This PR:
* Introduces an ATen op for creating true jagged views from a dense values buffer
* `_nested_view_from_jagged(values, offsets, lengths, ragged_idx, dummy)`
* This ops is implemented on the Python side using torch.library so we can return a subclass instance
* `jagged_from_list()` now uses this instead of the old autograd.Function `NestedViewFromBuffer`
* The latter op is used for non-contiguous JTs returned via `torch.nested.narrow()`
* `dummy` is an awful hack to ensure that `NestedTensor.__torch_dispatch__()` is invoked for our view
* Introduces an ATen op for accessing the `values` component of an NT via a view
* `_nested_get_values(nt)`
* **Removes** the autograd.Functions `ViewNestedFromBuffer` and `ViewBufferFromNested` in favor of `nested_from_values_offsets()` / `nested_from_values_offsets_lengths()` and `nt.values()`, respectively.
* Changes test code to prefer `as_nested_tensor()` over `jagged_from_list()` directly
* Similarly, avoid `buffer_from_jagged()`, preferring `values()`
* Depends on general subclass view fake-ification on the PT2 side (handled solely in previous PRs in the stack)
With these changes, the semantics of jagged layout NTs are such that they are considered a true view of the underlying `values` buffer. This means views of jagged NTs are views of the underlying buffer as well, simplifying some handling.
Differential Revision: [D54269922](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269922)
Co-authored-by: voznesenskym <voznesenskym@gmail.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113279
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR:
* Introduces an ATen op for creating true jagged views from a dense values buffer
* `_nested_view_from_jagged(values, offsets, lengths, ragged_idx, dummy)`
* This ops is implemented on the Python side using torch.library so we can return a subclass instance
* `jagged_from_list()` now uses this instead of the old autograd.Function `NestedViewFromBuffer`
* The latter op is used for non-contiguous JTs returned via `torch.nested.narrow()`
* `dummy` is an awful hack to ensure that `NestedTensor.__torch_dispatch__()` is invoked for our view
* Introduces an ATen op for accessing the `values` component of an NT via a view
* `_nested_get_values(nt)`
* **Removes** the autograd.Functions `ViewNestedFromBuffer` and `ViewBufferFromNested` in favor of `nested_from_values_offsets()` / `nested_from_values_offsets_lengths()` and `nt.values()`, respectively.
* Changes test code to prefer `as_nested_tensor()` over `jagged_from_list()` directly
* Similarly, avoid `buffer_from_jagged()`, preferring `values()`
* Depends on general subclass view fake-ification on the PT2 side (handled solely in previous PRs in the stack)
With these changes, the semantics of jagged layout NTs are such that they are considered a true view of the underlying `values` buffer. This means views of jagged NTs are views of the underlying buffer as well, simplifying some handling.
Differential Revision: [D54269922](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269922)
Co-authored-by: voznesenskym <voznesenskym@gmail.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113279
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
List of changes:
- Replace JVP_NESTING by torch._C._functorch.maybe_current_level()
- Remove all increment nesting functions from wrap_fx_proxy_cls
- fwAD.make_dual receives the dual_level as keyword argument
- Add jvp_increment_nesting, set_fwd_grad_enabled and dual_level context managers to dynamo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119926
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
List of changes:
- Replace JVP_NESTING by torch._C._functorch.maybe_current_level()
- Remove all increment nesting functions from wrap_fx_proxy_cls
- fwAD.make_dual receives the dual_level as keyword argument
- Add jvp_increment_nesting, set_fwd_grad_enabled and dual_level context managers to dynamo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119926
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Reduces the `torch.compile(backend="eager")` for this code
~~~
def fn(x):
for _ in range(10000):
# x = torch.sin(x)
x = torch.ops.aten.sin(x)
# x = sin(x)
return x
~~~
From 18 seconds to 12 seconds.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/121031
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This PR:
* Uses reified ViewFuncs to swap in fake tensors / symbolic SymInts for view replay during subclass view fake-ification
* Enables automatic dynamic on view bases -> fakeifies according to the resultant symbolic context instead of the old "all-static" approach
* Covers the following view types:
* subclass -> dense
* dense -> subclass
* subclass -> subclass
* Dense -> dense views are handled the old way via an `as_strided()` call, as it's likely there is no view func available
Differential Revision: [D54269082](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269082)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118405
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Currently when there is a print/warning in the graph, dynamo graph breaks causing export to fail. However export would like to just skip over these print/warning calls: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/113792.
Additionally there's a torch.compile feature request to "reorder prints" so that instead of graph breaking when hitting prints/logging, we can skip over these prints to create larger compiled graphs, and then print the results out after those compiled graphs: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/93739. This PR also adds the `reorderable_logging_functions` config for users to register logging functions to be reordered (like `print` or a custom logging function). Printout of the bytecode after reordering the prints looks like the following: P914736600
There are some limitations to the printing right now:
* You can only register logging functions, not methods
* Inputs to the logging functions can only be tensors, constants, and format strings
* Inputs to the logging functions which will later be mutated in-place will not be printed correctly
TODO: Add the following tests
* print function with argument of nested data structure;
* print function with argument of nested data structure being updated inside of compile region (this would test if we handle side effect correctly);
* custom defined logging functions with nn.Module or nn.Module attribute arguments;
* custom defined logging functions with submodule input/output as arguments (we need to handle the mapping and fused-out value);
* custom defined logging functions with tensor argument and mutation inside of the function (TBD: this may increase memory usage);
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116106
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
The special-case code for handling SUPPORTED_NODES was producing a guard that looked like:
```
"G['torch'].utils._pytree.SUPPORTED_NODES[<class '__main__.CausalLMOutputWithPast'>].type"
```
resulting in a eval error trying to evaluate the guard.
This change adds a new source type (`ClassSource`) which is given a class type (in this case `CausalLMOutputWithPast`) and attempts to fetch it from its defining module. It then uses that to build the `SUPPORTED_NODES` guards instead of referring to the type directly.
Also added a unit test which fails before this change and passes after.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120798
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
Currently when there is a print/warning in the graph, dynamo graph breaks causing export to fail. However export would like to just skip over these print/warning calls: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/113792.
Additionally there's a torch.compile feature request to "reorder prints" so that instead of graph breaking when hitting prints/logging, we can skip over these prints to create larger compiled graphs, and then print the results out after those compiled graphs: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/93739. This PR also adds the `reorderable_logging_functions` config for users to register logging functions to be reordered (like `print` or a custom logging function). Printout of the bytecode after reordering the prints looks like the following: P914736600
There are some limitations to the printing right now:
* You can only register logging functions, not methods
* Inputs to the logging functions can only be tensors, constants, and format strings
* Inputs to the logging functions which will later be mutated in-place will not be printed correctly
TODO: Add the following tests
* print function with argument of nested data structure;
* print function with argument of nested data structure being updated inside of compile region (this would test if we handle side effect correctly);
* custom defined logging functions with nn.Module or nn.Module attribute arguments;
* custom defined logging functions with submodule input/output as arguments (we need to handle the mapping and fused-out value);
* custom defined logging functions with tensor argument and mutation inside of the function (TBD: this may increase memory usage);
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116106
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
The special-case code for handling SUPPORTED_NODES was producing a guard that looked like:
```
"G['torch'].utils._pytree.SUPPORTED_NODES[<class '__main__.CausalLMOutputWithPast'>].type"
```
resulting in a eval error trying to evaluate the guard.
This change adds a new source type (`ClassSource`) which is given a class type (in this case `CausalLMOutputWithPast`) and attempts to fetch it from its defining module. It then uses that to build the `SUPPORTED_NODES` guards instead of referring to the type directly.
Also added a unit test which fails before this change and passes after.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120798
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
This adds support for backwards hooks that are *both*:
1) Interior to the graph; and
2) Dynamically generated (e.g. lambdas)
We do this by creating a BackwardState object that is used to register the hooks in the forward, then populated by dynamo *after* the forwards runs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120382
Approved by: https://github.com/xmfan
With the current `Dim`-based dynamic shapes API for export, one can express that shapes of different input shapes must be equal by reusing the same `Dim`. However, non-trivial relationships between such input shapes cannot be expressed.
Recently we are seeing more and more examples of code that require this additional expressibility, e.g., where a pair of shapes might differ by one, or a shape might be double another (or simply even).
This PR introduces the concept of a "derived" `Dim`, i.e., a linear arithmetic expression over a `Dim`. By using a combination of `Dim`s and derived `Dim`s to specify input shapes, the desired relationships can be expressed naturally. E.g., a pair of shapes might be `dim` and `dim + 1`, or `dim` and `2*dim`, or even `2*dim` and `dim + 1`.
We extend the current infrastructure that translates `Dim`s to deprecated `dynamic_dim`-based constraints to work with derived `Dim`s. As usual, we raise constraint violation errors when shape guards cannot be verified given a dynamic shapes spec; suggest fixes; and raise runtime errors when future inputs violate the spec.
Importantly, some guards that used to cause forced specializations in the constraint solver because they were deemed "too complex" now do not do so, because they can now be specified as constraints. Since this was what motivated the introduction of a `disable_constraint_solver` flag to some internal APIs, we may not need that flag any more.
Note that shapes of placeholders in exported programs can now contain symbolic expressions and not just symbols.
Differential Revision: D53254587
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118729
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Finally we have this PR to merge allow_in_graph/inline/skip trace rules into ```trace_rules.lookup_inner```, where we can define and lookup trace rules at both function level and file level. Going forward, this is the central place that we define and consulte Dynamo trace rule for any function.
* ```trace_rules.looup``` is the API can return allow_in_graph, inline or skip.
* ```skipfiles.check``` is the API can return inline or skip, since we have multiple places that only do inline/skip check.
* I'll move ```skipfiles.check``` to ```trace_rules.check``` as one of the follow-ups.
* Both functions consulte ```trace_rules.lookup_inner``` to get the tracing rule.
To avoid a single big PR, I left a few items as the follow-ups:
* Remove ```skipfiles.py``` and merge the code into ```trace_rules.py```.
* We do double check in ```symbolic_convert.check_inlineable```, will refactor and simplify it. We should only do inline/skip check before generating ```SkipFilesVariable``` and ```UserFunctionVariable```.
* Rename ```SkipFilesVariable``` as ```SkipFunctionVariable```, since we only handle functions.
* The inline/skip reasons are not logged for some cases, since the new lookup framework doesn't always return inline/skip reasons. I'll refactor loggings to record the inline/skip reason in next step.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118971
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Make variables in dict lazy and remove DICT_KEYS guard.
We build the keys of a dict depth-first and we rely on the guards of
each element in the dict to create the correct guards. This allows us to
remove the rather buggy DICT_KEYS guard and make the guard lazy.
The guards are not completely lazy yet, as we instantiate them in
`_HashableTracker._eq_impl` but it should be possible to make them
truly lazy.
Also, adding new types to the supported types within keys should be less
error prone.
This is marginally less efficient when we graph break, but in turn we
should graph break much less. It also makes the dicts code easier to maintain
(removes `is_hashable_python_var`).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117625
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/peterbell10, https://github.com/anijain2305
ghstack dependencies: #117982, #118098, #117983
The original motivation for MYPYINDUCTOR was a faster type checking configuration that only checked a subset of files. With the removal of `follow_imports = ignore`, we are now able to use dmypy to do fast incremental typechecking, eliminating the need for this.
Perhaps erroneously, when I tee'ed up this PR I elected to delete the `follow_imports = skip` designations in the mypy-inductor.ini. This lead to a number of extra type error suppressions that I manually edited. You will need to review.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118432
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: #118414, #118418
We split install_global_once into two APIs:
- `install_global_by_id(prefix, value) -> name`: installs a global if it hasn't
been installed yet
- `install_global(prefix, value) -> name`: always installs the global (and
generates a unique name for it)
Then, we refactor most callsites of `install_global_unsafe` to one of
the previous. Some callsites cannot be refactored because we create the
global name first, do a lot of stuff with it, and then install it.
This fixes more test flakiness.
Test Plan:
- Existing tests; I can't reliably repro the flakiness
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118100
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/mlazos
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/117851
In tests, we ran into an issue where:
- In frame A, Dynamo would install a global
- We call reset()
- reset() did not delete the installed global due to a refcycle
- In frame B, Dynamo would re-use the same global
- Python gc ran, deleting the installed global, leading to the compiled
version of frame B raising NameNotFound
This PR changes the following:
- module globals are now installed at a per-frame basis.
- renames install_global to install_global_unsafe: if the names are not
unique and end up being re-used across frames, then we've got trouble.
Test Plan:
- I tested that this got rid of the test flakiness locally. I'm not sure
how to easily write a test for this, because I don't actually know
what the refcycle in the above is.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117998
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/anijain2305
