## Summary
- add a CuBLASReductionOption enum so the CUDA context can track reduced-precision and split-K options
- extend the Python bindings, backend helpers, and docs to accept an optional allow_splitk argument for fp16/bf16 matmul controls
- update cuBLAS/cuBLASLt call sites plus dynamo guards and tests to respect the new combinations
## Testing
- python test/test_cuda.py TestCuda.test_cublas_allow_fp16_reduced_precision_reduction_get_set -v *(fails: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'psutil')*
------
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68e404623178832f8a3e1d34e1e175da
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164766
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#141884
This fixes the issue for all optimizers and parameter options.
A member function `overwrite_from` is added to the optimizer base class. Each optimizer then implements this function for comparing their accepted parameters to defaults. A SFINAE approach to handle the different optimizer parameters generically (in optimizer.h only) was evaluated, but I think this is easier to review and maintain.
This mirrors the Python API up to one edge case. An example of the edge case is provided below.
Python can distinguish between 1) Key not present in dict = "not specified" and 2) Key present in dict = "explicitly set". The C++ implementation cannot.
The issue hinges on whether or not to track if a particular parameter was set by the user explicitly or not (discrepancy in the case when the constructor default is explicitly passed in).
To track this seems like it will take more intervention than would be worth it (modify TORCH_ARG to keep track, use std::optional for the parameter types, use bitset tracking) and was not pursued in the current PR. I'm happy to alter the design if appropriate.
### Example of edge case hinging on CONSTRUCTOR DEFAULTS vs OPTIMIZER DEFAULTS
1. CONSTRUCTOR DEFAULTS:
These are the values you get when calling AdamOptions()
AdamOptions().lr() = 0.001
AdamOptions().weight_decay() = 0
AdamOptions().eps() = 1e-08
2. OPTIMIZER DEFAULTS:
These are the values the user chose when creating the optimizer
User's optimizer defaults:
optimizer.lr() = 0.005
optimizer.weight_decay() = 0.1
optimizer.eps() = 1e-07
3. THE PROBLEM SCENARIO:
User wants to add a parameter group with explicit weight_decay=0.0
User sets: weight_decay(0)
4. THE CONFUSION:
Constructor default weight_decay: 0
User's explicit weight_decay: 0
Are they equal? YES
Since they're equal, our overwrite_from() logic thinks:
"User didn't set weight_decay explicitly, use optimizer default"
5. CURRENT BEHAVIOR:
Final weight_decay: 0.1
User expected: 0
Match? ❌ NO
=== KEY INSIGHT ===
Constructor defaults are built into the C++ class definition.
Optimizer defaults are chosen by the user at runtime. We want to respect the user intention.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/161825
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
Modified `multimem_one_shot_all_reduce_out` function to accept a `root` argument, making it a `multimem_reduce` op.
The original `multimem_one_shot_all_reduce` op becomes a caller of the `multimem_reduce`, with each rank providing its own rank id as root.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164517
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
This PR skips the hipify step of torch/csrc/jit/ir/ir.h to avoid a build-time error for the JIT cuda namespace. This fixes two skipped tests in test/jit/test_cuda.py.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164735
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily
Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
Fixes#89034
Updated tensor_to_numpy() function in tensor_numpy.cpp to handle ZeroTensors by throwing an error if force=False and returning an array full of zeros if force=True.
@ngimel, I just saw that you mentioned PyTorch is not too concerned with this issue but I had already worked on it so I figured I would push it anyways and see what you thought. Feel free to close the PR if you think it is not worth merging.
@albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164487
Approved by: https://github.com/izaitsevfb
Low-level PyTorch APIs should be usable/stable enough at this point but we might move the underlying driver API usage a bit from here...
Built on top of @drisspg 's branch
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/159104
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Co-authored-by: drisspg <drisspguessous@gmail.com>
Python 3.13 added PyObject_GetOptionalAttrString. I'm not 100% certain that it is strictly better than the old approach in all cases, but based on documentation/comments it seems to be meant for this type of use, and it's faster when I profile torchtitan training (which gets to the "check for the `__torch_function__` attr on some object" part of maybe_has_torch_function frequently enough to notice, but wastes a bunch of time generating exceptions that we then suppressed here).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164624
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This PR applies clang-tidy readability checks to jit sources and all headers in the code base.
`readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is suppressed because it incurs too many changes. `readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is used to detect redundant inline specifiers on function and variable declarations. There are many in-class method definitions that are marked inline.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164652
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
This PR applies clang-tidy readability checks to jit sources and all headers in the code base.
`readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is suppressed because it incurs too many changes. `readability-redundant-inline-specifier` is used to detect redundant inline specifiers on function and variable declarations. There are many in-class method definitions that are marked inline.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164652
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
Fixes#89034
Updated tensor_to_numpy() function in tensor_numpy.cpp to handle ZeroTensors by throwing an error if force=False and returning an array full of zeros if force=True.
@ngimel, I just saw that you mentioned PyTorch is not too concerned with this issue but I had already worked on it so I figured I would push it anyways and see what you thought. Feel free to close the PR if you think it is not worth merging.
@albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164487
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/albanD
Low-level PyTorch APIs should be usable/stable enough at this point but we might move the underlying driver API usage a bit from here...
Built on top of @drisspg 's branch
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/159104
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Co-authored-by: drisspg <drisspguessous@gmail.com>
Modified `multimem_one_shot_all_reduce_out` function to accept a `root` argument, making it a `multimem_reduce` op.
The original `multimem_one_shot_all_reduce` op becomes a caller of the `multimem_reduce`, with each rank providing its own rank id as root.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/164517
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
`grad_dtype` is a new attribute on Tensor to control gradient dtype:
- Access/setting is leaf-only.
- grad_dtype is respected when (1) when assigning to .grad, and (2) in the engine after the previous node produces incoming gradients for AccumulateGrad. (See table below for details)
- Not setting grad_dtype preserves the current behavior. Accessing it returns `t.dtype`
- `grad_dtype` cannot be set when there is already a `.grad` present and the dtypes conflict.
| `grad_dtype` setting | Setting `.grad` manually | Incoming gradient from autograd engine |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| **Default (tensor’s dtype)** | `.grad` must match tensor’s dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to tensor’s dtype |
| **Set to specific dtype** | `.grad` must match that dtype | Engine casts incoming grad to the specified dtype |
| **Set to `None`** | `.grad` may be any dtype | Engine does not cast; accepts incoming grad dtype as-is |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/162815
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
Fixes#162129. Added validation in _rank_not_in_group() to check if ```FakeProcessGroup``` is properly initialized before use, raising a clear error message if ```torch.distributed.init_process_group(backend='fake')``` hasn't been called first.
This prevents silent failures and ensures proper dispatch system integration for all distributed operations.
Added test case test_fake_process_group_direct_usage_error() that validates the error is raised for ```all_reduce``` and ```all_to_all_single``` operations.
Please let me know if additional distributed operators should be tested or if any other updates are needed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163665
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Add `struct AOTInductorConstantMapEntry` to represent the constant map in AOTI Model. We cannot use `std::unordered_map` for cross-compilation, because it is not ABI stable.
it will be tested when we test `update_user_managed_constant_buffer` for windows cross-compilation
Example usage:
```
// Load constants. Create random constants here.
auto* fc1_w = new slim::SlimTensor(slim::empty({16, 10}, c10::kFloat, c10::Device(c10::kCUDA, 0)));
fc1_w->fill_(1.0);
.....
// Build pairs
std::vector<AOTInductorConstantPair> constants{
{"fc1_weight", fc1_w},
{"fc1_bias", fc1_b},
{"fc2_weight", fc2_w},
{"fc2_bias", fc2_b},
};
// Call runtime (pass raw pointer + size)
update_user_managed_constant_buffer_abi(
container_handle,
constants.data(),
constants.size(),
/*use_inactive=*/false,
/*validate_full_update=*/true);
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/163819
Approved by: https://github.com/desertfire
