The goal of this PR is to provide a standard way to create simple treespec instances and hide the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
Changes:
1. Add function `treespec_leaf()` to replace `LeafSpec()`.
2. Add function `treespec_tuple(...)` and `treespec_dict(...)` to create treespec for `tuple` / `dict` which is used for `*args` / `**kwargs`. This avoids direct modification to `treespec` instances that rely on the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
3. Change `len(spec.children_specs)` to `spec.num_children`.
4. Change `isinstance(spec, LeafSpec)` to `spec.is_leaf()`.
------
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160843
Approved by: https://github.com/mlazos
when the slice is tensor, we decompose it to .item() call and pass the unbacked symbol to the slice to avoid DDE.
the diff also fix an existing bug in codegen_dynamic_slice_size in the cpp wrapper. a +1 should be -1 making it match
python codegen.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165074
Approved by: https://github.com/Lucaskabela
Some previous PRs have been merged. This PR aims for some **assert** that the users can trigger, and it may be better to turn them into a graph break. Correct me if there are any problems.
* ->#165903(Clean up for graph break)
* #165745
* #165430
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165903
Approved by: https://github.com/williamwen42
Co-authored-by: William Wen <william.wen42@gmail.com>
This `patch.dict(counters, ...` appears to be ancient code that doesn't really seem to be doing anything? It causes issues in nested graph breaks because the patch cleanup clears out the record of the nested graph break. Removing the patch to see if it's even needed in the first place.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/166015
Approved by: https://github.com/Lucaskabela
ghstack dependencies: #166013
At a high level after this fix we get the following nice tlparse https://manifold.edge.x2p.facebook.net/v0/read/tree/logs/bobren/54a57665-7dcc-41e0-8ca7-df01393cd4aa/custom/index.html?bucketName=tlparse_reports&apiKey=tlparse_reports-key&withPayload=1&timeoutMsec=10000
As seen in this doc, previously we were simply dropping assert post
dynamo: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nRQwvw_gWL0_9T3VKb5Ly3_tNI1fgqG9WtryeD6qaZI/edit?tab=t.0
The fixes are a couple things:
1) Actually run the runtime assertion fx graph pass on subgraphs
2) Reset fake mode unbacked memo across speculate subgraph invocations
since the memos actually break the runtime assertion insertions since
calls like nonzero end up not allocating new unbacked symints and
hence not populating pending_unbacked which then results in incorrect
unbacked_bindings on fx_nodes in subgraphs.
This is a first step in hardening runtime asserts across all phases of
the compiler (eager, aot_eager, inductor, etc.). I will continue kicking
tires and fixing bugs until we get runtime assert generations in a good
place. One obvious next step is the added test case in this PR fails
when compiled with inductor with the following error (NB: it fails before this PR as well):
```
File "/data/users/bobren/a/pytorch/torch/_inductor/ir.py", line 659, in get_dtype
return self.dtype
torch._dynamo.exc.BackendCompilerFailed: backend='inductor' raised:
LoweringException: AttributeError: 'ShapeAsConstantBuffer' object has no attribute 'dtype'
target: cond
args[0]: Eq(Mod(s77, 4), 0)
args[1]: Subgraph(name='true_graph_0', graph_module=<lambda>(), graph=<torch._inductor.graph.SubgraphLowering object at 0x7fbcbb11e110>)
args[2]: Subgraph(name='false_graph_0', graph_module=<lambda>(), graph=<torch._inductor.graph.SubgraphLowering object at 0x7fbcbb21cf70>)
args[3]: (s77, TensorBox(StorageBox(
ComputedBuffer(name='buf0', layout=FlexibleLayout('cuda:0', torch.float32, size=[s77, s77], stride=[s77, 1]), data=Pointwise(device=device(type='cuda', index=0), dtype=torch.float32, inner_fn=<function make_pointwise.<locals>.inner.<locals>.inner_fn at 0x7fbcbb2f37f0>, ranges=[s77, s77]))
)))
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165893
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Extend from #165430
* #165903(Clean up for graph break)
* ->#165745
* #165430
One main refractor from the previous PR:
* For assertions like checking `len(args)` or `len(kwargs)`, using `raise_args_mismatch` instead of `raise_type_error_exc`
I am also considering moving `raise_type_error_exc` into `utils.py` for consistency.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165745
Approved by: https://github.com/Lucaskabela
This avoids generation of bad bytecode, leading to really confusing
error. I am not sure why we can't reconstruct cleanly, it has to do with
the input being a dict, while other supported ctx managers take bools.
Fixing that is for another day. Lets give a good error message for now.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/166006
Approved by: https://github.com/yushangdi, https://github.com/SherlockNoMad
Fixes#165911
- Add message to Attribute error so we see ` Developer debug context: raised exception AttributeError(["'Linear' object has no attribute 'w'"])` instead of just `Developer debug context: raised exception AttributeError([])`
- Add stack trace in `ObservedException` so we display the inner most error stack trace back to user code
Output:
```
/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/__init__.py:2641: UserWarning: You are calling torch.compile inside torch.export region. To capture an useful graph, we will implicitly switch to torch.compile(backend=eager)
warnings.warn(
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/variables/user_defined.py", line 1385, in var_getattr
subobj = self._getattr_static(name)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/variables/user_defined.py", line 1256, in _getattr_static
subobj = type(self.value).__getattribute__(self.value, name)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'Linear' object has no attribute 'w'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
torch._dynamo.exc.ObservedAttributeError: 'Linear' object has no attribute 'w'
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/test.py", line 34, in <module>
mod = torch._dynamo.functional_export._dynamo_graph_capture_for_export(Model())(x)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/functional_export.py", line 481, in inner
out = fullgraph_capture(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/convert_frame.py", line 1053, in fullgraph_capture
return _fullgraph_capture_frame(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/convert_frame.py", line 1115, in _fullgraph_capture_frame
raise e.with_traceback(None) from e.__cause__ # User compiler error
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
torch._dynamo.exc.Unsupported: Observed exception
Explanation: Dynamo found no exception handler at the top-level compiled function when encountering an exception. Exception will propagate outside the compiled region.
Hint: Dynamo has detected that tracing the code will result in an error when running in eager. Please double check that your code doesn't contain a similar error when actually running eager/uncompiled.
Hint: It may be possible to write Dynamo tracing rules for this code. Please report an issue to PyTorch if you encounter this graph break often and it is causing performance issues.
Developer debug context: raised exception AttributeError(["'Linear' object has no attribute 'w'"])
For more details about this graph break, please visit: https://meta-pytorch.github.io/compile-graph-break-site/gb/gb0088.html
from user code:
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/functional_export.py", line 171, in forward
res = self._export_root(*args, **kwargs)
File "/data/users/shangdiy/pytorch/test.py", line 31, in forward
weight = self.linear.w
Set TORCHDYNAMO_VERBOSE=1 for the internal stack trace (please do this especially if you're reporting a bug to PyTorch). For even more developer context, set TORCH_LOGS="+dynamo"
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165930
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
Reapply of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163260
AOTI utils expect free function sometimes so adjust export API to handle that, haven't seen any methods getting exported. Some AOTI flows also require we populate dynamo_flat_name_to_original_fqn so i just copy how it is done in eval_frame.py. I also cleaned up how we get rid of export_root and fixed some overcomplicated nn_module_stack handling in export code. The logic is simpler now thanks to @anijain2305 .
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165582
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
