Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Changes by apply order:
1. Replace all `".."` and `os.pardir` usage with `os.path.dirname(...)`.
2. Replace nested `os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(...))` call with `str(Path(...).parent.parent)`.
3. Reorder `.absolute()` ~/ `.resolve()`~ and `.parent`: always resolve the path first.
`.parent{...}.absolute()` -> `.absolute().parent{...}`
4. Replace chained `.parent x N` with `.parents[${N - 1}]`: the code is easier to read (see 5.)
`.parent.parent.parent.parent` -> `.parents[3]`
5. ~Replace `.parents[${N - 1}]` with `.parents[${N} - 1]`: the code is easier to read and does not introduce any runtime overhead.~
~`.parents[3]` -> `.parents[4 - 1]`~
6. ~Replace `.parents[2 - 1]` with `.parent.parent`: because the code is shorter and easier to read.~
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/129374
Approved by: https://github.com/justinchuby, https://github.com/malfet
Update ruff to 0.4.1 .
This version fixes a lot false negatives/false positives, is 20-40% faster, and has various other bug fixes.
Below is a before and after table showing the execution time of ruff lint and ruff format in milliseconds courtesy of https://astral.sh/blog/ruff-v0.4.0
| Repository | Linter (v0.3) | Linter (v0.4) | Formatter (v0.3) | Formatter (v0.4) |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|------------------|------------------|
| [pytorch/pytorch](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch) | 328.7 | 251.8 | 351.1 | 274.9 |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/124549
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Previously we were downloading all of (eager311, dynamo38, dynamo311).
Now we just download what's necessary. This is useful for
update_failures.py because the dynamo tests finish much faster than the
eager tests and it only needs the result from the dynamo tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/119027
Approved by: https://github.com/jamesjwu
ghstack dependencies: #118874, #118882, #118931
Previously, you could run update_failures.py (with a commit hash) and it
would add new expected failures and skips for newly failing tests and
remove expected failures for newly passing tests.
This PR teaches update_failures.py to also remove skips for tests that
are now passing without them.
The way we do this is:
- dynamo_test_failures.py doesn't actually skip tests -- it runs the
test and then suppresses the signal.
- if the test actually passed, then the test gets skipped with a special
skip message
- we teach update_failures.py to look for the presence of that skip
message.
Test Plan:
- Used this to generate https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118928
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118931
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
ghstack dependencies: #118874, #118882
```
def f():
def g():
return ()
print(g.__name__)
f()
```
The following script should print `g` (with or without torch.compile),
but prints `f.<locals>.g` with torch.compile.
The problem looks like we use the co_qualname when reconstructing the
NestedUserFunctionVariable. I switched this over to use the co_name.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/118768
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang, https://github.com/jansel
- passrate.py: compute the pass rate
- update_failures.py: update `dynamo_test_failures.py`
Both of these scripts require you to download the test results from CI
locally. Maybe we can automate this more in the future. Checking these
in for now, with no tests :P.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/117400
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
ghstack dependencies: #117391
