At high current implementation of constrains functions (constrain_as_**) will raise exception for the following code snippets:
```
def f(x):
a = x.item()
constrain_as_size(a, 4, 7)
return torch.empty((a, 4))
inp = torch.tensor([5])
ep = torch._export.export(f, (inp,))
```
The reason is because current constrain logic is:
1) Purely python so it won't survive AOT export (the full node is gone after AOT export since AOT export only maintains aten level op).
2) Utilize side effect to add range constraints for traced symbol's shape env ([code](9591e52880/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (L370-L372))).
3) If runtime assertion is turned on (by default). [`_AddRuntimeAssertionsForConstraintsPass`](9591e52880/torch/_export/passes/add_runtime_assertions_for_constraints_pass.py (L98-L100)) will try to append assertion node based on range constrains extracted from shape env of symbol during another interpretation round.
4). However, since 1), in the round of AOT export, range constraints logic won't run for symbols generated during this round. And later there is no range constrains information available for assertion round and caused issue.
5) As a result of above, it will failure at `torch.empty((a, 4))` (there is no constrains for `a` that it must be positive).
The fix here is just to implement range constrain logic as a native aten op (CPU implementation as no-op) to make it be able to survive AOT export.
**NOTE:**
[Logic](2d745b95d7/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (L350-L365C15)) within [`constrain_range`](2d745b95d7/torch/fx/experimental/symbolic_shapes.py (LL313C74-L313C74)) is split out as `constrain_range_int` to capture case when non `SymInt` is passed in and reused in the new `_constrain_range`. The reason is when non `SymInt` is provided:
* If it directly calls `sym_constrain_range`, the C++ version will be called which will be no-op.
* So in this case it calls `constrain_range_int` instead to be able to capture issue like user provides a input whose tensor's shape could be out of range during exporting, like the following for above code example:
```
...
inp = torch.tensor([10])
ep = torch._export.export(f, (inp,)) # immediately raise error
```
Differential Revision: [D46734204](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46734204)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103346
Approved by: https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan
This PR introduces a new operator called aten._assert_async.msg, which allows passing a tensor value and assertion message as inputs. As part of TorchDynamo, we're replacing the use of torch._assert with this new operator so that make_fx also knows how to handle assertions. This is subset of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98878, refer there for historic reviews.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100101
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Applies the remaining flake8-comprehension fixes and checks. This changes replace all remaining unnecessary generator expressions with list/dict/set comprehensions which are more succinct, performant, and better supported by our torch.jit compiler. It also removes useless generators such as 'set(a for a in b)`, resolving it into just the set call.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/94676
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary: Handwritten out ops should have feature parity with the codegend ones. This means they should resize out to the appropriate size. Q. Why are these handwritten instead of codegend anyway? Q2. Wheres a good spot to put the resize and copy helpers since they are reused in the codegend out kernels
Test Plan: ci.
Differential Revision: D42177051
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/91194
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
# Summary
Creates a callable native function that can determine which implementation of scaled dot product will get called. This allows to bump re-order the runtime dispatch of SDP to enable autograd.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/89029
Approved by: https://github.com/cpuhrsch
Something people found confusing was that whether or not a native::
signature would get SymInt or not in its type was based on the dispatch
key. This changes it so that SymInt or not in type is based on whether
or not you have _symint in the name of the kernel or not. This means
that even when we make operators support SymInt, you no longer have to
go and update all the preexisting definitions; instead, you now
selectively write _symint to opt individual kernels into SymInt support.
I then go and update a bunch of kernels that don't have proper SymInt
support to make use of this convention. There is some hacking around
for view generation code.
I also add support for external backends to specify 'symint' operators, for which we generate SymInt signatures instead of regular signatures.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Differential Revision: [D39310060](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39310060)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84579
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
- nondeterministic_seeded was not applied to enough functions. I added
some heuristics to codegen for identifying functions that are likely
to be random and added a bunch of these tags to functions. Not sure
I got all of them.
- Don't constant propagate through nondeterministic functions in FX
tracing.
It would be better to do some testing for the tag but this would be quite an effort.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83650
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh, https://github.com/eellison
Summary:
Previously we don't generate out variant (both schema and kernel) for an operator with functional variant only. This adds support for that and adds test.
## Changes on `native_function_generation.py`
We are generating out variant for all functional variants if possible. This PR introduces a lot of newly generated out variants and `native_functions.yaml` needs to incorporate the changes by adding `autogen` keywords.
The logic for determining what operators we should generate an out variant for is the following:
1. No existing out variant for this `NativeFunction`
2. Contains an existing in place, mutable or functional variant
3. Contains at least 1 tensor like return(s)
For operators matching the first two conditions but failing the third, I listed them in `FUNCTIONAL_OPS_THAT_CANNOT_GET_AN_OUT_VARIANT`.
## Special handling
The following operators satisfy all 3 criteria above but we chose to not autogen them, with some reasons.
* `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d`, the generated out variant `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` is colliding with the `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out` kernel in `adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` operator. I manually created `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` and renamed `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out` to `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out_stub`.
* `min`, `max` and `mean`. There already exist `min.out`, `max.out` and `mean.out` but they are having different semantics with the functional ones. I manually created `min.unary_out`, `max.unary_out` and `mean.dtype_out` to disambiguate.
## Autograd Changes
We introduced a logic to not match derivatives info in `derivatives.yaml` to out variant, since we are generating `NOT_IMPLEMENTED` kernels for those out variants anyway. The issue we are seeing with the original logic is that it doesn't handle `TensorOption` arguments really well. For example we have these two operators:
* `_to_copy(Tensor self, *, ScalarType? dtype=None, Layout? layout=None, Device? device=None, bool? pin_memory=None, bool non_blocking=False, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None) -> Tensor`
* `_to_copy.out(Tensor self, *, bool non_blocking=False, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None, Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)`
If we uses `_to_copy` derivative info, there will be compilation error since `dtype` is missing from `_to_copy.out` signature.
Test Plan: Rely on unit test
Differential Revision: D37832342
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81437
Approved by: https://github.com/iseeyuan, https://github.com/bdhirsh
`resize_()` is annoying because it needs special casing for functionalization. It's technically an inplace-view op, but it can't really have a pure view variant, since calling resize_() might bust the old storage. I gave it an `inplace_view` tag so that stuff like `FakeTensor` that relies on tags will pick it up properly, which required jumping through some codegen hoops.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82667
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
This should fix the last issue that @anijain2305 hit when running ResNet with TorchDynamo <> functionalization.
Today if you try to call an `OpOverloadPacket` from python with some arguments, we will use the types of those arguments to perform overload resolution. With some functional variants of ops, this can be ambiguous.
Today this affects just one op: `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper`, although it would potentially affect e.g. `native_batch_norm` in the future.
Example:
```
# There are technically two overloads:
# torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.default (returns 2 argument, mutates 4 of its inputs inplace)
# torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.functional (returns 6 argument, mutates none of its inputs)
# We pick the wrong one - no way to know that we should pick the functional one, just from the call site.
outs = torch.ops.aten._fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper(a, a, a, a, a, a, a, 1.0, 0, 1, 0)
# raises an error - tries to call the overload with only 2 returns
return _fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper_functional[5]
```
Specifically, functionalization will bake `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper.functional` into the graph, but when AOTAutograd tries to compile with TorchScript, it needs to remove the overload name (TS doesn't know how to parse overload names directly, so we need to remove the overload name and let it infer the right overload at runtime later- so it picks the wrong one).
The situation is pretty similar to inplace; `ops.aten.add` and `ops.aten.add_` represent two different `OverloadPacket` objects; they can't be overloads of the same op, because their schemas would be ambiguous - the alias annotations are different, but that isn't enough to disambiguate).
In this PR, I try to fix the situation in a pretty similar way to how we handle `inplace` in the data model: `inplace` ops get their own base operator name, but they are represented as a flag inside of `BaseOperatorName` in the data model.
Two other important changes that I made as part of this PR:
(1) Originally, there were ~100 different `*_functional` operators: e.g. we had operators named `resize.functional` and `zero.functional`. The `_functional` bit isn't actually necessary in most cases: it's only necessary for operators that **also** have a `SchemaKind.mutable` variant, where `_fused_moving_avg_obs_fq_helper` is the only op that fits that description today. So I removed the unnecessary notion of "functional" from those other ops. I also added a bunch of assertions to force this restriction.
I think that makes more sense in the long run, because it eliminates an unnecessary difference in the model. E.g. we don't have `add_.Tensor` and `add.Tensor_functional`. We just have `add_.Tensor` and `add.Tensor`.
(2) I noticed that we actually still weren't pairing up a bunch of `_foreach` operators correctly, because their input arguments were different (`self` vs. `tensors`). Since they're private API's, I went ahead and changed the argument names directly so they get matched up. Before this PR, we were generating a separate `_foreach_add` and `_foreach_add.functional` variant in a bunch of cases, that really did the same thing (but happened to have a different name for the first argument).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80556
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
Adding a feature to allow user to specify namespaces for operator and kernels.
# Feature
There's a feature request to allow DSL to:
1. take in an operator namespace other than `aten`.
2. take in a kernel that is in a different namespace than `at::native`.
For both features, we only allow user to have a single layer of namespace for the sake of simplicity. If user specify `custom::function` as kernel, the codegen will depend on `custom::native::function` where `native` is hardcoded.
# Proposal
For feature 1, add a `namespace` attribute to data class `NativeFunction`. The namespace will be extract out by matching pattern "::" on the `func` variable. For `NativeFunctionsGroup` there's an assumption that all variants (function, inplace, out) will have the same namespace. By default (if not specified) the namespace will be "aten".
For feature 2, add a `namespace` attribute to `BackendMetadata` class, similarly match pattern "::" on the kernel field. Remove the `cpp_namespace` field from `register_dispatch_key` data class. By default (if not specified) the namespace for a kernel would be "at::native".
Test Plan:
Example yaml entries:
```
- func: custom::gelu.out(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none', Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)
structured: True
structured_inherits: TensorIteratorBase
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
CPU: custom::gelu_out_cpu
CUDA: custom::gelu_out_cuda
MPS: custom::gelu_out_mps
- func: custom::gelu_(Tensor(a!) self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor(a!)
structured_delegate: gelu.out
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
NestedTensorCPU, NestedTensorCUDA: custom::NestedTensor_gelu_
- func: custom::gelu(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor
structured_delegate: gelu.out
device_check: NoCheck # TensorIterator
python_module: nn
dispatch:
MkldnnCPU: custom::mkldnn_gelu
QuantizedCPU: custom::gelu_quantized_cpu
NestedTensorCPU, NestedTensorCUDA: custom::NestedTensor_gelu
```
see generated code:
`RegisterCPU.cpp`:
```
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(aten, CPU, m) {
...
}
TORCH_LIBRARY_IMPL(custom, CPU, m) {
m.impl("gelu", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu));
m.impl("gelu.out", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu_out_out));
m.impl("gelu_", TORCH_FN(wrapper_gelu_));
};
```
```
struct structured_gelu_out_cpu_inplace final : public custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu {
structured_gelu_out_cpu_inplace(Tensor& self) : outputs_{std::ref(self)} {}
void set_output_strided(
int64_t output_idx, IntArrayRef sizes, IntArrayRef strides,
TensorOptions options, DimnameList names
) override {
const auto& out = outputs_[output_idx].get();
check_inplace(out, sizes, options);
auto maybe_proxy = maybe_create_proxy(out, sizes, strides, options);
if (C10_UNLIKELY(maybe_proxy.has_value())) {
proxy_outputs_[output_idx] = c10::ExclusivelyOwned<Tensor>(std::move(maybe_proxy).value());
}
if (!names.empty()) {
namedinference::propagate_names(outputs_[output_idx], names);
}
// super must happen after, so that downstream can use maybe_get_output
// to retrieve the output
custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu::set_output_raw_strided(output_idx, sizes, strides, options, names);
}
void set_output_raw_strided(
int64_t output_idx, IntArrayRef sizes, IntArrayRef strides,
TensorOptions options, DimnameList names
) override {
const auto& out = outputs_[output_idx].get();
check_inplace(out, sizes, options);
if (!names.empty()) {
namedinference::propagate_names(outputs_[output_idx], names);
}
// super must happen after, so that downstream can use maybe_get_output
// to retrieve the output
custom::native::structured_gelu_out_cpu::set_output_raw_strided(output_idx, sizes, strides, options, names);
}
const Tensor& maybe_get_output(int64_t output_idx) override {
return proxy_outputs_[output_idx].has_value() ? **proxy_outputs_[output_idx] : outputs_[output_idx].get();
}
std::array<std::reference_wrapper<Tensor>, 1> outputs_;
std::array<c10::optional<c10::ExclusivelyOwned<Tensor>>, 1> proxy_outputs_;
};
```
`RegisterSchema.cpp`
```
TORCH_LIBRARY(aten, m) {
...
}
TORCH_LIBRARY(custom, m) {
m.def("gelu.out(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none', Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)");
m.def("gelu_(Tensor(a!) self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor(a!)");
m.def("gelu(Tensor self, *, str approximate='none') -> Tensor");
};
```
Differential Revision: D36558459
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78015
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
