1. Fix the wrong tests about lazy init for PrivateUse1 named foo
2. Refactor the tests and make it more flexible
3. Disable the two tests temporarily
- test_open_device_faketensor
- test_open_device_scalar_type_fallback
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125572
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#100152
1. Fix the wrong tests about lazy init for PrivateUse1 named foo
2. Fix wrong backend meta registry mechanism when compiling with clang++( compiling with g++ work well)(introduced by static variable in inline function)
3. Refactor the tests and make it more flexible
4. Disable the two tests temporarily
- test_open_device_storage_pin_memory
- test_compile_autograd_function_aliasing
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124712
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/malfet
1) add operand and get_dim_names API;
2) set will_resize to true when output tensor is undefined;
3) add abs_stub for dummy device and calculate on cpu device;
4) support dummy device copy with stride;
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120792
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/102970. See the comment [here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/102970#issuecomment-1577223773) for details.
We normally treat "outputs that alias inputs" specially in AOTAutograd, by replaying the views at runtime, instead of baking them into the graph. For views that are part of custom autograd functions though, we can't do that view-replay, since it will clobber the backwards function that the user specified in their custom autograd.Function.
Right now in this PR, I distinguish between "aliased inputs that are normal views" vs. "aliased inputs that are views that came from an autograd.Function call" by checking the outputs `.grad_fn` field, to see if it inherits from our custom CBackward function class. Then I added a new `OutputType` enum value, that we effectively treat the "normal" way (the same way that we treat ordinary, non-aliased outputs). The new enum val is mostly for debugging - so we can print it and know that our graph had custom autograd.Function aliased outputs in it.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102992
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/zou3519
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
as the title, add context support for custom device and testcase.
And in the future, we may want to refactor these hooks for different device to unify the APIs, would you agree my
idea？ @albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/105056
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Now for the custom device, we use `getattr` and `setattr` to run the func defined in custom device module in some files, such as `AMP`, `random`, `DDP` and so on. So I want to add a generic func to get these funcs more friendly, could you take a look? @bdhirsh @albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99048
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Add the serialization logic of backend metadata to the serialization of tensor, which is implemented through custom registration functions.
In #97429 , the structure backendMeta is provided in TensorImpl, and we think that this part of information may also need to be serialized for custom.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99808
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/huydhn
Complete the implementation of the interface is_pinned() of untyped storage class for privateuse1.
And refactor the implementation in typed storage by untyped_storage.is_pinned().
Hi, @ezyang
This is another improvement of untyped storage for privateuse1, can you take a moment to review it? Thanks.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100868
Approved by: https://github.com/kurtamohler, https://github.com/ezyang
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
For the scenario where users inherit storageimpl to implement their own subclasses, the current storage creation method cannot correctly create storage objects.
Refer to the registration method of Allocator to expand the creation method of storageimpl, users can register their own custom storageimpl creation.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100237
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Add the serialization logic of backend metadata to the serialization of tensor, which is implemented through custom registration functions.
In #97429 , the structure backendMeta is provided in TensorImpl, and we think that this part of information may also need to be serialized for custom.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99808
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Add the serialization logic of backend metadata to the serialization of tensor, which is implemented through custom registration functions.
In #97429 , the structure backendMeta is provided in TensorImpl, and we think that this part of information may also need to be serialized for custom.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99808
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
when create a torch.device obj, like `x=torch.device("foo")`, the device index is None.
So in this scenario, we need to get the current device index again.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99704
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#99326
Support storage pin_memory and is_pinned for custom device, by calling dispatched tensor operations.
@ezyang this pr is what we have discussed in issue #99326, would you please take a moment to review it, thanks.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99712
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
add entry for privateuse1 storage serialization register_package in _register_device_module.
1. User only need to implement `privateuse1_tag` and `privateuse1_deserialize` in the device module of open device. When registering device module, the methods are registered with _package_registry in storage serialization.
2. Provides a fixed sequence number 30 for privateuse1 in storage serialization _package_registry list.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98920
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Currently storage only considers partial backend. We want storage to create on custom backend by key PrivateUse1.
It also provides an easy automatic generation of storage-related attributes.
When the user registers a new backend, the corresponding methods and attributes can be automatically generated.
Do this code.
`torch.utils.rename_privateuse1_backend('foo')`
`torch.utils.generate_storage_for_privateuse1_backend()`
Then, get the following methods and attributes.
`torch.TypedStorage.is_foo`
`torch.TypedStorage.foo()`
`torch.UntypedStorage.is_foo`
`torch.UntypedStorage.foo()`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98478
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
#97593
A new extension mechanism has been added.
When the user registers a new backend, the corresponding methods and attributes can be automatically generated.
Do this code.
`torch.utils.rename_privateuse1_backend('foo')`
`torch.utils.generate_for_privateuse1_backend()`
Then, get the following methods and attributes.
`torch.Tensor.is_foo`
`torch.Tensor.foo()`
`torch.nn.Module.foo()`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98066
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Extend rng device related func，support custom device extensions，and default device is `cuda`.
@bdhirsh @kit1980 would you please take a moment to review my changes？
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98069
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
