I figured these out by unconditionally turning on a no-op torch function
mode on the test suite and then fixing errors as they showed up. Here's
what I found:
- _parse_to failed internal assert when __torch_function__'ed because it
claims its name is "to" to the argument parser; added a name override
so we know how to find the correct name
- Infix operator magic methods on Tensor did not uniformly handle
__torch_function__ and TypeError to NotImplemented. Now, we always
do the __torch_function__ handling in
_wrap_type_error_to_not_implemented and your implementation of
__torch_function__ gets its TypeErrors converted to NotImplemented
(for better or for worse; see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/75462 )
- A few cases where code was incorrectly testing if a Tensor was
Tensor-like in the wrong way, now use is_tensor_like (in grad
and in distributions). Also update docs for has_torch_function to
push people to use is_tensor_like.
- is_grads_batched was dropped from grad in handle_torch_function, now
fixed
- Report that you have a torch function even if torch function is
disabled if a mode is enabled. This makes it possible for a mode
to return NotImplemented, pass to a subclass which does some
processing and then pass back to the mode even after the subclass
disables __torch_function__ (so the tensors are treated "as if"
they are regular Tensors). This brings the C++ handling behavior
in line with the Python behavior.
- Make the Python implementation of overloaded types computation match
the C++ version: when torch function is disabled, there are no
overloaded types (because they all report they are not overloaded).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/75484
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Closes#44459
This migrates the python implementation of `_pad_circular` to ATen and
removes the old C++ implementation that had diverged from python.
Note that `pad` can't actually use this until the
forward-compatibility period is over.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73410
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72871
We do this same trick in the native MHA implementation; backport it for purposes of fair comparison.
ghstack-source-id: 149526858
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D34176090
fbshipit-source-id: 8b578c29c4dcf0d85bae74dfbbb82db9a8f32dc7
(cherry picked from commit fd50170935)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/71720
This PR removes the old warnings for `recompute_scale_factor` and `align_corners`.
Looking at this, I realize that the tests I modified don't really catch whether or not a warning is created for `recompute_scale_factor`. If desired, I can add a couple lines into the tests there to pass a floating point in the `scale_factors` kwarg, along with `recompute_scale_factor=None`.
Let me know how this looks, thanks so much!
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72093
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D33917615
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: e822f0a15b813ecf312cdc6ed0b693e7f1d1ca89
(cherry picked from commit c14852b85c)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61608
See #61544 for an example of issues created by functional wrappers. In this
case, these are directly wrapping the native function with no added
functionality. One exception was `bilinear` which was just missing the default
argument in C++, but was otherwise the same.
I've kept the symbol `torch.functional.istft` because it looks like public API,
but it could just as easily be moved to `_torch_docs.py`.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D31401361
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 162b74d0b2d4f2e5c4834687a94541960cefdd52
(cherry picked from commit 700cd73ca1)
Summary:
Just updated a few examples that were either failing or raising deprecated warnings.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/69816
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D33217585
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: c6804909be74585c8471b8166b69e6693ad62ca7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/68565
This makes it so that we can now vmap over nn.functional.pad (circular
variant). Previously we could not because we were effectively doing
`out.copy_(input)` where the out was created with empty.
This also has the added side effect of cleaning up the code.
Test Plan:
- I tested this using functorch.vmap and can confirm that vmap now
works.
- Unfortunately this doesn't work with the vmap in core so I cannot add
a test for this here.
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D32520188
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 780a7e8207d7c45fcba645730a5803733ebfd7be
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/67574
When adding the optional params for sharded embedding op. Found that we cannot get these params from `__torch_function__` override. The reason is that we don't pass them via keyword arguments. So maybe we want to change them to kwargs?
ghstack-source-id: 143029375
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D32039152
fbshipit-source-id: c7e598e49eddbabff6e11e3f8cb0818f57c839f6
Summary:
This PR adds OpInfo for `nn.functional.conv1d`. There is a minor typo fix in the documentation as well.
Issue tracker: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/54261
cc: mruberry
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/67747
Reviewed By: malfet
Differential Revision: D32309258
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: add21911b8ae44413e033e19398f398210737c6c
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/63435
Adds optional tensor arguments to check handling torch function checks. The only one I didn't do this for in the functional file was `multi_head_attention_forward` since that already took care of some optional tensor arguments but not others so it seemed like arguments were specifically chosen
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63967
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D30640441
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 5ef9554d2fb6c14779f8f45542ab435fb49e5d0f
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/11959
Alternative approach to creating a new `CrossEntropyLossWithSoftLabels` class. This PR simply adds support for "soft targets" AKA class probabilities to the existing `CrossEntropyLoss` and `NLLLoss` classes.
Implementation is dumb and simple right now, but future work can add higher performance kernels for this case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61044
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D29876894
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: 75629abd432284e10d4640173bc1b9be3c52af00
Summary:
There is a very common error when writing docs: One forgets to write a matching `` ` ``, and something like ``:attr:`x`` is rendered in the docs. This PR fixes most (all?) of these errors (and a few others).
I found these running ``grep -r ">[^#<][^<]*\`"`` on the `docs/build/html/generated` folder. The regex finds an HTML tag that does not start with `#` (as python comments in example code may contain backticks) and that contains a backtick in the rendered HTML.
This regex has not given any false positive in the current codebase, so I am inclined to suggest that we should add this check to the CI. Would this be possible / reasonable / easy to do malfet ?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60474
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D29309633
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 9621e0e9f87590cea060dd084fa367442b6bd046
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27655
This PR adds a C++ and Python version of ReflectionPad3d with structured kernels. The implementation uses lambdas extensively to better share code from the backward and forward pass.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59791
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D29242015
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: 18e692d3b49b74082be09f373fc95fb7891e1b56
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56674
`torch.nn.functional.multi_head_attention_forward` supports a long tail of options and variations of the multihead attention computation. Its complexity is mostly due to arbitrating among options, preparing values in multiple ways, and so on - the attention computation itself is a small fraction of the implementation logic, which is relatively simple but can be hard to pick out.
The goal of this PR is to
- make the internal logic of `multi_head_attention_forward` less entangled and more readable, with the attention computation steps easily discernible from their surroundings.
- factor out simple helpers to perform the actual attention steps, with the aim of making them available to other attention-computing contexts.
Note that these changes should leave the signature and output of `multi_head_attention_forward` completely unchanged, so not BC-breaking. Later PRs should present new multihead attention entry points, but deprecating this one is out of scope for now.
Changes are in two parts:
- the implementation of `multi_head_attention_forward` has been extensively resequenced, which makes the rewrite look more total than it actually is. Changes to argument-processing logic are largely confined to a) minor perf tweaks/control flow tightening, b) error message improvements, and c) argument prep changes due to helper function factoring (e.g. merging `key_padding_mask` with `attn_mask` rather than applying them separately)
- factored helper functions are defined just above `multi_head_attention_forward`, with names prefixed with `_`. (A future PR may pair them with corresponding modules, but for now they're private.)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gmagogsfm
Differential Revision: D28344707
Pulled By: bhosmer
fbshipit-source-id: 3bd8beec515182c3c4c339efc3bec79c0865cb9a
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/45687
Fix changes the input size check for `InstanceNorm*d` to be more restrictive and correctly reject sizes with only a single spatial element, regardless of batch size, to avoid infinite variance.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56659
Reviewed By: pbelevich
Differential Revision: D27948060
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: 21cfea391a609c0774568b89fd241efea72516bb
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/53964. cc albanD almson
## Major changes:
- Overhauled the actual loss calculation so that the shapes are now correct (in functional.py)
- added the missing doc in nn.functional.rst
## Minor changes (in functional.py):
- I removed the previous check on whether input and target were the same shape. This is to allow for broadcasting, say when you have 10 predictions that all have the same target.
- I added some comments to explain each shape check in detail. Let me know if these should be shortened/cut.
Screenshots of updated docs attached.
Let me know what you think, thanks!
## Edit: Description of change of behaviour (affecting BC):
The backwards-compatibility is only affected for the `reduction='none'` mode. This was the source of the bug. For tensors with size (N, D), the old returned loss had size (N), as incorrect summation was happening. It will now have size (N, D) as expected.
### Example
Define input tensors, all with size (2, 3).
`input = torch.tensor([[0., 1., 3.], [2., 4., 0.]], requires_grad=True)`
`target = torch.tensor([[1., 4., 2.], [-1., 2., 3.]])`
`var = 2*torch.ones(size=(2, 3), requires_grad=True)`
Initialise loss with reduction mode 'none'. We expect the returned loss to have the same size as the input tensors, (2, 3).
`loss = torch.nn.GaussianNLLLoss(reduction='none')`
Old behaviour:
`print(loss(input, target, var)) `
`# Gives tensor([3.7897, 6.5397], grad_fn=<MulBackward0>. This has size (2).`
New behaviour:
`print(loss(input, target, var)) `
`# Gives tensor([[0.5966, 2.5966, 0.5966], [2.5966, 1.3466, 2.5966]], grad_fn=<MulBackward0>)`
`# This has the expected size, (2, 3).`
To recover the old behaviour, sum along all dimensions except for the 0th:
`print(loss(input, target, var).sum(dim=1))`
`# Gives tensor([3.7897, 6.5397], grad_fn=<SumBackward1>.`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56469
Reviewed By: jbschlosser, agolynski
Differential Revision: D27894170
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 197890189c97c22109491c47f469336b5b03a23f
Summary:
Match updated `Embedding` docs from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54026 as closely as possible. Additionally, update the C++ side `Embedding` docs, since those were missed in the previous PR.
There are 6 (!) places for docs:
1. Python module form in `sparse.py` - includes an additional line about newly constructed `Embedding`s / `EmbeddingBag`s
2. Python `from_pretrained()` in `sparse.py` (refers back to module docs)
3. Python functional form in `functional.py`
4. C++ module options - includes an additional line about newly constructed `Embedding`s / `EmbeddingBag`s
5. C++ `from_pretrained()` options
6. C++ functional options
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56065
Reviewed By: malfet
Differential Revision: D27908383
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: c5891fed1c9d33b4b8cd63500a14c1a77d92cc78
Summary:
As this diff shows, currently there are a couple hundred instances of raw `noqa` in the codebase, which just ignore all errors on a given line. That isn't great, so this PR changes all existing instances of that antipattern to qualify the `noqa` with respect to a specific error code, and adds a lint to prevent more of this from happening in the future.
Interestingly, some of the examples the `noqa` lint catches are genuine attempts to qualify the `noqa` with a specific error code, such as these two:
```
test/jit/test_misc.py:27: print(f"{hello + ' ' + test}, I'm a {test}") # noqa E999
test/jit/test_misc.py:28: print(f"format blank") # noqa F541
```
However, those are still wrong because they are [missing a colon](https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/3.9.1/user/violations.html#in-line-ignoring-errors), which actually causes the error code to be completely ignored:
- If you change them to anything else, the warnings will still be suppressed.
- If you add the necessary colons then it is revealed that `E261` was also being suppressed, unintentionally:
```
test/jit/test_misc.py:27:57: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
test/jit/test_misc.py:28:35: E261 at least two spaces before inline comment
```
I did try using [flake8-noqa](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-noqa/) instead of a custom `git grep` lint, but it didn't seem to work. This PR is definitely missing some of the functionality that flake8-noqa is supposed to provide, though, so if someone can figure out how to use it, we should do that instead.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56272
Test Plan:
CI should pass on the tip of this PR, and we know that the lint works because the following CI run (before this PR was finished) failed:
- https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/2365189927
Reviewed By: janeyx99
Differential Revision: D27830127
Pulled By: samestep
fbshipit-source-id: d6dcf4f945ebd18cd76c46a07f3b408296864fcb
Summary:
This PR adds a `padding_idx` parameter to `nn.EmbeddingBag` and `nn.functional.embedding_bag`. As with `nn.Embedding`'s `padding_idx` argument, if an embedding's index is equal to `padding_idx` it is ignored, so it is not included in the reduction.
This PR does not add support for `padding_idx` for quantized or ONNX `EmbeddingBag` for opset10/11 (opset9 is supported). In these cases, an error is thrown if `padding_idx` is provided.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/3194
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49237
Reviewed By: walterddr, VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D26948258
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: 3ca672f7e768941f3261ab405fc7597c97ce3dfc
Summary:
* Lowering NLLLoss/CrossEntropyLoss to ATen dispatch
* This allows the MLC device to override these ops
* Reduce code duplication between the Python and C++ APIs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53789
Reviewed By: ailzhang
Differential Revision: D27345793
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 99c0d617ed5e7ee8f27f7a495a25ab4158d9aad6
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45667
First part of #3867 (Pooling operators still to do)
This adds a `padding='same'` mode to the interface of `conv{n}d`and `nn.Conv{n}d`. This should match the behaviour of `tensorflow`. I couldn't find it explicitly documented but through experimentation I found `tensorflow` returns the shape `ceil(len/stride)` and always adds any extra asymmetric padding onto the right side of the input.
Since the `native_functions.yaml` schema doesn't seem to support strings or enums, I've moved the function interface into python and it now dispatches between the numerically padded `conv{n}d` and the `_conv{n}d_same` variant. Underscores because I couldn't see any way to avoid exporting a function into the `torch` namespace.
A note on asymmetric padding. The total padding required can be odd if both the kernel-length is even and the dilation is odd. mkldnn has native support for asymmetric padding, so there is no overhead there, but for other backends I resort to padding the input tensor by 1 on the right hand side to make the remaining padding symmetrical. In these cases, I use `TORCH_WARN_ONCE` to notify the user of the performance implications.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D27170744
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: b3d8a0380e0787ae781f2e5d8ee365a7bfd49f22
Summary:
I edited the documentation for `nn.SiLU` and `F.silu` to:
- Explain that SiLU is also known as swish and that it stands for "Sigmoid Linear Unit."
- Ensure that "SiLU" is correctly capitalized.
I believe these changes will help users find the function they're looking for by adding relevant keywords to the docs.
Fixes: N/A
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53239
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D26816998
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: b4e9976e6b7e88686e3fa7061c0e9b693bd6d198
Summary:
-Lower Relu6 to ATen
-Change Python and C++ to reflect change
-adds an entry in native_functions.yaml for that new function
-this is needed as we would like to intercept ReLU6 at a higher level with an XLA-approach codegen.
-Should pass functional C++ tests pass. But please let me know if more tests are required.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52723
Reviewed By: ailzhang
Differential Revision: D26641414
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: dacfc70a236c4313f95901524f5f021503f6a60f
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/52257
## Background
Reverts MHA behavior for `bias` flag to that of v1.5: flag enables or disables both in and out projection biases.
Updates type annotations for both in and out projections biases from `Tensor` to `Optional[Tensor]` for `torch.jit.script` usage.
Note: With this change, `_LinearWithBias` defined in `torch/nn/modules/linear.py` is no longer utilized. Completely removing it would require updates to quantization logic in the following files:
```
test/quantization/test_quantized_module.py
torch/nn/quantizable/modules/activation.py
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/linear.py
torch/nn/quantized/modules/linear.py
torch/quantization/quantization_mappings.py
```
This PR takes a conservative initial approach and leaves these files unchanged.
**Is it safe to fully remove `_LinearWithBias`?**
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52537
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_nn.py TestNN.test_multihead_attn_no_bias
```
## BC-Breaking Note
In v1.6, the behavior of `MultiheadAttention`'s `bias` flag was incorrectly changed to affect only the in projection layer. That is, setting `bias=False` would fail to disable the bias for the out projection layer. This regression has been fixed, and the `bias` flag now correctly applies to both the in and out projection layers.
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D26583639
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: b805f3a052628efb28b89377a41e06f71747ac5b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/51909
Several scenarios don't work when trying to script `F.normalize`, notably when you try to symbolically trace through it with using the default argument:
```
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch
from torch.fx import symbolic_trace
def f(x):
return F.normalize(x)
gm = symbolic_trace(f)
torch.jit.script(gm)
```
which leads to the error
```
RuntimeError:
normalize(Tensor input, float p=2., int dim=1, float eps=9.9999999999999998e-13, Tensor? out=None) -> (Tensor):
Expected a value of type 'float' for argument 'p' but instead found type 'int'.
:
def forward(self, x):
normalize_1 = torch.nn.functional.normalize(x, p = 2, dim = 1, eps = 1e-12, out = None); x = None
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <--- HERE
return normalize_1
Reviewed By: jamesr66a
Differential Revision: D26324308
fbshipit-source-id: 30dd944a6011795d17164f2c746068daac570cea
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48965
This PR pulls `__torch_function__` checking entirely into C++, and adds a special `object_has_torch_function` method for ops which only have one arg as this lets us skip tuple construction and unpacking. We can now also do away with the Python side fast bailout for `Tensor` (e.g. `if any(type(t) is not Tensor for t in tensors) and has_torch_function(tensors)`) because they're actually slower than checking with the Python C API.
Test Plan: Existing unit tests. Benchmarks are in #48966
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D25590732
Pulled By: robieta
fbshipit-source-id: 6bd74788f06cdd673f3a2db898143d18c577eb42
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/47979
For MHA module, it is preferred to use the combined weight branch as much as possible when query/key/value are same (in case of same values by `torch.equal` or exactly same object by `is` ops). This PR will enable the faster branch when a single object with `nan` is passed to MHA.
For the background knowledge
```
import torch
a = torch.tensor([float('NaN'), 1, float('NaN'), 2, 3])
print(a is a) # True
print(torch.equal(a, a)) # False
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/48126
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D25042082
Pulled By: zhangguanheng66
fbshipit-source-id: 6bb17a520e176ddbb326ddf30ee091a84fcbbf27
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46758
It's in general helpful to support int32 indices and offsets, especially when such tensors are large and need to be transferred to accelerator backends. Since it may not be very useful to support the combination of int32 indices and int64 offsets, here we enforce that these two must have the same type.
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D24470808
fbshipit-source-id: 94b8a1d0b7fc9fe3d128247aa042c04d7c227f0b
Summary:
Fix https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/44601
I added bicubic grid sampler in both cpu and cuda side, but haven't in AVX2
There is a [colab notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1mIh6TLLj5WWM_NcmKDRvY5Gltbb781oU?usp=sharing) show some test results. The notebook use bilinear for test, since I could only use distributed version of pytorch in it. You could just download it and modify the `mode_torch=bicubic` to show the results.
There are some duplicate code about getting and setting values, since the helper function used in bilinear at first clip the coordinate beyond boundary, and then get or set the value. However, in bicubic, there are more points should be consider. I could refactor that part after making sure the overall calculation are correct.
Thanks
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44780
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D24681114
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: d39c8715e2093a5a5906cb0ef040d62bde578567
Summary:
Many of our functions contain same warnings about results reproducibility. Make them use common template.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45748
Reviewed By: colesbury
Differential Revision: D24089114
Pulled By: ngimel
fbshipit-source-id: e6aa4ce6082f6e0f4ce2713c2bf1864ee1c3712a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44433
Not entirely sure why, but changing the type of beta from `float` to `double in autocast_mode.cpp and FunctionsManual.h fixes my compiler errors, failing instead at link time
fixing some type errors, updated fn signature in a few more files
removing my usage of Scalar, making beta a double everywhere instead
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D23636720
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: caea2a1f8dd72b3b5fd1d72dd886b2fcd690af6d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43680
As discussed [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/43342),
adding in a Python-only implementation of the triplet-margin loss that takes a
custom distance function. Still discussing whether this is necessary to add to
PyTorch Core.
Test Plan:
python test/run_tests.py
Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D23363898
fbshipit-source-id: 1cafc05abecdbe7812b41deaa1e50ea11239d0cb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44486
SmoothL1Loss had a completely different (and incorrect, see #43228) path when target.requires_grad was True.
This PR does the following:
1) adds derivative support for target via the normal derivatives.yaml route
2) kill the different (and incorrect) path for when target.requires_grad was True
3) modify the SmoothL1Loss CriterionTests to verify that the target derivative is checked.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D23630699
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 0f94d1a928002122d6b6875182867618e713a917
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43025
- Use new overloads that better reflect the arguments to interpolate.
- More uniform interface for upsample ops allows simplifying the Python code.
- Also reorder overloads in native_functions.yaml to give them priority.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37177
ghstack-source-id: 106938111
Test Plan:
test_nn has pretty good coverage.
Relying on CI for ONNX, etc.
Didn't test FC because this change is *not* forward compatible.
To ensure backwards compatibility, I ran this code before this change
```python
def test_func(arg):
interp = torch.nn.functional.interpolate
with_size = interp(arg, size=(16,16))
with_scale = interp(arg, scale_factor=[2.1, 2.2], recompute_scale_factor=False)
with_compute = interp(arg, scale_factor=[2.1, 2.2])
return (with_size, with_scale, with_compute)
traced_func = torch.jit.trace(test_func, torch.randn(1,1,1,1))
sample = torch.randn(1, 3, 7, 7)
output = traced_func(sample)
assert not torch.allclose(output[1], output[2])
torch.jit.save(traced_func, "model.pt")
torch.save((sample, output), "data.pt")
```
then this code after this change
```python
model = torch.jit.load("model.pt")
sample, golden = torch.load("data.pt")
result = model(sample)
for r, g in zip(result, golden):
assert torch.allclose(r, g)
```
Reviewed By: AshkanAliabadi
Differential Revision: D21209991
fbshipit-source-id: 5b2ebb7c3ed76947361fe532d1dbdd6faa3544c8
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44471
L1Loss had a completely different (and incorrect, see #43228) path when target.requires_grad was True.
This PR does the following:
1) adds derivative support for target via the normal derivatives.yaml route
2) kill the different (and incorrect) path for when target.requires_grad was True
3) modify the L1Loss CriterionTests to verify that the target derivative is checked.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D23626008
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 2828be16b56b8dabe114962223d71b0e9a85f0f5
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44437
MSELoss had a completely different (and incorrect, see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/43228) path when target.requires_grad was True.
This PR does the following:
1) adds derivative support for target via the normal derivatives.yaml route
2) kill the different (and incorrect) path for when target.requires_grad was True
3) modify the MSELoss CriterionTests to verify that the target derivative is checked.
TODO:
1) do we still need check_criterion_jacobian when we run grad/gradgrad checks?
2) ensure the Module tests check when target.requires_grad
3) do we actually test when reduction='none' and reduction='mean'?
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D23612166
Pulled By: gchanan
fbshipit-source-id: 4f74d38d8a81063c74e002e07fbb7837b2172a10
Summary:
According to pytorch/rfcs#3
From the goals in the RFC:
1. Support subclassing `torch.Tensor` in Python (done here)
2. Preserve `torch.Tensor` subclasses when calling `torch` functions on them (done here)
3. Use the PyTorch API with `torch.Tensor`-like objects that are _not_ `torch.Tensor`
subclasses (done in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30730)
4. Preserve `torch.Tensor` subclasses when calling `torch.Tensor` methods. (done here)
5. Propagating subclass instances correctly also with operators, using
views/slices/indexing/etc. (done here)
6. Preserve subclass attributes when using methods or views/slices/indexing. (done here)
7. A way to insert code that operates on both functions and methods uniformly
(so we can write a single function that overrides all operators). (done here)
8. The ability to give external libraries a way to also define
functions/methods that follow the `__torch_function__` protocol. (will be addressed in a separate PR)
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Adds the `self` argument to the arg parser.
2. Dispatches on `self` as well if `self` is not `nullptr`.
3. Adds a `torch._C.DisableTorchFunction` context manager to disable `__torch_function__`.
4. Adds a `torch::torch_function_enabled()` and `torch._C._torch_function_enabled()` to check the state of `__torch_function__`.
5. Dispatches all `torch._C.TensorBase` and `torch.Tensor` methods via `__torch_function__`.
TODO:
- [x] Sequence Methods
- [x] Docs
- [x] Tests
Closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/28361
Benchmarks in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37091#issuecomment-633657778
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37091
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D22765678
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 53f8aa17ddb8b1108c0997f6a7aa13cb5be73de0
Summary:
Raise and assert used to have a hard-coded error message "Exception". User provided error message was ignored. This PR adds support to represent user's error message in TorchScript.
This breaks backward compatibility because now we actually need to script the user's error message, which can potentially contain unscriptable expressions. Such programs can break when scripting, but saved models can still continue to work.
Increased an op count in test_mobile_optimizer.py because now we need aten::format to form the actual exception message.
This is built upon an WIP PR: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34112 by driazati
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41907
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D22778301
Pulled By: gmagogsfm
fbshipit-source-id: 2b94f0db4ae9fe70c4cd03f4048e519ea96323ad
Summary:
Current losses in PyTorch only include a (partial) implementation of Huber loss through `smooth l1` based on Fast RCNN - which essentially uses a delta value of 1. Changing/Renaming the [`_smooth_l1_loss()`](3e1859959a/torch/nn/functional.py (L2487)) and refactoring to include delta, enables to use the actual function.
Supplementary to this, I have also made a functional and criterion versions for anyone that wants to set the delta explicitly - based on the functional `smooth_l1_loss()` and the criterion `Smooth_L1_Loss()`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37599
Differential Revision: D21559311
Pulled By: vincentqb
fbshipit-source-id: 34b2a5a237462e119920d6f55ba5ab9b8e086a8c
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41575
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/34294
This updates the C++ argument parser to correctly handle `TensorList` operands. I've also included a number of updates to the testing infrastructure, this is because we're now doing a much more careful job of testing the signatures of aten kernels, using the type information about the arguments as read in from `Declarations.yaml`. The changes to the tests are required because we're now only checking for `__torch_function__` attributes on `Tensor`, `Optional[Tensor]` and elements of `TensorList` operands, whereas before we were checking for `__torch_function__` on all operands, so the relatively simplistic approach the tests were using before -- assuming all positional arguments might be tensors -- doesn't work anymore. I now think that checking for `__torch_function__` on all operands was a mistake in the original design.
The updates to the signatures of the `lambda` functions are to handle this new, more stringent checking of signatures.
I also added override support for `torch.nn.functional.threshold` `torch.nn.functional.layer_norm`, which did not yet have python-level support.
Benchmarks are still WIP.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34725
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D22357738
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 0e7f4a58517867b2e3f193a0a8390e2ed294e1f3
Summary:
BCELoss currently uses different broadcasting semantics than numpy. Since previous versions of PyTorch have thrown a warning in these cases telling the user that input sizes should match, and since the CUDA and CPU results differ when sizes do not match, it makes sense to upgrade the size mismatch warning to an error.
We can consider supporting numpy broadcasting semantics in BCELoss in the future if needed.
Closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/40023
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41426
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D22540841
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 6c6d94c78fa0ae30ebe385d05a9e3501a42b3652
Summary:
This is a duplicate of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38362
"This PR completes Interpolate's deprecation process for recomputing the scales values, by updating the default value of the parameter recompute_scale_factor as planned for pytorch 1.6.0.
The warning message is also updated accordingly."
I'm recreating this PR as previous one is not being updated.
cc gchanan
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39453
Reviewed By: hl475
Differential Revision: D21955284
Pulled By: houseroad
fbshipit-source-id: 911585d39273a9f8de30d47e88f57562216968d8
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37173
This function is only called in one place, so inline it. This eliminates
boilerplate related to overloads and allows for further simplification
of shared logic in later diffs.
All shared local variables have the same names (from closed_over_args),
and no local variables accidentally collide.
ghstack-source-id: 106938108
Test Plan: Existing tests for interpolate.
Differential Revision: D21209995
fbshipit-source-id: acfadf31936296b2aac0833f704764669194b06f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37172
This improves readability by keeping cases with similar behavior close
together. It should also have a very tiny positive impact on perf.
ghstack-source-id: 106938109
Test Plan: Existing tests for interpolate.
Differential Revision: D21209996
fbshipit-source-id: c813e56aa6ba7370b89a2784fcb62cc146005258
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37171
Every one of these branches returns or raises, so there's no need for elif.
This makes it a little easier to reorder and move conditions.
ghstack-source-id: 106938110
Test Plan: Existing test for interpolate.
Differential Revision: D21209992
fbshipit-source-id: 5c517e61ced91464b713f7ccf53349b05e27461c
Summary:
## Description
* Updated assert statement to remove check on 3rd dimension (features) for keys and values in MultiheadAttention / Transform
* The feature dimension for keys and values can now be of different sizes
* Refer to https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27623
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39402
Reviewed By: zhangguanheng66
Differential Revision: D21841678
Pulled By: Nayef211
fbshipit-source-id: f0c9e5e0f33259ae2abb6bf9e7fb14e3aa9008eb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38478
Before this PR, the QAT ConvBN module inlined the batch normalization code
in order to reproduce Conv+BN folding.
This PR updates the module to use BN directly. This is mathematically
equivalent to previous behavior as long as we properly scale
and fake quant the conv weights, but allows us to reuse the BN code
instead of reimplementing it.
In particular, this should help with speed since we can use dedicated
BN kernels, and also with DDP since we can hook up SyncBatchNorm.
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_quantization.py TestQATModule
```
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21603230
fbshipit-source-id: ecf8afdd833b67c2fbd21a8fd14366079fa55e64
Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38120
Test Plan: build docs locally and attach a screenshot to this PR.
Differential Revision: D21477815
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 420bbcfcbd191d1a8e33cdf4a90c95bf00a5d226
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37169
This allows some cleanup of the code below by making lines shorter.
ghstack-source-id: 102773593
Test Plan: Existing tests for interpolate.
Reviewed By: kimishpatel
Differential Revision: D21209988
fbshipit-source-id: cffcdf9a580b15c4f1fa83e3f27b5a69f66bf6f7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37168
It looks like this was made a separate function because of the `dim` argument,
but that argument is always equal to `input.dim() - 2`. Remove the argument
and consolidate all call sites into one. This also means that this will be
called on paths that previously didn't call it, but all those cases throw
exceptions anyway.
ghstack-source-id: 102773596
Test Plan: Existing tests for interpolate.
Reviewed By: kimishpatel
Differential Revision: D21209993
fbshipit-source-id: 2c274a3a6900ebfdb8d60b311a4c3bd956fa7c37
Summary:
xref gh-32838, gh-34032
This is a major refactor of parts of the documentation to split it up using sphinx's `autosummary` feature which will build out `autofuction` and `autoclass` stub files and link to them. The end result is that the top module pages like torch.nn.rst and torch.rst are now more like table-of-contents to the actual single-class or single-function documentations pages.
Along the way, I modified many of the docstrings to eliminate sphinx warnings when building. I think the only thing I changed from a non-documentation perspective is to add names to `__all__` when adding them to `globals()` in `torch.__init__.py`
I do not know the CI system: are the documentation build artifacts available after the build, so reviewers can preview before merging?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37419
Differential Revision: D21337640
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: d4ad198780c3ae7a96a9f22651e00ff2d31a0c0f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36815
Pytorch does not have native channel shuffle op.
This diff adds that for both fp and quantized tensors.
For FP implementation is inefficient one. For quantized there is a native
QNNPACK op for this.
ghstack-source-id: 103267234
Test Plan:
buck run caffe2/test:quantization --
quantization.test_quantized.TestQuantizedOps.test_channel_shuffle
X86 implementation for QNNPACK is sse2 so this may not be the most efficient
for x86.
Reviewed By: dreiss
Differential Revision: D21093841
fbshipit-source-id: 5282945f352df43fdffaa8544fe34dba99a5b97e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37539
Bug fix
Test Plan:
This passed fbtranslate local integration test when I toggle fp16 to true on GPU.
Also it passed in with D21312488
Reviewed By: zhangguanheng66
Differential Revision: D21311505
fbshipit-source-id: 7ebd7375ef2c1b2ba4ac6fe7be5e7be1a490a319
Summary:
This PR fixes a couple of syntax errors in `torch/` that prevent MyPy from running, fixes simple type annotation errors (e.g. missing `from typing import List, Tuple, Optional`), and adds granular ignores for errors in particular modules as well as for missing typing in third party packages.
As a result, running `mypy` in the root dir of the repo now runs on:
- `torch/`
- `aten/src/ATen/function_wrapper.py` (the only file already covered in CI)
In CI this runs on GitHub Actions, job Lint, sub-job "quick-checks", task "MyPy typecheck". It should give (right now): `Success: no issues found in 329 source files`.
Here are the details of the original 855 errors when running `mypy torch` on current master (after fixing the couple of syntax errors that prevent `mypy` from running through):
<details>
```
torch/utils/tensorboard/_proto_graph.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.node_def_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_proto_graph.py:2: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.attr_value_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_proto_graph.py:3: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.tensor_shape_pb2'
torch/utils/backcompat/__init__.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/for_onnx/__init__.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch.for_onnx.onnx'
torch/cuda/nvtx.py:2: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/utils/show_pickle.py:59: error: Name 'pickle._Unpickler' is not defined
torch/utils/show_pickle.py:113: error: "Type[PrettyPrinter]" has no attribute "_dispatch"
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.graph_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:2: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.node_def_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:3: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.versions_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:4: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.attr_value_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:5: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorboard.compat.proto.tensor_shape_pb2'
torch/utils/tensorboard/_onnx_graph.py:9: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'onnx'
torch/contrib/_tensorboard_vis.py:10: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorflow.core.util'
torch/contrib/_tensorboard_vis.py:11: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorflow.core.framework'
torch/contrib/_tensorboard_vis.py:12: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'tensorflow.python.summary.writer.writer'
torch/utils/hipify/hipify_python.py:43: error: Need type annotation for 'CAFFE2_TEMPLATE_MAP' (hint: "CAFFE2_TEMPLATE_MAP: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/utils/hipify/hipify_python.py:636: error: "object" has no attribute "items"
torch/nn/_reduction.py:27: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/_reduction.py:27: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/_reduction.py:47: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/_reduction.py:47: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/utils/tensorboard/_utils.py:17: error: Skipping analyzing 'matplotlib.pyplot': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/utils/tensorboard/_utils.py:17: error: Skipping analyzing 'matplotlib': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/utils/tensorboard/_utils.py:18: error: Skipping analyzing 'matplotlib.backends.backend_agg': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/utils/tensorboard/_utils.py:18: error: Skipping analyzing 'matplotlib.backends': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/nn/modules/utils.py:27: error: Name 'List' is not defined
torch/nn/modules/utils.py:27: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import List")
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:17: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FileDescriptor"; did you mean "serialized_pb"?
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:25: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:31: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:35: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:39: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:43: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:47: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:51: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:55: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:59: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:63: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:67: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:71: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:75: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:102: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:108: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:112: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:124: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:130: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:134: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:138: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:142: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:146: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:150: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:154: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:158: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:162: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:166: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:170: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:174: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:178: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:182: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:194: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:200: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:204: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:208: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:212: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:224: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:230: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:234: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:238: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:242: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:246: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:250: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:254: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:267: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:274: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:281: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:288: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:295: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:302: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:327: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:334: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:341: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:364: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:371: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:378: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:385: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:392: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:399: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:406: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:413: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:420: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:427: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:434: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:441: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:448: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:455: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:462: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:488: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:495: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:502: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:509: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:516: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:523: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:530: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:537: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:544: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:551: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:558: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:565: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:572: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:596: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:603: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:627: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:634: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:641: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:648: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:655: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:662: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:686: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:693: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:717: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:724: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:731: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:738: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:763: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:770: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:777: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:784: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:808: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:815: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:822: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:829: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:836: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:843: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:850: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:857: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:864: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:871: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:878: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:885: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:892: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:916: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:923: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:930: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:937: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:944: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:951: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:958: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:982: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:989: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:996: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1003: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1010: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1017: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1024: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1031: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1038: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1045: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1052: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1059: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1066: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1090: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1097: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1104: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1128: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1135: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1142: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1166: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1173: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1180: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1187: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1194: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1218: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1225: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1232: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1239: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1246: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1253: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1260: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1267: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1274: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1281: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1305: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1312: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1319: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1326: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1333: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1340: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1347: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1354: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1361: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1368: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1375: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1382: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1389: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1396: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1420: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1427: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1434: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1441: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1465: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1472: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1479: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1486: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1493: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1500: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1507: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1514: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1538: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1545: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1552: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1559: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1566: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/caffe2_pb2.py:1667: error: "GeneratedProtocolMessageType" has no attribute "Segment"
torch/multiprocessing/queue.py:4: error: No library stub file for standard library module 'multiprocessing.reduction'
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:18: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FileDescriptor"; did you mean "serialized_pb"?
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:27: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:33: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "EnumValueDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:50: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:57: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:81: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:88: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:95: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:102: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:109: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:116: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:123: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:130: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:137: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:144: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:151: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:175: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:182: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:189: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:196: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:220: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:227: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:234: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:241: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:265: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:272: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:279: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:286: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:293: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:300: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:307: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:314: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:321: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:328: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:335: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:342: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:366: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:373: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:397: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:404: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:411: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:418: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:425: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/torch_pb2.py:432: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:17: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FileDescriptor"; did you mean "serialized_pb"?
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:29: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:36: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:43: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:50: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:57: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:64: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:88: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:95: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:102: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:126: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:133: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:140: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:164: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:171: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:178: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:202: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:209: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:216: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:240: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "Descriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:247: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:254: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:261: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:268: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:275: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:282: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:289: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/metanet_pb2.py:296: error: Unexpected keyword argument "serialized_options" for "FieldDescriptor"
caffe2/proto/__init__.py:13: error: Skipping analyzing 'caffe2.caffe2.fb.session.proto': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/multiprocessing/pool.py:3: error: No library stub file for standard library module 'multiprocessing.util'
torch/multiprocessing/pool.py:3: note: (Stub files are from https://github.com/python/typeshed)
caffe2/python/scope.py:10: error: Skipping analyzing 'past.builtins': found module but no type hints or library stubs
caffe2/python/__init__.py:7: error: Module has no attribute "CPU"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:8: error: Module has no attribute "CUDA"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:9: error: Module has no attribute "MKLDNN"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:10: error: Module has no attribute "OPENGL"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:11: error: Module has no attribute "OPENCL"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:12: error: Module has no attribute "IDEEP"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:13: error: Module has no attribute "HIP"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:14: error: Module has no attribute "COMPILE_TIME_MAX_DEVICE_TYPES"; maybe "PROTO_COMPILE_TIME_MAX_DEVICE_TYPES"?
caffe2/python/__init__.py:15: error: Module has no attribute "ONLY_FOR_TEST"; maybe "PROTO_ONLY_FOR_TEST"?
caffe2/python/__init__.py:34: error: Item "_Loader" of "Optional[_Loader]" has no attribute "exec_module"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:34: error: Item "None" of "Optional[_Loader]" has no attribute "exec_module"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:35: error: Module has no attribute "cuda"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:37: error: Module has no attribute "cuda"
caffe2/python/__init__.py:49: error: Module has no attribute "add_dll_directory"
torch/random.py:4: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/_classes.py:2: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/onnx/__init__.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/hub.py:21: error: Skipping analyzing 'tqdm.auto': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/hub.py:24: error: Skipping analyzing 'tqdm': found module but no type hints or library stubs
torch/hub.py:27: error: Name 'tqdm' already defined (possibly by an import)
torch/_tensor_str.py:164: error: Not all arguments converted during string formatting
torch/_ops.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/_linalg_utils.py:26: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:26: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_linalg_utils.py:26: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:63: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:63: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:63: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_linalg_utils.py:70: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:70: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_linalg_utils.py:70: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:88: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:88: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:88: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_linalg_utils.py:88: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/_linalg_utils.py:88: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/_jit_internal.py:17: error: Need type annotation for 'boolean_dispatched'
torch/_jit_internal.py:474: error: Need type annotation for '_overloaded_fns' (hint: "_overloaded_fns: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/_jit_internal.py:512: error: Need type annotation for '_overloaded_methods' (hint: "_overloaded_methods: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/_jit_internal.py:648: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "FinalCls", variable has type "_SpecialForm")
torch/sparse/__init__.py:11: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/sparse/__init__.py:71: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/sparse/__init__.py:71: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/sparse/__init__.py:71: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/sparse/__init__.py:71: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/sparse/__init__.py:71: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/nn/init.py:109: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:126: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:142: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:165: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:180: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:194: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:287: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/init.py:315: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/multiprocessing/reductions.py:8: error: No library stub file for standard library module 'multiprocessing.util'
torch/multiprocessing/reductions.py:9: error: No library stub file for standard library module 'multiprocessing.reduction'
torch/multiprocessing/reductions.py:17: error: No library stub file for standard library module 'multiprocessing.resource_sharer'
torch/jit/_builtins.py:72: error: Module has no attribute "_no_grad_embedding_renorm_"
torch/jit/_builtins.py:80: error: Module has no attribute "stft"
torch/jit/_builtins.py:81: error: Module has no attribute "cdist"
torch/jit/_builtins.py:82: error: Module has no attribute "norm"
torch/jit/_builtins.py:83: error: Module has no attribute "nuclear_norm"
torch/jit/_builtins.py:84: error: Module has no attribute "frobenius_norm"
torch/backends/cudnn/__init__.py:8: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/backends/cudnn/__init__.py:86: error: Need type annotation for '_handles' (hint: "_handles: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/autograd/profiler.py:13: error: Name 'ContextDecorator' already defined (possibly by an import)
torch/autograd/function.py:2: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/autograd/function.py:2: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/running_mypy.html#missing-imports
torch/autograd/function.py:109: error: Unsupported dynamic base class "with_metaclass"
torch/serialization.py:609: error: "Callable[[Any], Any]" has no attribute "cache"
torch/_lowrank.py:11: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:13: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:13: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_lowrank.py:14: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:14: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_lowrank.py:14: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:82: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:82: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:82: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_lowrank.py:82: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:82: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/_lowrank.py:130: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:130: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:130: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_lowrank.py:130: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:130: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/_lowrank.py:167: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:167: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:167: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/_lowrank.py:167: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/_lowrank.py:167: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/quantization/observer.py:45: error: Variable "torch.quantization.observer.ABC" is not valid as a type
torch/quantization/observer.py:45: note: See https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/common_issues.html#variables-vs-type-aliases
torch/quantization/observer.py:45: error: Invalid base class "ABC"
torch/quantization/observer.py:127: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:127: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:127: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/quantization/observer.py:172: error: Module has no attribute "per_tensor_symmetric"
torch/quantization/observer.py:172: error: Module has no attribute "per_channel_symmetric"
torch/quantization/observer.py:192: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:192: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:192: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/quantization/observer.py:233: error: Module has no attribute "per_tensor_symmetric"
torch/quantization/observer.py:233: error: Module has no attribute "per_channel_symmetric"
torch/quantization/observer.py:534: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:885: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:885: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:885: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/quantization/observer.py:894: error: Cannot determine type of 'max_val'
torch/quantization/observer.py:894: error: Cannot determine type of 'min_val'
torch/quantization/observer.py:899: error: Cannot determine type of 'min_val'
torch/quantization/observer.py:902: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:925: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/quantization/observer.py:928: error: Cannot determine type of 'min_val'
torch/quantization/observer.py:929: error: Cannot determine type of 'max_val'
torch/quantization/observer.py:946: error: Argument "min" to "histc" has incompatible type "Tuple[Tensor, Tensor]"; expected "Union[int, float, bool]"
torch/quantization/observer.py:946: error: Argument "max" to "histc" has incompatible type "Tuple[Tensor, Tensor]"; expected "Union[int, float, bool]"
torch/quantization/observer.py:1056: error: Module has no attribute "per_tensor_symmetric"
torch/quantization/observer.py:1058: error: Module has no attribute "per_channel_symmetric"
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:76: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:76: error: Name 'BroadcastingList2' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:259: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:259: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:259: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:289: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:290: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:308: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:326: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:356: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:371: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:400: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:400: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:400: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:430: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/functional.py:448: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/linear.py:26: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/modules/linear.py:28: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:40: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:47: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:54: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:61: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:68: error: Name 'List' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:68: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import List")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:68: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:75: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:140: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:146: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:151: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:157: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:162: error: Name 'List' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:162: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import List")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:162: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/functional_modules.py:168: error: Name 'Tensor' is not defined
torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py:9: error: Module 'torch.multiprocessing' has no attribute '_prctl_pr_set_pdeathsig'
torch/multiprocessing/__init__.py:28: error: Module has no attribute "__all__"
torch/jit/frontend.py:9: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C._jit_tree_views'
torch/jit/annotations.py:6: error: Module 'torch._jit_internal' has no attribute 'BroadcastingList2'; maybe "BroadcastingList1" or "BroadcastingListCls"?
torch/jit/annotations.py:6: error: Module 'torch._jit_internal' has no attribute 'BroadcastingList3'; maybe "BroadcastingList1" or "BroadcastingListCls"?
torch/jit/annotations.py:9: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/distributions/distribution.py:16: error: Need type annotation for 'arg_constraints' (hint: "arg_constraints: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/distributions/distribution.py:74: error: Name 'arg_constraints' already defined on line 16
torch/distributions/distribution.py:84: error: Name 'support' already defined on line 15
torch/functional.py:114: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/functional.py:114: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/functional.py:114: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:114: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:189: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "None", variable has type "Tensor")
torch/functional.py:200: error: Argument 1 to "_indices_product" has incompatible type "Tuple[int, ...]"; expected "List[int]"
torch/functional.py:204: error: No overload variant of "__setitem__" of "list" matches argument types "Tensor", "int"
torch/functional.py:204: note: Possible overload variants:
torch/functional.py:204: note: def __setitem__(self, int, int) -> None
torch/functional.py:204: note: def __setitem__(self, slice, Iterable[int]) -> None
torch/functional.py:204: error: No overload variant of "__getitem__" of "list" matches argument type "Tensor"
torch/functional.py:204: note: def __getitem__(self, int) -> int
torch/functional.py:204: note: def __getitem__(self, slice) -> List[int]
torch/functional.py:207: error: "Tensor" has no attribute "copy_"
torch/functional.py:212: error: No overload variant of "__setitem__" of "list" matches argument types "Tensor", "int"
torch/functional.py:212: note: Possible overload variants:
torch/functional.py:212: note: def __setitem__(self, int, int) -> None
torch/functional.py:212: note: def __setitem__(self, slice, Iterable[int]) -> None
torch/functional.py:212: error: No overload variant of "__getitem__" of "list" matches argument type "Tensor"
torch/functional.py:212: note: def __getitem__(self, int) -> int
torch/functional.py:212: note: def __getitem__(self, slice) -> List[int]
torch/functional.py:215: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "None", variable has type "Tensor")
torch/functional.py:334: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:334: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:429: error: Argument 2 to "pad" has incompatible type "Tuple[int, int]"; expected "List[int]"
torch/functional.py:431: error: Module has no attribute "stft"
torch/functional.py:766: error: Module has no attribute "cdist"
torch/functional.py:768: error: Module has no attribute "cdist"
torch/functional.py:770: error: Module has no attribute "cdist"
torch/functional.py:775: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:775: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:780: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:780: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:780: error: Name 'number' is not defined
torch/functional.py:780: error: Name 'norm' already defined on line 775
torch/functional.py:785: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:785: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:785: error: Name 'number' is not defined
torch/functional.py:785: error: Name 'norm' already defined on line 775
torch/functional.py:790: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:790: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:790: error: Name 'norm' already defined on line 775
torch/functional.py:795: error: Name 'norm' already defined on line 775
torch/functional.py:960: error: Name 'Any' is not defined
torch/functional.py:960: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Any")
torch/functional.py:960: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/functional.py:960: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/functional.py:1036: error: Argument 1 to "len" has incompatible type "int"; expected "Sized"
torch/functional.py:1041: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:1041: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:1041: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/functional.py:1041: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/functional.py:1056: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/functional.py:1056: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/functional.py:1056: error: Name 'Tuple' is not defined
torch/functional.py:1056: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Tuple")
torch/distributions/von_mises.py:87: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/negative_binomial.py:25: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_IntegerGreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/multivariate_normal.py:116: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/laplace.py:23: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/independent.py:34: error: Need type annotation for 'arg_constraints' (hint: "arg_constraints: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/distributions/cauchy.py:28: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/poisson.py:28: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_IntegerGreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/one_hot_categorical.py:32: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Simplex", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/normal.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/lowrank_multivariate_normal.py:79: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/gamma.py:30: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/exponential.py:23: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/fishersnedecor.py:25: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/dirichlet.py:44: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Simplex", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:230: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "Tensor")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:232: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "Tensor")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:236: error: Incompatible return value type (got "Tuple[Any, Tensor, Any]", expected "Tuple[int, int, int]")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:351: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "Type[LSTM]", base class "RNNBase" defined the type as "Type[RNNBase]")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:381: error: Module has no attribute "quantized_lstm"
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:385: error: Module has no attribute "quantized_lstm"
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:414: error: Argument 1 to "forward_impl" of "LSTM" has incompatible type "PackedSequence"; expected "Tensor"
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:416: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "PackedSequence", variable has type "Tensor")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:418: error: Incompatible return value type (got "Tuple[Tensor, Tuple[Tensor, Tensor]]", expected "Tuple[PackedSequence, Tuple[Tensor, Tensor]]")
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:420: error: Argument 1 of "permute_hidden" is incompatible with supertype "RNNBase"; supertype defines the argument type as "Tensor"
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:420: error: Return type "Tuple[Tensor, Tensor]" of "permute_hidden" incompatible with return type "Tensor" in supertype "RNNBase"
torch/nn/quantized/dynamic/modules/rnn.py:426: error: Argument 2 of "check_forward_args" is incompatible with supertype "RNNBase"; supertype defines the argument type as "Tensor"
torch/nn/intrinsic/qat/modules/conv_fused.py:232: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "Type[ConvBnReLU2d]", base class "ConvBn2d" defined the type as "Type[ConvBn2d]")
torch/distributions/beta.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Interval", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/geometric.py:31: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_IntegerGreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/continuous_bernoulli.py:38: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Interval", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/bernoulli.py:30: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Boolean", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/quantization/fake_quantize.py:126: error: Module has no attribute "per_tensor_symmetric"
torch/quantization/fake_quantize.py:132: error: Module has no attribute "per_channel_symmetric"
torch/distributions/transformed_distribution.py:41: error: Need type annotation for 'arg_constraints' (hint: "arg_constraints: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/jit/__init__.py:1: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/jit/__init__.py:15: error: Module 'torch.utils' has no attribute 'set_module'
torch/jit/__init__.py:70: error: Name 'Attribute' already defined on line 68
torch/jit/__init__.py:213: error: On Python 3 '{}'.format(b'abc') produces "b'abc'"; use !r if this is a desired behavior
torch/jit/__init__.py:215: error: On Python 3 '{}'.format(b'abc') produces "b'abc'"; use !r if this is a desired behavior
torch/jit/__init__.py:1524: error: Unsupported dynamic base class "with_metaclass"
torch/jit/__init__.py:1869: error: Name 'ScriptModule' already defined on line 1524
torch/jit/__init__.py:1998: error: Need type annotation for '_jit_caching_layer'
torch/jit/__init__.py:1999: error: Need type annotation for '_jit_function_overload_caching'
torch/distributions/relaxed_categorical.py:34: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/relaxed_categorical.py:108: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Simplex", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/relaxed_bernoulli.py:31: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/relaxed_bernoulli.py:114: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Interval", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/logistic_normal.py:31: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Simplex", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/log_normal.py:26: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/half_normal.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/half_cauchy.py:28: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/gumbel.py:28: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:18: error: Module 'torch.nn.utils' has no attribute 'fuse_conv_bn_weights'
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:209: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:209: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:214: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:321: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:321: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:323: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:447: error: Name 'Optional' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:447: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import Optional")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:449: error: Module has no attribute "ops"
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:513: error: Name 'nn.modules.conv._ConvTransposeNd' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:525: error: Name 'List' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:525: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import List")
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:527: error: Name 'List' is not defined
torch/nn/quantized/modules/conv.py:527: note: Did you forget to import it from "typing"? (Suggestion: "from typing import List")
torch/nn/intrinsic/quantized/modules/conv_relu.py:8: error: Module 'torch.nn.utils' has no attribute 'fuse_conv_bn_weights'
torch/nn/intrinsic/quantized/modules/conv_relu.py:21: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "Type[ConvReLU2d]", base class "Conv2d" defined the type as "Type[Conv2d]")
torch/nn/intrinsic/quantized/modules/conv_relu.py:62: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "Type[ConvReLU3d]", base class "Conv3d" defined the type as "Type[Conv3d]")
torch/distributions/weibull.py:25: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_GreaterThan", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/kl.py:35: error: Need type annotation for '_KL_MEMOIZE' (hint: "_KL_MEMOIZE: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/distributions/studentT.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_Real", base class "Distribution" defined the type as "None")
torch/distributions/mixture_same_family.py:48: error: Need type annotation for 'arg_constraints' (hint: "arg_constraints: Dict[<type>, <type>] = ...")
torch/distributions/__init__.py:158: error: Name 'transforms' is not defined
torch/onnx/utils.py:21: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'torch._C'
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:4: error: Cannot find implementation or library stub for module named 'urlparse'
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:4: error: Name 'urlparse' already defined (possibly by an import)
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:4: error: Name 'urlunparse' already defined (possibly by an import)
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:9: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'FileStore'
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:9: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'TCPStore'
torch/distributed/rendezvous.py:65: error: On Python 3 '{}'.format(b'abc') produces "b'abc'"; use !r if this is a desired behavior
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'AllreduceOptions'; maybe "ReduceOptions" or "AllreduceCoalescedOptions"?
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'AllreduceCoalescedOptions'; maybe "AllreduceOptions"?
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'AllToAllOptions'
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'BroadcastOptions'
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'GatherOptions'; maybe "ScatterOptions"?
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'ReduceOptions'; maybe "AllreduceOptions", "ReduceScatterOptions", or "ReduceOp"?
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'ReduceScatterOptions'; maybe "ScatterOptions" or "ReduceOptions"?
torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:11: error: Module 'torch.distributed' has no attribute 'ScatterOptions'; maybe "ReduceScatterOptions" or
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36584
Reviewed By: seemethere, ailzhang
Differential Revision: D21155985
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: f628d4293992576207167e7c417998fad15898d1
Summary:
Add the support to accept both float, byte, and bool tensors for `attn_mask`. No breakage is expected.
- If a bool tensor is provided, positions with `True` are not allowed to attend while `False` values will be unchanged.
- if a byte tensor is provided, it will be converted to bool tensor. Positions with non-zero are not allowed to attend while zero values will be unchanged.
- If a float tensor is provided, it will be added to the attention weight.
Note: the behavior of the float mask tensor is slightly different from the first two options because it is added to the attention weight, rather than calling `masked_fill_` function. Also, converting a byte tensor to bool tensor within `multi_head_attention_forward` causes extra overhead. Therefore, a bool mask is recommended here.
For `key_padding_mask`:
- if a bool tensor is provided, it will be converted to bool tensor. The positions with the value of `True` will be ignored while the position with the value of `False` will be unchanged.
- If a byte tensor is provided, the positions with the value of non-zero will be ignored while the position with the value of zero will be unchanged.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33763
Differential Revision: D20925358
Pulled By: zhangguanheng66
fbshipit-source-id: de174056be183cdad0f3de8024ee0a3c5eb364c9
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35187
When I touch these files, lint will always introduce some unintended change, to prevent it from happening, we need to format the code first.
change is generated by:
arc f
Test Plan: integration test.
Differential Revision: D20587596
fbshipit-source-id: 512cf6b86bd6632a61c80ed53e3a9e229feecc2a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35885
For the ops I added recently, ensure all the typehints are
present, so that JIT can script them.
We might want to look into a test for this in the future.
Test Plan:
scripting works for all of them now:
https://gist.github.com/vkuzo/1d92fdea548ad596310fffcbe95e4438
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20818431
fbshipit-source-id: 0de61eaf70c08d625128c6fffd05788e6e5bb920
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/35431
Resolving z-a-f's comments on earlier PRs on making
the docblocks easier to read.
Test Plan:
render the new docblocks in http://rst.aaroniles.net/
CI
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20658668
fbshipit-source-id: 5ea4a21d6b8dc9d744e2f4ede2f9d5d799fb902f
Summary:
This one doesn't actually do anything so we don't need an op for it.
It is used inside `torch.nn.functional.unfold` which is already tested
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34509
Pulled By: driazati
Differential Revision: D20676445
fbshipit-source-id: b72d1308bdec593367ec4e14bf9a901d0b62e1cc
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34747
Adds the hardswish FP operator from MobileNetV3 to PyTorch. This is for
common operator coverage, since this is widely used. A future PR will
add the quantized version. CUDA is saved for a future PR as well.
Test Plan:
tests pass:
```
python test/test_torch.py TestTorchDeviceTypeCPU.test_hardswish_cpu_float32
```
microbenchmark:
https://gist.github.com/vkuzo/b10d3b238f24e58c585314e8b5385aca
(batch_size == 1: 11.5GiB/s, batch_size == 4: 11.9GiB/s)
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20451404
fbshipit-source-id: c7e13c9ab1a83e27a1ba18182947c82c896efae2
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34545
This is for common operator coverage, since this is widely used. A future PR
will add the quantized version.
Some initial questions for reviewers, since it's my first FP operator
diff:
* do we need a backwards.out method for this?
* do we need CUDA? If yes, should it be this PR or is it ok to split
Test Plan:
```
// test
python test/test_torch.py TestTorchDeviceTypeCPU.test_hardsigmoid_cpu_float32
// benchmark
python -m pt.hardsigmoid_test
...
Forward Execution Time (us) : 40.315
Forward Execution Time (us) : 42.603
```
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20371692
fbshipit-source-id: 95668400da9577fd1002ce3f76b9777c6f96c327
Summary:
Now that lists are no longer specialized, we can register only one operator for list ops that are generic to their element type.
This PR reorgs lists into three sets of ops:
- CREATE_GENERIC_LIST_OPS
- CREATE_SPECIALIZED_LIST_OPS
- CREATE_COMPARATOR_LIST_OPS_SPECIALIZED (we didn't bind certain specialized ops to Tensor)
This is important to land quickly because mobile is finalizing its bytecode soon, after which we could not remove these ops.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34520
Reviewed By: iseeyuan
Differential Revision: D20429775
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: ae6519f9b0f731eaa2bf4ac20736317d0a66b8a0
Summary:
`torch.nn.functional.interpolate` was written as a builtin op when we scripted the standard library, because it has four possible overloads. As a result, whenever we make a change to `interpolate`, we need to make changes in two places, and it also makes it impossible to optimize the interpolate op. The builtin is tech debt.
I talked with ailzhang, and the symbolic script changes are good to remove (i guess that makes a third place we needed to re-implement interpolate).
I'm trying to get rid of unneccessary builtin operators because we're standardizing mobile bytecode soon, so we should try to get this landed as soon as possible.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34514
Differential Revision: D20391089
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: abc84cdecfac67332bcba6b308fca4db44303121
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33504
Fix resolution fo functions that are bound onto torch in torch/functional.py. This does not fix compilation of all of those functions, those will be done in follow ups. Does torch.stft as a start.
Fixes#21478
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D20014591
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: bb362f1b5479adbb890e72a54111ef716679d127
Summary:
This PR improves performance of EmbeddingBag on cuda by removing 5 kernel launches (2 of those are synchronizing memcopies).
- 2 memcopies are checking values of offsets[0] and offsets[-1] to be in expected range (0 for the former, less than number of indices for the latter). It seems strange to check only those 2 values, if users are providing invalid offsets, invalid values can be anywhere in the array, not only the first and last element. After this PR, the checks are skipped on cuda, the first value is forced to 0, if the last value is larger than expected, cuda kernel will assert. It is less nice than ValueError, but then again, the kernel could have asserted if other offset values were invalid. On the cpu, the checks are moved inside the cpu implementation from functional.py, and will throw RuntimeError instead of ValueError.
- 3 or 4 initializations (depending on the mode) of the output tensors with .zeros() are unnecessary, because every element of those tensors is written to, so their data can be uninitialized on the start.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33589
Reviewed By: jianyuh
Differential Revision: D20078011
Pulled By: ngimel
fbshipit-source-id: 2fb2e2080313af64adc5cf1b9fc6ffbdc6efaf16
Summary:
This adds `__torch_function__` support for all functions in `torch.functional` and `torch.nn.functional`.
The changes to C++ code and codegen scripts are to facilitate adding `__torch_function__` support for the native functions in `torch._C._nn`. Note that I moved the `handle_torch_function` C++ function to a header that both `python_torch_functions.cpp` and `python_nn_functions.cpp` include. The changes to `python_nn_functions.cpp` mirror the changes I made to `python_torch_functions.cpp` when `__torch_function__` support was first added in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27064. Due to the somewhat different way the `torch._C` and `torch._C._nn` namespaces are initialized I needed to create a new static reference to the `torch._C._nn` namespace (`THPNNVariableFunctions`). I'm not sure if that is the best way to do this. In principle I could import these namespaces in each kernel and avoid the global variable but that would have a runtime cost.
I added `__torch_function__` support to the Python functions in `torch.nn.functional` following the approach in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/32194.
I re-enabled the test that checks if all functions in the `torch` namespace are explicitly tested for `__torch_function__` support. I also generalized the check to work for `torch.functional` and `torch.nn.functional` as well. This test was explicitly disabled in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/30730 and I'm happy to disable it again if you think that's appropriate. I figured now was as good a time as any to try to re-enable it.
Finally I adjusted the existing torch API tests to suppress deprecation warnings and add keyword arguments used by some of the code in `torch.nn.functional` that were missed when I originally added the tests in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/27064.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32799
Differential Revision: D19956809
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 40d34e0109cc4b9f3ef62f409d2d35a1d84e3d22
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33008
Corrects D19373507 to allow valid use cases that fail now. Multiplies batch size by the number of elements in a group to get the correct number of elements over which statistics are computed.
**Details**:
The current implementation disallows GroupNorm to be applied to tensors of shape e.g. `(1, C, 1, 1)` to prevent cases where statistics are computed over 1 element and thus result in a tensor filled with zeros.
However, in GroupNorm the statistics are calculated across channels. So in case where one has an input tensor of shape `(1, 256, 1, 1)` for `GroupNorm(32, 256)`, the statistics will be computed over 8 elements and thus be meaningful.
One use case is [Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPPPooling)](791c172a33/torchvision/models/segmentation/deeplabv3.py (L50)), where GroupNorm could be used in place of BatchNorm [here](791c172a33/torchvision/models/segmentation/deeplabv3.py (L55)). However, now this is prohibited and results in failures.
Proposed solution consists in correcting the computation of the number of elements over which statistics are computed. The number of elements per group is taken into account in the batch size.
Test Plan: check that existing tests pass
Reviewed By: fmassa
Differential Revision: D19723407
fbshipit-source-id: c85c244c832e6592e9aedb279d0acc867eef8f0c
Summary:
The PR https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/31791 adds support for float[] constant, which affects some cases of ONNX interpolate support.
This PR adds float[] constants support in ONNX, updates interpolate in ONNX, and re-enable the disabled tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32554
Reviewed By: hl475
Differential Revision: D19566596
Pulled By: houseroad
fbshipit-source-id: 843f62c86126fdf4f9c0117b65965682a776e7e9
Summary:
The default value is removed because it is explained right below.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32945
Reviewed By: soumith
Differential Revision: D19706567
Pulled By: ailzhang
fbshipit-source-id: 1b7cc87991532f69b81aaae2451d944f70dda427
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/glow/pull/4049
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/27477
We would like to add the intra-op parallelization support for the EmbeddingBag operator.
This should bring speedup for the DLRM benchmark:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/24385
Benchmark code:
```
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function, unicode_literals
import torch
import time
eb = torch.nn.EmbeddingBag(1000000, 64, mode='sum')
input = torch.LongTensor(1500).random_(0, 1000000)
offsets = torch.zeros(64, dtype=torch.int64)
niter = 10000
s = time.time()
for _ in range(niter):
out = eb(input, offsets)
time_per_iter = (time.time() - s) / niter
print('time_per_iter', time_per_iter)
print('GB/s', (input.numel() * 64 * 4 + out.numel() * 4) / time_per_iter / 1e9)
```
The following results are single core on Skylake T6:
- Before our change (with the original caffe2::EmbeddingLookup)
time_per_iter 6.313693523406982e-05
GB/s 6.341517821789133
- After our change using the EmbeddingLookupIdx API which takes the offsets instead of lengths.
time_per_iter 5.7627105712890626e-05
GB/s 6.947841559053659
- With Intel's PR: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/24385
time_per_iter 7.393271923065185e-05
GB/s 5.415518381664018
For multi-core performance, because Clang doesn't work with OMP, I can only see the single-core performance on SKL T6.
ghstack-source-id: 97124557
Test Plan:
With D16990830:
```
buck run mode/dev //caffe2/caffe2/perfkernels:embedding_bench
```
With D17750961:
```
buck run mode/opt //experimental/jianyuhuang/embeddingbag:eb
buck run mode/opt-lto //experimental/jianyuhuang/embeddingbag:eb
```
OSS test
```
python run_test.py -i nn -- TestNNDeviceTypeCPU.test_EmbeddingBag_per_sample_weights_and_new_offsets_cpu
```
Buck test
```
buck test mode/dev-nosan //caffe2/test:nn -- "test_EmbeddingBag_per_sample_weights_and_new_offsets_cpu"
OMP_NUM_THREADS=3 buck test mode/opt -c pytorch.parallel_backend=tbb //caffe2/test:nn -- "test_EmbeddingBag_per_sample_weights_and_new_offsets" --print-passing-details
```
Generate the AVX2 code for embedding_lookup_idx_avx2.cc:
```
python hp_emblookup_codegen.py --use-offsets
```
Differential Revision: D17768404
fbshipit-source-id: 8dcd15a62d75b737fa97e0eff17f347052675700
Summary:
Perf improvements to multi_head_attention_forward
- qkv_same and kv_same were not used outside of that branch. Further, kv_same was calculated even though it is not used if qkv_same
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30142
Differential Revision: D18610938
Pulled By: cpuhrsch
fbshipit-source-id: 19b7456f20aef90032b0f42d7da8c8a2d5563ee3
Summary:
Added check for indicies in Reduction::None case.
### Benchmark results
Note: Due to the size of the input tensors this time the random number generation is responsible for a significant portion of the total time. It is better to look at the individual net time-outputs (which do not include the input preparation).
Script used for benchmark.: [nnl_loss2d_benchmark.py](https://gist.github.com/andreaskoepf/5864aa91e243317cb282c1e7fe576e1b)
#### WITH PR applied
```
using reduction: none
CPU forward 1000 took 7.916500908322632e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.0002642290201038122
CPU forward 100000 took 0.003828087996225804
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.037140720000024885
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.33387596398824826
CPU forward TOTAL time 7.218988707987592
using reduction: mean
CPU forward 1000 took 9.165197843685746e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.0005258890159893781
CPU forward 100000 took 0.0050761590246111155
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.047345594997750595
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.4790863030066248
CPU forward TOTAL time 7.9106070210109465
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0005489500181283802
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0015284279943443835
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.015138130984269083
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.15741890601930209
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 1.6703072849777527
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 9.555764263990568
using reduction: sum
CPU forward 1000 took 8.789298590272665e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.000514078012201935
CPU forward 100000 took 0.005135576997417957
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.04715992201818153
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.4821214270195924
CPU forward TOTAL time 7.9119505700073205
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.00047759301378391683
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0015945070190355182
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.018208994006272405
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.15904426100314595
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 1.5679037219961174
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 9.495157692988869
```
#### WITHOUT original TH impl
```
using reduction: none
CPU forward 1000 took 0.0003981560003012419
CPU forward 10000 took 0.0035912430030293763
CPU forward 100000 took 0.035353766987100244
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.3428319719969295
CPU forward 10000000 took 3.364342701010173
CPU forward TOTAL time 11.166179805004504
using reduction: mean
CPU forward 1000 took 8.63690220285207e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.0004704220045823604
CPU forward 100000 took 0.0045734510058537126
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.046232511987909675
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.4191019559802953
CPU forward TOTAL time 7.846049971994944
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0005974550149403512
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0014057719963602722
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.013776941981632262
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.13876214998890646
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 1.3666698939923663
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 9.10526105100871
using reduction: sum
CPU forward 1000 took 7.598899537697434e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.00046885499614290893
CPU forward 100000 took 0.0044489419960882515
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.04495517900795676
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.418376043002354
CPU forward TOTAL time 7.789334400993539
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0004464260127861053
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0017732900159899145
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.01626713399309665
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.11790941300569102
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 1.4346664609911386
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 9.294745502003934
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28304
Differential Revision: D18350157
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: e9437debe51386a483f4265193c475cdc90b28e4
Summary:
Replaces fused TH kernels with a 2-liner of regular Tensor functions.
Benchmarking revealed that performance improves compared to PyTorch 1.2.
Refs: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/24631, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/24632, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/24764, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/24765
VitalyFedyunin
### Benchmarking results on my laptop:
## 1.4.0a0+f63c9e8 output
```
PyTorch version: 1.4.0a0+f63c9e8
CPU Operator sanity check:
tensor(0.5926, grad_fn=<MeanBackward0>)
tensor([-0.0159, -0.0170, -0.0011, -0.0083, -0.0140, -0.0217, -0.0290, -0.0262,
-0.0078, -0.0129])
double backward
tensor(-0.1540, grad_fn=<SumBackward0>)
ok
GPU Operator sanity check:
tensor(0.5601, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=<MeanBackward0>)
tensor([-0.0393, -0.0316, -0.0233, -0.0140, -0.0141, -0.0161, -0.0322, -0.0238,
-0.0054, -0.0151], device='cuda:0')
double backward
tensor(-0.2148, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=<SumBackward0>)
ok
CPU warmup 1000 took 9.025700273923576e-05
CPU warmup 10000 took 0.0009383050055475906
CPU warmup 100000 took 0.0015631120040779933
CPU warmup TOTAL time 0.0026368020044174045
CPU forward 1000 took 6.919399311300367e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.00014462800754699856
CPU forward 100000 took 0.0011234670091653243
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.014555767003912479
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.13409724000666756
CPU forward 100000000 took 1.246048310000333
CPU forward TOTAL time 1.3961777170043206
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0003219560021534562
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.00037290599721018225
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.001975035003852099
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.02621342398924753
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 0.2944270490115741
CPU for- & backward 100000000 took 1.6856628700043075
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 2.0091958299890393
GPU warmup 1000 took 0.0002462909906171262
GPU warmup 10000 took 9.991199476644397e-05
GPU warmup 100000 took 0.00034347400651313365
GPU warmup TOTAL time 0.0007382350013358518
GPU forward 1000 took 9.67290106927976e-05
GPU forward 10000 took 9.349700121674687e-05
GPU forward 100000 took 9.384499571751803e-05
GPU forward 1000000 took 0.0004975290066795424
GPU forward 10000000 took 0.0017606960027478635
GPU forward 100000000 took 0.003572814996005036
GPU forward TOTAL time 0.006185991995153017
GPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.00035818999458570033
GPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0003240450023440644
GPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.0003223370003979653
GPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.00036740700306836516
GPU for- & backward 10000000 took 0.0003690610028570518
GPU for- & backward 100000000 took 0.0003672500024549663
GPU for- & backward TOTAL time 0.002197896988946013
```
## 1.2 output
```
PyTorch version: 1.2.0
CPU Operator sanity check:
tensor(0.5926, grad_fn=<SoftMarginLossBackward>)
tensor([-0.0159, -0.0170, -0.0011, -0.0083, -0.0140, -0.0217, -0.0290, -0.0262,
-0.0078, -0.0129])
double backward
tensor(-0.1540, grad_fn=<SumBackward0>)
ok
GPU Operator sanity check:
tensor(0.5601, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=<SoftMarginLossBackward>)
tensor([-0.0393, -0.0316, -0.0233, -0.0140, -0.0141, -0.0161, -0.0322, -0.0238,
-0.0054, -0.0151], device='cuda:0')
double backward
tensor(-0.2148, device='cuda:0', grad_fn=<SumBackward0>)
ok
CPU warmup 1000 took 8.422900282312185e-05
CPU warmup 10000 took 0.00036992700188420713
CPU warmup 100000 took 0.003682684007799253
CPU warmup TOTAL time 0.004169487991021015
CPU forward 1000 took 5.521099956240505e-05
CPU forward 10000 took 0.00036948200431652367
CPU forward 100000 took 0.003762389998883009
CPU forward 1000000 took 0.03725024699815549
CPU forward 10000000 took 0.3614480490068672
CPU forward 100000000 took 3.6139175269927364
CPU forward TOTAL time 4.016912263003178
CPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0002734809968387708
CPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0006605249946005642
CPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.005437346000690013
CPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.051245586000732146
CPU for- & backward 10000000 took 0.5291594529990107
CPU for- & backward 100000000 took 5.23841712900321
CPU for- & backward TOTAL time 5.8253340990049765
GPU warmup 1000 took 0.0005757809994975105
GPU warmup 10000 took 0.0004058420017827302
GPU warmup 100000 took 0.0003764610009966418
GPU warmup TOTAL time 0.0013992580061312765
GPU forward 1000 took 0.0003543390048434958
GPU forward 10000 took 0.0003633670130511746
GPU forward 100000 took 0.0004807310033356771
GPU forward 1000000 took 0.0005875999922864139
GPU forward 10000000 took 0.0016903509967960417
GPU forward 100000000 took 0.014400018990272656
GPU forward TOTAL time 0.0179396449966589
GPU for- & backward 1000 took 0.0006167769897729158
GPU for- & backward 10000 took 0.0006845899915788323
GPU for- & backward 100000 took 0.000631830989732407
GPU for- & backward 1000000 took 0.0010741150035755709
GPU for- & backward 10000000 took 0.0017265130009036511
GPU for- & backward 100000000 took 0.014847910992102697
GPU for- & backward TOTAL time 0.01965981800458394
```
### Code used for performance test
```
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch.nn as nn
from timeit import default_timer
torch.manual_seed(0)
cpu = torch.device('cpu')
gpu = torch.device('cuda')
loss_fn = F.soft_margin_loss
def run_benchmark(name, depth, require_grad, device, fn):
total_start = default_timer()
for i in range(3, 3 + depth):
start = default_timer()
n = 10 ** i
a = torch.rand(n, requires_grad=require_grad, device=device)
b = torch.rand(n, device=device)
fn(a, b)
end = default_timer()
print('{} {} took {}'.format(name, n, end-start))
total_end = default_timer()
print('{} TOTAL time {}'.format(name, total_end-total_start))
def fwd_only(a, b):
out = loss_fn(a, b)
def fwd_bck(a, b):
out = loss_fn(a, b)
out.backward()
def sanity_check(name, device):
print('{} Operator sanity check:'.format(name))
a = torch.rand(10, requires_grad=True, device=device)
b = torch.rand(10, device=device)
out = loss_fn(a,b)
print(out)
out.backward()
print(a.grad)
print('double backward')
loss = loss_fn(a, b)
loss2 = torch.autograd.grad(loss, a, create_graph=True)
z = loss2[0].sum()
print(z)
z.backward()
print('ok')
print()
print('PyTorch version:', torch.__version__)
sanity_check('CPU', cpu)
sanity_check('GPU', gpu)
print()
run_benchmark('CPU warmup', 3, False, cpu, fwd_only)
run_benchmark('CPU forward', 6, False, cpu, fwd_only)
run_benchmark('CPU for- & backward', 6, True, cpu, fwd_bck)
print()
run_benchmark('GPU warmup', 3, False, gpu, fwd_only)
run_benchmark('GPU forward', 6, False, gpu, fwd_only)
run_benchmark('GPU for- & backward', 6, True, gpu, fwd_bck)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/27673
Differential Revision: D17889288
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 9ddffe4dbbfab6180847a8fec32443910f18f0a9
