Summary:
This was error was run into when running ExportPassBase on an exported model with lifted constant tensors:
```
File "/data/users/angelayi/pytorch/torch/_subclasses/fake_tensor.py", line 1444, in dispatch
len(kwargs) == 0 and len(args) == 1 and type(args[0]) is torch.Tensor
AssertionError: (FakeTensor(..., size=(s0,)),) {}
While executing %lift_fresh_copy_1 : [num_users=1] = call_function[target=torch.ops.aten.lift_fresh_copy.default](args = (%_lifted_tensor_constant99,), kwargs = {})
Original traceback:
File "" in forward
mean = torch.tensor([0.485, 0.456, 0.406]).reshape(3, 1, 1)
```
In ExportPassBase, we retrace using the fake tensors in the placeholder nodes, but when running into this lift_fresh_copy operators, it's unable to be called with the fake tensors.
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: chakriu
Differential Revision: D50211827
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/111140
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17
Summary: Existing code is incorrectly overwriting the stacktrace to be None because since there is no exception happening, `traceback.format_exc` is None. Also we should only populate the stack trace if it not there in the first place.
Test Plan: CI
Differential Revision: D48818478
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/108217
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17
Summary: Internal model and Resnet uses "re-export" flow now. Also did some refactoring to make the code little cleaner
Some changes for OSS:
1. Correctly use the "cached" fake tensors so that static symbols are still resolved to static
2. Change logic in PassBase to allocate static shapes for parameters
3. Add "is_torch_exported" tag to every node to make it survive during various graph transformations.
4. Added experimental wrapper API for quantization team to get pre_dispatch=True graph. Note that it doesn't actually do that right now. But we plan to switch soon.
Test Plan: CI
Differential Revision: D47890878
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106676
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
The idea here is to create do a graph mutation to:
* Create an initial dependency token at the beginning of the program.
* Replace non-functional version of assertion statements to functional version.
* The functional version of assertion statement will:
* Accept a dependency token from output of previous functional assertion statement (or the initial dependency token if there isn't any).
* Generate a dependency token as the output of assertion statement.
* Augment the output to include the dependency token generated by last assertion statement.
The goal here is to:
* Form an explicit dependency chain and avoid potential reordering during other passes of compiling.
* Make the assertions a part of overall execution graph will affect the final output (or it could potentially be DCEed).
**NOTE:**
* Currently only cover `contrain_range` and WIP to support other assertions. Send out this PR to collect feedback first.
* Here it only focus on implementation itself. Will integrate it with current export in future PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103757
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri
Previously we had runtime asserts for range constraints. This diff adds runtime asserts for equality constraints.
This requires a bit of refactoring that is worth calling out.
1. [Minor] Some of the data structures produced by export and consumed by the runtime assertion pass need to be broadened. This is a WIP. There are some associated code improvements that are included in this diff, but by and large the structures are similar to what exists now. Meanwhile @angelayi and I are chatting about how to make it qualitatively better: briefly, we want to index everything by symbols, which are 1-1 with (name, dim) pairs.
2. [Major] The order in which runtime asserts are emitted is changed. Previously we used to do the work in `placeholder`, now this diff adds a hook for "post-processing" after processing of all placeholders is done. This is needed because equality constraints can mention different placeholders. This change also opens the way to optimizing codegen: e.g., each (name, dim) pair should correspond to a single intermediate variable that is reused across runtime asserts. This is future work.
Differential Revision: [D46177642](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D46177642/)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/102256
Approved by: https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan, https://github.com/angelayi
I ported over the code for the inline interpreter incorrectly in the pass base 😅
Originally the function `make_inline_interpreter` is supposed to take in a fx.Interpreter type but I accidentally passed in an fx.Interpreter object. Also realized while modifying this diff (and comments from Tugsuu) that we don't really need this InlineInterpreter.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100836
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17, https://github.com/tugsbayasgalan
* Added ExportPassBase, an interpreter based helper pass writing class
* It can also help maintain the dialect based on the operator namespace through having users override the `get_valid_dialects` function (returning an empty lists implies the pass works for any dialect).
* Added a `ReplaceBrokenOpsWithFunctionalOpsPass` to replace all ops that have not been converted with functionalization with their functional ones.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100000
Approved by: https://github.com/gmagogsfm
