The goal of this PR is to provide a standard way to create simple treespec instances and hide the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
Changes:
1. Add function `treespec_leaf()` to replace `LeafSpec()`.
2. Add function `treespec_tuple(...)` and `treespec_dict(...)` to create treespec for `tuple` / `dict` which is used for `*args` / `**kwargs`. This avoids direct modification to `treespec` instances that rely on the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
3. Change `len(spec.children_specs)` to `spec.num_children`.
4. Change `isinstance(spec, LeafSpec)` to `spec.is_leaf()`.
------
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160843
Approved by: https://github.com/mlazos
The goal of this PR is to provide a standard way to create simple treespec instances and hide the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
Changes:
1. Add function `treespec_leaf()` to replace `LeafSpec()`.
2. Add function `treespec_tuple(...)` and `treespec_dict(...)` to create treespec for `tuple` / `dict` which is used for `*args` / `**kwargs`. This avoids direct modification to `treespec` instances that rely on the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
3. Change `len(spec.children_specs)` to `spec.num_children`.
4. Change `isinstance(spec, LeafSpec)` to `spec.is_leaf()`.
------
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160843
Approved by: https://github.com/mlazos
The goal of this PR is to provide a standard way to create simple treespec instances and hide the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
Changes:
1. Add function `treespec_leaf()` to replace `LeafSpec()`.
2. Add function `treespec_tuple(...)` and `treespec_dict(...)` to create treespec for `tuple` / `dict` which is used for `*args` / `**kwargs`. This avoids direct modification to `treespec` instances that rely on the implementation details of the `PyTreeSpec` class.
3. Change `len(spec.children_specs)` to `spec.num_children`.
4. Change `isinstance(spec, LeafSpec)` to `spec.is_leaf()`.
------
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160843
Approved by: https://github.com/mlazos
We need to make function schema proxyable to trace a the auto_functionalized hop that takes function schema as inputs. The implementation basically follows how we support torchbind object:
1. upon seeing an untracked function schema arg, we creates a constant get_attr node
2. we track the function schema argument in export to support lift/unlift.
3. we need to support serde for functional schema. We'll add support for this in follow-up PRs.
However, compared with torchbind object:
1. we don't need a dynamo implementation, because the function schema is added when we auto_functionalize a hop to the argument of auto_functionalized. One potential use case is users re-traces an exported program with strict mode. Since non-strict is the default now, we don't see a use case yet.
2. we don't need an inductor implementation, because the function schema will go away after auto_functionalized re-inplacing pass.
edit: we greatly simplifies (and generalizes) the implementation following @zou3519 's suggestion of using pytree.register_constant
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/152073
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #152072
If optree is less than the minimum version, we should pretend it doesn't
exist.
The problem right now is:
- Install optree==0.12.1
- `import torch._dynamo`
- This raise an error "min optree version is 0.13.0"
The fix is to pretend optree doesn't exist if it is less than the min
version.
There are ways to clean up this PR more (e.g. have a single source of
truth for the version, some of the variables are redundant), but I am
trying to reduce the risk as much as possible for this to go into 2.7.
Test Plan:
I verified the above problem was fixed. Also tried some other things,
like the following, which now gives the expected behavior.
```py
>>> import torch
>>> import optree
>>> optree.__version__
'0.12.1'
>>> import torch._dynamo
>>> import torch._dynamo.polyfills.pytree
>>> import torch.utils._pytree
>>> import torch.utils._cxx_pytree
ImportError: torch.utils._cxx_pytree depends on optree, which is
an optional dependency of PyTorch. To u
se it, please upgrade your optree package to >= 0.13.0
```
I also audited all non-test callsites of optree and torch.utils._cxx_pytree.
Follow along with me:
optree imports
- torch.utils._cxx_pytree. This is fine.
- [guarded by check] f76b7ef33c/torch/_dynamo/polyfills/pytree.py (L29-L31)
_cxx_pytree imports
- [guarded by check] torch.utils._pytree (changed in this PR)
- [guarded by check] torch/_dynamo/polyfills/pytree.py (changed in this PR)
- [guarded by try-catch] f76b7ef33c/torch/distributed/_functional_collectives.py (L17)
- [guarded by try-catch] f76b7ef33c/torch/distributed/tensor/_op_schema.py (L15)
- [guarded by try-catch] f76b7ef33c/torch/distributed/tensor/_dispatch.py (L35)
- [guarded by try-catch] f76b7ef33c/torch/_dynamo/variables/user_defined.py (L94)
- [guarded by try-catch] f76b7ef33c/torch/distributed/tensor/experimental/_func_map.py (L14)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/151257
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/XuehaiPan
Summary:
- We are saying the minimum version of pytree that PyTorch can use is
0.13.0
- If a user imports torch.utils._cxx_pytree, it will raise an
ImportError if optree doesn't exist or exists and is less than the
minimum version.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/150889. There are
actually two parts to that issue:
1. dtensor imports torch.utils._cxx_pytree, but the optree installed in
the environment might be too old. Instead, raising ImportError in
torch.utils._cxx_pytree solves the issue.
2. We emit an "optree too low version" warning. I've deleted the
warning in favor of the more explicit ImportError.
Test Plan:
- code reading
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/150956
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/atalman, https://github.com/XuehaiPan
Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Changes in this PR:
1. Add `is_structseq` and `is_structseq_class` functions to determine a object or a class is PyStructSequence.
2. Add a generic class `structseq` which can be used as the registration key for PyStructSequence types like `namedtuple` for Named Tuple types.
3. Change `is_namedtuple` to accept subclasses of namedtuple to be namedtuple. Before this PR, only namedtuple class directly created by `collections.namedtuple` or `typing.NamedTuple` were namedtuple classes while their subclasses were not. This PR makes `is_namedtuple` return true for subclasses of namedtuple class.
Resolves#75982. New tests are included in this PR.
- #75982
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113257
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
As title, this enables `nonstrict_trace`-ed function to take in object
whose type has been `pytree.register_constant`-ed, as long as the object
existed outside the `torch.compile` region. This also forces Dynamo to
emit a `EQUALS_MATCH` guard on the object.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/148007
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #148385
## Context
> **Note:** `mark_traceable` got renamed to `nonstrict_trace` after
> offline discussion. The reasons are (1) it aligns with `torch.export`'s
> `nonstrict` notion, and (2) it's more definitive in behavior suggestion.
1. [Overall Design](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O-dR2ZQaJQVt_v67AVcDCw2yJLtqgkZFwoXK0buEWRg/edit?tab=t.0)
2. [Dynamo graph representation with `torch._higher_order_ops.flat_apply`](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YHl5nPTJvYeCPE5TO9uA18DPWNgUYGE4gCn6bFvXcBM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.xtw3hhbro4gn)
## Summary
This patch adds a `torch._dynamo.nonstrict_trace` decorator, which
currently is an enhanced version of `torch._dynamo.allow_in_graph` (see
docstring for their differences). Specifically, this patch focuses on
the UI and functionality prototyping/plumbing.
The main enhancement is supporting more input types, and the
implementation challenge lies in reconstructing the input objects from
Dynamo `VariableTracker` (while accounting for buffered side-effects and
guards). This patch takes a middle-ground (simple implementation with a
bit of user labor), by
1. asking the user to provide pytree registration for non-proxy-able
input types,
2. letting Dynamo trace through `pytree_flatten` (which accounts for
buffered side-effects and guards automatically),
3. and passing in the TreeSpec as a graph attribute constant into
`torch._higher_order_ops.flat_apply` (which unflattens the inputs and
invokes the underlying function).
## Next Steps
In subsequent patches, we will try to support the following:
- annotating on class method
- reads to global tensors
- inputs that contains `pytree.register_constant`-ed instances.
- function as input
- more output types (e.g., any pytree-registered type)
- `torch.nn.Module` as inputs
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146367
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #146714
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145815 used caching to for treespec_loads calculation to speed up AOTI module call.
However, this made tests flaky due when comparing TreeSpec for objects in local scope. ie. 'test_export.TestExport.test_pytree_register_nested_data_class.<locals>.Inner'
Type comparison will yield False when local scopes are different due to lru_cache.
Since this comparison is only used for testing purpose, we will only test if str(type) are equal.
Test Plan:
```
PYTORCH_TEST_WITH_ROCM=1 python test/export/test_retraceability.py
```
Differential Revision: D69137706
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146442
Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi
This PR:
- adds pytree.register_constant for registering a class to be treated as
a constant by torch.compile/torch.fx
- adds a very barebones flat_apply HOP. This should be sufficient to get
mark_traceable working. A lot more work is necessary to get the custom
operator case working (when make_fx sees a custom operator with PyTree
arg types, it needs to emit a call to the flat_apply HOP).
- I expect the flat_apply HOP to change a lot, I want to ship this in
the current state to unblock the mark_traceable and custom ops
work.
Test Plan:
- It's kind of difficult to test the barebones flat_apply HOP "works" so
I added a really simple test.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/146060
Approved by: https://github.com/StrongerXi, https://github.com/yanboliang
ghstack dependencies: #146059
Summary: Treespec can be reused instead of calculated from str every AOTI module call. Using cached result saves 0.2ms for each module call.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F1974751578}
After:
{F1974751667}
Differential Revision: D68749539
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/145815
Approved by: https://github.com/henrylhtsang
Summary:
Add experimental support for torch.nn.Module as input types.
Before this change, we don't support module inputs but recently we saw some interesting use cases like gpt-fast https://github.com/pytorch-labs/gpt-fast/blob/main/generate.py#L68 where we directly pass in a module input for different variants of the same models.
Since we don't really care about non-param or non-buffer states in non strict mode, we don't care about those either and pretend they are like plain constants during tracing. We treat any module input like a nested container of tensor, and each time we will automatically register a pytree handler for these module types to flatten its state dict into a group of tensors. We will just inline any module method call during tracing like we did for `self` module in export_for_training. This will make input modules' behavior very similar to the training module in typical case, except that we don't record the inputs as parameter or buffers but rather just plain user inputs.
Test Plan: buck run mode/opt caffe2/test:test_export -- -r test_module_input
Differential Revision: D67680827
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143925
Approved by: https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan
Changes:
1. Bump `ruff` from 0.7.4 to 0.8.4
2. Change `%`-formatted strings to f-string
3. Change arguments with the `__`-prefix to positional-only arguments with the `/` separator in function signature.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143753
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
