Summary:
In my last PR I've missed CUDA and distributed folders, fixing this now
This change is autogenerated by `python tool/clang_tidy.py -s`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/57235
Reviewed By: janeyx99
Differential Revision: D28084444
Pulled By: malfet
fbshipit-source-id: bf222f69ee90c7872c3cb0931e8cdb84f0cb3cda
Summary:
Sub-step of my attempt to split up the torch_cuda library, as it is huge. Please look at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/49050 for details on the split and which files are in which target.
This PR introduces two new macros for Windows DLL purposes, TORCH_CUDA_CPP_API and TORCH_CUDA_CU_API. Both are defined as TORCH_CUDA_API for the time being.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/50627
Reviewed By: mruberry
Differential Revision: D25955441
Pulled By: janeyx99
fbshipit-source-id: ff226026833b8fb2fb7c77df6f2d6c824f006869
Summary:
1. Added CudaFusionGuard as the custom TypeCheck for nvfuser; enabled dynamic shape support with profiling executor;
2. dropped support for legacy fuser;
3. re-enabled nvfuser tests;
4. added registration for profiling record to allow profiling on user specified nodes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46452
Reviewed By: zou3519, anjali411
Differential Revision: D24364642
Pulled By: ngimel
fbshipit-source-id: daf53a9a6b6636e1ede420a3a6d0397d4a8b450b
Summary:
Had a bunch of merged commits that shouldn't have been there, reverted them to prevent conflicts. Lots of new features, highlights listed below.
**Overall:**
- Enables pointwise fusion, single (but N-D) broadcast -- pointwise fusion, single (but N-D) broadcast -- pointwise -- single (but N-D) reduction fusion.
**Integration:**
- Separate "magic scheduler" logic that takes a fusion and generates code generator schedule
- Reduction fusion scheduling with heuristics closely matching eagermode (unrolling supported, but no vectorize support)
- 2-Stage caching mechanism, one on contiguity, device, type, and operations, the other one is input size->reduction heuristic
**Code Generation:**
- More generic support in code generation for computeAt
- Full rework of loop nest generation and Indexing to more generically handle broadcast operations
- Code generator has automatic kernel launch configuration (including automatic allocation of grid reduction buffers)
- Symbolic (runtime) tilling on grid/block dimensions is supported
- Simplified index generation based on user-defined input contiguity
- Automatic broadcast support (similar to numpy/pytorch semantics)
- Support for compile time constant shared memory buffers
- Parallelized broadcast support (i.e. block reduction -> block broadcast support)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/43129
Reviewed By: mrshenli
Differential Revision: D23162207
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 16deee4074c64de877eed7c271d6a359927111b2
Summary:
Have basic reduction fusion working, and have improved code generator to approach performance of eager mode reductions. Coming soon will be pointwise-reduction fusions in a way that should prevent the possibility of hitting regressions. Also working on performant softmax kernels in the code generator which may be our next fusion target.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/40864
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D22392877
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 457448a807d628b1035f6d90bc0abe8a87bf8447
Summary:
We've got quite a few things going on, preparing a push back to upstream so we don't get too desynced.
- Major refactor of transform replay. It is now far more robust and fixes bugs discovered in reductions. Preparing for extension to explicit broadcast ops which will be the last major memory pattern for op coverage. Broadcast ops will allow us to express up to and potentially beyond norms and gemms.
- Initial runtime expression evaluator. This allows us to evaluate expressions at runtime. Will be useful for determining our grid/block layout at runtime, so we don't have to manually compute them according to the code we're trying to generate.
- Moving to int64 and double for scalar representations to match PyTorch JIT.
- Improvements in codegen interface where we return Tensor like object instead of parent class Val.
- Add `addcmul` and `lerp` ops
- General updates, fixes, test additions, test inprovements.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/39579
Differential Revision: D21974001
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 7f7ccc91593466e948f3ce90f8f9b7fbc5c28de2
Summary:
Adds reduction support for the code generator. Reductions are fully supported with split/merge/reorder/rfactor/computeAt/unroll operators. There is also cross thread (intra-block) reduction support.
The two remaining pieces missing for reduction support is:
- Safety: If cross thread reduction was used, child operators shouldn't be able to bind that thread dim anymore
- Cross block reduction: we will want inter-block reduction support to match parity with tensor iterator
PR also provides FP16 support for fusions now. We insert casts on FP16 inputs to FP32, and we insert casts to FP16 on FP16 outputs.
Also working towards reductions and shape inference for reductions in the fusion pass.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/38627
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D21663196
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 3ff2df563f86c39cd5821ab9c1148149e5172a9e
Summary:
This PR added more supported operations in CUDA fuser. We are covering major point-wise operations supported in legacy fuser.
In an attempt to adapt to legacy executor:
1. added an naive shape propagation pass on pytorch JIT IR;
2. small refactor on graph partitioning;
3. fallback interpreter execution of fusion group;
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/37849
Reviewed By: yf225
Differential Revision: D21444320
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 712e18ab8497f8d58a07e6f8d200cdab52cf0d74
Summary:
This PR completely refactors the code lowering process from our IR to CUDA. Before we had one giant step that would go from a relatively high level IR straight to CUDA, now we're lowering this first into concepts like ForLoop, IfThenElse, TensorIndex, Allocate. This lowering will allow us to do more complex code lowering like reductions and unrolling. Unrolling will quickly follow this PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/36199
Reviewed By: dzhulgakov
Differential Revision: D20925220
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: 8f621c694c68a1aad8653e625d7287fe2d8b35dc
Summary:
**Summary:** This PR contains the infrastructure of a new CUDA fuser. This CUDA fuser is based on many of the same principles of TensorExpressions and Halide, however the implementation is ground up. The fusion pass itself is similar to the default CUDA fuser, however, it has undergone some refactoring and is using the new code generation infrastructure. For those who are interested in how the code generation in this PR works, I would recommend reviewing _test/cpp/jit/test_gpu_fusion.cpp_ as well as the long comment section at the beginning of _torch/csrc/jit/codegen/cuda/transform_replay.h_ One of the largest differences between our approach and that of TVM/Halide, is the concept of "TensorView". TensorView from a high level should be thought of similarly to how we think of working with Tensors in PyTorch. It's an N-D object which can undergo transformations that change its dimensionality. Dimensionality changes are done through the operations split/merge/reorder/computeAt. These transformations are similar to split/fuse/reorder/compute_at of TVM, they modify how a tensor is iterated over to generate GPU code. Interestingly, in our scheme these transformations are applied to tensors and only impact how that tensor is generated.
**Warning:** This PR is purposefully not feature complete with the current fuser. We wanted to separate out the infrastructure from the fusion capabilities. Once in, smaller incremental PRs will be submitted to expand capabilities of the fuser.
**Short term goals:**
Parity with current CUDA fuser (including performance):
- Dynamic shapes (no recompilation)
- Implicit handling of braodcast (broadcasted tensors are treated as tensors of the braodcasted size in the generated code)
- Dropout
**Mid-term goals:**
- Transposes fused with pointwise operations where transpose involves only 2 axes (across the fused operation).
- 1-D reductions fused with pointwise operations
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/34785
Reviewed By: ZolotukhinM
Differential Revision: D20650977
Pulled By: soumith
fbshipit-source-id: ee39c95a880e1b9822e874ed4cc180971572bf63
