We want to be able to use SingletonSymNode to represent strides for Jagged layout tensor. The following is for 3D, but easily generalizable to higher dimensions.
Constraints:
- [B, x, D] (where x represents the "variably lengthed dim") can be strided in two ways [x, 1, sum(x)] and [dx, d, 1]. We need two different placeholder values depending on how the jagged tensor is strided.
- When doing operations we need the strides of output tensors to be expressable in terms of the strides and sizes of the inner tensors. Given [B, x, D] @ [D, D'], the output strides is [x * D', D', 1] rather than some opaque [x2, D', 1]. This constraint exists because if I'm tracing, I need a symint to represent the output stride. This symint needs to come from somewhere; I get it in several ways: (1) create a constant, (2) unbacked symint, (3) create a new input using a source, (4) output of an operation on an existing symint. It is clear that (4) is what we want here, which brings us to the design below.
Design:
Given the two constraints, the most straightforward way to implement this is actually to update SingletonSymNode to include some scalar factor, i.e. Morally, SingletonSymNode represents `factor * [s_0, s_1, …, s_n]` This enables us to symbolically compute strides from sizes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/110369
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
ghstack dependencies: #110044
Previously, something like j0 >= 3, would return False. In sympy however, it is not possible to make it so that both j0 >= 3 and j0 < 3 return False. In sympy, you only get to dispatch on Ge, and the remaining are derived, e.g. defining Ge(j0 >= 3) to be False would force Lt(j0, 3) to be True, which is not what we want.
In this PR, we make it so that both j0 >=3 and j0 < 3 error, so that in a future PR when we create the symbolic counterpart of this singleton, the behaviors can be the same.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/110044
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
In this PR:
- When Constant SymNode are detected in unary/binary ops demote them to plain int/bool before proceeding. Sometimes this means doing a unary op with a Constant SymNode would result in a plain bool.
- Introduce an is_symbolic method, only available from Python. We need this because isinstance(x, SymInt) is no longer sufficient to check whether a given int/SymInt is symbolic or not. See later PR in the stack to see how this is used.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/109169
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
In this PR:
- {in,}equality between singleton and plain ints returns false instead of erroring
- Morally define the semantic of j0 > c to be as if j0 represented an array [s_0, s_1, ... s_n] and s_k > c for all k
- Just like for equality, we don't actually want to do the comparison one by one, instead j0 is constrained to some range [min, max]. By default this range is [2, int64_t::max] so that it acts like a size and passes 0/1 specialization checks.
- In the future, we can define some API to allow users to constrain the range of their singletons
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/108315
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Adds `SingletonSymNodeImpl` (alternatively, `SkolemSymNodeImpl`). This is a int-like object that only allows the`eq` operation; any other operation produces an error.
The main complexity is that we require operations that dispatch to SymNode must take and return SymNodes, but when performing operations involving `SingletonSymNodeImpl`, operations involving SymNode can return non-SymNode bools. For more discussion see [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/18iqMdnHlUnvoTz4BveBbyWFi_tCRmFoqMFdBHKmCm_k/edit)
- Introduce `ConstantSymNodeImpl` a generalization of `LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl` and replace usage of `LargeNegativeIntSymNodeImpl` in SymInt.
- Also use ConstantSymNodeImpl to enable SymBool to store its data on a SymNode. Remove the assumption that if SymBool holds a non-null SymNode, it must be symbolic.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/107089
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
ghstack dependencies: #107839
