Based on the [conversation](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/121791), we plan to drop the "highest, high, medium" to represent fp32 internal computation data types . Instead, we will directly use the algorithm to represent it.
### Design Choice: Directly use algorithms name like "TF32", "BF16".
#### Pros
- The names are more informative. 'tf32' is more informative than a simple "high".
- Easier to extend new algorithm like `tf32x3`
#### Cons
- "HIGHEST, HIGH, MEDIUM" indicated the relative precision between different algorithms. However, we can have more documents to discuss them.
### We provide a layered structure for backends/operators.
('f32' is short for 'fp32_precision')
### We provide 3 fp32 compute precision can be set:
- **"ieee"**: Not allowed to use any other internal computation data types .
- **"tf32"**: Allowed to use tf32 as internal computation data types.
- **"bf16"**: Allowed to use bf16 as internal computation data types.
- **"none"**: Precision's are not set. Can be override by its father node.
### Overriding Precision Settings
Child node can be override by its father node if it is set to default.
For current default settings:
```
backend = generic, op = all, precision setting = none
backend = cuda, op = all, precision setting = none
backend = cuda, op = conv, precision setting = tf32
backend = cuda, op = rnn, precision setting = tf32
backend = cuda, op = matmul, precision setting = none
backend = matmul, op = all, precision setting = none
backend = matmul, op = conv, precision setting = none
backend = matmul, op = rnn, precision setting = none
backend = matmul, op = matmul, precision setting = none
```
- If the user set `torch.backends.mkldnn.fp32_precision="bf16"`, his child nodes `torch.backends.mkldnn.matmul.fp32_precision` / `torch.backends.mkldnn.conv.fp32_precision` / `torch.backends.mkldnn.rnn.fp32_precision` will also be override to "bf16".
- If the user set `torch.backends.fp32_precision="bf16"`, `torch.backends.mkldnn.fp32_precision` and his child nodes will also we override to "bf16".
### Backward Compatible
Since new API allow user to have more fine-grained control. There will be some conflict. For example, previous `torch.backends.cudnn.allow_tf32` are not enough to represent the status for `torch.backends.cudnn.rnn.fp32_precision="ieee"` and `torch.backends.cudnn.conv.fp32_precision="tf32"`. Therefore, our goal for backward compatible is
- If the user only uses previous APIs, it will work as previous expectations.
- If the user use **new** API to change the status to an **un-representable** status for old API, and try to access the status by **old** API. We will raise Runtime Error and point the document for user.
### Test Plan
```
python test/test_cuda.py -k test_fp32_precision_with_tf32
python test/test_cuda.py -k test_fp32_precision_with_float32_matmul_precision
python test/test_cuda.py -k test_invalid_status_for_legacy_api
python test/test_mkldnn.py -k test_mlkdnn_get_set
python test/test_mkldnn.py -k test_generic_precision
python test/test_mkldnn.py -k test_invalid
python test/test_mkldnn.py -k test_default_use_parent
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125888
Approved by: https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/albanD
Co-authored-by: Jiang, Yanbing <yanbing.jiang@intel.com>
Noticed some of these ops were contributing to a big chunk of the runtime for OpenLLama as well as a few other benchmarks
At the op level, moving to a TensorIterator-based Metal kernel gives a 20x speedup. Will migrate the inverse trigonometric functions & log ops in a follow-up PR, as this one is already a bit large
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152876
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
By implementing `div_floor` and `div_trunc` . Do not mark `div_trunc` as OPMATH, to align following output with CPU(if division is performed in fp32, than result will be truncated to 25
```
import torch
print(torch.tensor([[-7.4688, -3.1289]], dtype=torch.float16,device="cpu").div(torch.tensor([-0.2988, -0.8789], dtype=torch.bfloat16,device="cpu"), rounding_mode="trunc"))
tensor([[24., 3.]])
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152758
Approved by: https://github.com/dcci
ghstack dependencies: #152663, #152515, #152737, #152743
For 3rd-party devices now, `` instantiate_device_type_tests()`` with explicitly passing ``str`` obj (rather than `List[str]/Tuple[str]`) to argument ``only_for`` or ``except_for`` would causes unexpected results.
For example, if calling ``instantiate_device_type_tests(TestXXX, globals(), only_for="cpu")``, then it goes into [filter_desired_device_types()](f38dae76ee/torch/testing/_internal/common_device_type.py (L729)) and results in ``only_for=['c', 'p', 'u']`` because ``only_for`` we passed is a "cpu" string.
This PR fixes the above unexpected behavior for ``str`` case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152177
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
As well as `.add`/`.sub` with complex alpha
Before this change `python3 -c "import torch;print(torch.rand(10, device='mps', dtype=torch.complex64).add(torch.rand(10, device='mps', dtype=torch.complex64), alpha=.5j))"` used to fail with
```
RuntimeError: value cannot be converted to type double without overflow
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152479
Approved by: https://github.com/dcci
ghstack dependencies: #152443, #152466
Using `logging.basicConfig` to set root logger's level is not a good behavior. Fix common_distributed.py to set level for current logger only, because it affects downstream's 3rd-party testing plugins.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152319
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
By instantiating it implicitly, otherwise attempts to run something like
```
% python3 -c "import torch; print(torch.special.entr(torch.testing.make_tensor(10, dtype=torch.bool, device='mps')))"
```
will fail with
```
Failed to created pipeline state object, error: Error Domain=AGXMetalG14X Code=3 "Compiler encountered an internal error"
```
Similar in spirit to https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/149123
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152204
Approved by: https://github.com/dcci
By reusing `c10/metal/atomic.h`
This also fixes `GPUTests.test_index_put_fallback[12]_mps` that is unrolled by inductor, so no need for dedicated atomic_add support
TODOs:
- Get rid of indexing kernel and compute it directly when kernel is run
- Simulate atomic_add for int64 types as series of int32 atomic-add-and-fetch
- Setup tolerances correctly to pass float16/bfloat16 tests (as CPU always takes sequential strategy)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151869
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/dcci
In this approach, we are catching any lane within a wave that is doing fastatomics to the same destination address and computing the sum on the CU. This is leading to 3x improvement in scatter_add performance and 2x improvement in index_select.
scatter_add performance on MI300x:
dtype|Baseline (before optimizations)|opportunistic fastatomics
-------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------
f32|1.389425039|0.430447996
fp16|2.195472956|0.779729486
bf16|2.194051027|0.784599513
Using the following reproducer
```
import torch
import triton
def main():
dtype = torch.float32
dim = 1305301
a = torch.rand(100, device="cuda", dtype=dtype)
index = torch.randint(0, 100, (dim,), device="cuda")
src = torch.rand(dim, device="cuda", dtype=dtype)
print("=" * 20)
print(
triton.testing.do_bench(
lambda: a.scatter_add(0, index, src),
return_mode="median",
)
)
print("=" * 20)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
co-authored by: @amd-hhashemi
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146264
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily, https://github.com/mxz297
Co-authored-by: Hashem Hashemi <hashem.hashemi@amd.com>
Fixes#135998
Adds support for fp8. These are compared bitwise, without atol and rtol. The implementation uses the same comparison functions, just with atol and rtol forced to zero. The error message is different from the default case; it only tells the user the first mismatch. This is to avoid triggering the error from #135998.
Test Plan:
New unit test covers new code paths.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150002
Approved by: https://github.com/cyyever, https://github.com/zou3519
Summary: add one option to allow skipping all reduce unused parameters, this could help improve training throughput significantly when the number of unused parameters is large in the model.
Test Plan: unit tests, CI
Differential Revision: D72282069
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151503
Approved by: https://github.com/mrshenli
Currently, `torch._chunk_cat` only supports contiguous inputs (due to `.view()` usage in `_pad_chunk()` supporting only contiguous tensor). This doesn't work for internal models where there can be non-contiguous input tensors:
- size=[8192, 16416], stride=[16448, 1] # stride[0] is larger than size[1]
- size=[1152, 384], stride=[1, 1152] # column-major tensor
In this PR, we relax the assumption on contiguous input tensor, by switching from `.view()` to `.reshape()`. Note that since `.reshape()` will try to use `.view()` under the hood whenever possible, this should not cause regression to existing use cases.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151263
Approved by: https://github.com/BoyuanFeng
Finishes up the work started in #121686 + adds test
Update: this was not as straightforward as I originally imagined. Context below.
**TL;DR:** `TestFoo{CPU, CUDA}` now actually derive from `TestFoo`! Also, `{CPU, CUDA}TestBase` setup / teardown logic is now always called (it is required to set the primary device), regardless of whether `super().setUpClass()` / `super().tearDownClass()` are called or not.
**Background:** The typical way to get device-specific tests is to write a generic `TestFoo` and call `instantiate_device_type_tests(TestFoo, locals())` to get `TestFooCPU`, `TestFooCUDA`, etc. After this, generic tests (e.g. `TestFoo.test_bar()`) become `TestFooCPU.test_bar_cpu()` / `TestFooCUDA.test_bar_cuda()`.
Behind the scenes, this was historically accomplished by creating a `TestFooCUDA` that derives from both a `CUDATestBase` and an *empty class* called `TestFoo_base`. This `TestFoo_base` has the same bases as `TestFoo`, but none of the test functions (e.g. `test_bar()`). The documented reason for this is to avoid things like a derived `TestFooCUDA.test_bar()` being discovered in addition to the real device-specific test `TestFooCUDA.test_bar_cuda()`.
(1) A reason this matters is because it should be possible to call e.g. `super().setUpClass()` from a custom setup / teardown classmethod. If the generated TestFooCUDA does not derive from TestFoo, but instead derives from the empty class described above, this syntax does not work; in fact there is no way to form a proper `super()` call that works across the device-specific test variants. Here's an example that breaks in the OpInfo tests:
070f389745/test/test_ops.py (L218-L221)
(2) Further, there is some precedent within a custom `setUpClass()` impl for storing things on the `cls` object to be accessed at test time. This must be the device-specific test class (`TestFooCUDA`) and not `TestFoo` for this to work. As an example, the open device registration tests load a module during setup and use it in the test logic:
070f389745/test/test_cpp_extensions_open_device_registration.py (L63-L77)070f389745/test/test_cpp_extensions_open_device_registration.py (L79-L80)
To accomplish both (1) and (2) at the same time, I decided to revisit the idea of utilizing a proper inheritance hierarchy for `TestFoo` -> `{TestFooCPU, TestFooCUDA}`. That is: have TestFooCPU / TestFooCUDA **actually** derive from `TestFoo`. This achieves both (1) and (2). The only thing left is to make sure the generic tests (e.g. `TestFoo.test_bar()`) are not discoverable, as was the stated reason for diverging from this in the first place. It turns out we can simply `delattr()` these generic tests from `TestFoo` once `TestFooCPU` / `TestFooCUDA` have been setup with the device-specific variants, and all works well. The `instantiate_device_type_tests(...)` logic already deletes `TestFoo` from scope, so I don't see a problem with deleting generic tests from this base class as well (CI will prove me right or wrong ofc).
**Side note:** I was encountering a weird race condition where sometimes the custom `setUpClass()` / `tearDownClass()` defined & swapped in [here](4a47dd9b3f/torch/testing/_internal/common_device_type.py (L940-L955)) would be used, and sometimes it wouldn't. This non-deterministic behavior was called out previously by @ngimel here:
4a47dd9b3f/test/inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py (L128-L130)
To address this, I moved this block of logic to before the first call to `instantiate_test()`, as that method queries for the primary device, and the primary device identification logic may manually invoke `setUpClass()` (see [here](4a47dd9b3f/torch/testing/_internal/common_device_type.py (L381-L384))). Goal: define the `setUpClass()` / `tearDownClass()` we want for correctness before they're ever called. This seems to work and the behavior is deterministic now AFAICT.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151129
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99, https://github.com/masnesral, https://github.com/malfet
Finishes up the work started in #121686 + adds test
Update: this was not as straightforward as I originally imagined. Context below.
**TL;DR:** `TestFoo{CPU, CUDA}` now actually derive from `TestFoo`! Also, `{CPU, CUDA}TestBase` setup / teardown logic is now always called (it is required to set the primary device), regardless of whether `super().setUpClass()` / `super().tearDownClass()` are called or not.
**Background:** The typical way to get device-specific tests is to write a generic `TestFoo` and call `instantiate_device_type_tests(TestFoo, locals())` to get `TestFooCPU`, `TestFooCUDA`, etc. After this, generic tests (e.g. `TestFoo.test_bar()`) become `TestFooCPU.test_bar_cpu()` / `TestFooCUDA.test_bar_cuda()`.
Behind the scenes, this was historically accomplished by creating a `TestFooCUDA` that derives from both a `CUDATestBase` and an *empty class* called `TestFoo_base`. This `TestFoo_base` has the same bases as `TestFoo`, but none of the test functions (e.g. `test_bar()`). The documented reason for this is to avoid things like a derived `TestFooCUDA.test_bar()` being discovered in addition to the real device-specific test `TestFooCUDA.test_bar_cuda()`.
(1) A reason this matters is because it should be possible to call e.g. `super().setUpClass()` from a custom setup / teardown classmethod. If the generated TestFooCUDA does not derive from TestFoo, but instead derives from the empty class described above, this syntax does not work; in fact there is no way to form a proper `super()` call that works across the device-specific test variants. Here's an example that breaks in the OpInfo tests:
070f389745/test/test_ops.py (L218-L221)
(2) Further, there is some precedent within a custom `setUpClass()` impl for storing things on the `cls` object to be accessed at test time. This must be the device-specific test class (`TestFooCUDA`) and not `TestFoo` for this to work. As an example, the open device registration tests load a module during setup and use it in the test logic:
070f389745/test/test_cpp_extensions_open_device_registration.py (L63-L77)070f389745/test/test_cpp_extensions_open_device_registration.py (L79-L80)
To accomplish both (1) and (2) at the same time, I decided to revisit the idea of utilizing a proper inheritance hierarchy for `TestFoo` -> `{TestFooCPU, TestFooCUDA}`. That is: have TestFooCPU / TestFooCUDA **actually** derive from `TestFoo`. This achieves both (1) and (2). The only thing left is to make sure the generic tests (e.g. `TestFoo.test_bar()`) are not discoverable, as was the stated reason for diverging from this in the first place. It turns out we can simply `delattr()` these generic tests from `TestFoo` once `TestFooCPU` / `TestFooCUDA` have been setup with the device-specific variants, and all works well. The `instantiate_device_type_tests(...)` logic already deletes `TestFoo` from scope, so I don't see a problem with deleting generic tests from this base class as well (CI will prove me right or wrong ofc).
**Side note:** I was encountering a weird race condition where sometimes the custom `setUpClass()` / `tearDownClass()` defined & swapped in [here](4a47dd9b3f/torch/testing/_internal/common_device_type.py (L940-L955)) would be used, and sometimes it wouldn't. This non-deterministic behavior was called out previously by @ngimel here:
4a47dd9b3f/test/inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py (L128-L130)
To address this, I moved this block of logic to before the first call to `instantiate_test()`, as that method queries for the primary device, and the primary device identification logic may manually invoke `setUpClass()` (see [here](4a47dd9b3f/torch/testing/_internal/common_device_type.py (L381-L384))). Goal: define the `setUpClass()` / `tearDownClass()` we want for correctness before they're ever called. This seems to work and the behavior is deterministic now AFAICT.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151129
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99, https://github.com/masnesral, https://github.com/malfet
This PR is the duplicated one for https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139975.
This PR is to add torch._scaled_mm for CPU backend.
_scaled_mm_out_cpu and _scaled_mm_cpu are new added and included in torch._scaled_mm CPU dispatch. We also add _scaled_mm_out_cpu_emulated as a fallback function if the current platform cannot run FP8 matmul using oneDNN. And this PR also updates the various UTs related to FP8 to support CPU tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150410
Approved by: https://github.com/atalman
This adds lazy initialization support to ProcessGroupGloo via `TORCH_GLOO_LAZY_INIT` or via `create_device(..., lazy_init=True)`
This is still a draft PR as there's one race condition when doing coalesced operations that needs to be fixed upstream in Gloo first. Depends on https://github.com/facebookincubator/gloo/pull/427 landing first
This also updates the gloo submodule to include the required changes.
Test plan:
added lazy init test variants
```
pytest -v test/distributed/test_c10d_gloo.py -k Lazy
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150801
Approved by: https://github.com/fduwjj
