Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Edward Z. Yang
df69660832 Revert "Revert "Add a lint rule for torch/csrc/util/pybind.h include (#82552)"" (#82599)
This reverts commit 532b8a9e00.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82599
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
2022-08-02 19:37:02 +00:00
PyTorch MergeBot
532b8a9e00 Revert "Add a lint rule for torch/csrc/util/pybind.h include (#82552)"
This reverts commit 9465c0e0b5.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82552 on behalf of https://github.com/zengk95 due to This seems to be breaking windows binary wheels
2022-08-01 20:25:35 +00:00
Edward Z. Yang
9465c0e0b5 Add a lint rule for torch/csrc/util/pybind.h include (#82552)
We define specializations for pybind11 defined templates
(in particular, PYBIND11_DECLARE_HOLDER_TYPE) and consequently
it is important that these specializations *always* be #include'd
when making use of pybind11 templates whose behavior depends on
these specializations, otherwise we can cause an ODR violation.

The easiest way to ensure that all the specializations are always
loaded is to designate a header (in this case, torch/csrc/util/pybind.h)
that ensures the specializations are defined, and then add a lint
to ensure this header is included whenever pybind11 headers are
included.

The existing grep linter didn't have enough knobs to do this
conveniently, so I added some features.  I'm open to suggestions
for how to structure the features better.  The main changes:

- Added an --allowlist-pattern flag, which turns off the grep lint
  if some other line exists.  This is used to stop the grep
  lint from complaining about pybind11 includes if the util
  include already exists.

- Added --match-first-only flag, which lets grep only match against
  the first matching line.  This is because, even if there are multiple
  includes that are problematic, I only need to fix one of them.
  We don't /really/ need this, but when I was running lintrunner -a
  to fixup the preexisting codebase it was annoying without this,
  as the lintrunner overall driver fails if there are multiple edits
  on the same file.

I excluded any files that didn't otherwise have a dependency on
torch/ATen, this was mostly caffe2 and the valgrind wrapper compat
bindings.

Note the grep replacement is kind of crappy, but clang-tidy lint
cleaned it up in most cases.

See also https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/4099

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82552
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
2022-08-01 17:16:58 +00:00
Michael Suo
30fb2c4aba [lint] autoformat test/cpp and torch/csrc
Let's have some fun.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78828

Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
2022-06-11 21:11:16 +00:00
Hugo van Kemenade
473e78c0fa Remove redundant code for unsupported Python versions (#49486)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49486

Remove code for Python 3.5 and lower.

There's more that can be removed/modernised, but sticking mainly to redundant version checks here, to keep the diff/PR smaller.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46579

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D24453571

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: c2cfcf05d6c5f65df64d89c331692c9aec09248e
2021-01-06 12:45:46 -08:00
Gao, Xiang
11c89dde55 Allow structseq to be input of operators where tuple is expected (#17208)
Summary:
Currently the following code gives an error on python 2 because `ret` is a structseq which is not a tuple
```python
ret = a.max(dim=0)
ret1 = torch.max(a, dim=0, out=ret)
```

This PR modify tuple check in python arg parser to allow structseq to be input of operators where tuple is expected, which would make the above code work.

Depend on: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/17136
Partially fixes: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/16813
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/17208

Differential Revision: D14280198

Pulled By: VitalyFedyunin

fbshipit-source-id: beffebfd3951c4f5c7c8fe99a5847616a89491f3
2019-03-11 11:33:35 -07:00
Xiang Gao
2e5a8cee82 Customize the printing of namedtuple return (#17136)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/17112
```python
print("good", torch.randn(5,5,5).max(1))
print("terrible", torch.randn(5,5,10).max(1))
print("not as good", torch.randn(5,5,500).max(1))
print ("old behaviour = gold standard")
print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,5).max(1)))
print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,10).max(1)))
print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,500).max(1)))
```
now gives
```
>>> import torch
>>> print("good", torch.randn(5,5,5).max(1))
good torch.return_types.max(
values=tensor([[ 1.2821,  1.8063,  1.8075,  1.3082, -0.1267],
        [ 0.3437,  0.7353,  1.2619,  0.7557,  1.6662],
        [ 0.8583,  1.8906,  1.0246,  1.7598,  1.1184],
        [ 1.7821,  0.0230,  0.9452,  1.0318,  1.0823],
        [ 0.4116, -0.0379, -0.1843,  1.4129,  1.8796]]),
indices=tensor([[4, 4, 3, 2, 1],
        [1, 2, 4, 1, 1],
        [2, 4, 0, 2, 1],
        [0, 2, 0, 3, 1],
        [0, 4, 4, 4, 4]]))
>>> print("terrible", torch.randn(5,5,10).max(1))
terrible torch.return_types.max(
values=tensor([[ 2.1272,  1.3664,  2.2067,  1.3974, -0.0883,  1.2505,  1.0074,  1.1217,
          0.3849,  0.6936],
        [ 0.6288, -0.4560,  1.2748,  1.5482,  1.2777,  1.6874,  0.7151,  0.6041,
          1.3572,  1.6232],
        [ 1.6703,  1.0075,  1.6480,  2.2839,  1.3390,  0.4938,  1.6449,  1.7628,
          0.8141,  2.5714],
        [ 0.7079,  1.8677,  3.2478,  1.5591,  2.4870,  0.8635, -0.1450,  1.6923,
          1.4924,  1.6298],
        [ 2.4056,  0.8002,  0.9317,  0.7455,  0.7866,  2.1191,  0.3492,  1.2095,
          1.8637,  1.7470]]),
indices=tensor([[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 4, 4, 4],
        [4, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 1, 3],
        [0, 3, 3, 0, 2, 1, 4, 1, 0, 1],
        [4, 1, 3, 0, 3, 2, 0, 1, 4, 3],
        [1, 0, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1]]))
>>> print("not as good", torch.randn(5,5,500).max(1))
not as good torch.return_types.max(
values=tensor([[ 0.3877,  0.7873,  1.8701,  ...,  0.5971,  1.6103, -0.3435],
        [ 1.1300,  2.2418,  1.4239,  ...,  1.3943,  0.3872,  1.6475],
        [ 2.0656,  1.3136,  0.9896,  ...,  2.3918,  0.8226,  1.0517],
        [ 1.1054,  0.9945,  1.0561,  ...,  2.1039,  1.1524,  3.0304],
        [ 1.5041,  2.2809,  1.0883,  ...,  0.8504,  2.4774,  1.1041]]),
indices=tensor([[4, 3, 1,  ..., 1, 4, 0],
        [4, 4, 4,  ..., 3, 0, 3],
        [3, 0, 1,  ..., 2, 2, 4],
        [0, 1, 1,  ..., 4, 2, 2],
        [1, 0, 4,  ..., 2, 0, 2]]))
>>> print ("old behaviour = gold standard")
old behaviour = gold standard
>>> print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,5).max(1)))
(tensor([[ 1.1908,  1.1807,  1.3151,  1.7184,  0.3556],
        [ 0.3798,  0.9213,  0.3001,  1.3087,  2.2419],
        [ 1.4233,  1.4814,  1.9900,  1.7744,  1.3059],
        [ 1.0026, -0.0330,  1.3061,  1.8730,  2.0685],
        [ 1.3041,  1.6458,  1.3449,  1.8948,  3.6206]]), tensor([[0, 4, 3, 4, 0],
        [1, 1, 4, 0, 4],
        [4, 1, 0, 3, 3],
        [1, 2, 1, 4, 0],
        [3, 3, 0, 3, 3]]))
>>> print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,10).max(1)))
(tensor([[-0.1232,  0.8275,  0.6732,  1.1223,  0.8247,  1.2851,  1.6009,  1.9979,
          1.9109,  0.7313],
        [ 0.2260,  0.5922,  1.6928,  0.6024,  2.1158,  3.0619,  0.5653,  0.7426,
          0.8316,  0.6346],
        [ 0.4319,  0.2231,  0.5255,  1.7620,  1.1657,  0.8875,  0.5782,  0.6506,
          0.5032,  1.7097],
        [ 0.4137,  1.7265,  1.4260,  2.0301,  1.2244,  0.7128,  2.6345,  0.7230,
          1.3553,  1.6508],
        [ 1.0684,  1.7195,  1.4068,  0.7076, -0.0242,  0.8474,  0.8754,  1.7108,
          0.2188,  1.1584]]), tensor([[0, 1, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 2, 1, 0],
        [1, 4, 0, 0, 3, 2, 0, 0, 3, 3],
        [2, 3, 1, 1, 4, 0, 1, 4, 4, 4],
        [0, 4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 2, 0, 3, 1],
        [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 3, 3, 2, 0]]))
>>> print(tuple(torch.randn(5,5,500).max(1)))
(tensor([[0.9395, 1.5572, 1.8797,  ..., 2.0494, 0.8202, 0.9623],
        [1.7937, 0.7225, 1.8836,  ..., 0.7927, 1.4976, 1.1813],
        [0.8558, 1.6943, 1.4192,  ..., 0.8327, 1.9661, 0.4197],
        [1.2993, 1.4995, 0.9357,  ..., 0.7810, 1.3030, 2.6216],
        [1.4206, 1.8315, 1.0338,  ..., 1.4312, 1.3198, 1.5233]]), tensor([[0, 4, 3,  ..., 3, 0, 2],
        [0, 1, 0,  ..., 0, 4, 3],
        [3, 4, 3,  ..., 3, 0, 0],
        [3, 2, 3,  ..., 1, 2, 1],
        [1, 2, 4,  ..., 3, 1, 3]]))
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/17136

Differential Revision: D14250021

Pulled By: VitalyFedyunin

fbshipit-source-id: aae72f03b35980063b1ac1f07b8353eddb0c8b93
2019-02-28 13:07:26 -08:00
Adam Paszke
963e410b57 Make tuple checks faster (#16657)
Summary:
As the comment indicates, the issue is only present in some versions of
Python 2, so we should be able to use heavily optimized PyTuple_Check in
most cases, and skip allocation of the strings, and unnecessary lookups
on object's type.

cc ezyang zasdfgbnm
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/16657

Differential Revision: D13957854

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: be32eb473ad77a0805e8247d8d583d673d4bdf25
2019-02-05 09:35:37 -08:00
Xiang Gao
c5e1b469be Return namedtuples from torch.* function with multiple return arguments for C++ operators (#15429)
Summary:
Partially fixes: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/394

Implementation detail:

Codegen is modified to generate codes that looks like below:
```C++
static PyObject * THPVariable_svd(PyObject* self_, PyObject* args, PyObject* kwargs)
{
  HANDLE_TH_ERRORS
  static PythonArgParser parser({
    "svd(Tensor input, bool some=True, bool compute_uv=True, *, TensorList[3] out=None)",
  }, /*traceable=*/true);

  ParsedArgs<6> parsed_args;
  auto r = parser.parse(args, kwargs, parsed_args);
  static PyStructSequence_Field fields0[] = {
    {"U", ""}, {"S", ""}, {"V", ""}, {nullptr}
  };
  static PyStructSequence_Desc desc0 = {
    "torch.return_types.svd_out", nullptr,
    fields0, 3
  };
  static PyTypeObject type0;
  static bool namedtuple_type_initialized0 = false;
  if (!namedtuple_type_initialized0) {
    PyStructSequence_InitType(&type0, &desc0);
    namedtuple_type_initialized0 = true;
  }
  static PyStructSequence_Field fields1[] = {
    {"U", ""}, {"S", ""}, {"V", ""}, {nullptr}
  };
  static PyStructSequence_Desc desc1 = {
    "torch.return_types.svd", nullptr,
    fields1, 3
  };
  static PyTypeObject type1;
  static bool namedtuple_type_initialized1 = false;
  if (!namedtuple_type_initialized1) {
    PyStructSequence_InitType(&type1, &desc1);
    namedtuple_type_initialized1 = true;
  }
  if (r.idx == 0) {
    if (r.isNone(3)) {
      return wrap(&type1, dispatch_svd(r.tensor(0), r.toBool(1), r.toBool(2)));
    } else {
      auto results = r.tensorlist_n<3>(3);
      return wrap(&type0, dispatch_svd(r.tensor(0), r.toBool(1), r.toBool(2), results[0], results[1], results[2]));
    }
  }
  Py_RETURN_NONE;
  END_HANDLE_TH_ERRORS
}
```
Types are defined as static member of `THPVariable_${op_name}` functions, and initialized at the first time the function is called.

When parsing function prototypes in `native_functions.yaml`, the parser will set the specified name as `field_name` when see things like `-> (Tensor t1, ...)`. These field names will be the field names of namedtuple. The class of namedtuples will be named `torch.return_types.${op_name}`.

In some python 2, `PyStructSequence` is not a subtype of tuple, so we have to create some functions to check if an object is a tuple or namedtuple for compatibility issue.

Operators in `native_functions.yaml` are changed such that only `max` and `svd` are generated as namedtuple. Tests are added for these two operators to see if the return value works as expected. Docs for these two ops are also updated to explicitly mention the return value is a namedtuple. More ops will be added in later PRs.

There is some issue with Windows build of linker unable to resolve `PyStructSequence_UnnamedField`, and some workaround is added to deal with this case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/15429

Differential Revision: D13709678

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 23a511c9436977098afc49374e9a748b6e30bccf
2019-01-22 11:12:18 -08:00