Code refactoring only. We move the wrap_to_fake_tensor_logic out of wrap_fx_proxy for placeholders to provide the invariant that **all graph inputs must set their example values when creating the inputs**. This invariant helps us to identify all the free symbols in the graph in top-level and sub-graphs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138428
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #138345
This reverts commit e688b78791.
We're reverting this because:
1) The original PR (#134872) fixed a bug but caused another one. The
assessment is that the bug it caused is worse than the bug it fixed.
2) it was reverted on the release 2.5 branch, so we want to prevent
divergence
3) The original author is out-of-office for a while so we don't want the
divergence to wait until they're back
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/137891
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Taking inspiration from `GraphModule.print_readable` (aka I copied its [code](17b45e905a/torch/fx/graph_module.py (L824))), I added a `print_readable` to the unflattened module, because it's kind of nontrivial to print the contents of this module.
Example print from `python test/export/test_unflatten.py -k test_unflatten_nested`
```
class UnflattenedModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, x: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
rootparam: "f32[2, 3]" = self.rootparam
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:99 in forward, code: x = x * self.rootparam
mul: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.mul.Tensor(x, rootparam); x = rootparam = None
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
foo: "f32[2, 3]" = self.foo(mul); mul = None
bar: "f32[2, 3]" = self.bar(foo); foo = None
return (bar,)
class foo(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child1param: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child1param
nested: "f32[2, 3]" = self.nested(mul); mul = None
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:79 in forward, code: return x + self.child1param
add: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.add.Tensor(nested, child1param); nested = child1param = None
return add
class nested(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:67 in forward, code: return x / x
div: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.div.Tensor(mul, mul); mul = None
return div
class bar(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, add: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child2buffer: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child2buffer
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:87 in forward, code: return x - self.child2buffer
sub: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.sub.Tensor(add, child2buffer); add = child2buffer = None
return sub
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128617
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17, https://github.com/pianpwk
Taking inspiration from `GraphModule.print_readable` (aka I copied its [code](17b45e905a/torch/fx/graph_module.py (L824))), I added a `print_readable` to the unflattened module, because it's kind of nontrivial to print the contents of this module.
Example print from `python test/export/test_unflatten.py -k test_unflatten_nested`
```
class UnflattenedModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, x: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
rootparam: "f32[2, 3]" = self.rootparam
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:99 in forward, code: x = x * self.rootparam
mul: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.mul.Tensor(x, rootparam); x = rootparam = None
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
foo: "f32[2, 3]" = self.foo(mul); mul = None
bar: "f32[2, 3]" = self.bar(foo); foo = None
return (bar,)
class foo(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child1param: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child1param
nested: "f32[2, 3]" = self.nested(mul); mul = None
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:79 in forward, code: return x + self.child1param
add: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.add.Tensor(nested, child1param); nested = child1param = None
return add
class nested(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:67 in forward, code: return x / x
div: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.div.Tensor(mul, mul); mul = None
return div
class bar(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, add: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child2buffer: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child2buffer
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:87 in forward, code: return x - self.child2buffer
sub: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.sub.Tensor(add, child2buffer); add = child2buffer = None
return sub
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128617
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17, https://github.com/pianpwk
Previously, subgraph input names were whatever the input proxies were,
which were confusing. This PR changes those names to be
whatever the names of the arguments the functions being
speculate_subgraph'ed are. This is best-effort: if we can't figure it
out then we go back to the previous strategy.
Test Plan:
- existing expecttests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130255
Approved by: https://github.com/ydwu4
Taking inspiration from `GraphModule.print_readable` (aka I copied its [code](17b45e905a/torch/fx/graph_module.py (L824))), I added a `print_readable` to the unflattened module, because it's kind of nontrivial to print the contents of this module.
Example print from `python test/export/test_unflatten.py -k test_unflatten_nested`
```
class UnflattenedModule(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, x: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
rootparam: "f32[2, 3]" = self.rootparam
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:99 in forward, code: x = x * self.rootparam
mul: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.mul.Tensor(x, rootparam); x = rootparam = None
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
foo: "f32[2, 3]" = self.foo(mul); mul = None
bar: "f32[2, 3]" = self.bar(foo); foo = None
return (bar,)
class foo(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child1param: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child1param
nested: "f32[2, 3]" = self.nested(mul); mul = None
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:79 in forward, code: return x + self.child1param
add: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.add.Tensor(nested, child1param); nested = child1param = None
return add
class nested(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, mul: "f32[2, 3]"):
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:67 in forward, code: return x / x
div: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.div.Tensor(mul, mul); mul = None
return div
class bar(torch.nn.Module):
def forward(self, add: "f32[2, 3]"):
# No stacktrace found for following nodes
child2buffer: "f32[2, 3]" = self.child2buffer
# File: /data/users/angelayi/pytorch2/test/export/test_unflatten.py:87 in forward, code: return x - self.child2buffer
sub: "f32[2, 3]" = torch.ops.aten.sub.Tensor(add, child2buffer); add = child2buffer = None
return sub
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128617
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17, https://github.com/pianpwk
The `usort` config in `pyproject.toml` has no effect due to a typo. Fixing the typo make `usort` do more and generate the changes in the PR. Except `pyproject.toml`, all changes are generated by `lintrunner -a --take UFMT --all-files`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127126
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
The `usort` config in `pyproject.toml` has no effect due to a typo. Fixing the typo make `usort` do more and generate the changes in the PR. Except `pyproject.toml`, all changes are generated by `lintrunner -a --take UFMT --all-files`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127126
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
ghstack dependencies: #127122, #127123, #127124, #127125
This does not introduce a new test but is tested by checking that all the classes we already have still behave as before now that they don't explicitly disable torch_function.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120632
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Don't require using it as `@requires_cuda()` -> `@requires_cuda` instead No need for the partial function invoked many times
Split out this change from the initial large refactoring in #117741 to hopefully get merged before conflicts arise
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118281
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
For training graphs (when inputs require grad), previously, we would speculate the forward and backward graph to determine if there are any graph breaks, side effect and etc but would not actually use these speculated graphs. We would just insert a call function node on the graph and later rely on autograd's tracing.
This approach does not work for more generalized graphs like graphs that include user defined triton kernels because autograd is not able to do the higher order function conversation.
This PR speculates the forward and backward functions and emits them in a HOF that later gets used via templating mechanism.
While working on this PR, I have exposed some bugs in the current tracing due to trampoline functions losing the source information resulting in incorrect graphs being produced. I have fixed these source information bugs and killed the trampolines.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116897
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/voznesenskym
