# Motivation
This PR aims to maintain backward compatibility when building PyTorch XPU with the old and new compilers.
# Additional Context
The details are described here. The new compiler (2025.0.0) has some breaking changes compared with the old compiler(2024.1), for examples:
1. On Windows, sycl library is named `sycl7.lib` in the old compiler but is named `sycl.lib` in the new compiler.
2. On Linux, in order to support ABI=0, we have to link `libsycl-preview.so` in the old compiler but we could link `libsycl.so` in the new compiler to have the same ABI compatibility.
3. We added a macro `SYCL_COMPILER_VERSION` to support our new code has good backward compatibility with the old compiler. Now the new feature(Event elapsed_time, memory summary, and device architecture property) introduced by the new compiler will be controlled within the macro `SYCL_COMPILER_VERSION`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/139258
Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/atalman, https://github.com/gujinghui
# Motivation
If build XPU via oneAPI 2024.2, it will fail because `sycl-preview.lib` exists in windows. And linking the unexpected lib results in `error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol`.
# Solution
Use explicitly `sycl-preview` in linux build only.
# Additional Context
For `find_library`, please note that the variable will not be updated if it has been stored.
```
If the library is found the result is stored in the variable and the search will not be repeated unless the variable is cleared.
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133845
Approved by: https://github.com/min-jean-cho, https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/atalman, https://github.com/malfet
# Motivation
This PR intends to support ABI=0 build for XPU backend.
# Additional Context
The major change is adding a compilation option `-D__INTEL_PREVIEW_BREAKING_CHANGES` for the host compiler(gcc) and `-fpreview-breaking-changes` for XPU device kernel code compiler(icpx), why?
Because we use
- gcc to compile host code and link SYCL runtime. So we need to pass `-D__INTEL_PREVIEW_BREAKING_CHANGES` to tell the host compiler invoking the ABI-neutral API included in SYCL. And
- use icpx to compile device kernel code and link SYCL runtime. So we need to pass `-fpreview-breaking-changes` to tell the device kernel compiler building ABI-neutral code. Besides,
- `libsycl-preview.so` is an ABI-neutral library but `libsycl.so` is not.
This PR depends on https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/131643.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130110
Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/albanD
# Motivation
This PR is a part of RFC #114848, and it is a successor PR of #116249 and #116019. This PR would depend on oneDNN compilation in #116249. Some runtime support is needed in #116019.
Aten operators like `addmm`, `baddmm` is defined in `Blas.cpp` in `aten/src/ATen/native/mkldnn/xpu/`.
Accompanied with these files provide core functionaliy, `BlasImpl.h`, `Utils.h` and other file provide basic utilities for them. For instance, `Utils.h` provide common memory descriptor query utils for `Matmul.h` and these utility function will also be used in other primitive, like `convolution`. `BlasImpl.h` is a header file that provide helper for handling shape info processing in matmul related operators. It would not only help basic GEMM operator like `addmm, baddmm` but also help fusion operators used in `torch.compile` like `linear_pointwise` in #117824.
In next stage, we would continually complete the oneDNN support through enabling `matmul fusion` and `convolution` related code.
Co-authored-by: xiaolil1 <xiaoli.liu@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: lei,zhenyuan <zhenyuan.lei@intel.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117202
Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/malfet
ghstack dependencies: #117098, #117112
# Motivation
As mentioned in [[RFC] Intel GPU Runtime Upstreaming](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/114842), The first runtime component we would like to upstream is `Device` which contains the device management functions of Intel GPU's runtime. To facilitate the code review, we split the code changes into 4 PRs. This is one of the 4 PRs and covers the changes under `c10`.
# Design
Intel GPU device is a wrapper of sycl device on which kernels can be executed. In our design, we will maintain a sycl device pool containing all the GPU devices of the current machine, and manage the status of the device pool by PyTorch. The thread local safe is considered in this design. The corresponding C++ files related to `Device` will be placed in c10/xpu folder. And we provide the c10 device runtime APIs, like
- `c10::xpu::device_count`
- `c10::xpu::set_device`
- ...
# Additional Context
In our plan, 4 PRs should be submitted to PyTorch for `Device`:
1. for c10
2. for aten
3. for python frontend
4. for lazy initialization shared with CUDA
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116019
Approved by: https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/malfet
# Motivation
As mentioned in [[RFC] Intel GPU Runtime Upstreaming](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/114842), The first runtime component we would like to upstream is `Device` which contains the device management functions of Intel GPU's runtime. To facilitate the code review, we split the code changes into 4 PRs. This is one of the 4 PRs and covers the changes under `c10`.
# Design
Intel GPU device is a wrapper of sycl device on which kernels can be executed. In our design, we will maintain a sycl device pool containing all the GPU devices of the current machine, and manage the status of the device pool by PyTorch. The thread local safe is considered in this design. The corresponding C++ files related to `Device` will be placed in c10/xpu folder. And we provide the c10 device runtime APIs, like
- `c10::xpu::device_count`
- `c10::xpu::set_device`
- ...
# Additional Context
In our plan, 4 PRs should be submitted to PyTorch for `Device`:
1. for c10
2. for aten
3. for python frontend
4. for lazy initialization shared with CUDA
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116019
Approved by: https://github.com/gujinghui, https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/malfet
