Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/96887
We error out in BOTH the case when graph is created and when it is not created.
Still bc-breaking, but not as severe because we are limiting to the case where someone uses setup_context.
This makes setup_context and non-setup_context versions diverge in their behavior
- With the non-setup_context version, saved variables are assumed to have the grad_fn of the inputs.
- But now with the setup_context version, we produce an error for this case.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97212
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
### Introduction
<!-- What did you change and why was it needed? -->
Removing unnecessary weight gradient calculation is very important for applications that need high-order derivatives during training. However, this is not supported by the current Autograd engine.
For more detail: The backward function of a `matmul` operator (e.g., `linear` `addmm` `mm`), has two matmuls, one for `input gradient` and another for `weight gradient`. For a typical neural network (nn) with a few linear layers and activation functions, if the user calls `torch.autograd.grad()` to calculate the derivative of the nn output `y` w.r.t the nn input `x`, only the `input gradient` of the `matmul` operator is needed, and the `weight gradient` is discarded. However, the current PyTorch autograd engine will always calculate the `weight gradient` if `weight` requires gradient (the calculation of the high-order derivative is performed during training).
The figure attached shows the autograd graph of the following code snippet:
```py
y = torch.nn.functional.linear(x, weight, bias)
y = y.pow(2)
# first order derivative
y__x, = torch.autograd.grad(y, x, grad_outputs=grad_outputs, create_graph=True)
# first order derivative
y__x__x, = torch.autograd.grad(y__x, x, grad_outputs=grad_outputs, create_graph=True)
```
The path with ❌ is not needed when calculating derivatives.
<img width="50%" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9999318/182018117-719c5a23-bcc6-4a63-8e8d-1bca3ebda2e3.png">
### Issue
<!-- Link to Issue ticket or RFP -->
Related issue: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/56500
### Method
When calling `torch.autograd.grad`, `exec_info_` is created for each GraphTask, which allows filtering paths on the graph that are not needed. However, when the GraphTask calls into the node, the node still does not know whether the edges are needed or not. In the case of matmul, `weight.requires_grad is True` so the weight gradient is always calculated.
Following https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/56500#issuecomment-825694656, this PR passes the graph task's thread_local `exec_info_` into the node, so it could trim unnecessary edges during `torch.autograd.grad` calls.
### Benchmark
Benchmark script: https://gist.github.com/yueyericardo/24158433a2021c51eeef9c3e2722df99
Benchmark result:
6 hidden layers, batch size 10000, on A100
FP32 result
| hessian benchmark | FP32 (before) | FP32 (After) | FP32 (Functorch v0.1.1) |
| ----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------- | ----------------------- |
| Linear + ReLU (no backward) | 55.658 ms | 29.392 ms (1.90X) | 29.547 ms (1.90X) |
| Linear + ReLU (with backward) | 81.173 ms | 54.917 ms (1.47X) | 68.988 ms (1.18X) |
TF32 result
| hessian benchmark | TF32 (before) | TF32 (after) | TF32 (Functorch v0.1.1) |
| ----------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------- | ----------------------- |
| Linear + ReLU (no backward) | 19.801 ms | 11.259 ms (1.76X) | 10.754 ms (1.84X) |
| Linear + ReLU (with backward) | 29.167 ms | 20.466 ms (1.42X) | 22.784 ms (1.28X) |
For FP32 result, we could get 1.9X speed up for hessian calculation, and 1.47X speed up during training, which is even faster than functorch `vmap(jacfwd(jacrev` implementation. (functorch has performance regression on v0.2.0, https://github.com/pytorch/functorch/issues/989, so we are using v0.1.1 for benchmark)
@zou3519 does functorch also includes similar optimizations during hessian calculation? If not, what do we need to do so the functorch could also benefit from this PR?
### Testing
<!-- How did you test your change? -->
- [x] we need to figure out a way for unittest
### Thanks
Thanks for the great blog: [How Computational Graphs are Executed in PyTorch | PyTorch](https://pytorch.org/blog/how-computational-graphs-are-executed-in-pytorch/)
cc @zasdfgbnm @albanD
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/82544
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/72008
Fixes #71119
Technically BC-breaking because when an input does not require grad, previously it was returned as-is instead of a view because it didn't need to. Now we will also return a view in that case (whether or not forward AD runs).
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D33859553
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 81b3fa371f4c0904630878500aa190492c562367
(cherry picked from commit ee74bc8234)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71569
Not sure if this is the right API
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D33695395
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: 652b5758f15d901f98ff0da94e977030c7f3415b
(cherry picked from commit 9421a6846a)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71531
Based on the comment above the original internal assert, this is the desired check.
1. Don't error, and automatically make jvp return a view for that tensor output (this is easier than I originally thought: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/71531#discussion_r789211877)
2. Error (currently doing)
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D33695399
Pulled By: soulitzer
fbshipit-source-id: dba49890a55ad1dd59ed5c41faa96bf7cfc9e562
(cherry picked from commit fdb0f266f5)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/63612
This makes Tensor inherit from a new class TensorBase, that provides a subset of Tensor that doesn't
directly depend on native_functions.yaml. Code that only includes TensorBase.h with thus not need to
be rebuilt every time someone changes an operator signature.
Making `Tensor` inherit from this class means that `const TensorBase&` parameters will be callable
with an ordinary `Tensor`. I've also made `Tensor` constructible and assignable from `TensorBase` to
minimize friction in code mixing the two types.
To help enforce that `Tensor.h` and `Functions.h` aren't accidentally included, I've added an error
into `Operators.h` if `TORCH_ASSERT_NO_OPERATORS` is defined. We can either set this in the build
system for certain folders, or just define it at the top of any file.
I've also included an example of manually special-casing the commonly used `contiguous` operator.
The inline function's slow path defers to `TensorBase::__dispatch_contiguous` which is defined in
`Tensor.cpp`. I've made it so `OptionalTensorRef` is constructible from `TensorBase`, so I can
materialize a `Tensor` for use in dispatch without actually increasing its refcount.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D30728580
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 2cbc8eee08043382ee6904ea8e743b1286921c03
Summary:
Switches most of the simple for loops outside of `jit` directories to use `c10::irange`.
Generated with D28874212.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/59481
Test Plan: Sandcastle
Reviewed By: ngimel
Differential Revision: D28909681
fbshipit-source-id: ec9ab1bd602933238d9d0f73d4d8d027b75d9d85
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54610
The `.is_view()` method actually only refers to backward mode views
This is not a problem right now in master (and thus I didn't revert the other PR) because nothing creates forward AD views.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: gchanan
Differential Revision: D27396756
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 64ff11c6f2486c6430714988d1cf6ecf3d80dccb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52422
As mentioned in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/52415,
`torch.utils.checkpoint` doesn't support checkpointing for functions which have
non-tensor inputs and outputs.
This PR resolves this issue by ensuring the autograd machinery ignores the
non-tensor inputs and outputs and processes the tensors accordingly.
ghstack-source-id: 124406867
Test Plan:
1) unit test
2) waitforbuildbot
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D26507228
fbshipit-source-id: 0a5a1591570814176185362e83ad18dabd9c84b0
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/54103
The goal is to reduce the spread of static casts in the autograd code as per the comment in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/49097#discussion_r543695091
I wasn't sure how to use a virtual method here but a simple method in impl clean it up quite nicely.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: agolynski
Differential Revision: D27117840
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 5f277dde34ccf6bc20f76583b906ff3528cde5aa
Summary:
Added a new option in AutogradContext to tell autograd to not materialize output grad tensors, that is, don't expand undefined/None tensors into tensors full of zeros before passing them as input to the backward function.
This PR is the second part that closes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/41359. The first PR is https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41490.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/41821
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D22693163
Pulled By: heitorschueroff
fbshipit-source-id: a8d060405a17ab1280a8506a06a2bbd85cb86461
Summary:
Update the API to access grad in cpp to avoid unexpected thread safety issues.
In particular, with the current API, a check like `t.grad().defined()` is not thread safe.
- This introduces `t.mutable_grad()` that should be used when getting a mutable version of the saved gradient. This function is **not** thread safe.
- The `Tensor& grad()` API is now removed. We could not do a deprecation cycle as most of our call side use non-const Tensors that use the non-const overload. This would lead to most calls hitting the warning. This would be too verbose for all the users.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/40887
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D22343932
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: d5eb909bb743bc20caaf2098196e18ca4110c5d2
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33896Fixes#32625. Previously, we'd receive an error message if we have a
custom function return a view of an input in a no_grad block:
```
class Alias(Function):
staticmethod
def forward(ctx, x):
return x[:]
staticmethod
def backward(ctx, gx):
return gx
inp = torch.rand(2, requires_grad=True)
with torch.no_grad():
# Used to error out
output = Alias.apply(inp)
```
After this change, the error no longer happens. The behavior changes to
become consistent to if we had implemented an operator that does the
same thing as the custom function:
- the output requires_grad
- we are able to detect (and error out) if the user tries to modify the
output in-place outside of the no_grad block.
Test Plan: - new test
Differential Revision: D20345601
Pulled By: zou3519
fbshipit-source-id: 7f95b4254f52ddbf989d26f449660403bcde1c78
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/32839
As mentioned in the updated comment in `variable.h`, this disambiguate code like:
```python
base = torch.rand(10, requires_grad=True)
with torch.no_grad():
view = base[1]
view.copy_(var)
torch.autograd.grad(base.sum(), var) # <- what should it return?
```
Given that there is no consensus of what should happen here (does the gradient flow through the view in the no_grad or not). This special case is detected and forbidden.
As mentionned in the error message:
- If you want it to be tracked: move both out of the no_grad
- If do not want them to be tracked, move both inside the no_grad
This implies that any custom Function that returns views does not allow inplace modification on its output. I'll add a PR to the stack to relax this to be a DeprecationWarning for now. And we will make it into an actual error for 1.6
This replaces https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/26607
cc sublee
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19814114
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: ff2c9d97c8f876d9c31773a2170e37b06d88bed7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33069
This PR adds the following:
- Warn when a non-input Tensor is given to `mark_dirty()` as it is not needed.
- Raise an error if we modify inplace an input that is a view and that we have multiple output. This setting is not handled by `CopySlices` and will raise a cryptic error during the backward.
- Raise an error if an input is modified inplace but not returned. That will prevent the graph rewrite from being done correctly.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19791563
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: 4d8806c27290efe82ef2fe9c8c4dc2b26579abd1
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/33068
The version counter is already tracked if we use pytorch's functions but not if the user unpack the Tensor and modifies it by hand or with a third party library.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D19791564
Pulled By: albanD
fbshipit-source-id: a73c0f73d8fd0c0e5bf838f14bed54fa66937840
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/29161.
I looked a bit at the code changes related to this and think I have all of the use cases of `DeprecatedTypeProperties` covered in the message, but suggestions from someone with more context on this would be very much appreciated :)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/30281
Differential Revision: D18830818
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 1a7fcee15354ae09e6644577e7fa33bd26acfe20
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/29665
Our intention is to merge the static distinction between Tensor and
Variable. Ordinarily, this would entail merging the methods of Tensor
and Variable. But there are a lot of "private"-ish methods on Variable
that we don't actually want to dump onto the Tensor class. So, as prep
work, we move all of those methods off of Variable and into
the torch::autograd::impl namespace (impl as in, please don't use this
end users). This ends up being a fairly large patch because all of
the call sites have to play ball too.
While I was on the topic, I also moved any of the touched functions into
the C++ file, so that modifying them would not trigger a recompilation of
all of torch.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D18496169
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: afb203252620ec274be596b3e7b1d84d321bad3a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/28620
All Tensors are Variables now, they just happen to have requires_grad=False. Tensors ALWAYS have `VariableTensorId` in their type set.
When constructing this patch, I had to make decisions about what I would fix in this patch, and what I would leave for follow up PRs. Here is the cleanup that happens in this patch:
- The `is_variable` property is removed from TensorOptions. I removed this immediately because unlike Tensor::is_variable, TensorOptions::is_variable doesn't respect our VariableTensorId thread-local state. This means that there were a bunch of places where TensorOptions::is_variable was false, which is obviously bogus in the world when tensor and variable are merged. Instead of keeping the method as a function that always returns true, I just opted to remove it entirely (it's not public API.) All places we set `is_variable` are deleted.
- Knock on effect: there is no longer a separate DeprecatedTypeProperties for the variable and non-variable versions of type.
- Knock on effect: instead of asserting on TensorOptions::is_variable, instead we just test `at::impl::variable_is_excluded()`
- There is now only one copy of the cuDNN RNN dropout cache, not two (I'm not sure why we had two to begin with)
Some cleanup that doesn't happen in this patch:
- Eliminating unnecessary uses of `make_variable`
- Eliminating `Tensor::is_variable`
The most subtle part of this patch is retaining tracing behavior: the fact that everything is a Variable means that more code gets routed to VariableType than before; this can change traces. I identified two places where we didn't appropriately turn off VariableType, mostly factory functions:
- `torch.tensor` must turn off VariableType before invoking `at::empty` to construct the tensor, as it subsequently does direct data access
- `tensor_slow` (invoked when you pass a Python scalar to a tensor argument) must turn off VariableType before calling `scalar_to_tensor` so the scalar gets traced as constant, rather than as a call to `scalar_to_tensor`.
Honestly, these are all giant hacks, and should be replaced with a more specialized guard that just toggles tracing.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: dreiss
Differential Revision: D18171156
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 5b6a045beba37492647e350190f495114e86504d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/25467
Use Layout/Device more directly in these cases.
ghstack-source-id: 89289651
Test Plan: sandcastle and ossci
Differential Revision: D17131883
fbshipit-source-id: ab3c6d1c879b7f26f20a2378364c852dc37508fc
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/24393
Ability to register hook on a variable, similar to python autograd API. register_hook will take a function as argument and create a CppFunctionPreHook similar to PyFunctionPreHook.
It will return the index of the hook which can be passed to remove_hook to disable the hook.
Test Plan: Added tests.
Differential Revision: D16861722
fbshipit-source-id: d08047f932e38c7bde04283a18b2d0311c8ad604
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/23618
For example: `save_for_backward({Variable(), x, Variable()})` should be allowed, so that this is consistent with the python API behaviour.
Test Plan: Added a test similar to the python test `test_save_none_for_backward` from test_autograd.py.
Differential Revision: D16589402
fbshipit-source-id: 847544ad8fc10772954d8629ad5a62bfdc1a66c1
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/23572
### **(The stack from #23020 was moved into this PR)**
Adding API for custom autograd operations, with user defined forward and backward, [like in python](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/notes/extending.html#extending-torch-autograd).
The custom operation should be a subclass of Function, with static forward and backward functions. `forward()` can accept any arguments similar to the Python API and `backward()` should accept a variable list as an argument.
Both `forward()` and `backward() `accept a AutogradContext* which can be used to share data between them.
Variables can be saved in the context using `save_for_backward()` and other data can be saved in the map `save` in the form of `<std::string, at::IValue>` pairs. Variables saved in forward can be accessed with `get_saved_variables()`.
Example usage:
```
class MyFunction : public Function<MyFunction> {
public:
static variable_list forward(AutogradContext *ctx, int n, Variable var) {
// Save data for backward in context
ctx->saved_data["n"] = n;
return {var};
}
static variable_list backward(AutogradContext *ctx, variable_list grad_output) {
// Use data saved in forward
auto n = ctx->saved_data["n"].toInt();
return {grad_output[0]*n};
}
};
```
Then, it can be used with:
```
Variable x;
MyFunction::apply(6, x);
```
Also AutogradContext has methods to mark outputs as non differentiable and mark inputs as dirty similar to the [Python API](ff23a02ac4/torch/autograd/function.py (L26)).
Test Plan: Added tests for the custom autograd function API based on test_autograd.py. Currently only the tests for the basic functionality have been added. More tests will be added later.
Differential Revision: D16583428
fbshipit-source-id: 0bd42f19ce37bcd99d3080d16195ad74d40d0413
Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/22631
Test Plan:
test suite
Imported from OSS
Differential Revision: D16185040
fbshipit-source-id: 9b83749f6c9cd05d13f54a3bb4801e263293252b
