torch.cuda._busy_wait_for_flag() will launch a kernel that spins until a flag is set by a corresponding torch.cuda._clear_flag(). These **must** be run on separate streams or it will deadlock.
When used correctly these kernels will put work on the GPU that is more predictable than torch.cuda._sleep() in cases where the unit test is depending on the GPU being busy.
Fixes#120318.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/166218
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily
Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
Summary:
The implementation adds the ability to:
Set custom metadata strings that will be attached to all subsequent allocations
Clear or change the metadata at any point
View the metadata in memory snapshots via _dump_snapshot()
Test Plan: Added test in test_cuda.py and check manually in snapshot to see that metadata was added.
Differential Revision: D84654933
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165490
Approved by: https://github.com/yushangdi
Summary:
The implementation adds the ability to:
Set custom metadata strings that will be attached to all subsequent allocations
Clear or change the metadata at any point
View the metadata in memory snapshots via _dump_snapshot()
Test Plan: Added test in test_cuda.py and check manually in snapshot to see that metadata was added.
Differential Revision: D84654933
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165490
Approved by: https://github.com/yushangdi
This is a cleaner implementation of opaque objects (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162660). Instead now we just need to do:
Call `register_opaque_type` to register the type as being "opaque" and allowed by custom ops. You also need to pass a unique name that maps to the type.
```python
class OpaqueQueue:
def __init__(self, queue: list[torch.Tensor], init_tensor_: torch.Tensor) -> None:
super().__init__()
self.queue = queue
self.init_tensor_ = init_tensor_
def push(self, tensor: torch.Tensor) -> None:
self.queue.append(tensor)
def pop(self) -> torch.Tensor:
if len(self.queue) > 0:
return self.queue.pop(0)
return self.init_tensor_
def size(self) -> int:
return len(self.queue)
register_opaque_type(OpaqueQueue, "_TestOpaqueObject_OpaqueQueue")
```
When creating the custom op, the schema will then use the unique name:
```python
self.lib = torch.library.Library("_TestOpaqueObject", "FRAGMENT")
torch.library.define(
"_TestOpaqueObject::queue_push",
"(_TestOpaqueObject_OpaqueQueue a, Tensor b) -> ()",
tags=torch.Tag.pt2_compliant_tag,
lib=self.lib,
)
@torch.library.impl(
"_TestOpaqueObject::queue_push", "CompositeExplicitAutograd", lib=self.lib
)
def push_impl(queue: OpaqueQueue, b: torch.Tensor) -> None:
assert isinstance(queue, OpaqueQueue)
queue.push(b)
```
Using the custom op:
```python
queue = OpaqueQueue([], torch.zeros(3))
torch.ops._TestOpaqueObject.queue_push(queue, torch.ones(3))
self.assertTrue(queue.size(), 1)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165004
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This is a cleaner implementation of opaque objects (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162660). Instead now we just need to do:
Call `register_opaque_type` to register the type as being "opaque" and allowed by custom ops. You also need to pass a unique name that maps to the type.
```python
class OpaqueQueue:
def __init__(self, queue: list[torch.Tensor], init_tensor_: torch.Tensor) -> None:
super().__init__()
self.queue = queue
self.init_tensor_ = init_tensor_
def push(self, tensor: torch.Tensor) -> None:
self.queue.append(tensor)
def pop(self) -> torch.Tensor:
if len(self.queue) > 0:
return self.queue.pop(0)
return self.init_tensor_
def size(self) -> int:
return len(self.queue)
register_opaque_type(OpaqueQueue, "_TestOpaqueObject_OpaqueQueue")
```
When creating the custom op, the schema will then use the unique name:
```python
self.lib = torch.library.Library("_TestOpaqueObject", "FRAGMENT")
torch.library.define(
"_TestOpaqueObject::queue_push",
"(_TestOpaqueObject_OpaqueQueue a, Tensor b) -> ()",
tags=torch.Tag.pt2_compliant_tag,
lib=self.lib,
)
@torch.library.impl(
"_TestOpaqueObject::queue_push", "CompositeExplicitAutograd", lib=self.lib
)
def push_impl(queue: OpaqueQueue, b: torch.Tensor) -> None:
assert isinstance(queue, OpaqueQueue)
queue.push(b)
```
Using the custom op:
```python
queue = OpaqueQueue([], torch.zeros(3))
torch.ops._TestOpaqueObject.queue_push(queue, torch.ones(3))
self.assertTrue(queue.size(), 1)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/165004
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
## Summary
- add a CuBLASReductionOption enum so the CUDA context can track reduced-precision and split-K options
- extend the Python bindings, backend helpers, and docs to accept an optional allow_splitk argument for fp16/bf16 matmul controls
- update cuBLAS/cuBLASLt call sites plus dynamo guards and tests to respect the new combinations
## Testing
- python test/test_cuda.py TestCuda.test_cublas_allow_fp16_reduced_precision_reduction_get_set -v *(fails: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'psutil')*
------
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68e404623178832f8a3e1d34e1e175da
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164766
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/albanD
Low-level PyTorch APIs should be usable/stable enough at this point but we might move the underlying driver API usage a bit from here...
Built on top of @drisspg 's branch
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/159104
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Co-authored-by: drisspg <drisspguessous@gmail.com>
Low-level PyTorch APIs should be usable/stable enough at this point but we might move the underlying driver API usage a bit from here...
Built on top of @drisspg 's branch
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/159104
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Co-authored-by: drisspg <drisspguessous@gmail.com>
`grad_dtype` is a new attribute on Tensor to control gradient dtype:
- Access/setting is leaf-only.
- grad_dtype is respected when (1) when assigning to .grad, and (2) in the engine after the previous node produces incoming gradients for AccumulateGrad. (See table below for details)
- Not setting grad_dtype preserves the current behavior. Accessing it returns `t.dtype`
- `grad_dtype` cannot be set when there is already a `.grad` present and the dtypes conflict.
| `grad_dtype` setting | Setting `.grad` manually | Incoming gradient from autograd engine |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| **Default (tensor’s dtype)** | `.grad` must match tensor’s dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to tensor’s dtype |
| **Set to specific dtype** | `.grad` must match that dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to the specified dtype |
| **Set to `None`** | `.grad` may be any dtype | Engine does not cast; accepts incoming grad dtype as-is |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162815
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#156052 and #156444.
This PR setup the privateuseone key in Python to be used as a python backend for pytorch.
Meaning that, after calling `setup_privateuseone_for_python_backend('npy')`, one can use a subclass to with that device to hold arbitrary python data as "device data" and use `torch.library` to register ops that takes that Tensor.
Changes done in this PR:
1. Register an vanilla Device Guard: I extended NoOpDeviceGuard to have allow device index of 0 and to not raise errors when event related functions are accessed. If I don't do those, when calling backward I would get errors. (CPU backend uses NoOpDeviceGuard just fine, although there seems to be special treatment of CPU in the autograd engine.
2. Tensor subclass allows not having `__torch_dispatch__` if the device is not CUDA or CPU. The comment of the check suggests it was to avoid segfault when calling into ops that expects a storage. Here we have a different device so will not call into those ops.
3. python function that invokes the other incantations to setup the privateusekey backend.
This took inspiration of https://github.com/bdhirsh/pytorch_open_registration_example and https://github.com/tinygrad/tinygrad/blob/master/extra/torch_backend/wrapped_tensor.cpp; great thanks to @bdhirsh and @geohot.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/157859
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#156052 and #156444.
This PR setup the privateuseone key in Python to be used as a python backend for pytorch.
Meaning that, after calling `setup_privateuseone_for_python_backend('npy')`, one can use a subclass to with that device to hold arbitrary python data as "device data" and use `torch.library` to register ops that takes that Tensor.
Changes done in this PR:
1. Register an vanilla Device Guard: I extended NoOpDeviceGuard to have allow device index of 0 and to not raise errors when event related functions are accessed. If I don't do those, when calling backward I would get errors. (CPU backend uses NoOpDeviceGuard just fine, although there seems to be special treatment of CPU in the autograd engine.
2. Tensor subclass allows not having `__torch_dispatch__` if the device is not CUDA or CPU. The comment of the check suggests it was to avoid segfault when calling into ops that expects a storage. Here we have a different device so will not call into those ops.
3. python function that invokes the other incantations to setup the privateusekey backend.
This took inspiration of https://github.com/bdhirsh/pytorch_open_registration_example and https://github.com/tinygrad/tinygrad/blob/master/extra/torch_backend/wrapped_tensor.cpp; great thanks to @bdhirsh and @geohot.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/157859
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
In various benchmarks scattered across the repo, the limits for flops/second and memory bandwidth are usually hardcoded for a single device. This utility could help in providing a more structured way to query the device capabilities. If this is approved, we can use it when reporting flops efficiency and bandwidth relative to peak in the benchmarks and tests. The intent is to add more devices, more parameters (e.g. L2 cache bandwidth, NVLink, etc.) for both CPUs and accelerators.
Testing:
```
import torch
if torch.cuda.is_available():
device = torch.cuda.current_device()
mod = torch.get_device_module('cuda')
hw = mod._device_limits.GPULimits(device)
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float16))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float32))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float64))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.bfloat16))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.int8))
print(hw.get_memory_bandwidth_Bps() / 1e9)
print(hw.get_shared_memory_bandwidth_Bps() / 1e9)
# Output on an H100 GPU
1070.53056
535.26528
66.90816
1070.53056
2141.06112
4893.696
33454.08
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162942
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/albanD
A big pain point ppl have with custom ops is that they do not accept arbitrary input/outputs. In this PR we create the concept of an "OpaqueObject" which allows users to pass arbitrary python objects into custom operators.
Some still slightly annoying parts with this implementation:
- The schema of the operator is `__torch__.torch.classes.aten.OpaqueObject` instead of whatever python type
- `@torch.library.custom_op` doesn't work.. yet?
UX:
```python
from torch._library.opaque_object import make_opaque, get_payload
# your custom python class
class OpaqueQueue:
def __init__(self, queue: list[torch.Tensor], init_tensor_: torch.Tensor) -> None:
super().__init__()
self.queue = queue
self.init_tensor_ = init_tensor_
def push(self, tensor: torch.Tensor) -> None:
self.queue.append(tensor)
def pop(self) -> torch.Tensor:
if len(self.queue) > 0:
return self.queue.pop(0)
return self.init_tensor_
def size(self) -> int:
return len(self.queue)
queue = OpaqueQueue([], torch.zeros(3))
obj: torch._C.ScriptObject = make_opaque(queue)
# obj.payload stores a direct reference to this python queue object
self.assertEqual(get_payload(obj), queue)
# This is able to be passed through the dispatcher
torch.ops._TestOpaqueObject.queue_push(obj, torch.ones(3))
self.assertTrue(queue.size(), 1)
```
Authoring a custom op:
```python
lib = torch.library.Library("_TestOpaqueObject", "FRAGMENT")
torch.library.define(
f"_TestOpaqueObject::queue_push",
"(__torch__.torch.classes.aten.OpaqueObject a, Tensor b) -> ()",
tags=torch.Tag.pt2_compliant_tag,
lib=lib,
)
@torch.library.impl(f"{libname}::queue_push", "CompositeExplicitAutograd", lib=lib)
def push_impl(q: torch._C.ScriptObject, b: torch.Tensor) -> None:
# We can get the payload directly by get_payload(q)
queue = get_payload(q)
assert isinstance(queue, OpaqueQueue)
queue.push(b)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162660
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
In various benchmarks scattered across the repo, the limits for flops/second and memory bandwidth are usually hardcoded for a single device. This utility could help in providing a more structured way to query the device capabilities. If this is approved, we can use it when reporting flops efficiency and bandwidth relative to peak in the benchmarks and tests. The intent is to add more devices, more parameters (e.g. L2 cache bandwidth, NVLink, etc.) for both CPUs and accelerators.
Testing:
```
import torch
if torch.cuda.is_available():
device = torch.cuda.current_device()
mod = torch.get_device_module('cuda')
hw = mod._device_limits.GPULimits(device)
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float16))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float32))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.float64))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.bfloat16))
print(hw.get_tflops_per_second(torch.int8))
print(hw.get_memory_bandwidth_Bps() / 1e9)
print(hw.get_shared_memory_bandwidth_Bps() / 1e9)
# Output on an H100 GPU
1070.53056
535.26528
66.90816
1070.53056
2141.06112
4893.696
33454.08
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162942
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Reland of #160532
Summary:
To support exporting a cuda model on a CPU-only machine under fake tensor mode. User commonly need to move sample inputs to the cuda device with .to("cuda:0") or .to("cuda") call. This diff supports this.
I expect the following pattern to work
```
with FakeTensorMode(allow_non_fake_inputs=True):
cuda_module = module.to("cuda:0")
cuda_sample_inputs = tuple([x.to("cuda:0") for x in sample_inputs])
with torch.no_grad():
ep = torch.export.export(cuda_module, cuda_sample_inputs)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163016
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163187
Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi
Reland of #160532
Summary:
To support exporting a cuda model on a CPU-only machine under fake tensor mode.
User commonly need to move sample inputs to the cuda device with .to("cuda:0") or .to("cuda") call.
This diff supports this.
I expect the following pattern to work
```
with FakeTensorMode(allow_non_fake_inputs=True):
cuda_module = module.to("cuda:0")
cuda_sample_inputs = tuple([x.to("cuda:0") for x in sample_inputs])
with torch.no_grad():
ep = torch.export.export(cuda_module, cuda_sample_inputs)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163016
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
Summary:
To support exporting a cuda model on a CPU-only machine under fake tensor mode.
User commonly need to move sample inputs to the cuda device with .to("cuda:0") or .to("cuda") call.
This diff supports this.
I expect the following pattern to work
```
with FakeTensorMode(allow_non_fake_inputs=True):
cuda_module = module.to("cuda:0")
cuda_sample_inputs = tuple([x.to("cuda:0") for x in sample_inputs])
with torch.no_grad():
ep = torch.export.export(cuda_module, cuda_sample_inputs)
```
Test Plan:
CI
Rollback Plan:
Differential Revision: D80181887
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/160532
Approved by: https://github.com/henryoier, https://github.com/ezyang
