We don't have any coverage for meta tensor correctness for backwards
because torch function mode can only allow us to interpose on
Python torch API calls, but backwards invocations happen from C++.
To make this possible, I add torch_dispatch_meta test which runs the
tests with __torch_dispatch__
While doing this, I needed to generate fresh expected failure / skip
lists for the new test suite, and I discovered that my original
scaffolding for this purpose was woefully insufficient. So I rewrote
how the test framework worked, and at the same time rewrote the
__torch_function__ code to also use the new logic. Here's whats
new:
- Expected failure / skip is now done on a per function call basis,
rather than the entire test. This means that separate OpInfo
samples for a function don't affect each other.
- There are now only two lists: expect failure list (where the test
consistently fails on all runs) and skip list (where the test
sometimes passes and fails.
- We explicitly notate the dtype that failed. I considered detecting
when something failed on all dtypes, but this was complicated and
listing everything out seemed to be nice and simple. To keep the
dtypes short, I introduce a shorthand notation for dtypes.
- Conversion to meta tensors is factored into its own class
MetaConverter
- To regenerate the expected failure / skip lists, just run with
PYTORCH_COLLECT_EXPECT and filter on a specific test type
(test_meta or test_dispatch_meta) for whichever you want to update.
Other misc fixes:
- Fix max_pool1d to work with BFloat16 in all circumstances, by making
it dispatch and then fixing a minor compile error (constexpr doesn't
work with BFloat16)
- Add resolve_name for turning random torch API functions into string
names
- Add push classmethod to the Mode classes, so that you can more easily
push a mode onto the mode stack
- Add some more skips for missing LAPACK
- Added an API to let you query if there's already a registration for
a function, added a test to check that we register_meta for all
decompositions (except detach, that decomp is wrong lol), and then
update all the necessary sites to make the test pass.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77477
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Double-header bug fix:
- As reported by jansel, dtypes are still showing up as integers
when the schema is an optional dtype. This is simple enough to
fix and I added a test for it. But while I was at it...
- I noticed that the THPMemoryFormat_new idiom with "unused" name
doesn't actually work, the repr of the returned memory format
object is wrong and this shows up when we try to log the args/kwargs.
So I fixed memory format to do it properly along with everything
else.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/77135
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77543
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/jansel
You can now do a lot of crazy things about redefining the behavior of an operator, and still be fast in cuda !!!
Example 1: swapping where's branches
```
code_string = "template <typename T> T inverted_where(bool cond, T a, T b){ return !cond ? a : b; }"
jitted_fn = torch.cuda.jiterator._create_jit_fn(code_string)
my_lib = torch.library.Library("aten", "IMPL")
my_lib.impl('aten::where.self', jitted_fn, "CUDA")
# torch.where is now overridden
```
Example 2: approximate gelu with relu
```
code_string = "template <typename T> T fast_gelu(T a){ return a > 0 ? a : 0;}"
jitted_fn = torch.cuda.jiterator._create_jit_fn(code_string)
my_lib = torch.library.Library("aten", "IMPL")
my_lib.impl('aten::gelu', jitted_fn, "CUDA")
# torch.nn.GELU and torch.nn.function.gelu are now overridden
```
Example 3: clipping output for numerical unstable kernels
```
code_string = "template <typename T> T clipped_exp(T a){ return a > T(10.0) ? T(22026.4657948) : exp(a); }"
jitted_fn = torch.cuda.jiterator._create_jit_fn(code_string)
my_lib = torch.library.Library("aten", "IMPL")
my_lib.impl('aten::exp', jitted_fn, "CUDA")
# torch.exp(x) and x.exp() are now overridden
```
Example 4: Simulate buggy hardware behaviors
```
code_string = "template <typename T> T buggy_add(T a, T b){ return a + b + T(1); }"
jitted_fn = torch.cuda.jiterator._create_jit_fn(code_string)
my_lib = torch.library.Library("aten", "IMPL")
my_lib.impl('aten::add.Tensor', jitted_fn, "CUDA")
torch.add(x, y), "x + y" and x.add(y) are now overridden
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77121
Approved by: https://github.com/anjali411
For the most part, PrimTorch refs have the same signature as their
ATen equivalents. I modify most PrimTorch refs to register themselves
as decompositions, using the prim name they wrap to find the aten name
(except for a few cases where the prim/aten names mismatch). There are
some exclusions, falling into one of two categories:
- The torch equivalent was already implemented as a CompositeImplicitAutograd
decomposition in C++
- The ref doesn't support enough features (e.g., the real deal has more
kwargs / overloads than are currently implemented)
PrimTorch refs are written as a single function that supports all
overloads, and this style is convenient for cases where we have a bundle
of overloads for what morally is a single overload with a Union type
on an argument (which we ought to have supported in
native_functions.yaml but blah); to support registering a single decomp
for all the overloads, we modify register_decomposition to register
to ALL overloads if you pass it an overload packet. This is technically
BC breaking but no tests started failing because of it.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/76835
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee, https://github.com/mruberry
Whether or not this is a reasonable operation to do in the presence of
subclasses is a good question in and of itself, but this fixes an
obvious invariant violation, which is that if a Tensor reports that
it is a tensor subclass, it had better have the Python dispatch key.
Previously, the dispatch key would have gotten unconditionally cleared;
now we preserve what ever the original bit was.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/75644
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
Following triage review discussion, it would be best for these tests to not be triaged high priority by automation, but by the triagers in the oncall.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74555
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D35099202
Pulled By: janeyx99
fbshipit-source-id: 657a0317141de3a598476a6f601ec26cc26231b1
(cherry picked from commit 057519cb2494d0f9a0b169f359ac87ba9e89f088)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71708
In Python 3.2, a number of asserts were deprecated.
In Python 3.11, these asserts are deleted completely. The files in this change still use the deprecated asserts.
Switch over to the supported syntax for 3.2 onwards.
Test Plan: Tested on the internal test suite runner.
Reviewed By: ajtulloch
Differential Revision: D33503694
fbshipit-source-id: a150f296033260acf8365d77b837ce0679f57361
(cherry picked from commit abf60ed97409265222915d8265aaabedd625fd93)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73850
Previously, torch.Tensor was treated as if it were torch.FloatTensor
(where Float is whatever the default dtype was). This is not good
behavior for tensor subclasses, which inherit from torch.Tensor and
will want to super() call into it and will only notice later that
only float works as a dtype. So in this PR I relax the behavior
for this case to make the torch.Tensor constructor more useful for
subclasses.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D34707396
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a995d601007b6fcd0317d89f66ca7e08c4d6053e
(cherry picked from commit e8d0d7b3e8b17681b931cbe4f5729de2e80cf3de)
I was working on an explanation of how to call into the "super"
implementation of some given ATen operation inside of __torch_dispatch__
(https://github.com/albanD/subclass_zoo/blob/main/trivial_tensors.py)
and I kept thinking to myself "Why doesn't just calling super() on
__torch_dispatch__ work"? Well, after this patch, it does! The idea
is if you don't actually unwrap the input tensors, you can call
super().__torch_dispatch__ to get at the original behavior.
Internally, this is implemented by disabling PythonKey and then
redispatching. This implementation of disabled_torch_dispatch is
not /quite/ right, and some reasons why are commented in the code.
There is then some extra work I have to do to make sure we recognize
disabled_torch_dispatch as the "default" implementation (so we don't
start slapping PythonKey on all tensors, including base Tensors),
which is modeled the same way as how disabled_torch_function is done.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73684
Approved by: albanD
Summary:
Reland of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72623 that was reverted for the tls cleanup was removed.
From close inspection on the counting of the number of available keys, I think there is one more since the guard is actually one after the last usable key. With this update assert, the last updated key will still be <=63 which will fit just fine.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72832
Reviewed By: H-Huang
Differential Revision: D34228571
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: ce5e10a841ea87386727346cfc8d9327252574c4
(cherry picked from commit 59d3b86353)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72622
This contain a version of the test for next PR that doesn't work. To see the change in behavior more easily.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: samdow
Differential Revision: D34214954
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 4d72f2d20e12c57ca7b63852ffe0c8aa61aa593b
(cherry picked from commit b5d792d103)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72620
Clarify how LoggingTensor works with autograd.
The updated comment should cover the semantic changes.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: samdow
Differential Revision: D34214956
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 730d0a68f4228d2a84758e6807d869a34cbc1b31
(cherry picked from commit 66110bf16b)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71707
Why?
- detach should behave like jax.stop_gradient in functorch. Because it
does not detach all the way through, functorch (as well as a Tensor
Subclass wrapping a Tensor subclass) won't see it after the first
layer/subclass handles it.
How?
- This PR changes detach to dispatch all the way through to the backend.
- This PR also modifies native::detach to call shallow_copy_and_detach
instead of native::alias. This is because today, the semantics of detach
and alias are differently -- they differ only by
allow_tensor_metadata_change. In the future, we may choose to deprecate
this flag.
- NB: Before and after this PR, detach() shows up twice in
torch_dispatch: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/71725. This is
not a regression so I didn't want to fix it in this PR because it is
weird to fix.
Test Plan: - added new tests; run existing tests
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D33752860
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 40cc2dc8232e75a02586a4ba5b0ef5f16cb76617
(cherry picked from commit f88aae426e)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/68945
This PR enables the Python conversion functions for `Storage` (specifically `UntypedStorage`) and also cleans up some remnants of the deprecated typed storages from `DynamicTypes.cpp`.
ghstack-source-id: 147245110
Test Plan: Run the existing unit and integration tests.
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D32676505
fbshipit-source-id: 3a3f6db4fb0da5c78dd406c96ab70bdc37015521
(cherry picked from commit d6427b94cf)
Summary:
The error message was changed following a PR comment. And since the test doesn't run on CI, I forgot to update the test to catch the new error message.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/69565
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D32932982
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: a1da72b0ca735e72b481bc944039233094f1c422
