This also comes with some bug fixes that were uncovered from doing
this:
- Forward device calls to inner tensor in FunctionalTensorWrapper
- Make legacyExtractDispatchKey exclude Functionalize, so that
it can get at the real device type key. This is noncontroversial.
- Stop stripping dense from key set. The reason for this is
FunctionalWrapperTensor may be used in contexts where people
query if it is dense or not. If it doesn't report this correctly
(from the dispatch key), it will cause errors. This caused some
torchbench models to fail when I did one-pass tracing.
- Save and restore reapply views TLS correctly
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/88063
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
From @ezyang's original PR:
There are a number of situations where we have non-backend kernels (e.g., CompositeImplicitAutograd, batching rules) which we would like to port to Python, but we have no way to integrate these ports with the overall system while using preexisting C++ registrations otherwise. This PR changes that by introducing a Python dispatcher (which can have its own kernels directly in Python), which can be interpose over ordinary C++ dispatch. The ingredients:
We introduce a new PythonDispatcher dispatch key, that has the same tenor as FuncTorchDynamicLayerFrontMode: it works by getting triggered before every other dispatch key in the dispatch key, and shunting to a Python implementation
The Python dispatcher is a per-interpreter global object that is enabled/disabled via the guard EnablePythonDispatcher/DisablePythonDispatcher. We don't make it compositional as I have no idea what a compositional version of this feature would look like. Because it is global, we don't need to memory manage it and so I use a simpler SafePyHandle (newly added) to control access to this pointer from non-Python C++. Like __torch_dispatch__, we use PyInterpreter to get to the Python interpreter to handle the dispatch.
I need to reimplement dispatch table computation logic in Python. To do this, I expose a lot more helper functions for doing computations on alias dispatch keys and similar. I also improve the pybind11 handling for DispatchKey so that you can either accept the pybind11 bound enum or a string; this simplifies our binding code. See https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/483#issuecomment-1237418106 for how this works; the technique is generally useful.
I need to be able to call backend fallbacks. I do this by permitting you to call at a dispatch key which doesn't have a kernel for the operator; if the kernel doesn't exist, we check the backend fallback table instead.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84826
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Added operator-, DispatchKeySet::add, and DispatchKeySet::remove.
I wanted to use these in functorch to make a constexpr DispatchKeySet.
Also adds C10_NODISCARD to DispatchKeySet::remove to make it
consistent with DispatchKeySet::add (this will raise a
warning if someone calls remove without assigning the result to a
variable; remove is NOT mutable and this is a pitfall that I run into a
lot)
Test Plan:
- wait for tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78558
Approved by: https://github.com/bdhirsh
Seems like it should be one. This will make it possible to register
meta implementations even when there is a CompositeImplicitAutograd
registration already. It also paves the way for sparse meta, etc.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78469
Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74963
This is a re-land of D35192346 (9872a06d77) and D35192317 (a9216cde6c), which together are a diff that changes the internal representation of `DispatchKeySet` in pytorch core to free up the number of dispatch keys that we have available. See a more detailed description of the design in the original PR: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/69633.
The original PR broke Milan workflows, which use a pytorch mobile build, and manifested as a memory corruption bug inside of `liboacrmerged.so`.
**Background: Existing Mobile Optimization**
Pytorch mobile builds have an existing optimization (here cc23725e89/c10/core/DispatchKey.h (L382) and here cc23725e89/aten/src/ATen/core/dispatch/OperatorEntry.h (L214)), which works as follows:
Every operator in pytorch has a "dispatch table" of function pointers, corresponding to all of the (up to 64) different kernels that we might dispatch to when we run an operator in pytorch (autograd, cpu, cuda, complex number support, etc).
In mobile builds, the size of that table is shrunk from 64 to 8 to save a bunch of space, because mobile doesn't end up using the functionality associated with most dispatch keys.
The dispatcher also has a notion of "fallback kernels", which are kernels that you can register to a particular dispatch key, but should be able to work for "any operator". The array of fallback kernels is defined here: cc23725e89/aten/src/ATen/core/dispatch/Dispatcher.h (L294).
The mobile-optimization currently does **not** extend to this array (it wouldn't be that useful anyway because there is only one array of fallback kernels globally - vs. there is a separate dispatch table of function pointers per operator). So the per-operator tables on mobile are size 8, while the fallback table is size 64.
**The Bug**
This PR actually makes it difficult to enable that optimization separately for the per-operator arrays vs. the fallback array, and incidentally shrunk the size of the fallback array from 64 to 8 for mobile (that happened on this line: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/69633/files#diff-f735cd7aa68f15b624100cbc4bb3b5ea76ffc7c9d3bec3b0ccabaa09609e5319R294).
That isn't a problem by itself (since mobile doesn't actually use any of the fallbacks that can no longer be stored). However, pytorch core will still register all of those fallback kernels on startup in mobile builds, even if they aren't used. When we tried to register one of those fallbacks on startup, it would try to dump the kernel somewhere in memory past the bounds of the (now smaller) array inside of the `Dispatcher` object, `backendFallbackKernels_`.
**Why didn't this problem show up in OSS CI? Why didn't it break other internal mobile workflows aside from Milan?**
Ideally, this failure would show up as part of the OSS signal on GitHub, since we already have mobile OSS builds. Given that it was another memory corruption issue that only affected Milan (subset of mobile), I'm not sure what's specific about Milan's builds that caused it only to manifest there. dreiss I wonder if there's another flavor of mobile builds we could run in OSS CI that could potentially help catch this?
**The debugging experience was pretty difficult**
Debugging the Milan-specific failure was made difficult by the following:
(1) lack of CI
- the original Milan failure didn't surface on my original diff, because the Milan job(s) that failed weren't triggered to run on pytorch changes. There's probably a balance to strike here, since those jobs will only be useful if they aren't flaky, and if they can produce reliable failure logs for debugging.
(2) It's difficult to get a repro.
- my work laptop doesn't have the right specs to run the Milan development workflow (not enough disk space)
- There is an existing OnDemand workflow for Milan, but it appears to be relatively new, and after a bunch of help from MarcioPorto, we ran into issues forwarding the log output from Milan tests on the emulator back to the terminal (see the original discussion here: https://fb.workplace.com/groups/OnDemandFRL/permalink/1424937774645433/)
(3) Lack of stack-traces.
- Most Milan failures didn't include actionable stack traces. phding generously helped me debug by running my suggested patches locally, and reporting back if there were any failures. The failing test didn't include a stack trace though (just the line where the crash appeared), so I ended up making some educated guesses about what the issue was based on the area of the crash.
ghstack-source-id: 152688542
Test Plan: Confirmed with phding that the broken Milan workflow from the previous version of this diff is now passing.
Reviewed By: phding, albanD
Differential Revision: D35222806
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad115a0f768bc8ea5d4c203b2990254c7092d30
(cherry picked from commit 002b91966f11fd55ab3fa3801b636fa39a6dd12c)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/74858
Original commit changeset: c7695e16dba3
Original Phabricator Diff: D34227615 (c0491c9179)
The Milan Assistant is crashing, see P489979944
After back out the change D34227615 (c0491c9179) and D34227616 (2cbddc0e9b), it works fine now
ghstack-source-id: 152380988
(Note: this ignores all push blocking failures!)
Test Plan:
Test on Milan with "get weather utterance"
buck build fbsource//fbandroid/mode/opt fbsource//fbandroid/mode/milan_build_rdk //fbandroid/apps/wearable/system/speechservice:speechservice_target30_xhdpi_armv7_release_debug_keystore -c pt.has_backtaces=1
Reviewed By: phding
Differential Revision: D35192317
fbshipit-source-id: e38081810a569b45ca037e019ec1c8773971534d
(cherry picked from commit 78833ac6997fbc8e20bd0f3ee0e0fe55a075054c)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72402
The original PR had an array-out-of-bounds access in `DispatchKeyExtractor.cpp`, that wasn't caught by ASAN and appeared to only manifest in a subset of android internal tests. After fixing the OOB access (and adding more asserts), I confirmed that the android internal test passes.
Reland of D33255193 (20b8653dfa)
ghstack-source-id: 148830728
Test Plan:
Steps to test:
(1) connect to a mobile OD
(2) run `one_world android emulator android-29` in a terminal to start the android emulator
(3) In a separate terminal, run the test: `buck test //fbandroid/instrumentation_tests/com/facebook/pytorch/bi_xray:instrumentation_test -c test.external_runner=tpx -- --regex 'testBIXRayModel.*PyTorchBIXRayInstrumentationTest' --force-remote-execution --run-disabled`
I also ran `buck test fbandroid/mode/dbg //fbandroid/instrumentation_tests/com/facebook/pytorch/bi_xray:instrumentation_test`, which failed before and passed after the PR.
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D34034848
fbshipit-source-id: 9677ee2c0a1afd1183896f7055009445712523c5
(cherry picked from commit 9ab9b12d35)
Summary: I think this diff stack broke all the related tasks below.
Test Plan:
For our failing tests:
buck test //fbandroid/instrumentation_tests/com/facebook/pytorch/bi_xray:instrumentation_test -c test.external_runner=tpx -- --regex 'testBIXRayModel.*PyTorchBIXRayInstrumentationTest' --force-remote-execution --run-disabled
For the ubn:
Not really sure what to do, trying to build the app and see if I can use an effect?
Reviewed By: shoumikhin
Differential Revision: D34018849
fbshipit-source-id: 3571718cb6621931af931b494e0a70d6e0164e65
(cherry picked from commit 3cc63cb2ea)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70364
A bunch of optimizations I made while staring at callgrind, after the DispatchKeySet changes further down in this stack.
There are basically three optimizations in this PR:
- Making `DispatchKeySet`'s constexpr (where previously they weren't)
- Condensing multiple keyset membership calls into a single function call
- Making `TensorImpl::layout()` fastpath. The common case it to return `kstrided`, but we were doing a bunch of checks before returning it in most cases.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D33301590
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: 6ec28e66e7fe21f9decae317e8a4013dcf44e2fb
(cherry picked from commit 5defa1676e)
Summary:
According to dispatch table computation logic, if no kernel
register to a certain dispatch key, will use CompositeExplicitAutograd
backend kernel, so we need add sparseXPU key to the alias key pool.
Signed-off-by: Ma, Jing1 <jing1.ma@intel.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70443
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D33406004
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: 009037739c818676901b10465632d3fef5ba14f2
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64432
Original PR description + feedback here: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63048
I've addressed all of the feedback in the original PR and made some pretty large changes, listed below.
**Table of Contents**
- Starting points
- List of the main changes from the original PR
- Next Steps
- Example codegen output (for a view, mutation, and view+mutation op)
**Starting Points**
A good place to start when looking through the PR:
* Alban mentioned that this is a useful mental model (thanks Ed for originally making this clear to me). Semantically, the pass currently does THREE things, which are all needed by functorch - all fused together into one big pass.
* (a) alias removal, which replaces {view} calls with {view}_copy calls, and manually tracks aliasing information, so that when one tensor is mutated, we re-apply the same mutation to all of the aliases. This is the bulk of the work - once this is done, the next 2 things are trivial to implement.
* (b) mutation removal, which is easy to do once we know that there are no aliases. Every mutation `a.add_(b)` becomes `a.replace_(a.add(b))`
* (c) reapplying views: all of the `{view}_copy` calls are replaced with `{view}` calls again. This is an optimization that we can make specifically for functorch (and strided backends), that only care about mutation removal and not alias removal
* XLA and Vulkan only want (a), or (a) + (b). Later, we'll want to split this out so that you can actually opt into different versions of this logic.
* There is currently no {view}_copy replacement, because the pass just <replace views with copies> and <replace copies with views> steps have been combined. Later, we'll want to actually implement {view}_copy variants of each view operator, probably with codegen.
* documentation breadcrumb 1, in `FunctionalTensorWrapper.cpp`: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64432/files#diff-a0bac99bf205dba5b94cb64fc2466d3d55d991887572f9cd6a02e27b3a91dd60R59 (you might have to expand the `FunctionalTensorWrapper.cpp` file, which GitHub closes by default because it's large)
* documentation breadcrumb 2, in `FunctionalTensorWrapper.h`: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/64432/files#diff-c945c71a4ccac65871f24a912e8904f9a5088b24a32e636727ea9c8fe920708aR12
* Reading through the codegen output at the bottom of this description.
**Main changes from the original PR**
(1) I use lambdas instead of a giant enum to handle all of the different views.
This results in less boilerplate per view op (and more stuff that can be codegen'd). Every `ViewMeta` object now contains a `forward` and `reverse` lambda, that knows how to replay the view and its inverse. This makes the actual code that executes the replaying logic a lot less boilerplate-y (see `Alias::sync_update_operations` and `FunctionalTensorWrapper::sync_`)
(2) Every tensor during the functionalization pass is always wrapped in a `FunctionalTensorWrapper`.
This is potentially unnecessary for Vulkan/XLA, and will have a mild perf impact, but for now this PR just targets the functorch use case. I previously had a complicated design a (`FunctionalTensorImplBase` class) to avoid needing the wrapper for XLA, but it had some subtleties that are gonna require more thought to fix, so I'm pushing that off for now.
(3) `FunctionalTensorWrapper` objects accurately report stride information.
It's a little annoying to do this though, because the logic that calculates stride info for each view isn't easily separated from the actual view kernels in core, `at::native::{view}`. I do this by adding logic in each `at::functionalization::{view}` kernel to call the reference implementation `at::native::{view}`. I don't do anything with the output aside from taking it's size/stride/storage_offset to set the actual output tensor's size/stride/storage_offset correctly. There's another annoying part to this: I'm pretty sure that we want to pass in the actual *wrapper* tensors directly into the native kernels, not their inner unwrapped values. But there are some `at::native::{view}` kernels that call other tensor methods, which re-invokes the dispatcher, calling functionalization/functorch kernels that try do the unwrapping.
To do this, right now I have an `AutoDispatchDirectlyToNative` guard that basically ensures that any tensor methods called inside of the at::native::{view} op always redispatch straight to the CPU kernel (which will be another at::native:: kernel). This feels kind of heavy handed, but I'm not sure of a better way to do it.
(4) `FunctionalTensorWrapper` objects accurately report aliasing information.
There's a new `FunctionalStorageImpl` class (subclass of `StorageImpl`) that allows tensors in the functionalization pass to accurately alias storage. If two tensors `a` and `b` in a functionalized program are views of one another, then `a.storage.is_alias_of(b.storage)` should return true. I added this in a pretty similar way to how meta tensors allocate storage, although I don't pass in an actual allocator (I think this is fine because you should never resize a functional tensor's storage).
One thing I'm not sure about - should `FunctionalTensorWrapper` set `storage_access_should_throw_`: (a) always, (b) never, (c) only if its wrapped tensor has it set.
Right now I have it not set, mostly because calling the reference view functions (`at::native::{view}`) requires looking at the storage. But that means that if you try to access storage from python in a functionalized program, you'll get silent garbage instead of an error. Related question: are we planning on exposing meta tensor storage to python in the future (even though it contains garbage)?
(5) better docs :)
**View operator coverage**
(6) The functionalization pass now gets math-composite view ops for free.
I didn't add the `Functionalize` dispatch key to the composite set, because I don't want composite ops like `torch.ones` to get decomposed before hitting the functionalization pass. Instead, I added codegen to manually register the `at::native::` kernels of composite view ops. This is a little hairy, because the names of the `at::native::` kernels aren't easily accessible. They're stored in a `Dict[DispatchKey, BackendIndex]`. I made a best-effort attempt to get each view kernel's name, basically by assuming that every view op has either a composite or cpu implementation.
There's also a hardcoded list of composite view ops in `gen_inplace_or_view_type.py`, but it looks like it's wrong. This is probably worth rationalizing later, but instead I created a new list of the "complete" set of composite view ops, and preserved the old set by hardcoding the delta between the two sets.
(7) I've added codegen for ops that are both views AND mutations, like `transpose_()` (why do we even have these {emoji:1f622}).
From some light testing, it looks like they work correctly with one caveat: I had a hard time ensuring that functorch programs that mutate their inputs using ops like `transpose_()` preserve the input mutations after the program finishes running. For (in my corresponding functorch branch) I emit a warning when this happens, and just don't preserve the mutation
(8) I added `{view}_inverse` implementations for every view op, in `FunctionalInverses.cpp`.
These are needed to take mutations made to views and replay them back onto the base. To reduce boilerplate, the codegen generates function declarations for each `{view}_inverse` function, so you get a nice compiler error when someone eventually adds a new view op.
The only view ops currently not supported are (a) as_strided, and (b) the sparse view ops (values()/indices()).
I can add support for as_strided, but it needs an `as_strided_inverse()` function. That will look really similar to the `as_strided_backward()` function in FunctionsManual.cpp, but it has some noticeable differences: we basically want an `as_strided_embed` for autograd and `as_strided_scatter` for functionalization. We also will probably need them to be primitives w.r.t to autograd, since the currently implementation for autograd uses view().copy_() calls that XLA won't be able to handle. I'm wondering if anyone has any objections, but otherwise I can make those change (which will require writing backward formulas for `as_strided_embed` and `as_strided_scatter`).
I did a bunch of manual testing that all looks pretty good, but it's definitely not fully tested. Ed pointed out that once XLA uses this pass (or at least once there's a POC), we can just run the existing xla view test suite. Hopefully that delay is okay - if it's not, maybe we can think about using OpInfos similar to how functorch uses them for testing.
Note: there's some duplication with autograd's view code. Every `{view}_inverse` implementation is really similar to the implementation for that view listed in `derivatives.yaml`. There are some major differences though:
* the autograd implementations over those backwards functions (like `permute_backwards()`, in `FunctionsManual.cpp`) internally call other view ops. For functoinalization, we want them to (eventually call `{view}_copy` operators).
* For view ops that take a subset of the original storage, like `slice/select/diagonal/as_strided()`, the autograd backward functions fill the "spaces" in the inverse call with zeroes. For functionalizations, we want to fill them with the value of `base` at those positions. It looks like this currently applies to 6 total ops (since we can ignore composites):
* select
* slice
* diagonal
* as_stridied
* split
* split_with_sizes
A nice end state would probably be for the autograd + functoinalization codegen to both look at the same yaml (either `derivatives.yaml`, or something else), and automatically generate the right thing. I didn't leave that in scope for this PR though.
**Current State + Next Steps**
There are a bunch of followups after this PR eventually lands. Roughly in order:
* Use the current pass to register problematic composite ops in functorch. Also, nested `functionalize()` calls aren't supported yet (I mostly just need to remove some debug asserts and test it).
* Work on freeing up dispatch key space in the by deduplicating the `{backend}`/`Autograd{backend}`/`Sparse{backend}`/`Quantized{backend}` keys
* Once we have more dispatch keys, split up this pass into 3 pieces - it's currently fused, and doesn't do the right thing for vulkan/XLA. Specifically, all of the `{view}` calls in the current pass's view-replay logic should turn into `{view}_copy` calls that vulkan/XLA know how to implement, and there will be separate passes for (a) removing mutations, and (b) turning `{view}_copy` calls back into `{view}` calls. For Vulkan, we eventually want a pass that ONLY removes aliasing and view calls, and doesn't remove mutations. We can also probably make the 2 new passes user dispatch keys to save dispatch key space, if they'll only be used by functorch anyway.
* Do more of a dive on perf for the vulkan/xla use cases. There are several areas to improve perf with varying levels of effort required. The simplest one that I'll probably do regardless is to codegen the out-of-place kernels instead of using a boxed fallback. Getting a POC working for xla will also be useful to test the view operator coverage.
**Example Codegen Output**
View Op:
```
::std::vector<at::Tensor> split_Tensor(c10::DispatchKeySet ks, const at::Tensor & self, int64_t split_size, int64_t dim) {
auto self_ = at::functionalization::impl::unwrapFunctionalTensor(self);
::std::vector<at::Tensor> out;
{
at::AutoDispatchBelowFunctionalize guard;
auto tmp_output = at::redispatch::split(ks & c10::after_func_keyset, self_, split_size, dim);
out = at::functionalization::impl::wrapFunctionalTensor(tmp_output);
// I'm fusing the [alias removal], [mutation removal], [add views back] passes together.
// Later, we'll want to turn them into separate passes (since e.g. vulkan only cares about alias removal).
}
at::functionalization::ViewMeta view_meta = at::functionalization::ViewMeta(
[split_size, dim](const at::Tensor& base, int64_t mutated_view_idx) -> at::Tensor {
return base.split(split_size, dim)[mutated_view_idx];
},
[split_size, dim](const at::Tensor& base, const at::Tensor& mutated_view, int64_t mutated_view_idx) -> at::Tensor {
return at::functionalization::impl::split_inverse(base, mutated_view, mutated_view_idx, split_size, dim);
}
);
at::functionalization::impl::set_view_meta(out, self, view_meta);
at::AutoDispatchDirectlyToNative native_guard;
::std::vector<at::Tensor> reference_tensor_output = at::native::split(self, split_size, dim);
at::functionalization::impl::set_strides(out, reference_tensor_output);
return out;
}
```
Mutation Op:
```
at::Tensor & add__Tensor(c10::DispatchKeySet ks, at::Tensor & self, const at::Tensor & other, const at::Scalar & alpha) {
at::functionalization::impl::sync(self);
at::functionalization::impl::sync(other);
auto self_ = at::functionalization::impl::unwrapFunctionalTensor(self);
auto other_ = at::functionalization::impl::unwrapFunctionalTensor(other);
at::Tensor tmp_output;
{
at::AutoDispatchBelowFunctionalize guard;
// The functionalization pass explicitly doesn't pass out= parameters to the redispatch
tmp_output = at::redispatch::add(
ks & c10::after_func_keyset, self_, other_, alpha);
}
self.replace_(tmp_output);
at::functionalization::impl::maybe_add_update(self);
return self;
}
```
View + Mutation Op:
```
at::Tensor & transpose_(c10::DispatchKeySet ks, at::Tensor & self, int64_t dim0, int64_t dim1) {
at::functionalization::ViewMeta view_meta = at::functionalization::ViewMeta(
[dim0, dim1](const at::Tensor& base, int64_t mutated_view_idx) -> at::Tensor {
return base.transpose(dim0, dim1);
},
[dim0, dim1](const at::Tensor& base, const at::Tensor& mutated_view, int64_t mutated_view_idx) -> at::Tensor {
return at::functionalization::impl::transpose_inverse(base, mutated_view, dim0, dim1);
}
);
at::functionalization::impl::mutate_view_meta(self, view_meta);
// See Note [Propagating strides in the functionalization pass]
// Directly update the sizes/strides/storage_offset fields on self using the inplace call.
// I need the guard because I don't want the at::native kernel to end up calling more functionalization/functorch kernels.
// Its only job is to directly compute the output size/stride/storage_offset metadata.
at::AutoDispatchDirectlyToNative native_guard;
at::native::transpose_(self, dim0, dim1);
return self;
}
```
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D31942093
Pulled By: bdhirsh
fbshipit-source-id: b95598dae35dd1842fa8b1d8d1448332f3afaadf
Summary:
This PR implements the necessary hooks/stubs/enums/etc for complete ONNX Runtime (ORT) Eager Mode integration. The actual extension will live out of tree at https://github.com/pytorch/ort.
We have been [working on this at Microsoft](https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime-pytorch/tree/eager-ort/torch_onnxruntime) for the last few months, and are finally ready to contribute the PyTorch core changes upstream (nothing major or exciting, just the usual boilerplate for adding new backends).
The ORT backend will allow us to ferry [almost] all torch ops into granular ONNX kernels that ORT will eagerly execute against any devices it supports (therefore, we only need a single ORT backend from a PyTorch perspective).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58248
Reviewed By: astaff
Differential Revision: D30344992
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 69082b32121246340d686e16653626114b7714b2
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57386
Here is the PR for what's discussed in the RFC https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/55374 to enable the autocast for CPU device. Currently, this PR only enable BF16 as the lower precision datatype.
Changes:
1. Enable new API `torch.cpu.amp.autocast` for autocast on CPU device: include the python API, C++ API, new Dispatchkey etc.
2. Consolidate the implementation for each cast policy sharing between CPU and GPU devices.
3. Add the operation lists to corresponding cast policy for cpu autocast.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: soulitzer
Differential Revision: D28572219
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: db3db509973b16a5728ee510b5e1ee716b03a152
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56830
Opt into formatting on GitHub and format everything. This is a trial run before turning on formatting for more and eventually all of the codebase.
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: zertosh
Differential Revision: D27979080
fbshipit-source-id: a80f0c48691c08ae8ca0af06377b87e6a2351151
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56939
These never have kernels registered to them and are effectively useless.
What I am not so sure if we allocate tensors to them or not; if we do
I cannot use asserts and I need to ensure we just return undefined
or something equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ailzhang
Differential Revision: D28006160
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: f8e2b61b8bd928fb2c0ac0b534bd4af076423f71
