Skipped `test_exponential` and `test_multinomial` because simply printing the result of an operator does not constitute a test. The testing framework does not attempt to interpret the output.
Modify `test_print_non_contiguous` to get tensors string representation, which is an equivalent operation
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139009
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This fixes internal crash due to the invalid bufer size computation if sliced API is used
Not sure what was the purpose of
```c++
IntArrayRef baseShape;
if (src.is_view()) {
baseShape = src._base().sizes();
} else {
baseShape = getIMPSAllocator()->getBufferShape(src.storage().data());
}
int flattenedShaped = 1;
for (const auto i : c10::irange(baseShape.size())) {
flattenedShaped *= baseShape[i];
}
```
As flattenShaped could be much easier computed as `[srcBuf
lengh]/src.element_size()`, and even if `srcBuf` is padded it's a safe thing to do.
When someone allocated buffer to hold say uint8 and that view-casted it
to float16, attempt to compute `baseShape` returned sizes of original
tensor in its data type, rather than size in new dtypes
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/137800
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138314
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/DenisVieriu97
Before this changes, tests for operators like `eye` or `triu_indices` were essentially a test that respective CPU operators are stable, as cpu_sample and mps_sample were the same
Moved the logic to `transform_opinfo_sample_to_mps` whicih in addition to copying tensors is also tweaks `kwargs`
Discovered that:
- `torch.randn` and `torch.randint` fall into the same undefined category
- `torch.logspace` is not implemented for MPS
- Allow 1.0 absolute tolerance for all `torch.linspace` calls over integral input as rounding is wrong on the MPS side
- `torch.triu_indices` are not implemented (PR is coming, this is how I've discovered this problem)
- `torch.signal.windows.kaiser` fails because `aten::i0` is not implemented
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137601
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
By even further reducing precisions of imprecise FP16 ops, introducing new BF16_LOW_PRECISION_OPS category and marking BF16 tests as xfail for `divfloor_rounding`, `floor_divide` and `remainder`.
I guess the nature of low-precision results, is that MPSGraph, unlike the rest of the PyTorch does not do accumulation over fp32 for reduction operations
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136987
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
ghstack dependencies: #137070
Before that attempt to run something like
```
% python -c "import torch;dev,dt='mps',torch.int; print(torch.normal(mean=torch.arange(1., 11., device=dev, dtype=dt), std=torch.arange(10, 0, -1, device=dev, dtype=dt)))"
```
Resulted in hard error
```
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: error: 'mps.multiply' op requires the same element type for all operands and results
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: note: see current operation: %5 = "mps.multiply"(%2, %arg1) : (tensor<10xf32>, tensor<10xsi32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: error: 'mps.multiply' op requires the same element type for all operands and results
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: note: see current operation: %5 = "mps.multiply"(%2, %arg1) : (tensor<10xf32>, tensor<10xsi32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphExecutable.mm:953: failed assertion `original module failed verification'
```
After the change, it raises a nice type error
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136863
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: #136754, #136755, #136821, #136822
This was a stupid cast error that caused MPSGraph to crash with the following exception
```
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: error: 'mps.multiply' op requires the same element type for all operands and results
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: note: see current operation: %3 = "mps.multiply"(%2, %arg1) : (tensor<1x3x9x9xf16>, tensor<1xf32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: error: 'mps.multiply' op requires the same element type for all operands and results
(mpsFileLoc): /AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphUtilities.mm:233:0: note: see current operation: %3 = "mps.multiply"(%2, %arg1) : (tensor<1x3x9x9xf16>, tensor<1xf32>) -> tensor<*xf32>
/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/e0873e53-5185-11ef-9a51-9ab6d782fe32/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/mpsgraph/MetalPerformanceShadersGraph/Core/Files/MPSGraphExecutable.mm:953: failed assertion `original module failed verification'
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136822
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: #136754, #136755, #136821
This PR adds a regression test for the issue reported in #122045. I was not able to reproduce on macOS > 13.
~Expect the first iteration of the tests to fail for macOS 13, but pass for 14 and 15.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136084
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Co-authored-by: Nikita Shulga <2453524+malfet@users.noreply.github.com>
Not sure, why `isinf` is a composite op, but those needs to be implemented by hand.
Implementation is a trivial call to
```objc
[mpsGraph equalWithPrimaryTensor:input
secondaryTensor:[mpsGraph constantWithScalar:std::numeric_limits<T>::infinity()
dataType:input.dataType]]
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136689
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
More or less literal copy-n-paste of c33b0580e6/aten/src/ATen/native/cuda/UpSampleBicubic2d.cu (L24)
and
c33b0580e6/aten/src/ATen/native/cuda/UpSampleBicubic2d.cu (L99)
Missing `uint8` implementation mimics CUDA behavior
Initial version coded live in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shi6Kb5xxvk
Later refinements:
- Switch from 2D dispatch to 1D one (to match CUDA behavior)
- Added batch + channel loops
- Fixed scale computation to match align corners behavior
- Added backward implementation
Backward implementation again, mimics CUDA, so it has issues precision issue for `torch.half` as well as a somewhat slow simulation of atomic adds using atomic compare and exchange of the pair of adjacent values, i.e.
```metal
emplate <typename T>
static inline void atomic_add_helper(
device atomic<int>* data,
long offset,
float value) {
auto ptr = data + (offset >> 1);
auto old = atomic_load_explicit(ptr, memory_order_relaxed);
union {
int i;
T t[2];
} val;
do {
val.i = old;
val.t[offset & 1] += static_cast<T>(value);
} while (!atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit(
ptr, &old, val.i, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_relaxed));
}
```
Bump basic Metal language version to 3.0, as it's supported on MacOS13 and that's the first version that has `atomic_float`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136123
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#131865. Addresses the issue seen when running llama v3.1 8B parameter model on MPS backend where the batch matmul output size can go over the 32-bit indexing limit of MPS tensors, causing an assert.
Test case to reproduce the issue with the dimensions encountered in llama v3.1 and verify this fix works around it:
```
import torch
device='mps'
a = torch.randn([32, 20064, 128], dtype=torch.float32,device=device)
b = torch.randn([32, 128, 20064], dtype=torch.float32, device=device)
res = torch.bmm(a, b)
```
Notably the current change only works as long as the individual output matrix in the bmm does not exceed the number of elements 2**32. This lets us split up the computation along the batch axis to avoid going over the limit.
Added a TORCH_CHECK to raise an error if the individual matrix dimensions are too large to handle for this op until a more general workaround tiling the matmuls is available.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133430
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Co-authored-by: Nikita Shulga <2453524+malfet@users.noreply.github.com>
Which fixes BatchNorm behavior for if called with empty tensors on MPS backed. Removed `expectedFailureMPS` in test_nn.py, deleted expected failure in `test_mps.py` and adjusted `skipIfMPS` to `expectedFailureMPS` in BatchNorm2d OpInfo decorator, but restrict it only to the memory format tests
Test Plan: CI + `python3 -c "import torch; print(torch.nn.BatchNorm2d(3, device='mps')(torch.rand(0, 3, 2, 2, device='mps')))"`
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/134423
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134540
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/albanD
