# Motivation
Fix https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/143543
# Solution
We should raise python exception instead of aborting...
# Additional Context
without this PR:
```python
>>> import torch
>>> torch.accelerator.current_stream(torch.accelerator.device_count())
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'c10::Error'
what(): device is out of range, device is 2, total number of device is 2.
Exception raised from check_device_index at /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/c10/xpu/XPUFunctions.h:36 (most recent call first):
frame #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 0xac (0x7f30707eb95c in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10.so)
frame #1: c10::detail::torchCheckFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 0xf3 (0x7f307078fc57 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10.so)
frame #2: <unknown function> + 0x19a3e (0x7f3070c2ba3e in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so)
frame #3: c10::xpu::getCurrentXPUStream(signed char) + 0x2f (0x7f3070c2c83f in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so)
frame #4: <unknown function> + 0x1ca35 (0x7f3070c2ea35 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so)
frame #5: <unknown function> + 0x653f15 (0x7f3083391f15 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)
frame #6: <unknown function> + 0x39e5f2 (0x7f30830dc5f2 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)
<omitting python frames>
frame #20: <unknown function> + 0x29d90 (0x7f308b19bd90 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6)
frame #21: __libc_start_main + 0x80 (0x7f308b19be40 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6)
Aborted (core dumped)
```
with this PR:
```python
>>> import torch
>>> torch.accelerator.current_stream(torch.accelerator.device_count())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/pt-gpu/4T-4652/guangyey/stock-pytorch/torch/accelerator/__init__.py", line 123, in current_stream
return torch._C._accelerator_getStream(device_index)
RuntimeError: The device index is out of range. It must be in [0, 2), but got 2.
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/143550
Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/dvrogozh, https://github.com/albanD
Otherwise certain sequences of tests will fail with OOM e.g.,
```
# python test/test_cuda.py -k max_split_expandable -k test_assigning_back_deleter_fns_to_tensor --repeat 100 .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 2 tests in 0.311s OK E. ====================================================================== ERROR: test_assigning_back_deleter_fns_to_tensor (__main__.TestBlockStateAbsorption.test_assigning_back_deleter_fns_to_tensor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/workspace/pytorch/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 3058, in wrapper
method(*args, **kwargs)
File "/workspace/pytorch/test/test_cuda.py", line 4320, in test_assigning_back_deleter_fns_to_tensor
graph, outputs = cudagraphify(foo, [inp])
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/workspace/pytorch/test/test_cuda.py", line 4080, in cudagraphify
fn(*inputs)
File "/workspace/pytorch/test/test_cuda.py", line 4316, in foo
int8_cuda(LARGE_BUFFER) + x,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
torch.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 160.00 MiB. GPU 0 has a total capacity of 31.73 GiB of which 31.30 GiB is free. Process 2916661 has 442.00 MiB memory in use. 120.00 MiB allowed; Of the allocated memory 52.00 MiB is allocated by PyTorch, and 6.00 MiB is reserved by PyTorch but unallocated. If reserved but unallocated memory is large try setting PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True to avoid fragmentation. See documentation for Memory Management (https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/notes/cuda.html#environment-variables)
To execute this test, run the following from the base repo dir:
python test/test_cuda.py TestBlockStateAbsorption.test_assigning_back_deleter_fns_to_tensor
This message can be suppressed by setting PYTORCH_PRINT_REPRO_ON_FAILURE=0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 0.136s
FAILED (errors=1)
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140852
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Certain `cpp_wrapper`-enabled tests were OOM-ing in the CI pipeline, with error messages suggesting that sufficient memory was accessible. This ultimately resulted from an internal memory limitation that was not queryable in the API. This PR adds querying for that limit.
Additionally, the failing tests had incorrect memory availability checks, and are updated with measured memory requirements.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/140620
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/eqy
ghstack dependencies: #141367
Canonically, the empty_cache API releases all cached blocks of the CUDACachingAllocator. There is no API that can release only the cached blocks of a given pool.
In this PR, we extend the functionality of empty_cache API such that it only releases the cached blocks of an active pool. When empty_cache API is called under a MemPoolContext, we only release the cached blocks that correspond to the pool id of the active pool.
Part of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/124807.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133602
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Canonically, the snapshot API returns the entire memory state of the CUDACachingAllocator (using `get_all_blocks`). There is no API that can only return the memory state of a given pool.
In this PR, we extend the functionality of snapshot API such that it can only return the memory addresses of an active pool. When snapshot API is called under a MemPoolContext, we only return the blocks that correspond to the pool id of the active pool.
Part of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/124807.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133601
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Canonically, the snapshot API returns the entire memory state of the CUDACachingAllocator (using `get_all_blocks`). There is no API that can only return the memory state of a given pool.
In this PR, we extend the functionality of snapshot API such that it can only return the memory addresses of an active pool. When snapshot API is called under a MemPoolContext, we only return the blocks that correspond to the pool id of the active pool.
Part of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/124807.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133601
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR refactors some ref-counting functionality out of `beginAllocateToPool` and `releasePool`. The ref-counting logic is then used in construction and destruction of `torch.cuda.MemPool`.
The `use_count` variable in the CUDACachingAllocator is essentially a refcount of how many context managers are using the pool. Since we are now lifting up the MemPool abstraction to the user, the MemPool object itself now needs to hold a an extra reference as well.
Part of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/124807.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133600
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/ezyang
# Motivation
This PR intends to make device-specific Event inherit from the generic torch.Event. The benefit is providing a generic abstract class `torch.Event` for different devices, like `torch.Stream`. This make it easier for Dynamo to capture the Event of different devices, like torch.cuda.Event and torch.xpu.Event.
And the next PR would like to remove previous useless base class `_StreamBase` and `_EventBase` to avoid multiple Inheritance.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134845
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/EikanWang
Seems like some other tests are holding onto memory that is not gc'able (e.g., cuBLAS workspaces), so these tests while working in isolation fail when run as e.g., `python test/test_cuda.py -k able`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/136496
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary: Fixed a bunch of fbcode imports that happened to work but confused autodeps. After this autodeps still suggests "improvements" to TARGETS (which breaks our builds) but at least it can find all the imports.
Test Plan:
```
fbpython fbcode/tools/build/buck/linters/lint_autoformat.py --linter=autodeps --default-exec-timeout=1800 -- fbcode/caffe2/TARGETS fbcode/caffe2/test/TARGETS
```
Before:
```
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "test_export" (from caffe2/test/export/testing.py:229) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See https://fbur$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "testing" (from caffe2/test/export/test_export.py:87) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See https://fburl$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "test_export" (from caffe2/test/export/test_serdes.py:9) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See https://fb$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "testing" (from caffe2/test/export/test_serdes.py:10) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See https://fburl$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "testing" (from caffe2/test/export/test_retraceability.py:7) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See https:$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "test_export" (from caffe2/test/export/test_retraceability.py:6) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See ht$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "testing" (from caffe2/test/export/test_export_nonstrict.py:7) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See http$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "test_export" (from caffe2/test/export/test_export_nonstrict.py:6) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule. See $
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "test_export" (from caffe2/test/export/test_export_training_ir_to_run_decomp.py:8) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of an$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "testing" (from caffe2/test/export/test_export_training_ir_to_run_decomp.py:10) when processing rule "test_export". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of anoth$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Found "//python/typeshed_internal:typeshed_internal_library" owner for "cv2" but it is protected by visibility rules: [] (from caffe2/test/test_bundled_images.py:7) when processing rule "test_bundled_$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "caffe2.test.profiler_test_cpp_thread_lib" (from caffe2/test/profiler/test_cpp_thread.py:29) when processing rule "profiler_test_cpp_thread". Please make sure it's listed in t$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "torch._utils_internal.get_file_path_2" (from caffe2/test/test_custom_ops.py:23) when processing rule "custom_ops". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of anoth$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "torch._utils_internal.get_file_path_2" (from caffe2/test/test_public_bindings.py:13) when processing rule "public_bindings". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs paramete$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "torch._C._profiler.symbolize_tracebacks" (from caffe2/test/test_cuda.py:3348) when processing rule "test_cuda". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another $
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for "torch._C._profiler.gather_traceback" (from caffe2/test/test_cuda.py:3348) when processing rule "test_cuda". Please make sure it's listed in the srcs parameter of another rule$
ERROR while processing caffe2/test/TARGETS: Cannot find an owner for include <torch/csrc/autograd/profiler_kineto.h> (from caffe2/test/profiler/test_cpp_thread.cpp:2) when processing profiler_test_cpp_thread_lib. Some things to try:
```
Differential Revision: D62049222
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/135614
Approved by: https://github.com/oulgen, https://github.com/laithsakka
Previously setting garbage_collection_threshold or max_split_size_mb along with expandable_segments:True could cause the allocator to hit assert failures when running nearly out of memory. This PR ensures garbage_collection and max_split freeing do not accidentally try to release expandable segments.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/134338
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR adds support to use expandable segments with private memory pools which should unblock using it with cuda graphs and cuda graph trees. Currently, the allocator silently avoids using expandable segments when allocating in a private pool due to checkpoint saving/restoring not meshing well with how we keep track of unmapped blocks.
The PR itself is pretty short, most of the logic for checkpointing and reapplying state for non-expandable segments transfers over without much work.
Expandable segments reserve a virtual address space of size equal to the amount of physical memory on the GPU. Every time we want to `malloc()` or `free()` memory in a memory pool with expandable segments turned on, we map/unmap pages of physical GPU memory under the hood to create a new block that we return to the caller. This is beneficial due to the fact that each memory pool functions as a single segment of memory with a contiguous block of memory addresses that can grow and shrink as needed, avoiding fragmentation from allocating multiple non-contiguous segments that may not be merged together.
The caching allocator handles this by creating an unmapped block for the entire reserved virtual address space at init, which is treated similarly to an unallocated block in a free pool. When callers call `malloc()`, it's split and mapped to create allocated blocks, and calling `free()` similarly caches and merges free blocks in a free pool to be used later. Expandable blocks are unmapped and returned back to Cuda when they are cleaned up, or when we hit an OOM and the allocator attempts to remap cached free blocks. The code paths to map, free, and unmap blocks in expandable segments is similar to that for normal blocks and does all the same work of updating stats on memory usage, moving blocks between active and free pools, and returning memory to Cuda.
With Cuda Graph Trees and private memory pools, we need the ability to take checkpoints of the current state of the memory allocator after each graph capture as well as reapplying the state before capturing a new graph after replaying a captured graph so that the new cuda graph capture has access to the state of the allocator at the point after replaying a previously captured graph so it can reuse empty blocks and allocate new ones.
As mentioned in a below comment, memory in a private pool is cached until the private pool is destroyed and allocations can only grow from extra graph captures, any freeing of memory would result in invalid memory addresses and would break cuda graphs.
One implementation detail to note for unmapped blocks with expandable segments is that unmapped blocks are kept track in a member variable `unmapped` of a `BlockPool`. `unmapped` is *not* part of the checkpointed state of the caching allocator and isn't restored when reapplying checkpoints since we never free/unmap memory back to cuda and is persisted across graph captures / replays.
Checkpointing the current state of the memory allocator works as expected with expandable segments. Checkpointing grabs the first block of every segment in the active and free pools of the private pool and traverses the linked list of blocks in the segment to capture the state of every segment, which is then saved and kept for when it is needed to be reapplied. For expandable blocks, the last block in every segment will be an unallocated unmapped block containing the remaining amount of unmapped memory at graph capture time, and this too is saved in the checkpoint.
Reapplying the checkpoints works by freeing all allocated blocks and merging them into a single block per segment, then for each segment, we manually split and allocate all blocks from the checkpoint and then free the blocks marked as unallocated in the checkpoint state. For expandable segments, we need to make some modifications to not split unmapped blocks and avoid manually mapping then freeing unmapped blocks.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128068
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/eellison
Fixes#125224
For large ranges, calls to CUDA `randint` use a different `unroll_factor` to generate random ints. This `unroll_factor` was not considered correctly in the calculation of the Philox offsets. Thus, some of the random states were reused, resulting in lower entropy (see #125224).
This also affects multiple other random functions, such as `torch.rand` and `torch.randn`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/126066
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/lezcano
This PR adds support to use expandable segments with private memory pools which should unblock using it with cuda graphs and cuda graph trees. Currently, the allocator silently avoids using expandable segments when allocating in a private pool due to checkpoint saving/restoring not meshing well with how we keep track of unmapped blocks.
The PR itself is pretty short, most of the logic for checkpointing and reapplying state for non-expandable segments transfers over without much work.
Expandable segments reserve a virtual address space of size equal to the amount of physical memory on the GPU. Every time we want to `malloc()` or `free()` memory in a memory pool with expandable segments turned on, we map/unmap pages of physical GPU memory under the hood to create a new block that we return to the caller. This is beneficial due to the fact that each memory pool functions as a single segment of memory with a contiguous block of memory addresses that can grow and shrink as needed, avoiding fragmentation from allocating multiple non-contiguous segments that may not be merged together.
The caching allocator handles this by creating an unmapped block for the entire reserved virtual address space at init, which is treated similarly to an unallocated block in a free pool. When callers call `malloc()`, it's split and mapped to create allocated blocks, and calling `free()` similarly caches and merges free blocks in a free pool to be used later. Expandable blocks are unmapped and returned back to Cuda when they are cleaned up, or when we hit an OOM and the allocator attempts to remap cached free blocks. The code paths to map, free, and unmap blocks in expandable segments is similar to that for normal blocks and does all the same work of updating stats on memory usage, moving blocks between active and free pools, and returning memory to Cuda.
With Cuda Graph Trees and private memory pools, we need the ability to take checkpoints of the current state of the memory allocator after each graph capture as well as reapplying the state before capturing a new graph after replaying a captured graph so that the new cuda graph capture has access to the state of the allocator at the point after replaying a previously captured graph so it can reuse empty blocks and allocate new ones.
As mentioned in a below comment, memory in a private pool is cached until the private pool is destroyed and allocations can only grow from extra graph captures, any freeing of memory would result in invalid memory addresses and would break cuda graphs.
One implementation detail to note for unmapped blocks with expandable segments is that unmapped blocks are kept track in a member variable `unmapped` of a `BlockPool`. `unmapped` is *not* part of the checkpointed state of the caching allocator and isn't restored when reapplying checkpoints since we never free/unmap memory back to cuda and is persisted across graph captures / replays.
Checkpointing the current state of the memory allocator works as expected with expandable segments. Checkpointing grabs the first block of every segment in the active and free pools of the private pool and traverses the linked list of blocks in the segment to capture the state of every segment, which is then saved and kept for when it is needed to be reapplied. For expandable blocks, the last block in every segment will be an unallocated unmapped block containing the remaining amount of unmapped memory at graph capture time, and this too is saved in the checkpoint.
Reapplying the checkpoints works by freeing all allocated blocks and merging them into a single block per segment, then for each segment, we manually split and allocate all blocks from the checkpoint and then free the blocks marked as unallocated in the checkpoint state. For expandable segments, we need to make some modifications to not split unmapped blocks and avoid manually mapping then freeing unmapped blocks.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128068
Approved by: https://github.com/zdevito, https://github.com/eqy
Fixes: #128478
In backward() implementation checkpointing code was quering device type from the rng_state tensors saved on forward(). These tensors are CPU only tensors and don't carry device information with them. As a result CUDA device was assumed as a default. Which is not correct if user runs on some other device. For example, on XPU.
This patch saves full device information on forward() and uses it on backward() to get device type. Previously forward save only device index.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128671
Approved by: https://github.com/guangyey, https://github.com/soulitzer
On Jetson IGX, `python test/test_cuda.py -k test_graph_capture_oom` fails with the following error:
```
RuntimeError: NVML_SUCCESS == r INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at "/opt/pytorch/pytorch/c10/cuda/CUDACachingAllocator.cpp":841, please report a bug to PyTorch.
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 59, in testPartExecutor
yield
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 591, in run
self._callTestMethod(testMethod)
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 549, in _callTestMethod
method()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 2759, in wrapper
method(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 2759, in wrapper
method(*args, **kwargs)
File "/opt/pytorch/pytorch/test/test_cuda.py", line 2255, in test_graph_capture_oom
with self.assertRaisesRegex(RuntimeError, oom_regex):
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 239, in __exit__
self._raiseFailure('"{}" does not match "{}"'.format(
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 163, in _raiseFailure
raise self.test_case.failureException(msg)
AssertionError: "out of memory" does not match "NVML_SUCCESS == r INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at "/opt/pytorch/pytorch/c10/cuda/CUDACachingAllocator.cpp":841, please report a bug to PyTorch. "
```
This is a known issue as nvml support on Jetson is limited, and the OOM reporting in CUDACachingAllocator.cpp requires nvml to be properly loaded, which fails on Jetson.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/128661
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/atalman
Use `typing_extensions.deprecated` for deprecation annotation if possible. Otherwise, add `category=FutureWarning` to `warnings.warn("message")` if the category is missing.
Note that only warnings that their messages contain `[Dd]eprecat(ed|ion)` are updated in this PR.
Resolves#126888
- #126888
This PR is split from PR #126898.
- #126898
------
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127689
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Use `typing_extensions.deprecated` for deprecation annotation if possible. Otherwise, add `category=FutureWarning` to `warnings.warn("message")` if the category is missing.
Note that only warnings that their messages contain `[Dd]eprecat(ed|ion)` are updated in this PR.
UPDATE: Use `FutureWarning` instead of `DeprecationWarning`.
Resolves#126888
- #126888
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/126898
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
# Motivation
## for `torch.amp.GradScaler`,
- `torch.cpu.amp.GradScaler(args...)` is completely equivalent to `torch. amp.GradScaler("cpu", args...)`.
- `torch.cuda.amp.GradScaler(args...)` is completely equivalent to `torch.amp.GradScaler("cuda", args...)`.
So, we intend to depreate them and **strongly recommend** developer to use `torch.amp.GradScaler`.
## for `custom_fwd` and `custom_bwd`,
this is a good solution to make the custom function run with or without effect even in an autocast-enabled region and can be shared by other backends, like CPU and XPU.
So we generalize it to be device-agnostic and put them int `torch/amp/autocast_mode.py` and re-expose to `torch.amp.custom_fwd` and `torch.amp.custom_bwd`. Meanwhile, we deprecate `torch.cuda.amp.custom_fwd` and `torch.cuda.amp.custom_bwd`.
# Additional Context
Add UT to cover the deprecated warning.
No need for more UTs to cover the functionality of `torch.amp.custom_f/bwd`, the existing UTs that previously covered the functionality of `torch.cuda.amp.custom_f/bwd` can cover them.
To facilitate the review, we separate these code changes to two PRs. The first PR cover `torch.amp.GradScaler`. The follow-up covers `custom_fwd` and `custom_bwd`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/126527
Approved by: https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/janeyx99, https://github.com/EikanWang
This PR is meant to address issue #123451, more specifically, the ```test_graph_optims``` and ```test_graph_scaling_fused_optimizers``` functions in ```test_cuda.py``` have been updated so that they now use the new OptimizerInfo infrastructure.
Lintrunner passed:
```
$ lintrunner test/test_cuda.py
ok No lint issues.
```
Tests passed:
```
>python test_cuda.py -k test_graph_optims
Ran 19 tests in 7.463s
OK (skipped=9)
>python test_cuda.py -k test_graph_scaling_fused_optimizers
Ran 6 tests in 2.800s
OK (skipped=3)
```
Both the functions have been moved to the newly created TestCase class ```TestCudaOptims```. The test is mostly the same except the ```@optims``` decorator is used at the top of the function to implicitly call the function using each of the optimizers mentioned in the decorator instead of explicitly using a for loop to iterate through each of the optimizers.
I was unable to use the ```_get_optim_inputs_including_global_cliquey_kwargs``` to get all kwargs for each of the optimizers since some of the kwargs that are used in the original ```test_graph_optims``` function are not being returned by the new OptimizerInfo infrastructure, more specifically, for the ```torch.optim.rmsprop.RMSprop``` optimizer, the following kwargs are not returned whenever ```_get_optim_inputs_including_global_cliquey_kwargs``` is called:
```
{'foreach': False, 'maximize': True, 'weight_decay': 0}
{ 'foreach': True, 'maximize': True, 'weight_decay': 0}
```
I ran into the same issue for ```test_graph_scaling_fused_optimizers```, for the ```torch.optim.adamw.AdamW``` optimizer, whenever ```optim_info.optim_inputs_func(device=device)``` was called, the following kwarg was not returned:
```
{'amsgrad': True}
```
Due to this issue, I resorted to using a dictionary to store the kwargs for each of the optimizers, I am aware that this is less than ideal. I was wondering whether I should use the OptimizerInfo infrastructure to get all the kwargs regardless of the fact that it lacks some kwargs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125127
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
# Motivation
We generalize a device-agnostic API `torch.amp.autocast` in [#125103](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/125103). After that,
- `torch.cpu.amp.autocast(args...)` is completely equivalent to `torch.amp.autocast('cpu', args...)`, and
- `torch.cuda.amp.autocast(args...)` is completely equivalent to `torch.amp.autocast('cuda', args...)`
no matter in eager mode or JIT mode.
Base on this point, we would like to deprecate `torch.cpu.amp.autocast` and `torch.cuda.amp.autocast` to **strongly recommend** developer to use `torch.amp.autocast` that is a device-agnostic API.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/126062
Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/albanD
- Original `test_grad_scaling_autocast_fused_optimizers` does not work since there is no "fused" in `optim_inputs`
- We should use different `grad_scaler`, they should not share 1 `scale`, there is no issue exposed here because the default `_growth_interval` is 2000 so it will not growth and there is also no inf is found so it will not reduced. The one in `test_cuda.py` should also have this issue,
- I set a manual seed to reproduce purpose if there is any numerical failure
- I use Tensor tracker here because we failed this UT in dynamo case, the cpp generated code are not exactly same with fused/non fused kernel.
- I make it check both `cuda` and `cpu`.
- I find some SGD numerical issue with `clang`, and fixed it by using `fmadd` instead of `add/mul` in fused sgd veckernel.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124904
Approved by: https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/janeyx99
This PR targets the issue mentioned in #123451 , and solves the specific task to update`test_graph_grad_scaling` in `test/test_cuda.py` to use the new OptimizerInfo infrastructure.
`test_graph_grad_scaling` is moved to a new `TestCase` class called `TestCudaOptims` in order to use `instantiate_device_type_tests`. The test content remained the same. `@onlyCUDA` is applied to the new test; the original use of the wrapper function is also changed to a `@parametrize` decorator for better style.
If we think that this migration is successful, we can delete the original test item under `TestCuda`. Currently it is left untouched to avoid any unexpected issues.
Local linter passed.
```
$ lintrunner test/test_cuda.py
ok No lint issues.
```
Local tests passed.
```
> python .\test\test_cuda.py -k test_graph_grad_scaling
Ran 7 tests in 0.458s
OK (skipped = 3)
```
Co-authored-by: Jane (Yuan) Xu <31798555+janeyx99@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123581
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
