Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Bell
718035791d Prefer e.is_number over not e.free_symbols in SymPy (#112688)
We spend somewhere on the order 1% in `sympy.Expr.free_symbols` as it is called millions of times.
Most of the time we actually just want to know "is this a constant", however `e.is_constant()` is
horribly slow. It turns out though that there is another propery `is_number` that does what we want.

> property is_number:
>
> Returns True if self has no free symbols and no undefined functions (AppliedUndef, to be precise). It will be faster
> than if not self.free_symbols, however, since is_number will fail as soon as it hits a free symbol or undefined
> function.

Even further, we also avoid the overhead of building the unnecessary set object.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/112688
Approved by: https://github.com/lezcano
2023-11-06 20:05:13 +00:00
Justin Chu
6e3cdcad08 Fix flake8 lint errors - part 2 - manual fixes (#99799)
<!--
copilot:all
-->
### <samp>🤖 Generated by Copilot at 8aef78f</samp>

### Summary
📝🚀🛠️

<!--
1.  📝 for modifying the logging format and style
2.  🚀 for improving performance and avoiding unnecessary string creation
3.  🛠️ for fixing flake8 issues
-->
This pull request updates some logging calls to use old-style string formatting with `%s` placeholders instead of f-strings in `torch/_dynamo/logging.py`, `torch/_functorch/compilers.py`, and `torch/fx/passes/pass_manager.py` as part of a logging standardization effort. It also adds a `# noqa: F404` comment to the `import __future__` statement in `torch/overrides.py` to fix a flake8 warning.

> _`log` uses old style_
> _formatting strings with `%s`_
> _logging is faster_

### Walkthrough
*  Standardize logging format and style to use old-style string formatting with `%s` placeholders instead of f-string syntax for performance and consistency ([link](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99799/files?diff=unified&w=0#diff-18807f7fd187b8bc8e69e93722566195b36d5bf269099b415a6f90b552228d6bL55-R55), [link](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99799/files?diff=unified&w=0#diff-fae8a66564055743ec031edb87eb22edeebf7fdebef9d21660d5e6a6252e5222L370-R373), [link](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99799/files?diff=unified&w=0#diff-5f3e37ded032f24e247dcf4a3be4b73ea0cf21382e342631742e5a04550202e1L72-R72))
*  Suppress flake8 warning for `import __future__` statement in `torch/overrides.py` with `# noqa: F404` comment ([link](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99799/files?diff=unified&w=0#diff-4f601fe7f31e875ee4354882c0bb490bc35e51d3d413d058cc5fda3be8ca9f15L23-R23))

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99799
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
2023-04-24 06:03:26 +00:00
Horace He
547bef11ee tweak heuristic for sdpa selection based off of *data* (and a decision tree) (#99644)
High level approach:
1. I generated a bunch of data comparing FlashAttention and Cutlass implementations (https://pastebin.com/pe0j3YeK)
2. I trained a decision tree using standard train/val split methodology and hyperparameter sweeps (https://pastebin.com/fjYX1HjR).
2a. I did a bunch of feature augmentation to capture interactions between features.

The heuristic I ended up with is:
```
use_flash = seq_len / (num_heads * batch_size) > 6
```

TL;DR: On my dataset, where FlashAttention and Cutlass differ by more than 10%, the existing heuristic achieves 69% accuracy.  My new heuristic achieves 94% accuracy.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99644
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel, https://github.com/drisspg
2023-04-21 23:28:44 +00:00
Edward Z. Yang
89e16c4f18 Assume sympy is always installed (#94903)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/94903
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/malfet
2023-02-16 14:09:58 +00:00
sli
524ee07143 Fix https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/92377 (#92379)
Fixes #92377

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/92379
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
2023-01-31 02:22:16 +00:00
Edward Z. Yang
e48c91688b DebugInterpreter works with symbolic shapes now, plus test (#90913)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90913
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
2022-12-16 05:22:56 +00:00
Edward Z. Yang
eef019c14a Lint rule to forbid direct use of logging.info/etc APIs (#90907)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90907
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
2022-12-16 05:13:51 +00:00
Richard Zou
4068c5467d [Reland] Move functorch/_src to torch/_functorch (#88756) (#90091)
This will be the last disruptive functorch internals change.

Why are we moving these files?
- As a part of rationalizing functorch we are moving the code in
functorch/_src to torch/_functorch
- This is so that we can offer the functorch APIs as native PyTorch APIs
(coming soon) and resolve some internal build issues.

Why are we moving all of these files at once?
- It's better to break developers all at once rather than many times

Test Plan:
- wait for tests

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90091
Approved by: https://github.com/anijain2305, https://github.com/ezyang
2022-12-03 14:17:15 +00:00
PyTorch MergeBot
218d9c6e09 Revert "Move functorch/_src to torch/_functorch (#88756)"
This reverts commit 52bc5c1cfe.

Reverted https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/88756 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to broke imports in tests 52bc5c1cfe https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/3574742513/jobs/6010814968 probably a landrace
2022-11-29 17:17:11 +00:00
Richard Zou
52bc5c1cfe Move functorch/_src to torch/_functorch (#88756)
This will be the last disruptive functorch internals change.

Why are we moving these files?
- As a part of rationalizing functorch we are moving the code in
functorch/_src to torch/_functorch
- This is so that we can offer the functorch APIs as native PyTorch APIs
(coming soon) and resolve some internal build issues.

Why are we moving all of these files at once?
- It's better to break developers all at once rather than many times

Test Plan:
- wait for tests

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/88756
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
2022-11-29 13:55:42 +00:00