This PR adds in support for semi-structured sparsity via a tensor
subclass. It currently uses the CUTLASS kernels merged in PR #100881.
In the future we plan to add in cuSPARSELt support (see the other PRs in
the stack), which will give us larger performance gains.
This PR adds in 2 things:
- a Tensor subclass, `SparseSemiStructuredTensor` to store the
sparse tensor in copmressed form and override `__torch_dispatch__`.
- a conversion function that takes in a dense tensor and a
semi-structured sparse bool mask and creates an instance of the
subclass.
**SparseSemiStructuredTensor**
The subclass stores the dense tensor in a contiguous flattened tensor
for future compatability with cuSPARSELt, which expects this format.
Note that the CUTLASS kernels do not have this limitation, as the
specified values and the metadata are passed separately in
`_structured_sparse_linear`. In the future we can use the cuSPARSELT bindings
[here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103700) for faster matmul, better dtype converage, and relaxed shape
constraints.
Since we currently don't have a way to go back from the sparse
representation to the dense representation, and we store the weights in
compressed form, we don't have a great way to handle .t().
Instead, we keep track of how often we've called transpose on our
tensor, and if it's an unexpected number we throw an error. When the first
argument is sparse, we expect an even number of calls to transpose,
while when the second argument is sparse, we expect an odd number of
calls. This is because we support second argument sparse matrix
multiplications by using transpose properties.
**to_sparse_semi_structured**
This is a conversion function to convert a dense tensor and a
semi-structured sparse bool mask into a subclass. Currently, we must
pass in a bool mask, since we can't infer it becuase there may be
additional zero elements in the dense tensor, so `tensor !=0` is not 2:4
sparse.
Once we add either a method to derive the mask from the dense tensor or
cuSPARSELt, we no longer need to pass in the mask. cuSPARSELt has it's
own helper functions to create the metadata mask.
**User Details**
We have implemented support for the following ops for `torch.float16`
and `torch.int8`:
```
torch.addmm(bias, dense, sparse.t())
torch.mm(dense, sparse)
torch.mm(sparse, dense)
aten.linear.default
aten.t.default
aten.t.detach
```
The end user interface to accelerate a nn.Linaer module with the
subclass would look like this:
```
from torch.sparse import to_sparse_semi_structured
mask = torch.Tensor([0, 0, 1, 1]).tile(128, 32).cuda().bool()
linear = Model(128, 128).half().cuda()
linear.weight = nn.Parameter(to_sparse_semi_structured(linear.weight,
mask=linear.weight.bool())
```
This also updates tests and the `torch.sparse` module docstring to
reflect these changes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102135
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
This PR adds in support for semi-structured sparsity via a tensor
subclass. It currently uses the CUTLASS kernels merged in PR #100881.
In the future we plan to add in cuSPARSELt support (see the other PRs in
the stack), which will give us larger performance gains.
This PR adds in 2 things:
- a Tensor subclass, `SparseSemiStructuredTensor` to store the
sparse tensor in copmressed form and override `__torch_dispatch__`.
- a conversion function that takes in a dense tensor and a
semi-structured sparse bool mask and creates an instance of the
subclass.
**SparseSemiStructuredTensor**
The subclass stores the dense tensor in a contiguous flattened tensor
for future compatability with cuSPARSELt, which expects this format.
Note that the CUTLASS kernels do not have this limitation, as the
specified values and the metadata are passed separately in
`_structured_sparse_linear`. In the future we can use the cuSPARSELT bindings
[here](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103700) for faster matmul, better dtype converage, and relaxed shape
constraints.
Since we currently don't have a way to go back from the sparse
representation to the dense representation, and we store the weights in
compressed form, we don't have a great way to handle .t().
Instead, we keep track of how often we've called transpose on our
tensor, and if it's an unexpected number we throw an error. When the first
argument is sparse, we expect an even number of calls to transpose,
while when the second argument is sparse, we expect an odd number of
calls. This is because we support second argument sparse matrix
multiplications by using transpose properties.
**to_sparse_semi_structured**
This is a conversion function to convert a dense tensor and a
semi-structured sparse bool mask into a subclass. Currently, we must
pass in a bool mask, since we can't infer it becuase there may be
additional zero elements in the dense tensor, so `tensor !=0` is not 2:4
sparse.
Once we add either a method to derive the mask from the dense tensor or
cuSPARSELt, we no longer need to pass in the mask. cuSPARSELt has it's
own helper functions to create the metadata mask.
**User Details**
We have implemented support for the following ops for `torch.float16`
and `torch.int8`:
```
torch.addmm(bias, dense, sparse.t())
torch.mm(dense, sparse)
torch.mm(sparse, dense)
aten.linear.default
aten.t.default
aten.t.detach
```
The end user interface to accelerate a nn.Linaer module with the
subclass would look like this:
```
from torch.sparse import to_sparse_semi_structured
mask = torch.Tensor([0, 0, 1, 1]).tile(128, 32).cuda().bool()
linear = Model(128, 128).half().cuda()
linear.weight = nn.Parameter(to_sparse_semi_structured(linear.weight,
mask=linear.weight.bool())
```
This also updates tests and the `torch.sparse` module docstring to
reflect these changes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102135
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Reference cycles are freed by the cycle collector rather than being cleaned up
when the objects in the cycle first become unreachable. If a cycle points to a tensor,
the CUDA memory for that tensor will not be freed until garbage collection runs.
Accumulation of CUDA allocations can lead to out of memory errors (OOMs), as well as
non-deterministic allocation behavior which is harder to debug.
This visualizer installs a garbage collection hook to look for cycles containing
CUDA tensors and saves a visualization of the garbage:
```
from torch.cuda._cycleviz import warn_tensor_cycles
warn_tensor_cycles()
# do some work that results in a cycle getting garbage collected
# ...
> WARNING:root:Reference cycle includes a CUDA Tensor see visualization of cycle /tmp/tmpeideu9gl.html
```
Reland to make windows skip the test.
This reverts commit 7b3b6dd426.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/104051
Approved by: https://github.com/aaronenyeshi, https://github.com/malfet
The following subjects are not in this PR and will be done in a follow up:
- Go through torch_function section and update to the latest phrasing and link to the proper new sections
- Go through torch.library and custom device docs to add links to the new sections as appropriate
- Top level explanations on which component should be used
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102087
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
Reference cycles are freed by the cycle collector rather than being cleaned up
when the objects in the cycle first become unreachable. If a cycle points to a tensor,
the CUDA memory for that tensor will not be freed until garbage collection runs.
Accumulatin of CUDA allocations can lead to out of memory errors (OOMs), as well as
non-deterministic allocation behavior which is harder to debug.
This visualizer installs a garbage collection hook to look for cycles containing
CUDA tensors and saves a visualization of the garbage:
```
from torch.cuda._cycleviz import warn_tensor_cycles
warn_tensor_cycles()
# do some work that results in a cycle getting garbage collected
# ...
> WARNING:root:Reference cycle includes a CUDA Tensor see visualization of cycle /tmp/tmpeideu9gl.html
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102656
Approved by: https://github.com/aaronenyeshi
**Summary**
- Update the quantization document that default qconfig with oneDNN backend is recommended to be used on CPUs with Vector Neural Network Instruction support.
- Add the warning message when user uses default qconfig with oneDNN backend on CPU without Vector Neural Network Instruction support.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103653
Approved by: https://github.com/jgong5, https://github.com/malfet
# torch.compiler public API
## Goal
The goal of this document is to describe the public facing API for torchdynamo and torchinductor.
Today both dynamo and torchinductor are in `torch/_dynamo` and `torch/_inductor` namespace with the only public function
`torch.compile()` which is directly placed in `torch/__init__.py`
This poses a few problems for users trying to take dependencies on PyTorch 2.0
1. Unclear BC guarantees
2. No builtin discovery mechanism outside of reading the source code
3. No hard requirements for docstrings or type annotations
Most importantly it mixes two personas the PyTorch 2.0 developer vs the PyTorch 2.0 customer so this is an attempt to address this. We draw a lot of inspiration from the `functorch` migration to the `func` namespace.
## Alternate names
We did discuss some other alternative names
1. `torch.compile` -> problem is this would break BC on the existing `torch.compile` function
2. `torch.dynamo` -> `dynamo` is so far not something we've deliberately hidden from users but problem is now figuring out what it's `_dynamo` vs `dynamo` might be confusing
3. `torch.compiler` -> 1 would be better but to keep BC this is a good compromise
# The general approach
## Proposal 1
In https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/__init__.py
We have function called `reset()`, this function is essential if users are trying to `torch.compile()` a model under different settings
```python
# in _dynamo/
def reset():
do_reset_stuff()
```
Instead we propose
```python
# in compiler/
def reset():
do_reset_stuff() # As in copy paste the logic from _dynamo.reset
# in _dynamo/
import warnings
import inspect
def reset():
function_name = inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name
warnings.warn(f"{function_name} is deprecated, use compiler.{function_name} instead", DeprecationWarning)
return compiler.reset()
```
## Proposal 2
```python
# in compiler/
def reset():
“””
Docstrings here
“””
_dynamo.reset()
# in _dynamo/
No changes
```
Consensus so far seems to be proposal 2 since fewer warnings will be less jarring and it’ll make it quite easy to merge the public API
## Docstrings
The above was an example of a function that has no inputs or outputs but there are other functions which could use an improvement in their docstrings, for example allow_in_graph actually works over lists of functions but that’s not mentioned anywhere in the example only if you read the source code.
def allow_in_graph(fn):
"""
Customize which functions TorchDynamo will include in the generated
graph. Similar to `torch.fx.wrap()`.
Parameters:
fn (callable or list/tuple): The function(s) to be allowed in the graph.
Returns:
callable or list/tuple: The input function(s) included in the graph.
Examples:
Customize inclusion of a single function:
::
torch._dynamo.allow_in_graph(my_custom_function)
Customize inclusion of multiple functions:
::
torch._dynamo.allow_in_graph([my_custom_function1, my_custom_function2])
@torch._dynamo.optimize(...)
def fn(a):
x = torch.add(x, 1)
x = my_custom_function(x)
x = torch.add(x, 1)
return x
fn(...)
Notes:
The `allow_in_graph` function allows customization of which functions TorchDynamo
includes in the generated graph. It can be used to include specific functions that
are not automatically captured by TorchDynamo.
If `fn` is a list or tuple, `allow_in_graph` will be called recursively on each
element in the sequence.
Once a function is allowed in the graph using `allow_in_graph`, it will be captured
in the graph generated by TorchDynamo. This customization enables more fine-grained
control over the functions included in the graph.
Note that `allow_in_graph` expects the input `fn` to be a callable.
"""
if isinstance(fn, (list, tuple)):
return [allow_in_graph(x) for x in fn]
assert callable(fn), "allow_in_graph expects a callable"
allowed_functions._allowed_function_ids.add(id(fn))
allowed_functions._disallowed_function_ids.remove(id(fn))
return fn
So to make the API public, we’d have to write similar docstrings for all public functions we’d like to create.
The benefit of this approach is that
1. No BC risks, internal and external users relying on our tooling can slowly wean off the private functions.
2. We will also have to write correct docstrings which will automatically make our documentation easier to maintain and render correctly on pytorch.org
3. We already have some BC guarantees already, we don’t kill OptimizedModule, we rejected the PR to change the config system
The con of this approach is that
Will be stuck with some potentially suboptimal functions/classes that you can’t kill
## Testing strategy
If the approach is to mostly make a public function call an already tested private function then all we need to do is ensure that the function signatures don't change
## Which functions should be in the public API
Our heuristic for deciding whether something should be public or not is are users already relying on it for lack of other options or have we recommended some non public functions for users to debug their PT 2.0 programs.
Heuristic for not putting something in public is that it’s an experimental subsystem with the goal of turning it on by default, it’s very core dev centric, meta centric, a bunch of different configs that should be batched into a single user facing one, or something that needs to be renamed because the name is confusing
#### Top level
`torch.compile()` -> already is a public API it does require some minor improvements like having configs be passed in to any backend and not just inductor (EDIT: This was already done https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99645l) and renaming `mode=reduce-overhead` to `mode=cudagraph`
To make sure that PT 2.0 is supported with a given pytorch version users can create a new public function and this would replace the need for `try/except` blocks around `import torch._dynamo` that has been populating user code.
```python
def pt2_enabled():
if hasattr(torch, 'compile'):
return True
else:
return False
```
For all of the below they will be translated to `torch.compiler.function_name()`
#### From _dynamo
As a starting point we looked at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/__init__.py and we suggest redefining these functions in `pytorch/torch/compiler/__init__.py`
It might also make sense to split them over multiple files and import them in `__init__.py` but because the number of functions is small it'd probably be fine to add them all into a single compiler/__init__.py until this list becomes larger
1. `reset()`
2. `allow_in_graph()`
10. `list_backends()`
12. `compile()`: torch.compile() would be mostly a shell function passing arguments to torch.compiler.compile()
13. `assume_constant_result()`: TODO: Double check how this is useful
15. `torch._dynamo.disable()`
Some notable omissions
11. `explain()`: We need to clean up the output for this function, make it a data class and pretty printable
1. `forbid_in_graph()`: Considered adding this but should instead consolidate on `disallow_in_graph`
2. `optimize_assert()`: Already covered by `torch.compile(fullgraph=True)`
3. `check_if_dynamo_supported()`: this would be supplanted by pt2_enabled()
4. `compilation_metrics`, `graph_breaks_reasons` ..: would all be accessed via `torch.compiler.explain()`
5. `replay` does not seem useful to end customers
6. . `graph_break()`: Mostly useful for debugging or unit tests
9. `register_backend()`: End users will just pass a string backend to torch.compile, only devs will create new backends
10. `export()` : Eventually this needs to public but for now it’s not ready so just highlighting that it will be in the public API eventually
11. `disallow_in_graph()`: Usage is limited
12. `mark_static()`: we can keep this private until dynamic=True is recommended in stable
13. `mark_dynamic()`: we can keep this private until dynamic=True is recommended in trunk
14. 8. `OptimizedModule`: This is the only class that we'd expose but is crucial since users are running code like `if isinstance(mod, OptimizedModule): torch.save(mod._orig_mod)` EDIT: because we fixed pickling we no longer need to
expose this
15. `is_compiling()`: Still not clear how this useful to end users
There are also config variables which we need to expose https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/config.py
Some of our configs are useful dev flags, others are to gate experimental functionality and others are essential debugging tools and we seperate out the essential debugging and logging tools to a public facing config.
TODO: I still need to think of a good way of porting the config in a BC way here are some ideas
1. Just make all passes available and controllable via `torch.compile(options={})` but only show docstrings for the ones users should care about.
The current problem with our config system is we have 3 ways of setting them once via `options={}`, environment variables and variables in `config.py`, it'd be worth settling on one source of truth and have that be the public API.
The configs we should make public are
1. `log_file_name`
2. `verbose`
3. `cache_size_limit`
4. `repro_level` and `repro_after`: Although we can rename these to minifier and give human readable names to the levels
Everything else should stay private in particular
1. `print_graph_breaks`, `print_specializations`: should be supplanted by `explain()` for public users
2. dynamic shape configs : Users should only have to worry about `torch.compile(dynamic=True/False)`
3. The distributed flags, hook or guard configs: If we tell a user to use FSDP and DDP then the flag should be enabled by default or be in a private namespace
4. The fbcode flags: Obviously no need to be user facing
5. Skip/Allow lists: Not something normal users should play around with
#### From _inductor
Very little of inductor should be exposed in a public facing API, our core audience as in people writing models mostly just need information on what certain passes mean and how to control them a high level and they can do this with `torch.compile(options={})` so the goal here should be more to make available passes clearer and ideally consolidate them into `torch.compile()` docstrings or modes.
There are some exceptions though from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_inductor/__init__.py
1. `list_mode_options()`
2. `list_options()`: this needs an additional pass to hide internal or debug options
For both of these we’d rename them to compiler.inductor_list_mode_options and compiler.inductor_list_options() since they would be in the same init file as the one for dynamo
Notable omissions
1. `_inductor.compile()`: Because of users are coming in with their own fx graph, they are likely developers
2. `_inductor.aot_compile()`:Again this is about capturing and modifying fx graphs so users APIs don't need to be public
However the configs are a slightly different story, because we can choose to either
1. Make all configs public
2. Make some configs public and keep most of the private ones. If public config is set it should override the private version
3. Make all configs controllable via `torch.compile(options={})` but make list_options() hide more things
For now 3 seems like the most reasonable choice with some high level configs we’ll keep like TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG
Regardless here's what should probably be public or advertised more
1. `disable_progress` and verbose_progress: Combine and enable by default
2. `fallback_random`: We could make the case this shouldn't be public if a top level deterministic mode enables this
3. `profile_bandwidth`: Or could make the case that this should be in TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG
Notable omissions
1. Any config that would generally improve performance for most that we should probably enable by default but might be disabled in the short term because of stability: example `epilogue_fusion`, `pattern_matcher`, `reordering`
2. Autotuning flags: Should just sit behind `torch.compile(mode="max-autotune")` like `max_autotune`, `max_autotune_gemm`
3. `coordinate_descent_tuning`: This one I'm a but mixed about, maybe it just also fall into `mode="max-autotune"`
4. `trace`: `TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG` is the best flag for all of this
5. `triton.cudagraphs`: Default should be `torch.compile(mode="reduce-overhead")` - I'd go further and rename the `mode=cudagraph` and we can keep reduce-overhead for BC reasons
6. `triton_unique_kernel_names`: Mostly useful for devs debugging
7. `dce`: which doesnt really do anything
8. `shape_padding`: Elias is working on enabling this by default in which case we also remove it
## Mechanics
This PR would include the public functions with their docstrings
Another PR will take a stab at the configs
And for work where the APIs are still being cleaned up whether its minifier or escape hatches, export or dynamic shapes, aot_inductor etc.. we’ll keep them private until a public commitment can be made
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102182
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/albanD
# torch.compiler public API
## Goal
The goal of this document is to describe the public facing API for torchdynamo and torchinductor.
Today both dynamo and torchinductor are in `torch/_dynamo` and `torch/_inductor` namespace with the only public function
`torch.compile()` which is directly placed in `torch/__init__.py`
This poses a few problems for users trying to take dependencies on PyTorch 2.0
1. Unclear BC guarantees
2. No builtin discovery mechanism outside of reading the source code
3. No hard requirements for docstrings or type annotations
Most importantly it mixes two personas the PyTorch 2.0 developer vs the PyTorch 2.0 customer so this is an attempt to address this. We draw a lot of inspiration from the `functorch` migration to the `func` namespace.
## Alternate names
We did discuss some other alternative names
1. `torch.compile` -> problem is this would break BC on the existing `torch.compile` function
2. `torch.dynamo` -> `dynamo` is so far not something we've deliberately hidden from users but problem is now figuring out what it's `_dynamo` vs `dynamo` might be confusing
3. `torch.compiler` -> 1 would be better but to keep BC this is a good compromise
# The general approach
## Proposal 1
In https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/__init__.py
We have function called `reset()`, this function is essential if users are trying to `torch.compile()` a model under different settings
```python
# in _dynamo/
def reset():
do_reset_stuff()
```
Instead we propose
```python
# in compiler/
def reset():
do_reset_stuff() # As in copy paste the logic from _dynamo.reset
# in _dynamo/
import warnings
import inspect
def reset():
function_name = inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name
warnings.warn(f"{function_name} is deprecated, use compiler.{function_name} instead", DeprecationWarning)
return compiler.reset()
```
## Proposal 2
```python
# in compiler/
def reset():
“””
Docstrings here
“””
_dynamo.reset()
# in _dynamo/
No changes
```
Consensus so far seems to be proposal 2 since fewer warnings will be less jarring and it’ll make it quite easy to merge the public API
## Docstrings
The above was an example of a function that has no inputs or outputs but there are other functions which could use an improvement in their docstrings, for example allow_in_graph actually works over lists of functions but that’s not mentioned anywhere in the example only if you read the source code.
def allow_in_graph(fn):
"""
Customize which functions TorchDynamo will include in the generated
graph. Similar to `torch.fx.wrap()`.
Parameters:
fn (callable or list/tuple): The function(s) to be allowed in the graph.
Returns:
callable or list/tuple: The input function(s) included in the graph.
Examples:
Customize inclusion of a single function:
::
torch._dynamo.allow_in_graph(my_custom_function)
Customize inclusion of multiple functions:
::
torch._dynamo.allow_in_graph([my_custom_function1, my_custom_function2])
@torch._dynamo.optimize(...)
def fn(a):
x = torch.add(x, 1)
x = my_custom_function(x)
x = torch.add(x, 1)
return x
fn(...)
Notes:
The `allow_in_graph` function allows customization of which functions TorchDynamo
includes in the generated graph. It can be used to include specific functions that
are not automatically captured by TorchDynamo.
If `fn` is a list or tuple, `allow_in_graph` will be called recursively on each
element in the sequence.
Once a function is allowed in the graph using `allow_in_graph`, it will be captured
in the graph generated by TorchDynamo. This customization enables more fine-grained
control over the functions included in the graph.
Note that `allow_in_graph` expects the input `fn` to be a callable.
"""
if isinstance(fn, (list, tuple)):
return [allow_in_graph(x) for x in fn]
assert callable(fn), "allow_in_graph expects a callable"
allowed_functions._allowed_function_ids.add(id(fn))
allowed_functions._disallowed_function_ids.remove(id(fn))
return fn
So to make the API public, we’d have to write similar docstrings for all public functions we’d like to create.
The benefit of this approach is that
1. No BC risks, internal and external users relying on our tooling can slowly wean off the private functions.
2. We will also have to write correct docstrings which will automatically make our documentation easier to maintain and render correctly on pytorch.org
3. We already have some BC guarantees already, we don’t kill OptimizedModule, we rejected the PR to change the config system
The con of this approach is that
Will be stuck with some potentially suboptimal functions/classes that you can’t kill
## Testing strategy
If the approach is to mostly make a public function call an already tested private function then all we need to do is ensure that the function signatures don't change
## Which functions should be in the public API
Our heuristic for deciding whether something should be public or not is are users already relying on it for lack of other options or have we recommended some non public functions for users to debug their PT 2.0 programs.
Heuristic for not putting something in public is that it’s an experimental subsystem with the goal of turning it on by default, it’s very core dev centric, meta centric, a bunch of different configs that should be batched into a single user facing one, or something that needs to be renamed because the name is confusing
#### Top level
`torch.compile()` -> already is a public API it does require some minor improvements like having configs be passed in to any backend and not just inductor (EDIT: This was already done https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99645l) and renaming `mode=reduce-overhead` to `mode=cudagraph`
To make sure that PT 2.0 is supported with a given pytorch version users can create a new public function and this would replace the need for `try/except` blocks around `import torch._dynamo` that has been populating user code.
```python
def pt2_enabled():
if hasattr(torch, 'compile'):
return True
else:
return False
```
For all of the below they will be translated to `torch.compiler.function_name()`
#### From _dynamo
As a starting point we looked at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/__init__.py and we suggest redefining these functions in `pytorch/torch/compiler/__init__.py`
It might also make sense to split them over multiple files and import them in `__init__.py` but because the number of functions is small it'd probably be fine to add them all into a single compiler/__init__.py until this list becomes larger
1. `reset()`
2. `allow_in_graph()`
10. `list_backends()`
12. `compile()`: torch.compile() would be mostly a shell function passing arguments to torch.compiler.compile()
13. `assume_constant_result()`: TODO: Double check how this is useful
15. `torch._dynamo.disable()`
Some notable omissions
11. `explain()`: We need to clean up the output for this function, make it a data class and pretty printable
1. `forbid_in_graph()`: Considered adding this but should instead consolidate on `disallow_in_graph`
2. `optimize_assert()`: Already covered by `torch.compile(fullgraph=True)`
3. `check_if_dynamo_supported()`: this would be supplanted by pt2_enabled()
4. `compilation_metrics`, `graph_breaks_reasons` ..: would all be accessed via `torch.compiler.explain()`
5. `replay` does not seem useful to end customers
6. . `graph_break()`: Mostly useful for debugging or unit tests
9. `register_backend()`: End users will just pass a string backend to torch.compile, only devs will create new backends
10. `export()` : Eventually this needs to public but for now it’s not ready so just highlighting that it will be in the public API eventually
11. `disallow_in_graph()`: Usage is limited
12. `mark_static()`: we can keep this private until dynamic=True is recommended in stable
13. `mark_dynamic()`: we can keep this private until dynamic=True is recommended in trunk
14. 8. `OptimizedModule`: This is the only class that we'd expose but is crucial since users are running code like `if isinstance(mod, OptimizedModule): torch.save(mod._orig_mod)` EDIT: because we fixed pickling we no longer need to
expose this
15. `is_compiling()`: Still not clear how this useful to end users
There are also config variables which we need to expose https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_dynamo/config.py
Some of our configs are useful dev flags, others are to gate experimental functionality and others are essential debugging tools and we seperate out the essential debugging and logging tools to a public facing config.
TODO: I still need to think of a good way of porting the config in a BC way here are some ideas
1. Just make all passes available and controllable via `torch.compile(options={})` but only show docstrings for the ones users should care about.
The current problem with our config system is we have 3 ways of setting them once via `options={}`, environment variables and variables in `config.py`, it'd be worth settling on one source of truth and have that be the public API.
The configs we should make public are
1. `log_file_name`
2. `verbose`
3. `cache_size_limit`
4. `repro_level` and `repro_after`: Although we can rename these to minifier and give human readable names to the levels
Everything else should stay private in particular
1. `print_graph_breaks`, `print_specializations`: should be supplanted by `explain()` for public users
2. dynamic shape configs : Users should only have to worry about `torch.compile(dynamic=True/False)`
3. The distributed flags, hook or guard configs: If we tell a user to use FSDP and DDP then the flag should be enabled by default or be in a private namespace
4. The fbcode flags: Obviously no need to be user facing
5. Skip/Allow lists: Not something normal users should play around with
#### From _inductor
Very little of inductor should be exposed in a public facing API, our core audience as in people writing models mostly just need information on what certain passes mean and how to control them a high level and they can do this with `torch.compile(options={})` so the goal here should be more to make available passes clearer and ideally consolidate them into `torch.compile()` docstrings or modes.
There are some exceptions though from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/torch/_inductor/__init__.py
1. `list_mode_options()`
2. `list_options()`: this needs an additional pass to hide internal or debug options
For both of these we’d rename them to compiler.inductor_list_mode_options and compiler.inductor_list_options() since they would be in the same init file as the one for dynamo
Notable omissions
1. `_inductor.compile()`: Because of users are coming in with their own fx graph, they are likely developers
2. `_inductor.aot_compile()`:Again this is about capturing and modifying fx graphs so users APIs don't need to be public
However the configs are a slightly different story, because we can choose to either
1. Make all configs public
2. Make some configs public and keep most of the private ones. If public config is set it should override the private version
3. Make all configs controllable via `torch.compile(options={})` but make list_options() hide more things
For now 3 seems like the most reasonable choice with some high level configs we’ll keep like TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG
Regardless here's what should probably be public or advertised more
1. `disable_progress` and verbose_progress: Combine and enable by default
2. `fallback_random`: We could make the case this shouldn't be public if a top level deterministic mode enables this
3. `profile_bandwidth`: Or could make the case that this should be in TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG
Notable omissions
1. Any config that would generally improve performance for most that we should probably enable by default but might be disabled in the short term because of stability: example `epilogue_fusion`, `pattern_matcher`, `reordering`
2. Autotuning flags: Should just sit behind `torch.compile(mode="max-autotune")` like `max_autotune`, `max_autotune_gemm`
3. `coordinate_descent_tuning`: This one I'm a but mixed about, maybe it just also fall into `mode="max-autotune"`
4. `trace`: `TORCH_COMPILE_DEBUG` is the best flag for all of this
5. `triton.cudagraphs`: Default should be `torch.compile(mode="reduce-overhead")` - I'd go further and rename the `mode=cudagraph` and we can keep reduce-overhead for BC reasons
6. `triton_unique_kernel_names`: Mostly useful for devs debugging
7. `dce`: which doesnt really do anything
8. `shape_padding`: Elias is working on enabling this by default in which case we also remove it
## Mechanics
This PR would include the public functions with their docstrings
Another PR will take a stab at the configs
And for work where the APIs are still being cleaned up whether its minifier or escape hatches, export or dynamic shapes, aot_inductor etc.. we’ll keep them private until a public commitment can be made
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102182
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Adding to the docs for now, hopefully we can move to `cudaMallocAsync`-backed cuBLAS workspaces soon which should alleviate the recent confusion around `cuBLAS` "leaking" memory through workspaces.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100919
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
To make TP more generic for Attention module, we come up with this new col/rowwise parallel style.
Basically, the idea behind is that:
We only do DTensor op for Col/Rowwise sharded part. For the rest of ATen ops, we will leave it to Tensor ops.
And we set this behavior as default for Colwise and Rowwise parallel style. If people want to customize it, they can always pass in different prepare_input or prepare_output
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100508
Approved by: https://github.com/wanchaol
