Reference: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/#assert-statements
> Unlike Black, Ruff prefers breaking the message over breaking the assertion, similar to how both Ruff and Black prefer breaking the assignment value over breaking the assignment target:
>
> ```python
> # Input
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
>
> # Black
> assert (
> len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates
> ), f"This tests needs at least {priority+num_duplicates} many types."
>
> # Ruff
> assert len(policy_types) >= priority + num_duplicates, (
> f"This tests needs at least {priority + num_duplicates} many types."
> )
> ```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/144546
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
This PR proposes to use std::optional<Generator>& for underlying functions to avoid unnecessary copy and move operations. The torchgen code was changed to generate the new type.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120076
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Enable some sensible flake8-simplify rules. Mainly wanted to enable the SIM101, and `yield from` SIM103 checks. @kit1980 since you wanted to be tagged on this CI check.
Enabling this check also helped flag one logical bug so it's definitely beneficial (also fixed in this PR).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97984
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
- Make toIValue accept SymIntNode and SymFloatNode where number (aka Scalar) is
expected
- Binding for symintlistOptional in python arg parser
- Teach translate to convert from IntArrayRef to ArrayRef<int64_t>
- Don't query _symint function for meta info in LTC unless LTC is
code generating a symint function
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/86042
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
This fixes two problems:
- First, shape signature didn't respect the symint property (so it
would always mark the operator as symint). This was relatively
easy to fix.
- Second, the call to fallback goes directly through at::_ops, so
it must always be SymInt-aware, even if SymInt is disabled externally.
This was a bit more difficult, because the current LTC codegen
is poorly factored. First, I needed to make it so individual
arguments knew if they were going to be SymInt in LTC or not; second,
I need to plumb enough information about the enclosing bindings so
that I could use translate to do the expressions (previously, it was
just assumed the signatures matched.)
The LTC codegen would do well to have a complete rewrite, but this will
have to do for now, I suppose.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84832
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Also Back out "Revert D39075159: [acc_tensor] Use SymIntArrayRef for overloaded empty.memory_format's signature"
Original commit changeset: dab4a9dba4fa
Original commit changeset: dcaf16c037a9
Original Phabricator Diff: D38984222
Original Phabricator Diff: D39075159
Also update Metal registrations for C++ registration changes.
Also update NNPI registration to account for tightened schema checking
Differential Revision: [D39084762](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)
**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Facebook specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)!
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84173
Approved by: https://github.com/Krovatkin
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Addresses `Wc++98-compat-extra-semi` warning from https://github.com/llvm/torch-mlir/issues/1264 by removing extraneous semicolon after autogen LTC native function definitions.
```
/home/runner/work/torch-mlir/torch-mlir/build/tools/torch-mlir/python/torch_mlir/csrc/base_lazy_backend/generated/LazyNativeFunctions.cpp:4241:6: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi]
};
^
```
cc: @wconstab @desertfire @ke1337 @antoniojkim
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83955
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Done via
```
git grep -l 'SymbolicIntNode' | xargs sed -i 's/SymbolicIntNode/SymIntNodeImpl/g'
```
Reasoning for the change:
* Sym is shorter than Symbolic, and consistent with SymInt
* You usually will deal in shared_ptr<...>, so we're going to
reserve the shorter name (SymIntNode) for the shared pointer.
But I don't want to update the Python name, so afterwards I ran
```
git grep -l _C.SymIntNodeImpl | xargs sed -i 's/_C.SymIntNodeImpl/_C.SymIntNode/'
```
and manually fixed up the binding code
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82350
Approved by: https://github.com/Krovatkin
When constructing a lazy::Node, [null operands (optional values that aren't included) are dropped](30fb2c4aba/torch/csrc/lazy/core/ir.cpp (L82-L84)), so it’s possible for the stored operand list to be a different length than the one that was passed into the constructor.
This can become a problem during the call to `CanBeReused` in the autogen `LazyIr.h` code. For example:
```
bool CanBeReused(const torch::lazy::Value& input, const c10::optional<torch::lazy::Value>& weight, const c10::optional<torch::lazy::Value>& bias, const c10::optional<torch::lazy::Value>& running_mean, const c10::optional<torch::lazy::Value>& running_var, const bool& training, const double& momentum, const double& eps) const {
size_t i = 0;
std::cout << "Num operands: " << operands().size() << std::endl;
return (operand(i++) == input &&
operand(i++) == weight.value_or(kNullValue) &&
operand(i++) == bias.value_or(kNullValue) &&
operand(i++) == running_mean.value_or(kNullValue) &&
operand(i++) == running_var.value_or(kNullValue) &&
this->training == training &&
this->momentum == momentum &&
this->eps == eps);
}
```
Here we operate under the assumption that the number of operands stored in the `lazy::Node` is equal to the number of operands originally passed into the constructor. Recall that we drop any null operands though, so it’s possible to inadvertently access an invalid index at this point.
This PR addresses this issue by adding a new nullable_operand method which falls back to a null value instead of producing an index error when going out of bounds.
This should solve the issue found at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/79637#issuecomment-1162044545
cc: @antoniojkim @ke1337 @wconstab @desertfire
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80060
Approved by: https://github.com/desertfire
Add codegen infrastructure to generate IR nodes for non-native ops.
The proposed change is to add a `non_native` key to the `{backend}_native_functions.yaml` file that contains schema definitions similar to what is found in `native_functions.yaml`. e.g.
```
non_native:
...
- func: expand(Tensor input, int[] size, bool is_scalar_expand) -> Tensor
...
```
these definitions are parsed into a `LazyIrSchema` that can be used for generating IR nodes using `GenLazyIR`.
Fixes#74628
CC: @wconstab @desertfire @henrytwo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76535
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Previously when codegening ops like `zeros_` or `ones_` we'd hit a `Code below assumes there is at least one tensor arg error`. This check is not entirely correct which is what is causing the error to be thrown. There are ops like the ones mentioned that pass in a `device` parameter that can be used in place of the "first tensor".
CC: @wconstab @desertfire @henrytwo @ke1337
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76917
Approved by: https://github.com/desertfire
