Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63177
**Summary**
This commit adds a link in the documentation for `torch.transpose` that
directs to `torch.t` and vice versa. These two functions are related and
it is useful for users of one to know about the other.
**Test Plan**
Continuous integration.
**Fixes**
This commit fixes#56267.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D30292654
Pulled By: SplitInfinity
fbshipit-source-id: 8e60cd7a598ff8b4756cb30141399dfe8e118338
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63165
Add details about the overloads for
* list of tensors input
* supporting tensor scale/zero-point inputs
Test Plan:
CI
Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D30291045
fbshipit-source-id: 9fc6418792c5e3a35417eeb8d31de4a4bfcbb7a5
Summary:
Sphinx 4.x is out, but it seems that requires many more changes to
adopt. So instead use the latest version of 3.x, which includes
several nice features.
* Add some noindex directives to deal with warnings that would otherwise
be triggered by this change due to conflicts between the docstrings
declaring a function and the autodoc extension declaring the
same function.
* Update distributions.utils.lazy_property to make it look like a
regular property when sphinx autodoc inspects classes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61601
Reviewed By: ejguan
Differential Revision: D29801876
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 544d2434a15ceb77bff236e934dbd8e4dbd9d160
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59077Fixes#58549
`from_buffer` constructs a tensor object from an already allocated buffer through
CPython's buffer protocol. Besides the standard `dtype`, `count`, and `offset` parameters,
this function also accepts:
- `device`: where the buffer lives
- `requires_grad`: should autograd record operations on the new tensor
A new test file _test_buffer_protocol.py_ was created. Currently, only CPU tests were
implemented. That's because neither PyTorch nor Numba implements CPython's buffer
protocol. Therefore, there's no way to create a CUDA buffer with the existing
dependencies (could use PyCUDA for that, though).
At the moment, if `device` differs from the device the buffer actually lives, two things
may happen:
- `RuntimeError`, if `device='cuda'`
- Segmentation fault (not tested -- see above), if `device='cpu'`
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D29870914
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 9fa8611aeffedfe39c9af74558178157a11326bb
Summary:
This PR un-reverts https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/61475 + fixes compilation with MSVC, that does not recognize alternative operator spellings (i.e. using `or` instead of `||` )
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61937
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D29805941
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: 01e5963c6717c1b44b260300d87ba0bf57f26ce9
Summary:
This PR bundles a number of errata detected in the linalg docs over the last few weeks.
- Simpler Cholesky deprecation rule
- Remove repeated consecutive words
- Correct cond with rcond in lstsq
- Correct examples of lstsq
- More concise examples
- Use the names of the inputs / outputs in the variables of the examples
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61578
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D29757988
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: a740a64826c065c1d7c1b8b498364d147008d76d
Summary:
torch.chunk may return less than the requested number of chunks silently if some undocumented division constraints are not met. The functionality that users expect is provided by another function: torch.tensor_split
This has led to confusion countless times and who knows how many systems out there are fragile because of this.
My changes describe the discrepancy, show an example and direct users to the usually preferred function.
Issues mentioning this problem:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/9382https://github.com/torch/torch7/issues/617
I considered documenting the constraint for when an unexpected number of chunks may be returned (it is chunks*chunks>input.size[dim] ), so that users could quickly tell if their code may be affected. Please let me know if you think this should be in the docs or not.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/61097
Reviewed By: heitorschueroff
Differential Revision: D29660280
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 675086bc8a8882c1685a50a2c083ae8dd1854384
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/56058
User facing changes:
1. Adds a negative bit and corresponding new API (`is_neg()`,`resolve_neg()`)
2. `tensor.conj().imag` now returns a floating point tensor with neg bit set to 1 instead of a tensor with no notion of negative bit. Note that imag is still a view and all the view properties still hold for imag.
Non user facing changes:
1. Added a new Negative dispatch key and a backend fallback to handle it
2. Updated copy kernel to handle negative bit
3. Merged conjugate and negative bit fallback kernel
4. fixed https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/60478 (caused due to https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54987)
Testing:
1. Added a new OpInfo based test `test_neg_view` (verifies that out-of-place and in-place operations work correctly for all operations when the input is a neg view tensor by checking the result against an actually negated tensor, verifies that autograd returns the same output for both neg view and actually negated tensors as well as it works fine when grad_out is a neg view).
2. Added a new test class containing `test_conj_view`, `test_neg_view`.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: soulitzer
Differential Revision: D29636403
fbshipit-source-id: 12214c9dc4806c51850f4a72a109db9527c0ca63
Summary:
Based from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50466
Adds the initial implementation of `torch.cov` similar to `numpy.cov`. For simplicity, we removed support for many parameters in `numpy.cov` that are either redundant such as `bias`, or have simple workarounds such as `y` and `rowvar`.
cc PandaBoi
closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/19037
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58311
Reviewed By: jbschlosser
Differential Revision: D29431651
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: 167dea880f534934b145ba94291a9d634c25b01b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60507
Fix incorrect documentation about the dtype for `torch.randint` described in issue #56347
Test Plan: Review documentation to make sure formatting is right
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D29321181
fbshipit-source-id: caae69a9bbb30052da518a3f5d22a7ed3504cdd2
Summary:
There is a very common error when writing docs: One forgets to write a matching `` ` ``, and something like ``:attr:`x`` is rendered in the docs. This PR fixes most (all?) of these errors (and a few others).
I found these running ``grep -r ">[^#<][^<]*\`"`` on the `docs/build/html/generated` folder. The regex finds an HTML tag that does not start with `#` (as python comments in example code may contain backticks) and that contains a backtick in the rendered HTML.
This regex has not given any false positive in the current codebase, so I am inclined to suggest that we should add this check to the CI. Would this be possible / reasonable / easy to do malfet ?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60474
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D29309633
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 9621e0e9f87590cea060dd084fa367442b6bd046
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/56036
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/56130
* All the interior points are computed using second order accurate central differences method for gradient operator. However, currently we only have first order method computation for edge points. In this PR we are adding second order methods for edge points as well.
* Currently, there is no detailed description of how gradient operator computed using second order method, and how to use parameters correctly. We add detailed explanation of meaning of each parameter, and return of the gradient operator, meanwhile giving description of the second-order computation.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58165
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D29305321
Pulled By: iramazanli
fbshipit-source-id: 0e0e418eed801c8510b8babe2ad3d064479fb4d6
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/3025
## Background
This PR implements a function similar to numpy's [`isin()`](https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.isin.html#numpy.isin).
The op supports integral and floating point types on CPU and CUDA (+ half & bfloat16 for CUDA). Inputs can be one of:
* (Tensor, Tensor)
* (Tensor, Scalar)
* (Scalar, Tensor)
Internally, one of two algorithms is selected based on the number of elements vs. test elements. The heuristic for deciding which algorithm to use is taken from [numpy's implementation](fb215c7696/numpy/lib/arraysetops.py (L575)): if `len(test_elements) < 10 * len(elements) ** 0.145`, then a naive brute-force checking algorithm is used. Otherwise, a stablesort-based algorithm is used.
I've done some preliminary benchmarking to verify this heuristic on a devgpu, and determined for a limited set of tests that a power value of `0.407` instead of `0.145` is a better inflection point. For now, the heuristic has been left to match numpy's, but input is welcome for the best way to select it or whether it should be left the same as numpy's.
Tests are adapted from numpy's [isin and in1d tests](7dcd29aaaf/numpy/lib/tests/test_arraysetops.py).
Note: my locally generated docs look terrible for some reason, so I'm not including the screenshot for them until I figure out why.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/53125
Test Plan:
```
python test/test_ops.py # Ex: python test/test_ops.py TestOpInfoCPU.test_supported_dtypes_isin_cpu_int32
python test/test_sort_and_select.py # Ex: python test/test_sort_and_select.py TestSortAndSelectCPU.test_isin_cpu_int32
```
Reviewed By: soulitzer
Differential Revision: D29101165
Pulled By: jbschlosser
fbshipit-source-id: 2dcc38d497b1e843f73f332d837081e819454b4e
Summary:
Based from https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50466
Adds the initial implementation of `torch.cov` similar to `numpy.cov`. For simplicity, we removed support for many parameters in `numpy.cov` that are either redundant such as `bias`, or have simple workarounds such as `y` and `rowvar`.
cc PandaBoi
TODO
- [x] Improve documentation
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58311
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D28994140
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: 1890166c0a9c01e0a536acd91571cd704d632f44
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54987
Based off of ezyang (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44799) and bdhirsh (https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43702) 's prototype:
Here's a summary of the changes in this PR:
This PR adds a new dispatch key called Conjugate. This enables us to make conjugate operation a view and leverage the specialized library functions that fast path with the hermitian operation (conj + transpose).
1. Conjugate operation will now return a view with conj bit (1) for complex tensors and returns self for non-complex tensors as before. This also means `torch.view_as_real` will no longer be a view on conjugated complex tensors and is hence disabled. To fill the gap, we have added `torch.view_as_real_physical` which would return the real tensor agnostic of the conjugate bit on the input complex tensor. The information about conjugation on the old tensor can be obtained by calling `.is_conj()` on the new tensor.
2. NEW API:
a) `.conj()` -- now returning a view.
b) `.conj_physical()` -- does the physical conjugate operation. If the conj bit for input was set, you'd get `self.clone()`, else you'll get a new tensor with conjugated value in its memory.
c) `.conj_physical_()`, and `out=` variant
d) `.resolve_conj()` -- materializes the conjugation. returns self if the conj bit is unset, else returns a new tensor with conjugated values and conj bit set to 0.
e) `.resolve_conj_()` in-place version of (d)
f) `view_as_real_physical` -- as described in (1), it's functionally same as `view_as_real`, just that it doesn't error out on conjugated tensors.
g) `view_as_real` -- existing function, but now errors out on conjugated tensors.
3. Conjugate Fallback
a) Vast majority of PyTorch functions would currently use this fallback when they are called on a conjugated tensor.
b) This fallback is well equipped to handle the following cases:
- functional operation e.g., `torch.sin(input)`
- Mutable inputs and in-place operations e.g., `tensor.add_(2)`
- out-of-place operation e.g., `torch.sin(input, out=out)`
- Tensorlist input args
- NOTE: Meta tensors don't work with conjugate fallback.
4. Autograd
a) `resolve_conj()` is an identity function w.r.t. autograd
b) Everything else works as expected.
5. Testing:
a) All method_tests run with conjugate view tensors.
b) OpInfo tests that run with conjugate views
- test_variant_consistency_eager/jit
- gradcheck, gradgradcheck
- test_conj_views (that only run for `torch.cfloat` dtype)
NOTE: functions like `empty_like`, `zero_like`, `randn_like`, `clone` don't propagate the conjugate bit.
Follow up work:
1. conjugate view RFC
2. Add neg bit to re-enable view operation on conjugated tensors
3. Update linalg functions to call into specialized functions that fast path with the hermitian operation.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: VitalyFedyunin
Differential Revision: D28227315
Pulled By: anjali411
fbshipit-source-id: acab9402b9d6a970c6d512809b627a290c8def5f
Summary:
Adds `is_inference` as a native function w/ manual cpp bindings.
Also changes instances of `is_inference_tensor` to `is_inference` to be consistent with other properties such as `is_complex`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58729
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D28874507
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 0fa6bcdc72a4ae444705e2e0f3c416c1b28dadc7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58881
recently added new parameter to the function with PR: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58417
However, this introduced ambiguity when making call below:
some_tensor.repeat_interleave(some_integer_value)
Making it optional to avoid the issue.
Reviewed By: ezyang, ngimel
Differential Revision: D28653820
fbshipit-source-id: 5bc0b1f326f069ff505554b51e3b24d60e69c843
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/58417
Same as title.
Test Plan:
Rely on CI signal.
Update unit test to exercise new code path as well.
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D28482927
fbshipit-source-id: 3ec8682810ed5c8547b1e8d3869924480ce63dcd
Summary:
This one had a tricky usage of `torch.symeig` that had to be replaced. I tested the replacement locally though.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57732
Reviewed By: bdhirsh
Differential Revision: D28328189
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 7f000fcbf2b029beabc76e5a89ff158b47977474
Summary:
Backward methods for `torch.lu` and `torch.lu_solve` require the `torch.lu_unpack` method.
However, while `torch.lu` is a Python wrapper over a native function, so its gradient is implemented via `autograd.Function`,
`torch.lu_solve` is a native function, so it cannot access `torch.lu_unpack` as it is implemented in Python.
Hence this PR presents a native (ATen) `lu_unpack` version. It is also possible to update the gradients for `torch.lu` so that backward+JIT is supported (no JIT for `autograd.Function`) with this function.
~~The interface for this method is different from the original `torch.lu_unpack`, so it is decided to keep it hidden.~~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46913
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D28355725
Pulled By: mruberry
fbshipit-source-id: 281260f3b6e93c15b08b2ba66d5a221314b00e78
