Summary:
1. move module related stuff to test_module_container
2. created test_types for types and annotation
3. created test_misc for the rest
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/55560
Reviewed By: VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D27650911
Pulled By: walterddr
fbshipit-source-id: d895a7da9e9c3d25a662a37faf4daabc276b9c1a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52881
**This PR adds:**
1. logic to parse complex constants (complex literals of the form `bj`)
2. logic to parse complex lists
3. support for complex constructors: `complex(tensor/int/float/bool, tensor/int/float/bool)`
4. Limited operator support
- `add`, `sub`, `mul`, `torch.tensor`, `torch.as_tensor`
**Follow-up work:**
1. Add complex support for unary and other registered ops.
2. support complex constructor with string as input (this is supported in Python eager mode).
3. Test all emitXYZ for all XYZ in `ir_emitter.cpp` (currently only emitConst, emitValueToTensor are tested). e.g., test loops etc.
4. onnx doesn't support complex tensors, so we should error out with a clear and descriptive error message.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D27245059
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: af043b5159ae99a9cc8691b5a8401503fa8d6f05
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53908
This adds reinplacing to MKLDNN Subgraphs so that we replace `aten::add` with `aten::add_`. Normally you would have to prove device and dtype, but we know that already, and because we have explicit broadcast nodes for other reasons we dont have to prove that the output shape of add is the same as inputs.
Ive tested correctness on resnet, I'm going to do more extensive testing as well. When I benchmarked the "unsafe" version (always inplace) I saw average speedups of ~16% for both Single threaded and Multithreaded. I dont think the "safe" version will be far beyond; when I looked at resnet for example every `add` and `relu` were reinplaced.
Theres some question of reusing other alias / liveness / inplacing passes in SR. I thought about it, however I didnt want to add a cross-dependency between very different parts of the code base with a bunch of different assumptions. The logic here is also covering a simpler case and does not add much complexity IMO.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: Krovatkin
Differential Revision: D27132969
Pulled By: eellison
fbshipit-source-id: 121a38daaedf01363f6b66a814beaaa72a0ab0dc
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53682
With this, under the meta device, 101 tests passed and 16953 skipped.
It ain't much, but it's a start.
Some various bits and bobs:
- NotImplementedError suppression at test level is implemented
in the same way as CUDA memory leak check, i.e., by wrapping
test methods and monkeypatching them back in.
- I had to reimplement assertRaises/assertRaisesRegex from scratch to
ignore NotImplementedError when _ignore_not_implemented_error is True.
The implementation relies on a small amount of private API that hasn't
changed since 2010
- expectedAlertNondeterministic doesn't really work so I skipped them
all; there's probably a way to do it better
I tested this using `pytest --disable-warnings --tb=native -k meta --sw
test/*.py` and a pile of extra patches to make collection actually work
(lol).
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D26955539
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: ac21c8734562497fdcca3b614a28010bc4c03d74
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53424
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/24807 and supersedes the stale https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/25093 (Cc Microsheep). If you now run the reproduction
```python
import torch
if __name__ == "__main__":
t = torch.tensor([1, 2, 3], dtype=torch.float64)
```
with `pylint==2.6.0`, you get the following output
```
test_pylint.py:1:0: C0114: Missing module docstring (missing-module-docstring)
test_pylint.py:4:8: E1101: Module 'torch' has no 'tensor' member; maybe 'Tensor'? (no-
member)
test_pylint.py:4:38: E1101: Module 'torch' has no 'float64' member (no-member)
```
Now `pylint` doesn't recognize `torch.tensor` at all, but it is promoted in the stub. Given that it also doesn't recognize `torch.float64`, I think fixing this is out of scope of this PR.
---
## TL;DR
This BC-breaking only for users that rely on unintended behavior. Since `torch/__init__.py` loaded `torch/tensor.py` it was populated in `sys.modules`. `torch/__init__.py` then overwrote `torch.tensor` with the actual function. With this `import torch.tensor as tensor` does not fail, but returns the function rather than the module. Users that rely on this import need to change it to `from torch import tensor`.
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D26223815
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: 125b9ff3d276e84a645cd7521e8d6160b1ca1c21
Summary:
Previously `torch.jit.trace` relies on AutoGrad hooks to infer name of tensors in computation, including those of function/method arguments. This often doesn't work out because:
- These names often do not exist
- Tracer uses argument name of first tensor operation on each tensor as inferred argument names. These tensor operations have programmatically-generated names like `argument_1`
This PR extracts argument names directly from Python functions and pass them down to tracer, which then assigns them to correct graph inputs. This way, we always have the correct argument names captured in IR.
This is useful for both debugging and supporting using `InterfaceType` to represent traced modules.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/51775
Reviewed By: izdeby
Differential Revision: D26273105
Pulled By: gmagogsfm
fbshipit-source-id: 934a385041137dc3731bb6fa8657b11532fed9e5
Summary:
Previously TorchScript allows a ignore-all type check suppression rule that looks like
```
code code code # type: ignore
```
But a more common use case is
```
code code code # type: ignore[specific-rule]
```
This PR allows the more common use case
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/48643
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/51675
Reviewed By: ansley
Differential Revision: D26304870
Pulled By: gmagogsfm
fbshipit-source-id: 0ac9ee34f0219c86e428318a69484d5aa3ec433f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/51340
**Summary**
`toIValue` assumes that any value passed for an argument of type
`torch.device` is a valid device object, even when it is not. This can
lead to device type arguments of functions being assigned incorrect
values (see #51098).
This commit adds an explicit check that the passed in object is indeed a
`torch.device` using `THPDevice_Check` and only then does is it
converted to an `IValue`. Since implicit conversion from strings to
devices is generally allowed, if `THPDevice_Check` fails, it is assumed
that the object is a string and an `IValue` containing a `c10::Device`
containing the passed in string is returned.
**Test Plan**
This commit adds a unit test to `test_jit.py` to test that invalid
strings passed as devices are not longer silently accepted.
**Fixes**
This commit fixes#51098.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: pbelevich
Differential Revision: D26187190
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 48c990203431da30f9f09381cbec8218d763325b
Summary:
This simplifies our handling and allows passing CompilationUnits from Python to C++ defined functions via PyBind easily.
Discussed on Slack with SplitInfinity
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50614
Reviewed By: anjali411
Differential Revision: D25938005
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 94aadf0c063ddfef7ca9ea17bfa998d8e7b367ad
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50593
There are no equivalent to torch.FloatTensor, torch.cuda.FloatTensor for complex
types. So `get_gpu_type` and `get_cpu_type` are broken for complex tensors.
Also found a few places that explicitly cast inputs to floating point types,
which would drop the imaginary component before running the test.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D25954050
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 1fa8e5af233aa095c839d5e2f860564baaf92aef
