FSDP2 creates CUDA streams outside of compile region in its 1st iteration eager run, and then torch.compile will attempt to record method calls on these streams (e.g. `stream.record_event()`) in >1st iteration compiled run.
Before this PR, stream proxy is None which causes "None doesn't have attribute record_event" error when we try to call `record_event()` on it. After this PR, stream proxy has the correct value which makes calling methods on it possible.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123487
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
I am ok if people don't want this PR to be merged.
For optimizers, we know that the state dict and param_group have same parameters. So, I think its ok to skip TENSOR_MUST_ALIAS guards.
Similarly for state tensors, all of them are different. Therefore, we can skip the tensor aliasing guards.
With this PR, these are the numbers for Megatron which has 394 parameters
<img width="290" alt="image" src="https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/assets/13822661/0ce75dc6-4299-46bb-bf3c-7989ebc7cfc4">
C++ numbers jump a lot because of 2 reasons
1) We are now not doing INCREF/DECREF for a large number of tensors.
2) For python guards, we can expect higher numbers but that requires some more plumbing because the Python tensor guards are all collapsed into one.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/123044
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/mlazos
Currently, when we create proxies for a list's elements in wrap_fx_proxy_cls, we create them using the same source as the list's e.g. `LocalSource(inputs)` instead of `GetItemSource(LocalSource(inputs), index=i)`. This results in invalid guards when the tensors it contains becomes dynamic, and the guard system thinks the list is a tensor:
```
Malformed guard:
L['sizes'][0] == L['inputs'].size()[0]
Malformed guard:
2 <= L['inputs'].size()[0]
Traceback [...]
AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'size'
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/122691
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/anijain2305
Fixes#118795
This is a graph breaking partial fix for #120914. We still need -actual- module parametrization tracing support, but at least it doesn't blow up hard now.
**Background**: Module parametrization injects a property as the module parameter attribute that calls a `nn.Module` whose forward takes in a module parameter and returns a reparametrized module parameter.
Example:
```
class MyParametrization(nn.Module):
def forward(X):
# This reparametrization just negates the original parameter value
return -X
m = nn.Linear(...)
p = MyParametrization()
register_parametrization(m, "weight", p)
# Accessing the "weight" attribute will invoke p's forward() on m's original weight and return the output as the new weight.
# m.weight here is now an injected property that does the above instead of an actual Parameter.
# This property is defined in torch/nn/utils/parametrize.py.
m.weight
# NB: Parametrization changes the module type (e.g. torch.nn.utils.parametrize.ParametrizedLinear)
print(type(m))
```
**Problem 1**: Dynamo has special tracing rules for things in `torch.nn`. Parametrizing a module changes the type of the module and the parametrized attribute, so now these rules wrongly affect tracing here. To fix this:
* For parametrized modules, call `convert_to_unspecialized()` to restart analysis where Dynamo starts inlining the module.
**Problem 2**: The issue seen in #118795 is that Dynamo will see a dynamically constructed tensor when `m.weight` is called and introduce that to its `tensor_weakref_to_sizes_strides` cache during fake-ification. This tensor is also made to be a graph input, since it's a module parameter. When guards are created for this module parameter input, the logic calls `m.weight` again and tries to look the result up in the cache, but this is a different tensor now, giving the `KeyError` symptom. To fix this:
* Replace Dynamo's `tensor_weakref_to_sizes_strides` cache with a `input_source_to_sizes_strides` cache.
* This cache was originally introduced in #100128.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/121041
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
List of changes:
- Replace JVP_NESTING by torch._C._functorch.maybe_current_level()
- Remove all increment nesting functions from wrap_fx_proxy_cls
- fwAD.make_dual receives the dual_level as keyword argument
- Add jvp_increment_nesting, set_fwd_grad_enabled and dual_level context managers to dynamo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119926
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
This PR:
* Introduces an ATen op for creating true jagged views from a dense values buffer
* `_nested_view_from_jagged(values, offsets, lengths, ragged_idx, dummy)`
* This ops is implemented on the Python side using torch.library so we can return a subclass instance
* `jagged_from_list()` now uses this instead of the old autograd.Function `NestedViewFromBuffer`
* The latter op is used for non-contiguous JTs returned via `torch.nested.narrow()`
* `dummy` is an awful hack to ensure that `NestedTensor.__torch_dispatch__()` is invoked for our view
* Introduces an ATen op for accessing the `values` component of an NT via a view
* `_nested_get_values(nt)`
* **Removes** the autograd.Functions `ViewNestedFromBuffer` and `ViewBufferFromNested` in favor of `nested_from_values_offsets()` / `nested_from_values_offsets_lengths()` and `nt.values()`, respectively.
* Changes test code to prefer `as_nested_tensor()` over `jagged_from_list()` directly
* Similarly, avoid `buffer_from_jagged()`, preferring `values()`
* Depends on general subclass view fake-ification on the PT2 side (handled solely in previous PRs in the stack)
With these changes, the semantics of jagged layout NTs are such that they are considered a true view of the underlying `values` buffer. This means views of jagged NTs are views of the underlying buffer as well, simplifying some handling.
Differential Revision: [D54269922](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269922)
Co-authored-by: voznesenskym <voznesenskym@gmail.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113279
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR:
* Introduces an ATen op for creating true jagged views from a dense values buffer
* `_nested_view_from_jagged(values, offsets, lengths, ragged_idx, dummy)`
* This ops is implemented on the Python side using torch.library so we can return a subclass instance
* `jagged_from_list()` now uses this instead of the old autograd.Function `NestedViewFromBuffer`
* The latter op is used for non-contiguous JTs returned via `torch.nested.narrow()`
* `dummy` is an awful hack to ensure that `NestedTensor.__torch_dispatch__()` is invoked for our view
* Introduces an ATen op for accessing the `values` component of an NT via a view
* `_nested_get_values(nt)`
* **Removes** the autograd.Functions `ViewNestedFromBuffer` and `ViewBufferFromNested` in favor of `nested_from_values_offsets()` / `nested_from_values_offsets_lengths()` and `nt.values()`, respectively.
* Changes test code to prefer `as_nested_tensor()` over `jagged_from_list()` directly
* Similarly, avoid `buffer_from_jagged()`, preferring `values()`
* Depends on general subclass view fake-ification on the PT2 side (handled solely in previous PRs in the stack)
With these changes, the semantics of jagged layout NTs are such that they are considered a true view of the underlying `values` buffer. This means views of jagged NTs are views of the underlying buffer as well, simplifying some handling.
Differential Revision: [D54269922](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269922)
Co-authored-by: voznesenskym <voznesenskym@gmail.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113279
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
List of changes:
- Replace JVP_NESTING by torch._C._functorch.maybe_current_level()
- Remove all increment nesting functions from wrap_fx_proxy_cls
- fwAD.make_dual receives the dual_level as keyword argument
- Add jvp_increment_nesting, set_fwd_grad_enabled and dual_level context managers to dynamo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119926
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
List of changes:
- Replace JVP_NESTING by torch._C._functorch.maybe_current_level()
- Remove all increment nesting functions from wrap_fx_proxy_cls
- fwAD.make_dual receives the dual_level as keyword argument
- Add jvp_increment_nesting, set_fwd_grad_enabled and dual_level context managers to dynamo
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119926
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Reduces the `torch.compile(backend="eager")` for this code
~~~
def fn(x):
for _ in range(10000):
# x = torch.sin(x)
x = torch.ops.aten.sin(x)
# x = sin(x)
return x
~~~
From 18 seconds to 12 seconds.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/121031
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This PR:
* Uses reified ViewFuncs to swap in fake tensors / symbolic SymInts for view replay during subclass view fake-ification
* Enables automatic dynamic on view bases -> fakeifies according to the resultant symbolic context instead of the old "all-static" approach
* Covers the following view types:
* subclass -> dense
* dense -> subclass
* subclass -> subclass
* Dense -> dense views are handled the old way via an `as_strided()` call, as it's likely there is no view func available
Differential Revision: [D54269082](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54269082)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118405
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Currently when there is a print/warning in the graph, dynamo graph breaks causing export to fail. However export would like to just skip over these print/warning calls: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/113792.
Additionally there's a torch.compile feature request to "reorder prints" so that instead of graph breaking when hitting prints/logging, we can skip over these prints to create larger compiled graphs, and then print the results out after those compiled graphs: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/93739. This PR also adds the `reorderable_logging_functions` config for users to register logging functions to be reordered (like `print` or a custom logging function). Printout of the bytecode after reordering the prints looks like the following: P914736600
There are some limitations to the printing right now:
* You can only register logging functions, not methods
* Inputs to the logging functions can only be tensors, constants, and format strings
* Inputs to the logging functions which will later be mutated in-place will not be printed correctly
TODO: Add the following tests
* print function with argument of nested data structure;
* print function with argument of nested data structure being updated inside of compile region (this would test if we handle side effect correctly);
* custom defined logging functions with nn.Module or nn.Module attribute arguments;
* custom defined logging functions with submodule input/output as arguments (we need to handle the mapping and fused-out value);
* custom defined logging functions with tensor argument and mutation inside of the function (TBD: this may increase memory usage);
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116106
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
The special-case code for handling SUPPORTED_NODES was producing a guard that looked like:
```
"G['torch'].utils._pytree.SUPPORTED_NODES[<class '__main__.CausalLMOutputWithPast'>].type"
```
resulting in a eval error trying to evaluate the guard.
This change adds a new source type (`ClassSource`) which is given a class type (in this case `CausalLMOutputWithPast`) and attempts to fetch it from its defining module. It then uses that to build the `SUPPORTED_NODES` guards instead of referring to the type directly.
Also added a unit test which fails before this change and passes after.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120798
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
Currently when there is a print/warning in the graph, dynamo graph breaks causing export to fail. However export would like to just skip over these print/warning calls: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/113792.
Additionally there's a torch.compile feature request to "reorder prints" so that instead of graph breaking when hitting prints/logging, we can skip over these prints to create larger compiled graphs, and then print the results out after those compiled graphs: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/93739. This PR also adds the `reorderable_logging_functions` config for users to register logging functions to be reordered (like `print` or a custom logging function). Printout of the bytecode after reordering the prints looks like the following: P914736600
There are some limitations to the printing right now:
* You can only register logging functions, not methods
* Inputs to the logging functions can only be tensors, constants, and format strings
* Inputs to the logging functions which will later be mutated in-place will not be printed correctly
TODO: Add the following tests
* print function with argument of nested data structure;
* print function with argument of nested data structure being updated inside of compile region (this would test if we handle side effect correctly);
* custom defined logging functions with nn.Module or nn.Module attribute arguments;
* custom defined logging functions with submodule input/output as arguments (we need to handle the mapping and fused-out value);
* custom defined logging functions with tensor argument and mutation inside of the function (TBD: this may increase memory usage);
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116106
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
The special-case code for handling SUPPORTED_NODES was producing a guard that looked like:
```
"G['torch'].utils._pytree.SUPPORTED_NODES[<class '__main__.CausalLMOutputWithPast'>].type"
```
resulting in a eval error trying to evaluate the guard.
This change adds a new source type (`ClassSource`) which is given a class type (in this case `CausalLMOutputWithPast`) and attempts to fetch it from its defining module. It then uses that to build the `SUPPORTED_NODES` guards instead of referring to the type directly.
Also added a unit test which fails before this change and passes after.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120798
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305
This adds support for backwards hooks that are *both*:
1) Interior to the graph; and
2) Dynamically generated (e.g. lambdas)
We do this by creating a BackwardState object that is used to register the hooks in the forward, then populated by dynamo *after* the forwards runs.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/120382
Approved by: https://github.com/xmfan
With the current `Dim`-based dynamic shapes API for export, one can express that shapes of different input shapes must be equal by reusing the same `Dim`. However, non-trivial relationships between such input shapes cannot be expressed.
Recently we are seeing more and more examples of code that require this additional expressibility, e.g., where a pair of shapes might differ by one, or a shape might be double another (or simply even).
This PR introduces the concept of a "derived" `Dim`, i.e., a linear arithmetic expression over a `Dim`. By using a combination of `Dim`s and derived `Dim`s to specify input shapes, the desired relationships can be expressed naturally. E.g., a pair of shapes might be `dim` and `dim + 1`, or `dim` and `2*dim`, or even `2*dim` and `dim + 1`.
We extend the current infrastructure that translates `Dim`s to deprecated `dynamic_dim`-based constraints to work with derived `Dim`s. As usual, we raise constraint violation errors when shape guards cannot be verified given a dynamic shapes spec; suggest fixes; and raise runtime errors when future inputs violate the spec.
Importantly, some guards that used to cause forced specializations in the constraint solver because they were deemed "too complex" now do not do so, because they can now be specified as constraints. Since this was what motivated the introduction of a `disable_constraint_solver` flag to some internal APIs, we may not need that flag any more.
Note that shapes of placeholders in exported programs can now contain symbolic expressions and not just symbols.
Differential Revision: D53254587
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118729
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Finally we have this PR to merge allow_in_graph/inline/skip trace rules into ```trace_rules.lookup_inner```, where we can define and lookup trace rules at both function level and file level. Going forward, this is the central place that we define and consulte Dynamo trace rule for any function.
* ```trace_rules.looup``` is the API can return allow_in_graph, inline or skip.
* ```skipfiles.check``` is the API can return inline or skip, since we have multiple places that only do inline/skip check.
* I'll move ```skipfiles.check``` to ```trace_rules.check``` as one of the follow-ups.
* Both functions consulte ```trace_rules.lookup_inner``` to get the tracing rule.
To avoid a single big PR, I left a few items as the follow-ups:
* Remove ```skipfiles.py``` and merge the code into ```trace_rules.py```.
* We do double check in ```symbolic_convert.check_inlineable```, will refactor and simplify it. We should only do inline/skip check before generating ```SkipFilesVariable``` and ```UserFunctionVariable```.
* Rename ```SkipFilesVariable``` as ```SkipFunctionVariable```, since we only handle functions.
* The inline/skip reasons are not logged for some cases, since the new lookup framework doesn't always return inline/skip reasons. I'll refactor loggings to record the inline/skip reason in next step.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118971
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
