We implement a template and we fill it up via CRTP. This heavily reduces
the ammount of repeated code.
Just testing the waters here. If you like this idea, I can easily extend
this idea to cover many of the properties that we currently implement.
N.b. It'd be nice to have proper `if constexpr` support for this one,
but here we are.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/81576
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
I noticed that in some situations torch dispatch modes were being
invoked with a mode active, which isn't supposed to happen (we
disable modes before calling into the user mode.) I also noticed that
I was getting a warning that I had a deprecated non-static definition of
torch dispatch on an argument even though there wasn't any.
It turns out this is because modes were part of the overloaded arguments
list in the Python fallback kernel for torch dispatch. This is wrong;
instead we should rely on the actual dispatching function to consult
modes. This makes the code simpler.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/80992
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
This PR adds support for `SymInt`s in python. Namely,
* `THPVariable_size` now returns `sym_sizes()`
* python arg parser is modified to parse PyObjects into ints and `SymbolicIntNode`s
* pybind11 bindings for `SymbolicIntNode` are added, so size expressions can be traced
* a large number of tests added to demonstrate how to implement python symints.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/78135
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Double-header bug fix:
- As reported by jansel, dtypes are still showing up as integers
when the schema is an optional dtype. This is simple enough to
fix and I added a test for it. But while I was at it...
- I noticed that the THPMemoryFormat_new idiom with "unused" name
doesn't actually work, the repr of the returned memory format
object is wrong and this shows up when we try to log the args/kwargs.
So I fixed memory format to do it properly along with everything
else.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/77135
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77543
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD, https://github.com/jansel
This makes prims look as if they were defined in native_functions.yaml
but they're still all written in Python. You now need to give a full
schema string for your prims. The returned prim object is now
torch.ops.prim overload (prims are not allowed to be overloaded,
so we return the overload, not the overload packet, for speed.)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/77117
Approved by: https://github.com/mruberry, https://github.com/albanD
The pattern of a PyObject* bundled with a PyInterpreter* is pretty
useful in many contexts (e.g., TorchDispatchTypeObject) so I have turned
it into a dedicated class SafePyObject. In the process I fixed a
bug with the old TorchDispatchTypeObject (copy constructor/assignment
was not deleted), made the API more safe (retrieving the PyObject*
pointer requires verification that the PyInterpreter* matches) and
fixed some minor inefficiencies in C++ code.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/75142
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73999
Seems to be the typical way to detect a flavor of TensorImpl.
ghstack-source-id: 151440167
Test Plan: Existing tests?
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D34665269
fbshipit-source-id: 5081a00928933e0c5252eeddca43bae0b026013d
(cherry picked from commit 7cf62a3f69f158a33c5108f7e96ea4c5520f0f15)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73850
Previously, torch.Tensor was treated as if it were torch.FloatTensor
(where Float is whatever the default dtype was). This is not good
behavior for tensor subclasses, which inherit from torch.Tensor and
will want to super() call into it and will only notice later that
only float works as a dtype. So in this PR I relax the behavior
for this case to make the torch.Tensor constructor more useful for
subclasses.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D34707396
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a995d601007b6fcd0317d89f66ca7e08c4d6053e
(cherry picked from commit e8d0d7b3e8b17681b931cbe4f5729de2e80cf3de)
I was working on an explanation of how to call into the "super"
implementation of some given ATen operation inside of __torch_dispatch__
(https://github.com/albanD/subclass_zoo/blob/main/trivial_tensors.py)
and I kept thinking to myself "Why doesn't just calling super() on
__torch_dispatch__ work"? Well, after this patch, it does! The idea
is if you don't actually unwrap the input tensors, you can call
super().__torch_dispatch__ to get at the original behavior.
Internally, this is implemented by disabling PythonKey and then
redispatching. This implementation of disabled_torch_dispatch is
not /quite/ right, and some reasons why are commented in the code.
There is then some extra work I have to do to make sure we recognize
disabled_torch_dispatch as the "default" implementation (so we don't
start slapping PythonKey on all tensors, including base Tensors),
which is modeled the same way as how disabled_torch_function is done.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/73684
Approved by: albanD
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71747
The getter is trivial as it's just creating a view tensor, but the
setter is actually copying data so does call into kernel code.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: anjali411
Differential Revision: D33770046
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: f0a70acaef790ae1e5b2f68ac4ce046e850c9624
(cherry picked from commit 36a0109400)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/69437
linalg.{inv, cholesky} are problematic because they call .data_ptr().
This makes them not composite compliant (e.g. meta tensors will not run
on them correctly). This PR makes them composite compliant by adding a
new native_functions operator that does error checking,
`_linalg_check_errors(Tensor info, str api_name, bool is_matrix`
that is a primitive with respect to autograd.
This PR modifies linalg.inv and linalg.cholesky to call the new error
check function. I also needed to refactor singleCheckErrors and
batchCheckErrors to accept a c10::string_view instead of a
`const char*`; you can convert `const char*` to c10::string_view but not
the other way around because `string_view` does not require null
terminated buffers.
Finally, there is a bugfix in `__torch_dispatch__` for this PR for
the composite compliant testing mechanism. Previously,
`__torch_dispatch__` could not handle operators with no returns; this PR
fixes that. No returns in C++ is equivalent to a single None return in
Python.
Test Plan: - composite compliant tests
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D32883666
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: d5a3f52ebab116c93e1a54a203eacc8f787de7e2
(cherry picked from commit 9e24c9599a)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70326
See D24145988 for context: it allows loops such as for(int i=0;i<10;i++) to be expressed as for(const auto i : c10::irange(10)). This is nice because it auto-types the loops and adds const-safety to the iteration variable.
Test Plan: buck run //caffe2/torch/fb/sparsenn:test
Reviewed By: r-barnes
Differential Revision: D33243400
fbshipit-source-id: b1f1b4163f4bf662031baea9e5268459b40c69a3
