Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43015
Currently activation_post_process are inserted by default in qat modules, which is not
friendly to automatic quantization tools, this PR removes them.
Test Plan:
Imported from OSS
Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: vkuzo
Differential Revision: D23105059
fbshipit-source-id: 3439ac39e718ffb0390468163bcbffd384802b57
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/42343
Currently activation_post_process are inserted by default in qat modules, which is not
friendly to automatic quantization tools, this PR removes them.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: raghuramank100
Differential Revision: D22856816
fbshipit-source-id: 988a43bce46a992b38fd0d469929f89e5b046131
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/42576
Previously we have qconfig propagate list and we only attach qconfig for modules
in the list, this works when everything is quantized in the form of module.
but now we are expanding quantization for functional/torch ops, we'll need to attach qconfig
to all modules
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: vkuzo
Differential Revision: D22939453
fbshipit-source-id: 7d6a1f73ff9bfe461b3afc75aa266fcc8f7db517
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/42222
This change adds the necessary passes to perform FP16 dynamic quantization.
We skip inserting observers for activations based on the dtype (torch.float16) and only insert the Fp16Observer for weights
Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeJitOps
Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: jerryzh168
Differential Revision: D22849220
fbshipit-source-id: 2c53594ecd2485e9e3dd0b380eceaf7c5ab5fc50
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41930
As title
ghstack-source-id: 108517079
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: jerryzh168
Differential Revision: D22698386
fbshipit-source-id: 4f748c9bae4a0b615aa69c7cc8d8e451e5d26863
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/40396
Removes activation and normalization modules from eager mode QAT.
These were incorrectly added, but we don't actually need them.
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizationAwareTraining
```
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D22169768
fbshipit-source-id: b5bd753dafe92e90e226fb773eb18c6aae179703
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39203
Adds logic and test coverage for optional weights and biases for
the quantized normalization operators. This was broken before this
PR because the `TORCH_LIBRARY` registration had these as required parameters
- removed it, and cleaned up the callsites.
Note: consolidating the registrations in `native_functions.yaml` as opposed to `library.cpp`
after a discussion with ezyang .
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizedOps.test_qlayer_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizedOps.test_group_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizedOps.test_instance_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestStaticQuantizedModule.test_layer_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestStaticQuantizedModule.test_group_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestStaticQuantizedModule.test_instance_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeScriptPTSQOps.test_layer_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeScriptPTSQOps.test_group_norm
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeScriptPTSQOps.test_instance_norm
```
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21885259
fbshipit-source-id: 978c7b8bd6c11a03e9e5fdb68f154cb80cc43599
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/40101
Create three tests for LSTMs:
1. test_qlstm: Test to check numerics of quantized LSTM operator.
2. test_lstm_api: To check the LSTM module and compare
it with the quantized LSTM op
3. test_quantized_rnn: Check the dynamic quantization workflow, scriptability and serialization of quantized
LSTM
ghstack-source-id: 105997268
(Note: this ignores all push blocking failures!)
Test Plan:
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_lstm_api \(quantization\.test_quantized_module\.TestDynamicQuantizedModule\)' --print-passing-details
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_quantized_rnn \(quantization\.test_quantize\.TestPostTrainingDynamic\)'
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_qlstm \(quantization\.test_quantized_op\.TestDynamicQuantizedRNNOp\)' --print-passing-details
Differential Revision: D22070826
fbshipit-source-id: 46c333e19b9eab8fa5cab6f132e89b80a635791a
Summary:
Create three tests for LSTMs:
1. test_qlstm: Test to check numerics of quantized LSTM operator.
2. test_lstm_api: To check the LSTM module and compare
it with the quantized LSTM op
3. test_quantized_rnn: Check the dynamic quantization workflow, scriptability and serialization of quantized
LSTM
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38851
ghstack-source-id: 105945574
(Note: this ignores all push blocking failures!)
Test Plan:
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_lstm_api \(quantization\.test_quantized_module\.TestDynamicQuantizedModule\)' --print-passing-details
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_quantized_rnn \(quantization\.test_quantize\.TestPostTrainingDynamic\)'
buck test caffe2/test:quantization -- 'test_qlstm \(quantization\.test_quantized_op\.TestDynamicQuantizedRNNOp\)' --print-passing-details
Differential Revision: D21628596
fbshipit-source-id: 4aeda899f2e5f14bfbe3d82096cb4ce89c725fa1
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39090
Makes quantized GroupNorm work in eager mode post training static quant.
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_quantization.py TestPostTrainingStatic.test_normalization
python test/test_quantization.py TestStaticQuantizedModule.test_group_norm
```
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21885262
fbshipit-source-id: 58b0ffb59c601fcb4c79f711c7c98a667ffc6170
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38434
We insert dequantize for each use in order to produce quantization patterns that will
later be fused, after that we should also remove extra dequantize node produced by this operation.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21597834
fbshipit-source-id: 18dfb2760bbb08932aa4e1d06f96cfc5fb37ed88
Summary:
Return unmodified type from decorator if fbgemm is present.
Fix `Tried to trace <__torch__.torch.classes.rnn.CellParamsBase object at 0x55f504c56b40> but it is not part of the active trace. Modules that are called during a trace must be registered as submodules of the thing being traced` thrown from `TestPostTrainingDynamic.test_quantized_rnn` by preserving modules in returned qRNNBase (i.e. by partially reverting https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38134 )
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38432
Differential Revision: D21567333
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 364fa2c8fc6e400b4f2e425b922a977756aec1d8
Summary:
I've picked wrong revision when landed the diff, it should have had an actual check rather than `if True`:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38058
Differential Revision: D21466152
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 03fdc510562fab44b7d64a42284d4c3c1f8e940a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37366
- we can put both fake quant module and observer module tests in the test_workflow_module.py
- added test_quantized_functional.py
- moved tests in test_numerics.py to test_quantize.py and removed test_numerics.py
Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D21282198
fbshipit-source-id: 60107cee7d1ed2cd14a45650e91ec28b8a262c52
