This PR adds a C function to check if all torch function is disabled.
Recall that there are three torch function enablement states:
* All disabled
* Torch Function Subclass disabled
* All enabled
The API before this change provides two functions:
* `_is_torch_function_enabled` - returns True iff the current TF state is All enabled
* `_is_torch_function_mode_enabled` - returns True iff the state is not All disabled and the torch function mode stack is non-empty.
The crux of why a new API is needed is the following: If dynamo enters a frame with the torch function mode stack empty, `_is_torch_function_enabled` == False, it is impossible to determine if after a new mode is pushed whether we should enter the mode or not. This is because we don't know if the enablement state is All disabled or only subclass disabled. Adding this API to check if All disabled is True allows us to disambiguate this case.
In the next PR, Dynamo InstructionTranslator will have clearer flags than the underlying C API:
* A flag to indicate if subclasses are disabled (ie All disabled or Subclass Disabled is the current state)
* A flag to indicate if modes are disabled (ie if All disabled is the current state)
* A symbolic stack which can be checked if any modes are present
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/133136
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
ghstack dependencies: #133130, #133729, #133131, #133132, #133133, #133134
Summary:
# Problem
`TORCH_WARN` can cause massive log spam.
I output the logs for before and after adding this change.
*Before:*
* The log file size was ~61.15 MB(61148028 bytes).
*After:*
* The log filesize was ~56.44 MB(56444057) bytes.
# Context
Looks like we tried to land this change earlier but it was reverted:
* D59413413
* Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/130047 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to broke test_overrides.py::TestTorchFunctionWarning::test_warn_on_invalid_torch_function
# Testing Update
`test_warn_on_invalid_torch_function` would fail because the warning would not be called on the handling of the second torch function class since `TORCH_WARN_ONCE` stops repeats globally.
Updated so that it runs separate programs. (Was not able to actually run the test, could someone help me with that
Test Plan: Need help with this...
Differential Revision: D60561181
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/132374
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Updates flake8 to v6.1.0 and fixes a few lints using sed and some ruff tooling.
- Replace `assert(0)` with `raise AssertionError()`
- Remove extraneous parenthesis i.e.
- `assert(a == b)` -> `assert a == b`
- `if(x > y or y < z):`->`if x > y or y < z:`
- And `return('...')` -> `return '...'`
Co-authored-by: Nikita Shulga <2453524+malfet@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116591
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/malfet
Fixes#109842.
This disables the implicit `UserWarning`s that were raised for deprecated `torch` attributes. The filtering was designed to be as specific as possible, in order to not filter any other warnings that may be raised.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109890
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR is to address the issue seeing in PR #97417 where the newly added op requires `kwargs`, however, currently tools/autograd/gen_annotated_fn_args.py does not support `kwargs`, only `func_args` are generated for test_overrides.py.
The PR adds a new field "is_kwargs" to each argument indicating whether it's a `kwargs` or not. See example:
```
annotated_args = {
torch._C._VariableFunctions._cast_Byte: [{'is_kwarg_only': 'False', 'name': 'self', 'simple_type': 'Tensor'}],
...
```
The full comparison of the generated file `annotated_fn_args.py` can be found here:
- **Before**: [P681991116](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P681991116)
- **After**: [P681994218](https://www.internalfb.com/intern/paste/P681994218/)
Differential Revision: D44698310
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/98396
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Based on @ezyang's suggestion, mode stack now has "one true mode" which is the _only_ mode that can ever be active at the C++ level. That mode's torch dispatch is just to take the top mode in the stack, reenable itself (if we aren't at the end of the mode stack), and run the top mode's torch_{dispatch|function}
This maintains that in the middle of a mode's torch dispatch, the mode itself will not be active. It changes the function the user has to call to see what the current mode is (no longer queries the C++, it's python only) but allows the user to also see the entire mode stack easily
Removes `enable_torch_dispatch_mode` and `.restore()` since neither makes sense in this new setup
### Background
Why do we want this? Well, a pretty common pattern that was coming up was that users had to do something like
```python
## PRE-PR UX
def f(mode):
with mode.restore(): # user needs to understand this restore thing?
...
with Mode() as m:
pass
f(m)
```
Many users were getting error from forgetting to call `.restore` or from forgetting to add the (tbh weird) "mode instantiation" step where they use the mode as a context manager with an empty body. Really, they wanted to treat modes like context managers and just write
```python
## FROM FEEDBACK, USER DESIRED CODE. POSSIBLE POST-PR
def f(mode):
with mode:
...
f(Mode())
```
** Technical Details **
With the old mode stack, we basically had a linked list so the mode itself could only be used once and had a fixed parent. In this new design, the mode stack is just a python list that we're pushing to and popping from. There's only one mode that's ever active at the C++ level and it runs the next mode in the Python list. The modes don't have state on them anymore
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84774
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/zou3519
Partially fixes: #66328
This PR:
- adds support for `ITensorList` to the dispatcher for:
- computing the dispatch key
- boxing and unboxing `ITensorList`
- modified the codegen for structured kernels:
- codegen APIs use `ITensorList` instead of `ArrayRef<Tensor>`
**Changes summary:**
- Signature changes due to the different APIs:
- dispatcher API (e.g. `BatchingRegistrations.cpp`)
- C++ API (e.g. `TensorShape.cpp`)
- Miscelaneous functions used by codegen'd functions (e.g. `FunctionalTensorWrapper.*`)
- Dispatcher changes for handling `ITensorList` correctly (e.g. `DispatchKeyExtractor.h`)
- Signature changes of `at::cat` due to the need of `const` inside `TensorBody.h`
- Forward declarations of `ITensorList` (e.g. `MethodOperators.h`)
- Codegen changes, special casing structured kernels (e.g. `gen.py`)
**Short description of structured kernels special casing:**
I introduced, mainly, 5 types of changes to the codegen for generating code depending on
whether the kernel is structured or not:
1. Added a `structured_type_override` flag to the `argument_type` function definition of
the affected APIs (mainly the dispatcher and C++ APIs).
- `api/cpp.py`, `api/dispatcher.py`, `api/native.py`
2. Added a `structured_type_override` member to the signature
classes (e.g. `CppSignature`), since `FunctionSchema` doesn't really know whether the
function is structured or not
- `api/types.py`
3. Added a `part_of_structured_group` to `NativeFunction` class, which is just a
convenient function to forward to `structured_type_override` wherever needed
- `model.py`
4. Appropriately changed the rest of the codegen, whenever it used either the signature
classes or the `arguments` function directly
5. Added a check for `const ITensorList&` type wherever there was a check for `TensorList`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73350
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
unflatten now has a free function version in torch.flatten in addition to
the method in torch.Tensor.flatten.
Updated docs to reflect this and polished them a little.
For consistency, changed the signature of the int version of unflatten in
native_functions.yaml.
Some override tests were failing because unflatten has unusual
characteristics in terms of the .int and .Dimname versions having
different number of arguments so this required some changes
to test/test_override.py
Removed support for using mix of integer and string arguments
when specifying dimensions in unflatten.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81399
Approved by: https://github.com/Lezcano, https://github.com/ngimel
Currently we have 2 ways of doing the same thing for torch dispatch and function modes:
`with push_torch_dispatch_mode(X)` or `with X.push(...)`
is now the equivalent of doing
`with X()`
This removes the first API (which is older and private so we don't need to go through a deprecation cycle)
There is some risk here that this might land race with a PR that uses the old API but in general it seems like most are using the `with X()` API or `enable_torch_dispatch_mode(X())` which isn't getting removed.
EDIT: left the `with X.push(...)` API since there were ~3 land races with that over the past day or so. But made it give a warning and ask users to use the other API
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78215
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
