Fixes#115331.
This PR increases the number of valid GPU devices to 512 (from 64) in order to future-proof PyTorch for providers that offer [single nodes with a large device count](https://www.tensorwave.com/). Until now, `DeviceIndex` was an `int8_t`, thus multiple changes were necessary:
- `DeviceIndex` changed to `int16_t`. Updated consumers that assume it to be an `int8_t`.
- Updated bounds checking for `torch.device()` in the Python frontend. Right now, we allow funny things like `torch.device('cpu', 200).index == -56`, which is undefined behavior. I inserted some checks to only allow values between 0 and `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES - 1`.
- Updated the `ArgumentInfo` struct as it hardcodes the device index as 8 bit field [^1]. Might be a breaking change, not sure if users rely on this.
- Introduced `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES` as a replacement for the old `C10_COMPILE_TIME_MAX_GPUS`
[^1]: This field was unsigned, so I guess this has also been undef behavior the whole time? Our default device index is -1, so this always wrapped around to 255 when written to the `ArgumentInfo` struct. When I switched the `DeviceIndex` to `int16_t`, it actually stayed 255 after unpacking from `ArgumentInfo` again, as the `DeviceIndex` was now wide enough that it didn't wrap back to -1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119639
Approved by: https://github.com/cyyever, https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/huydhn
Fixes#115331.
This PR increases the number of valid GPU devices to 512 (from 64) in order to future-proof PyTorch for providers that offer [single nodes with a large device count](https://www.tensorwave.com/). Until now, `DeviceIndex` was an `int8_t`, thus multiple changes were necessary:
- `DeviceIndex` changed to `int16_t`. Updated consumers that assume it to be an `int8_t`.
- Updated bounds checking for `torch.device()` in the Python frontend. Right now, we allow funny things like `torch.device('cpu', 200).index == -56`, which is undefined behavior. I inserted some checks to only allow values between 0 and `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES - 1`.
- Updated the `ArgumentInfo` struct as it hardcodes the device index as 8 bit field [^1]. Might be a breaking change, not sure if users rely on this.
- Introduced `c10::Device::MAX_NUM_DEVICES` as a replacement for the old `C10_COMPILE_TIME_MAX_GPUS`
[^1]: This field was unsigned, so I guess this has also been undef behavior the whole time? Our default device index is -1, so this always wrapped around to 255 when written to the `ArgumentInfo` struct. When I switched the `DeviceIndex` to `int16_t`, it actually stayed 255 after unpacking from `ArgumentInfo` again, as the `DeviceIndex` was now wide enough that it didn't wrap back to -1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119639
Approved by: https://github.com/cyyever, https://github.com/albanD
Related to #103973#110532#108404#94891
**Context:**
As commented in 6ae0554d11/cmake/Dependencies.cmake (L1198)
Kernel asserts are enabled by default for CUDA and disabled for ROCm.
However it is somewhat broken, and Kernel assert was still enabled for ROCm.
Disabling kernel assert is also needed for users who do not have PCIe atomics support. These community users have verified that disabling the kernel assert in PyTorch/ROCm platform fixed their pytorch workflow, like torch.sum script, stable-diffusion. (see the related issues)
**Changes:**
This pull request serves the following purposes:
* Refactor and clean up the logic, make it simpler for ROCm to enable and disable Kernel Asserts
* Fix the bug that Kernel Asserts for ROCm was not disabled by default.
Specifically,
- Renamed `TORCH_DISABLE_GPU_ASSERTS` to `C10_USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT` for the following reasons:
(1) This variable only applies to ROCm.
(2) The new name is more align with #define CUDA_KERNEL_ASSERT function.
(3) With USE_ in front of the name, we can easily control it with environment variable to turn on and off this feature during build (e.g. `USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT=1 python setup.py develop` will enable kernel assert for ROCm build).
- Get rid of the `ROCM_FORCE_ENABLE_GPU_ASSERTS' to simplify the logic and make it easier to understand and maintain
- Added `#cmakedefine` to carry over the CMake variable to C++
**Tests:**
(1) build with default mode and verify that USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT is OFF(0), and kernel assert is disabled:
```
python setup.py develop
```
Verify CMakeCache.txt has correct value.
```
/xxxx/pytorch/build$ grep USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT CMakeCache.txt
USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT:BOOL=0
```
Tested the following code in ROCm build and CUDA build, and expected the return code differently.
```
subprocess.call([sys.executable, '-c', "import torch;torch._assert_async(torch.tensor(0,device='cuda'));torch.cuda.synchronize()"])
```
This piece of code is adapted from below unit test to get around the limitation that this unit test now was skipped for ROCm. (We will check to enable this unit test in the future)
```
python test/test_cuda_expandable_segments.py -k test_fixed_cuda_assert_async
```
Ran the following script, expecting r ==0 since the CUDA_KERNEL_ASSERT is defined as nothing:
```
>> import sys
>>> import subprocess
>>> r=subprocess.call([sys.executable, '-c', "import torch;torch._assert_async(torch.tensor(0,device='cuda'));torch.cuda.synchronize()"])
>>> r
0
```
(2) Enable the kernel assert by building with USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT=1, or USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT=ON
```
USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT=1 python setup.py develop
```
Verify `USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT` is `1`
```
/xxxx/pytorch/build$ grep USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT CMakeCache.txt
USE_ROCM_KERNEL_ASSERT:BOOL=1
```
Run the assert test, and expected return code not equal to 0.
```
>> import sys
>>> import subprocess
>>> r=subprocess.call([sys.executable, '-c', "import torch;torch._assert_async(torch.tensor(0,device='cuda'));torch.cuda.synchronize()"])
>>>/xxxx/pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/hip/TensorCompare.hip:108: _assert_async_cuda_kernel: Device-side assertion `input[0] != 0' failed.
:0:rocdevice.cpp :2690: 2435301199202 us: [pid:206019 tid:0x7f6cf0a77700] Callback: Queue 0x7f64e8400000 aborting with error : HSA_STATUS_ERROR_EXCEPTION: An HSAIL operation resulted in a hardware exception. code: 0x1016
>>> r
-6
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114660
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily, https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/jithunnair-amd
Summary: Rename static tracepoint macros to better describe their targeted usage.
Test Plan:
Same as for D47159249:
Tested the following macros on test scripts with libbpf USDTs:
* `CAFFE_SDT`
* `CAFFE_DISABLE_SDT`
* `CAFFE_SDT_WITH_SEMAPHORE`
Reviewed By: chaekit
Differential Revision: D47727339
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106380
Approved by: https://github.com/chaekit
Summary: Moving static tracepoint macros header to a location where it can be easily used by various PyTorch components (`c10/utill`).
Test Plan:
Same as for D47159249:
Tested the following macros on test scripts with libbpf USDTs:
* `CAFFE_SDT`
* `CAFFE_DISABLE_SDT`
* `CAFFE_SDT_WITH_SEMAPHORE`
Reviewed By: EDG-GH
Differential Revision: D47636258
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/105856
Approved by: https://github.com/EDG-GH, https://github.com/chaekit
- BatchLinearAlgebraLib.cpp is now split into one additional file
- BatchLinearAlgebraLib.cpp uses only cusolver APIs
- BatchLinearAlgebraLibBlas.cpp uses only cublas APIs
- hipify operates at the file level and cannot mix cusolver and cublas APIs within the same file
- cmake changes to link against hipblas instead of rocblas
- hipify mappings changes to map cublas -> hipblas instead of rocblas
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/105881
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
Fix existing CAFFE static tracepoint macros and make them match the latest FOLLY version.
Per anakryiko, current `CAFE_SDT` definition is broken. Quote:
```
"Arguments: -5@-16(%rbp) -4@$100
Arguments: -8@-16(%rbp) -4@$100
#define FOLLY_SDT_IS_ARRAY_POINTER(x) ((__builtin_classify_type(x) == 14) || \
(__builtin_classify_type(x) == 5))
vs
#define CAFFE_SDT_ISARRAY(x) (__builtin_classify_type(x) == 14)
https://github.com/atgreen/gcc/blob/master/gcc/typeclass.h
that 5 is "pointer_type_class"
so you were right, it's just fixed up version of header
I think it should be 8, not 5
5 is the size of literal, but you don't pass string literal as an argument, you pass its address, so actual argument is a pointer, and so 8 byte long
you can try just fixing up CAFFE_SDT macro
```
{F1048035373}
Test Plan:
Tested the following macros on test scripts with libbpf USDTs:
CAFFE_SDT
CAFFE_DISABLE_SDT
CAFFE_SDT_WITH_SEMAPHORE
Reviewed By: RihamSelim
Differential Revision: D47159249
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/105232
Approved by: https://github.com/chaekit, https://github.com/malfet
This PR enables `-Winconsistent-missing-destructor-override` and `-Winconsistent-missing-override`
and fixes violations.
<!--
copilot:summary
-->
### <samp>🤖 Generated by Copilot at 47e904e</samp>
This pull request updates the code of various classes and operators in the `caffe2` and `aten` subdirectories to use the `override` specifier instead of the `virtual` keyword for destructors and other virtual functions that override a base class function. This improves the code readability, quality, and consistency with C++ best practices. It also modifies the `./CMakeLists.txt` file to enable warnings for these specifiers, but disable errors.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/104032
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
