIs to interact directly with Dispatcher,
rather than indirecting through the old API
- We deleted alias analysis kind merging entirely. As a nod to BC, it's
possible to define a full schema with alias analysis kind, and then
later do another full schema def with missing alias analysis kind, but
the opposite direction is not allowed. We can remove this entirely
following the plan at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/35040
- Schema matching is moved inside the dispatcher, because we might not
be able to immediately schema match at the point of an impl() (because
we don't have the schema yet). To do this, we store the inferred
function schema inside a KernelEntry, so we can check it when we get
the real schema.
- Registered kernel functions now store a debug string which
can be used to more easily identify them. There's some best
effort stuff based on __FUNCSIG__ but this is only really
capable of reporting types and not function symbols. Tests
use this to distinguish between multiple distinct registrations.
Because we need our static initializers to work no matter what order
they're run, the testing strategy on this PR is quite involved.
The general concept:
- Bind a (very gimped) version of the dispatcher API from Python,
so that we can easily write a more complex testing harness
using expect tests.
- For series of registrations we want to test, exhaustively
test every possible permutation of registrations (and
deregistrations), and show that the intermediate states
agree no matter what path is taken.
- Intermediate states are rendered using a new dumpState()
debugging method that prints the internal state of the
dispatcher. This method may be generally useful for people
who want to see what's in the dispatcher.
- Simultaneously, add a new invariant testing function which
checks that the internal invariants of the dispatcher are
upheld (so we don't have to print internal implementation
details of the dispatcher)
The testing framework found a few bugs in development. For example,
here is a case where we registered schema too early, before checking
if it was valid:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 164, in test_def_impl_schema_mismatch
], raises=True)
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 135, in commute
results=results, raises=raises)
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 83, in run_permutation
.format(ctor_order[:i], op_ix))
File "test/test_dispatch.py", line 59, in check_invariants
.format(expected_provenance, actual_provenance)
AssertionError: 'name[16 chars]ema: (none)\ncatchall: boxed unboxed :: (Tenso[18 chars]0)\n' != 'name[16 chars]ema: test::foo(Tensor x, Tensor y) -> (Tensor)[53 chars]0)\n'
name: test::foo
- schema: (none)
+ schema: test::foo(Tensor x, Tensor y) -> (Tensor)
catchall: boxed unboxed :: (Tensor _0) -> (Tensor _0)
: expected from running ctors (1,); actual from running ctors (1,) and then failing to run ctor 0 (did this failure leave the dispatcher in a wedged state? it shouldn't!)
```
There are also C++ smoketests for the API. These tests comprehensively
cover the C++ API surface of the new operator registration API, but
don't check very hard if the API does the right thing (that's what
test_dispatch.py is for)
Some miscellaneous changes which could have been split into other
PRs, but I was too lazy to do so:
- Add torch::jit::parseName (mirroring parseSchema/parseSchemaOrName)
- Add cloneWithName functionality to FunctionSchema
- Unconditionally generate schema registration, even when type_method_dispatch
is a dict. The one exception is for manual registrations....
- Add fallback, CppFunction::makeFallthrough and
CppFunction::makeFromBoxedFunction to public API of op_registration, so we can
stop calling internal registerImpl directly
- Add new syntax sugar dispatch_autograd for registering autograd kernels
- Minor OperatorName cleanup, storing OperatorName in DispatchTable
and defining operator<< on OperatorName
- Refactored the op registration API to take FunctionSchema directly.
We now do namespacing by post facto fixing up the OperatorName
embedded in FunctionSchema. This also means that you can
now do torch::import("ns1").def("ns2::blah") and have the ns2
override ns1 (although maybe this is not the correct behavior.)
- New torch::schema public API, for attaching alias analysis kind
annotation kinds. This meant we had to template up some function
signatures which previously took const char*. There's now a nice
comment explaining this strategy.
- torch::import now takes std::string which means we can use
the namespacing from Python
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20680520
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 5d39a28e4ec7c73fe4b1fb2222e865ab65e188f5
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34774
This PR provides pybind11's `type_caster<at::Generator>` that allows mapping `at::Generator` instance returned from user-defined method to python `torch::Generator`, defined as `THPGenerator ` c++ class.
This allows 1) defining custom RNG in c++ extension 2) using custom RNG in python code.
`TestRNGExtension.test_rng` shows how to use custom RNG defined in `rng_extension.cpp`
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20549451
Pulled By: pbelevich
fbshipit-source-id: 312a6deccf8228f7f60695bbf95834620d52f5eb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33093
In #30187 the aliasAnalysis field on operator registration was updated
so that alias analysis could be specified in only some registration call
sites, rather than requiring it be consistently specified in all call
sites. With this change, we can eliminate the requirement that all
registrations specify aliasAnalysis; as long as we know *one* site
specifies the correct aliasAnalysis, we don't have to specify it
any of the other sites.
In this patch, the "one site" is TypeDefault.cpp (previously we only
generated these stub declarations for manually registered functions,
but now we generate the stubs for everything). Then I delete aliasAnalysis
anywhere we register an op for an existing function (which is a lot
of places).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19837897
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 26a7fbc809ec1553da89ea5c0361f3e81526d4c2
Summary:
This pull request has changes for:
1. Enabling a torch module with HIP code to be compiled by cpp_extensions.py
2. Fixes for hipify module to be able to be used by a torch extension
cc: ezyang iotamudelta jeffdaily
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32669
Differential Revision: D20033893
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: fd6ddc8cdcd3930f41008636bb2bc9dd26cdb008
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32495
Background
------------------------------
Previously, ninja was used to compile+link inline cpp_extensions and
ahead-of-time cpp_extensions were compiled with distutils. This PR adds
the ability to compile (but not link) ahead-of-time cpp_extensions with ninja.
The main motivation for this is to speed up cpp_extension builds: distutils
does not make use of parallelism. With this PR, using the new option, on my machine,
- torchvision compilation goes from 3m43s to 49s
- nestedtensor compilation goes from 2m0s to 28s.
User-facing changes
------------------------------
I added a `use_ninja` flag to BuildExtension. This defaults to
`True`. When `use_ninja` is True:
- it will attempt to use ninja.
- If we cannot use ninja, then this throws a warning and falls back to
distutils.
- Situations we cannot use ninja: Windows (NYI, I'll open a new issue
for this), if ninja cannot be found on the system.
Implementation Details
------------------------------
This PR makes this change in two steps. Please me know if it would be
easier to review this if I split this up into a stacked diff.
Those changes are:
1) refactor _write_ninja_file to separate the policy (what compiler flags
to pass) from the mechanism (how to write the ninja file and do compilation).
2) call _write_ninja_file and _run_ninja_build while building
ahead-of-time cpp_extensions. These are only used to compile objects;
distutils still handles the linking.
Change 1: refactor _write_ninja_file to seperate policy from mechanism
- I split _write_ninja_file into: _write_ninja_file and
_write_ninja_file_to_build_library
- I renamed _build_extension_module to _run_ninja_build
Change 2: Call _write_ninja_file while building ahead-of-time
cpp_extensions
- _write_ninja_file_and_compile_objects calls _write_ninja_file to only
build object files.
- We monkey-patch distutils.CCompiler.compile to call
_write_ninja_files_and_compile_objects
- distutils still handles the linking step. The linking step is not a
bottleneck so it was not a concern.
- This change only works on unix-based systems. Our code for windows
goes down a different codepath and I did not want to mess with that.
- If a system does not support ninja, we raise a warning and fall back
to the original compilation path.
Test Plan
------------------------------
Adhoc testing
- I built torchvision using pytorch master and printed out the build
commands. Next, I used this branch to build torchvision and looked at
the ninja file. I compared the ninja file with the build commands and
asserted that they were functionally the same.
- I repeated the above for pytorch/nestedtensor.
PyTorch test suite
- I split `test_cpp_extensions` into `test_cpp_extensions_aot` and
`test_cpp_extensions_jit`. The AOT (ahead-of-time) version tests
ahead-of-time and the JIT version tests just-in-time (not to be confused
with TorchScript)
- `test_cpp_extensions_aot` gets run TWICE by run_test.py, once with
a module that was built with ninja, and once with a module that was
built without ninja.
- run_test.py asserts that when we are building with use_ninja=True,
ninja is actually available on the system.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19730432
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 819590d01cf65e8da5a1e8019b8b3084792fee90
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32704
-Werror is too aggressive check for test cpp extensions because it fails even on deprecation warnings which is are included from core codebase.
Fixes#32136
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19620190
Pulled By: pbelevich
fbshipit-source-id: 0e91566eb5de853559bb59e68a02b0bb15e7341b
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/29161.
I looked a bit at the code changes related to this and think I have all of the use cases of `DeprecatedTypeProperties` covered in the message, but suggestions from someone with more context on this would be very much appreciated :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30281
Differential Revision: D18830818
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 1a7fcee15354ae09e6644577e7fa33bd26acfe20
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28468
We don't need this anymore.
ghstack-source-id: 92595388
Test Plan: unit tests
Differential Revision: D18073339
fbshipit-source-id: d0ef1332c83e47117fe0a5eadc8faedb259cfba0
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28208
Backend extensions should call torch::RegisterOperators, not globalATenDispatch().
If the op is still on globalATenDispatch, then torch::RegisterOperators will do the right thing and forward it to globalATenDispatch.
ghstack-source-id: 92436988
Test Plan: waitforsandcastle
Differential Revision: D17975369
fbshipit-source-id: 0d4bd5e4e5b86e6dcfba527a7d11c25508896ac1
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25914
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D17284083
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 430ac7ea2bd042b1f4bb874e53679d0fde326dec
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/26131
Changes in this PR:
- For each operator with use_c10_dispatcher: True, additionally generate a c10 registration line in TypeDefault.cpp, CPUType.cpp, and other backend files.
- This doesn't change globalATenDispatch yet, the c10 registration is purely additional and the operator calling path doesn't change. A diff further up the stack will change these things.
- Enable the use_c10_dispatcher: True flag for about ~70% of operators
- This also changes the c10->jit operator export because ATen ops are already exported to JIT directly and we don't want to export the registered c10 ops because they would clash
- For this, we need a way to recognize if a certain operator is already moved from ATen to c10, this is done by generating a OpsAlreadyMovedToC10.cpp file with the list. A diff further up in the stack will also need this file to make sure we don't break the backend extension API for these ops.
Reasons for some ops to be excluded (i.e. not have the `use_c10_dispatcher` flag set to true):
- `Tensor?(a!)` (i.e. optional tensor with annotations) not supported in c++ function schema parser yet
- `-> void` in native_functions.yaml vs `-> ()` expected by function schema parser
- out functions have different argument order in C++ as in the jit schema
- `Tensor?` (i.e. optional tensor) doesn't work nicely with undefined tensor sometimes being undefined tensor and sometimes being None.
- fixed-size arrays like `int[3]` not supported in c10 yet
These will be fixed in separate diffs and then the exclusion tag will be removed.
ghstack-source-id: 90060748
Test Plan: a diff stacked on top uses these registrations to call these ops from ATen
Differential Revision: D16603131
fbshipit-source-id: 315eb83d0b567eb0cd49973060b44ee1d6d64bfb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25252
Our model going forward for extensions will be that you will have to
get an allocation of an ID in our system. This is how things work
in practice today; we're just simplifying our underlying registration
since there is no need to have distributed registration.
There are some codemods in this diff:
```
codemod --extensions cpp,h,cc,cuh,py,in --exclude-paths=c10/core/TensorTypeId.h '([A-Za-z]+?)TensorId\(\)' 'TensorTypeId::\1TensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp,h,cc,cuh,py,in 'TensorTypeIds::undefined\(\)' 'TensorTypeId::UndefinedTensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType1\(\)' 'TensorTypeId::CPUTensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType2\(\)' 'TensorTypeId::CUDATensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType3\(\)' 'TensorTypeId::XLATensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType1' 'CPUTensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType2' 'CUDATensorId'
codemod --extensions cpp 'TensorType3' 'XLATensorId'
```
The main hand-written changes are in c10/core/TensorTypeId.h
Other manual fixes:
- aten/src/ATen/core/op_registration/op_registration.cpp - stop using
std::string operator+
- aten/src/ATen/function_wrapper.py - handle a hardcoded TypeId() that
wasn't caught by codemod
- torch/csrc/tensor/python_tensor.h - fix now incorrect forward declaration
of TensorTypeId
- aten/src/ATen/core/op_registration/ - remove out-of-line registration
Differential Revision: D17072001
Test Plan: ossci and sandcastle
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: c641515fd0604c045c54fbb1d6b1b950f45e89d1
Summary:
This PR adds deprecation message for `tensor.data<T>()` (91d94e7d41), and changes all call sites of `tensor.data<T>()` to `tensor.data_ptr<T>()` in PyTorch core.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/24886
Differential Revision: D16924576
Pulled By: yf225
fbshipit-source-id: 0943d6be73245c7c549c78597b74c3b07fa24440
Summary:
We need this to be able to register them with the c10 dispatcher.
The overload names are based on one-letter-per-argument-type.
Script used to change native_functions.yaml and derivatives.yaml: P75630718
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/23532
ghstack-source-id: 87539687
Differential Revision: D16553437
fbshipit-source-id: a1d0f10c42d284eba07e2a40641f71baa4f82ecf
Summary:
re-apply changes reverted in:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/22412
Also change log_softmax to take positional arguments. Long-term we do want the kwarg-only interface, but seems to currently be incompatible with jit serialization.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/22456
Differential Revision: D16097159
Pulled By: nairbv
fbshipit-source-id: 8cb73e9ca18fc66b35b873cf4a574b167a578b3d
Summary:
This change is backwards incompatible in *C++ only* on mean(), sum(), and prod() interfaces that accepted either of:
```
Tensor sum(IntArrayRef dim, bool keepdim=false) const;
Tensor sum(IntArrayRef dim, ScalarType dtype) const;
```
but now to specify both the dim and dtype will require the keepdim parameter:
```
Tensor sum(IntArrayRef dim, bool keepdim=false, c10::optional<ScalarType> dtype=c10::nullopt) const;
```
[xla ci]
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/21088
Reviewed By: ailzhang
Differential Revision: D15944971
Pulled By: nairbv
fbshipit-source-id: 53473c370813d9470b190aa82764d0aea767ed74
Summary:
As part of the Variable/Tensor merge work: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/13638, we make the following changes in this PR:
1. Remove the `Variable::Impl` class and the `DifferentiableViewImpl` class
2. Change all `Variable.data()` call sites to either use `Variable` directly, or use `Variable.tensor_data()`
3. Remove `Variable.data()` API
3. Add `Variable.variable_data()` that matches `tensor.data` in Python API, which creates a new `Variable` that shares the same storage and tensor metadata with the original `Variable`, but with a completely new autograd history.
After this PR, Variable doesn't wrap a Tensor internally anymore, and both Variable and Tensor use the same TensorImpl class as its `impl_`. The only difference is that Variable always has AutogradMeta in its TensorImpl, but Tensor doesn't.
**Note that this PR is BC-breaking in the following use cases:**
**Use Case 1:**
Previously, `x.data = y` works even if `x` and `y` are of different TensorImpl type (e.g. `x` is a CPU dense tensor whose impl is of type TensorImpl, while `y` is a CPU sparse tensor whose impl is of type SparseTensorImpl). However, after this PR, `x.data = y` doesn't work anymore if `x` and `y` are of different TensorImpl type, because the underlying implementation `variable.set_data(tensor)` no longer works if `variable` and `tensor` have different TensorImpl type.
**Use Case 2:**
If a tensor `x`'s `grad` is sparse, accumulating dense gradients to `x` will change the tensor that `x.grad` is pointing to. This is better illustrated with the following example:
```python
params = torch.tensor([1.5, 1.5]).requires_grad_()
with torch.no_grad():
# Change gradient to a sparse tensor
params.grad = torch.sparse_coo_tensor(torch.tensor([[1, 1]]).long(), torch.tensor([1., 1.]))
grad_saved = params.grad
params.backward(torch.tensor([1.5, 1.5]))
assert id(grad_saved) == id(params.grad) # This will fail after this PR
```
The assertion in the last line will fail after this PR, because adding dense gradients to sparse gradients will change the `params.grad` tensor reference.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/17072
Differential Revision: D14075257
Pulled By: yf225
fbshipit-source-id: 0e681df641270dea586042dd26db59f2e76b5957
