The `usort` config in `pyproject.toml` has no effect due to a typo. Fixing the typo make `usort` do more and generate the changes in the PR. Except `pyproject.toml`, all changes are generated by `lintrunner -a --take UFMT --all-files`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/127124
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: #127122, #127123
Retry of #90590, which is a retry of #89594. Original PR reverted due to internal breakage.
This PR fixes the breakage by adding a default value to the new argument.
This PR allows `get_native_function_declarations` API to take a function as argument. This function should take `NativeFunction` as input and emit code for native function declaration. By default it is `dest.compute_native_function_declaration`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90780
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary:
Sometimes we want to extend an existing custom namespace library, instead of creating a new one,
but we don't have a namespace config right now, so we hardcode some custom libraries defined
in pytorch today, i.e. quantized and quantized_decomposed
Test Plan:
ci
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/88229
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Summary: Context: currently `static_dispatch` assumes that given a native function `f`, we always want to map from its `DispatchSignature` to its `CppSignature`. This assumption may not hold true for some use cases, where the source bindings may not come from its `DispatchSignature`. Here I'm changing the argument `sig: DispatcherSignature` to be `sig: Union[CppSignature, DispatcherSignature]`, also removes unused `f`
Test Plan: Rely on added unit test.
Differential Revision: D39192969
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84384
Approved by: https://github.com/iseeyuan
Something people found confusing was that whether or not a native::
signature would get SymInt or not in its type was based on the dispatch
key. This changes it so that SymInt or not in type is based on whether
or not you have _symint in the name of the kernel or not. This means
that even when we make operators support SymInt, you no longer have to
go and update all the preexisting definitions; instead, you now
selectively write _symint to opt individual kernels into SymInt support.
I then go and update a bunch of kernels that don't have proper SymInt
support to make use of this convention. There is some hacking around
for view generation code.
I also add support for external backends to specify 'symint' operators, for which we generate SymInt signatures instead of regular signatures.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Differential Revision: [D39310060](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39310060)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84579
Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Also Back out "Revert D39075159: [acc_tensor] Use SymIntArrayRef for overloaded empty.memory_format's signature"
Original commit changeset: dab4a9dba4fa
Original commit changeset: dcaf16c037a9
Original Phabricator Diff: D38984222
Original Phabricator Diff: D39075159
Also update Metal registrations for C++ registration changes.
Also update NNPI registration to account for tightened schema checking
Differential Revision: [D39084762](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)
**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Facebook specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39084762/)!
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/84173
Approved by: https://github.com/Krovatkin
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Previously, we introduced new SymInt overloads for every function we wanted. This led to a lot of boilerplate, and also a lot of confusion about how the overloads needed to be implemented.
This PR takes a simpler but more risky approach: just take the original function and changes its ints to SymInts.
This is BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The C++ API for registering implementations for aten operators will change from int64_t to SymInt whenever you make this change. Code generated registrations in PyTorch do not change as codegen handles the translation automatically, but manual registrations will need to follow the change. Typically, if you now accept a SymInt where you previously only took int64_t, you have to convert it back manually. This will definitely break XLA, see companion PR https://github.com/pytorch/xla/pull/3914 Note that not all dispatch keys get the automatic translation; all the composite keys and Meta keys are modified to take SymInt directly (because they should handle them directly), and so there are adjustments for this.
This is not BC-breaking in the following ways:
* The user facing C++ API remains compatible. Even if a function changes from int to SymInt, the default C++ binding still takes only ints. (e.g., at::empty(IntArrayRef, ...). To call with SymInts, you must call at::empty_symint instead. This involved adding two more signatures to CppSignatureGroup; in many cases I refactored code to iterate over all signatures in the group instead of hard-coding the two that previously existed.
* This is TorchScript compatible; internally we treat SymInts as ints so there is no change to what happens at runtime in TorchScript. In particular, it's OK to reference an empty schema by its old type (using int types), as long as you're not doing string equality (which you shouldn't be), these parse to the same underyling type.
Structure of the PR:
* The general strategy of this PR is that, even when you write `SymInt` inside `native_functions.yaml`, sometimes, we will treat it *as if* it were an `int`. This idea pervades the codegen changes, where we have a translation from SymInt to c10::SymInt or int64_t, and this is controlled by a symint kwarg which I added and then audited all call sites to decide which I wanted. Here are some of the major places where we pick one or the other:
* The C++ FunctionSchema representation represents `SymInt` as `int`. There are a few places we do need to know that we actually have a SymInt and we consult `real_type()` to get the real type in this case. In particular:
* When we do schema validation of C++ operator registration, we must compare against true schema (as the C++ API will provide `c10::SymInt`, and this will only be accepted if the schema is `SymInt`. This is handled with cloneWithRealTypes before we check for schema differences.
* In `toIValue` argument parsing, we parse against the true schema value. For backwards compatibility reasons, I do still accept ints in many places where Layout/SymInt/etc were expected. (Well, accepting int where SymInt is expected is not BC, it's just the right logic!)
* In particular, because SymInt never shows up as type() in FunctionSchema, this means that we no longer need a dedicated Tag::SymInt. This is good, because SymInts never show up in mobile anyway.
* Changes to functorch/aten are mostly about tracking changes to the C++ API registration convention. Additionally, since SymInt overloads no longer exist, registrations for SymInt implementations are deleted. In many cases, the old implementations did not properly support SymInts; I did not add any new functionality with this PR, but I did try to annotate with TODOs where this is work to do. Finally, because the signature of `native::` API changed from int to SymInt, I need to find alternative APIs for people who were directly calling these functions to call. Typically, I insert a new dispatch call when perf doesn't matter, or use `at::compositeexplicitautograd` namespace to handle other caes.
* The change to `make_boxed_from_unboxed_functor.h` is so that we accept a plain IntList IValue anywhere a SymIntList is expected; these are read-only arguments so covariant typing is OK.
* I change how unboxing logic works slightly. Previously, we interpret the C++ type for Layout/etc directly as IntType JIT type, which works well because the incoming IValue is tagged as an integer. Now, we interpret the C++ type for Layout as its true type, e.g., LayoutType (change to `jit_type.h`), but then we accept an int IValue for it anyway. This makes it symmetric with SymInt, where we interpret the C++ type as SymIntType, and then accept SymInt and int IValues for it.
* I renamed the `empty.names` overload to `empty_names` to make it less confusing (I kept mixing it up with the real empty overload)
* I deleted the `empty.SymInt` overload, which ended up killing a pile of functions. (This was originally a separate PR but the profiler expect test was giving me grief so I folded it in.)
* I deleted the LazyDynamicOpsTest tests. These were failing after these changes, and I couldn't figure out why they used to be passing: they make use of `narrow_copy` which didn't actually support SymInts; they were immediately converted to ints.
* I bashed LTC into working. The patches made here are not the end of the story. The big problem is that SymInt translates into Value, but what if you have a list of SymInt? This cannot be conveniently represented in the IR today, since variadic Values are not supported. To work around this, I translate SymInt[] into plain int[] (this is fine for tests because LTC dynamic shapes never actually worked); but this will need to be fixed for proper LTC SymInt support. The LTC codegen also looked somewhat questionable; I added comments based on my code reading.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83628
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/bdhirsh
Summary:
We started to see use cases where it involves more than 1 custom namespace to live within the same yaml file. Hence relaxing the restriction that 1 yaml file can only have 1 custom namespace other than `aten`. Updated unit test as well.
Differential Revision: D38775685
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/83580
Approved by: https://github.com/JacobSzwejbka
Summary:
Previously we don't generate out variant (both schema and kernel) for an operator with functional variant only. This adds support for that and adds test.
## Changes on `native_function_generation.py`
We are generating out variant for all functional variants if possible. This PR introduces a lot of newly generated out variants and `native_functions.yaml` needs to incorporate the changes by adding `autogen` keywords.
The logic for determining what operators we should generate an out variant for is the following:
1. No existing out variant for this `NativeFunction`
2. Contains an existing in place, mutable or functional variant
3. Contains at least 1 tensor like return(s)
For operators matching the first two conditions but failing the third, I listed them in `FUNCTIONAL_OPS_THAT_CANNOT_GET_AN_OUT_VARIANT`.
## Special handling
The following operators satisfy all 3 criteria above but we chose to not autogen them, with some reasons.
* `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d`, the generated out variant `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` is colliding with the `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out` kernel in `adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` operator. I manually created `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d.out` and renamed `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out` to `mkldnn_adaptive_avg_pool2d_out_stub`.
* `min`, `max` and `mean`. There already exist `min.out`, `max.out` and `mean.out` but they are having different semantics with the functional ones. I manually created `min.unary_out`, `max.unary_out` and `mean.dtype_out` to disambiguate.
## Autograd Changes
We introduced a logic to not match derivatives info in `derivatives.yaml` to out variant, since we are generating `NOT_IMPLEMENTED` kernels for those out variants anyway. The issue we are seeing with the original logic is that it doesn't handle `TensorOption` arguments really well. For example we have these two operators:
* `_to_copy(Tensor self, *, ScalarType? dtype=None, Layout? layout=None, Device? device=None, bool? pin_memory=None, bool non_blocking=False, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None) -> Tensor`
* `_to_copy.out(Tensor self, *, bool non_blocking=False, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None, Tensor(a!) out) -> Tensor(a!)`
If we uses `_to_copy` derivative info, there will be compilation error since `dtype` is missing from `_to_copy.out` signature.
Test Plan: Rely on unit test
Differential Revision: D37832342
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81437
Approved by: https://github.com/iseeyuan, https://github.com/bdhirsh
`derivatives.yaml` can now take a `dispatch` entry which registers per-autograd dispatch key derivatives such as
```
name: foo(Tensor self, Tensor y) -> Tensor
dispatch:
Default:
x: grad
y: grad.expand(y.sizes())
AutogradNestedTensor:
x: grad
y: NestedTensor_foo_backward(grad, y)
output_differentiabilty: [True]
```
However the old schema where there is no `dispatch` entry is still supported.
Would greatly appreciate feedback on *how to improve the testing strategy* of this PR, currently have registered an aten test op in TestOps.cpp with dummy gradients in derivatives.yaml and have some tests in test_autograd.py:TestAutogradMultipleDispatch but I am not sure whether these are sufficiently rigorous.
Additionally, this PR also makes the assumption that sets like [VIEW_FUNCTIONS](ff5399e528/tools/autograd/gen_inplace_or_view_type.py (L60)) are per-native-function and not per-native-function-and-dispatch-key. I'm not sure whether this is necessarily the case, *would there ever be a situation where (e.g. a nested_tensor op is a view op but the aten function is not or vice versa?)*
* __->__ #82801
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82801
Approved by: https://github.com/bhosmer, https://github.com/albanD
Summary:
Some quantized operators needs `QuantizedCPU` backend, due to an issue in namespace checking, currently if we have two backends as well as a custom namespaces in native function, codegen will hit assertion error. This PR fixes this issue
The root cause is that codegen right now asserts that a native function should only have one namespace. The current behavior is that If a native function is not found in a `BackendIndex`, we will use default namespace for that backend, for fallback kernels. However that default namespace may not be listed in the yaml file and it should not be counted when checking if we have two different namespaces for that backend. In our error case, we have 2 `BackendIndex`, one for `QuantizedCPU` and one for `CPU`. The native function doesn't have a kernel in `QuantizedCPU` but we still use a default namespace (`at::native`) for it. Since we have a custom namespace for dispatch key `CPU`, we ran into the assertion error.
This PR changes the assertion criteria. We only error out if a namespace has two or more kernels and they have two or more different namespaces.
Test Plan: rely on newly added unit test
Differential Revision: D38101345
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82133
Approved by: https://github.com/iseeyuan
With ufmt in place https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81157, we can now use it to gradually format all files. I'm breaking this down into multiple smaller batches to avoid too many merge conflicts later on.
This batch (as copied from the current BLACK linter config):
* `tools/**/*.py`
Upcoming batchs:
* `torchgen/**/*.py`
* `torch/package/**/*.py`
* `torch/onnx/**/*.py`
* `torch/_refs/**/*.py`
* `torch/_prims/**/*.py`
* `torch/_meta_registrations.py`
* `torch/_decomp/**/*.py`
* `test/onnx/**/*.py`
Once they are all formatted, BLACK linter will be removed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81285
Approved by: https://github.com/suo
Summary:
A followup to #78015 and #79733. In those PRs I introduced custom namespace support into:
* `Register<DispatchKey>.cpp`
* `RegisterSchema.cpp`
* `NativeFunctions.h`
This PR extracts out logic that generates schema registration code (used in `RegisterSchema.cpp`) into a function so that it can be easily tested and reused. Added unit test to cover the logic as well.
Test Plan: Rely on newly added unit tests.
Differential Revision: D37581186
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80780
Approved by: https://github.com/iseeyuan
