Recent 2 triton PRs (https://github.com/openai/triton/pull/2701, https://github.com/openai/triton/pull/2756) change the interface for triton.compile, this PR added the necessary change on inductor side to work with both old and new compile API.
Also there is some simplification between compilation call in subprocess and the one in main process
- previously we pass warm_cache_only=True if the compilation happens in subprocess. But triton never use that argument in the currently used pin. So I removed that
- previously we only pass compute_capability if compilation happens in subprocess. The PR change that to always passing compute_capability to triton.compile no matter if the compilation happens in main or sub process.
Updated:
There are more interface change from triton side. E.g.
- tl.math.{min, max} now requires a propagate_nan argument
- JITFunction.run now requires a warmup argument. This affect the benchmarking phase of matmul max-autotune; on the other hand, JITFunction.run forbids stream argument now. Simply removing passing this in when benchmarking matmul triton kernel will work for both old and new version of triton.
- triton Autotuner change attribute name from 'warmup' to 'num_warmup' and from 'rep' to 'num_rep'. This cause dynamo failed to handle triton Autotuner object since dynamo TritonKernelVariable makes assumption about attribute names. It's used in some test cases that a model call triton Autotuner directly.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/115878
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Summary: Currently, we [`clone`](19207b9183/torch/_inductor/lowering.py (L5273)) every `TensorBox` argument of custom Triton kernels while lowering them to the Inductor IR, during which the stride information of the kernel inputs is lost. This is problematic in the common case when the strides of a `torch.Tensor` argument are passed as scalars to a custom Triton kernel alongside the tensor itself (due to the underlying Triton code interpreting the tensors as raw pointers, so the contained stride semantics of the `torch.Tensor` is lost).
In this PR, we add an extended version of the existing [`clone` lowering](19207b9183/torch/_inductor/lowering.py (L2289))---`clone_preserve_reinterpret_view`---which carries over the `ir.ReinterpretVew` layers (if any) from the source `TensorBox` to the cloned one. The rationale behind adding a new function (and switching to it in the `triton_kernel_wrap` only for now) as opposed to extending the existing `clone` is keeping the semantics of the latter untouched, as it is a lowering of `torch.clone` (albeit incomplete, as the `memory_format` is currently ignored). Changing the existing `clone` would change the semantics which is not necessarily desirable in general. Open to suggestions, though.
Test Plan:
```
$ python test/dynamo/test_functions.py -k test_triton_kernel_strided_input
...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 5.568s
OK
```
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/116219
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This PR fixes two bugs
1) Constant folding a triton kernel results in the kernel's inputs to be returned back without any modification. Disable constant folding for triton kernels. Need more investigation
2) NoneLayout buffers should not be deleted as they do not exist
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/115908
Approved by: https://github.com/aakhundov, https://github.com/jansel
Due to not all tests in the Dynamo shard actually running in CI, we've
started to bitrot on this implementation. Since our plan is to trace
into the functorch implementations instead of construct a HOP
(which is what capture_func_transforms=True does), let's turn off this
config by default.
Test Plan:
- Tests
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/115267
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym, https://github.com/guilhermeleobas
Fixes#104797
```
File "/home/jansel/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1486, in <lambda>
lambda: run_node(tx.output, node, args, kwargs, nnmodule)
File "/home/jansel/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1591, in run_node
raise RuntimeError(fn_str + str(e)).with_traceback(e.__traceback__) from e
File "/home/jansel/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1570, in run_node
return node.target(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/jansel/conda/envs/pytorch/lib/python3.10/site-packages/einops/packing.py", line 153, in unpack
n_unknown_composed_axes = sum(x == -1 for x in lengths_of_composed_axes)
torch._dynamo.exc.TorchRuntimeError: Failed running call_function <function unpack at 0x7f644b962710>(*(FakeTensor(..., device='cuda:0', size=(1, s0*s1, 128)), [(s0, s1)], 'b * c'), **{}):
unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'SymBool'
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114828
Approved by: https://github.com/lezcano
Prior to this PR, autotuned arguments could only be at the back of the argument list. This is an inductor limitation and not triton limitation. Fixing this allows more MRS kernels to use user defined triton kernels.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/114002
Approved by: https://github.com/aakhundov
ghstack dependencies: #113967
fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/90552. This is a simpler fix that just detects the situation where AOTAutograd can't create a proper backward graph for the situation and graph breaks. This was technically a silent correctness issue before.
This PR tries to always graph break when we see a factory function that returns a tensor requiring grad. I check this by seeing if the op returned a `TensorVariable` in dynamo, and if one of the input arguments was a `requires_grad=True` kwarg. I think this is high-fidelity enough, and I'm also hoping that this is uncommon enough that a graph break is reasonable here.
The fix to avoid the graph break in user land is also pretty easy - just instantiate your tensor outside of the compiled region and plumb it in.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/113277
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
ghstack dependencies: #113267, #113416, #113584
1) This PR moves the grid function codegen to wrapper so that we can use
IndentBuffers as opposed to manually adding tabs for indentation.
2) In inductor, emits the grid function in the body of the kernel call so
that it can use free symbols from dynamic shapes
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/112523
Approved by: https://github.com/Chillee
Summary:
As of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103192, dynamo
supports code that creates OrderedDict instances using kwargs
for the key-value pairs rather than passing a dict literal.
But custom dicts (for example subclasses of OrderedDict) follow
a different codepath so that we can check for conditions such
as a custom `__init__` that need to force a graph break.
This commit allows kwargs for custom dict constructors - if the
args are empty and the class is not also a dataclass (which is
the case that, for example, a
`transformers.modeling_outputs.ModelOutput` instance will wind
up hitting) then treat the kwargs as the key-value pairs.
NOTE: For this to behave 100% correctly, we are relying on
the fact that python dicts behave like ordered dicts so that they
preserve the kwargs' ordering. Technically it is not guaranteed that
future versions of Python will respect this; if that behavior changes
we would need to ensure that dynamo uses OrderedDict for kwargs all
the way down in order to handle special cases like OrderedDict where
the kwargs' ordering does matter.
Test Plan:
```
pytest test/dynamo/test_functions.py
```
I also verified that the new test fails without the changes to
`dicts.py`.
Reviewers: yanboliang
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/112513
Approved by: https://github.com/yanboliang
The strategy for supporting functools partials is relatively straightforward.
There are 2 cases we need to support:
**1) Functools partials as input**
In this case, we are first seeing the functools partial and it is guaranteed to have a source. As such, the args, keywords, and func of the functools partial are passed through VariableBuilder. As this is the first time we are seeing these objects (as it is an input), we re-enter VariableBuilder with a source referencing the args, keywords, and func as attributes of the input to produce:
- func: A callable VariableTracker (UDF, TorchVariable, etc) depending on the value of `func`
- args: List[VariableTracker] - note, not ListVariableTracker!
- keywords: Dict[str, VariableTracker]
A major benefit of this structure is that it very elegantly matches the args to `call_function`.
We then compose a FunctoolsPartialVariable from the VariableTrackers made above.
**2) Functools partials created within compile**
In this case, we already have all the args as known VTs, and thus just compose a FunctoolsPartialVariable as we do for case (1).
For both (1) and (2) - we propagate all guards from the func, args, and keyword VTs to the FunctoolsPartialVariable
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/108846
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/jansel
RFC: https://github.com/pytorch/rfcs/pull/54
First commit is the contents of https://github.com/Quansight-Labs/numpy_pytorch_interop/
We have already been using this in core for the last few months as a external dependency. This PR pulls all these into core.
In the next commits, I do a number of things in this order
- Fix a few small issues
- Make the tests that this PR adds pass
- Bend backwards until lintrunner passes
- Remove the optional dependency on `torch_np` and simply rely on the upstreamed code
- Fix a number dynamo tests that were passing before (they were not tasting anything I think) and are not passing now.
Missing from this PR (but not blocking):
- Have a flag that deactivates tracing NumPy functions and simply breaks. There used to be one but after the merge stopped working and I removed it. @lezcano to investigate.
- https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106431#issuecomment-1667079543. @voznesenskym to submit a fix after we merge.
All the tests in `tests/torch_np` take about 75s to run.
This was a work by @ev-br, @rgommers @honno and I. I did not create this PR via ghstack (which would have been convenient) as this is a collaboration, and ghstack doesn't allow for shared contributions.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/106211
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Original PR: #103546
Trying to support numpy function call in dynamo, with numpy dtype as argument.
For example:
```
def fn(x: int):
return np.empty_like(x, dtype=np.float64)
```
This currently doesn't work because `NumpyVariable` doesn't implement `as_proxy()`. The idea in `as_proxy()` for now is to convert `np.float64` and other np.<dtype> into `str` and then feed into the corresponding `torch_np` method. The assumption here is that all `torch_np` methods that are taking `dtype` kwarg will be able to also take `str` as `dtype`. This assumption stands for `numpy`.
For previous example, we convert `np.float64` to `"float64"` in `as_proxy()` and then feed it into `torch_np.empy_like()` method.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/105034
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
The main complexity comes from the __init__ function of Dataclass variables which look something like this
```
[2023-07-10 05:01:29,548] torch._dynamo.symbolic_convert: [DEBUG] INLINING <code object __init__ at 0x7f7015154450, file "<string>", line 2>
3 0 LOAD_FAST 1 (b)
2 LOAD_FAST 0 (self)
4 STORE_ATTR 0 (b)
4 6 LOAD_FAST 2 (named_tensors)
8 LOAD_DEREF 0 (_HAS_DEFAULT_FACTORY)
10 IS_OP 0
12 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 20
14 LOAD_DEREF 1 (_dflt_named_tensors)
16 CALL_FUNCTION 0
18 JUMP_FORWARD 2 (to 22)
>> 20 LOAD_FAST 2 (named_tensors)
>> 22 LOAD_FAST 0 (self)
24 STORE_ATTR 1 (named_tensors)
26 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
28 RETURN_VALUE
```
There are multiple issues
* VariableBuilder call in functions.py was wrong. We were calling *options as args.
* We were not setting source while tracking the new object. This led to no source for Dataclass variable, which has some new variables in its closures as seen in the above bytecode.
* There is IS_OP in above bytecode, which brings more cases.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/104840
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
## Problem
Trying to support numpy function call in dynamo, with numpy dtype as argument.
For example:
```
def fn(x: int):
return np.empty_like(x, dtype=np.float64)
```
## Solution
This currently doesn't work because `NumpyVariable` doesn't implement `as_proxy()`. The idea in `as_proxy()` for now is to convert `np.float64` and other np.<dtype> into `torch.dtype` and then feed into the corresponding `torch_np` method.
For previous example, we convert `np.float64` to `torch.float64` in `as_proxy()` and then feed it into `torch_np.empy_like()` method.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103546
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR turns translation validation on by default for tests and accuracy benchmark
runs. It also installs Z3 on CI.
The main changes are:
- Add `--no-translation-validation` as an option in _test/run_tests.py_
- Set `PYTORCH_TEST_WITH_TV` environment variable
- Add `TEST_WITH_TV` variable in _torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py_
- Turn translation validation on for accuracy benchmarks in _benchmarks/dynamo/common.py_
- Add Z3 installation on CI scripts
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/103611
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
This PR adds universal support for ndarray methods. After #100839 each `NumpyNdarrayVariable` should wrap a `torch.Tensor`. This PR adds a `numpy_method_wrapper` which converts the `torch.Tensor` to `torch_np.ndarray` and then call the numpy ndarray method. Then we also try to return a `torch.Tensor` (return as-is if the value is not ndarray-like)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/97537
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Issue: #93684
In previous PRs #95849#99560 we redirect `numpy.*`, `<tensor>.numpy()` calls to `torch_np.*` methods and attributes, by creating `NumpyNdarrayVariable` for those calls.
We need to handle `NumpyNdarrayVariable` when graph break happens.
This PR did 2 things:
1. In `codegen.py` we made sure we can reconstruct the value wrapped by `NumpyNdarrayVariable`, to be `torch_np.ndarray` in the stack whenerver we recompiles the subgraph.
2. In `builder.py` we can wrap the value to be `NumpyNdarrayVariable` and save it as graph input.
-----
Starting from commit 6:
## A new design for supporting numpy in dynamo
In short the core concept doesn't change: we still convert `numpy` API calls to `torch_np` API calls. However, instead of wrapping a `torch_np.ndarray` in `NumpyNdarrayVariable`, the new design wraps a `torch.Tensor`.
The reason for doing this change is because we need to keep `torch.Tensor` everywhere in the captured graph, so that it works well with the backend of dynamo. See discussions in https://github.com/Quansight-Labs/numpy_pytorch_interop/issues/142 for details.
### Flow
This is an example showing how do we think about dynamo working on a simple function:
```python
def f(x: torch.Tensor, y: torch.Tensor):
a, b = x.numpy(), y.numpy()
c = np.add(x, y)
return torch.from_numpy(c)
```
```
+------------+ +------------+
torch.Tensor | |numpy.ndarray| |
-------------- .numpy() --------------| |
| | | | +------------------+
+------------+ | numpy.add |numpy.ndarray| |torch.Tensor
+------------+ | --------------| torch.from_numpy --------------
torch.Tensor | |numpy.ndarray| | | |
-------------- .numpy() --------------| | +------------------+
| | | |
+------------+ +------------+
+------------+ +----------------+
torch.Tensor | |torch.Tensor | |
-------------- .detach() --------------| |
| | | | +----------------+ +------------+
+------------+ | |torch_np.ndarray| |torch.Tensor| |torch.Tensor
| torch_np.add -----------------| util.to_tensor -------------| .detach() --------------
+------------+ | | | | | |
torch.Tensor | |torch.Tensor | | +----------------+ +------------+
-------------- .detach() --------------| |
| | | |
+------------+ | +----------------+ |
| wrapper on torch_np.add |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
```
### Approach
`torch_np` APIs can take both `torch_np.ndarray` as well as `torch.Tensor`. What we need to do is to have a wrapper for these APIs to convert the return value back to `torch.Tensor`. This way only the wrapper is showing up in the captured graph, with `torch.Tensor`s as input and `torch.Tensor` as output.
If we have a graph break or we've traced to the end of the program, we need to inspect all the `NumpyNdarrayVariable` in the stack and convert them back to `numpy.ndarray`, to make sure the compiled version is still behaving the same as the eager version.
### Examples
Here's an example of the graph generated:
```python
def fn(x: np.ndarray, y: np.ndarray):
a = x.real
b = y.real
torch._dynamo.graph_break()
return np.add(a, 1), np.add(b, 1)
```
Graph generated:
```
[2023-05-16 10:31:48,737] torch._dynamo.output_graph.__graph: [DEBUG] TRACED GRAPH
__compiled_fn_0 <eval_with_key>.0 opcode name target args kwargs
------------- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------
placeholder l_x_ L_x_ () {}
placeholder l_y_ L_y_ () {}
call_function from_numpy <built-in method from_numpy of type object at 0x12b1fdc80> (l_x_,) {}
call_function from_numpy_1 <built-in method from_numpy of type object at 0x12b1fdc80> (l_y_,) {}
call_function attr_wrapper <function attr_wrapper at 0x12e8693a0> (from_numpy, 'real') {}
call_function attr_wrapper_1 <function attr_wrapper at 0x12e8693a0> (from_numpy_1, 'real') {}
output output output ((),) {}
[2023-05-16 10:31:48,908] torch._dynamo.output_graph.__graph: [DEBUG] TRACED GRAPH
__compiled_fn_2 <eval_with_key>.1 opcode name target args kwargs
------------- ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- --------
placeholder l_a_ L_a_ () {}
placeholder l_b_ L_b_ () {}
call_function from_numpy <built-in method from_numpy of type object at 0x12b1fdc80> (l_a_,) {}
call_function from_numpy_1 <built-in method from_numpy of type object at 0x12b1fdc80> (l_b_,) {}
call_function wrapped_add <Wrapped function <original add>> (from_numpy, 1) {}
call_function wrapped_add_1 <Wrapped function <original add>> (from_numpy_1, 1) {}
output output output ((wrapped_add, wrapped_add_1),) {}
```
### Changes
* `codegen.py`: reconstruct `numpy.ndarray` from `NumpyNdarrayVariable` by adding bytecode to call `utils.to_numpy_helper()`.
* `output_graph.py`: getting rid of legacy code that does exactly what `codegen.py` does, which only handling return case but not graph break case.
* `utils.py`: added helpers to convert `numpy.ndarray` to `torch.Tensor` and vice versa. Also adding a wrapper class that takes in a function. In `__call__` it calls the function and converts its out to `torch.Tensor` (or a list of it).
* `builder.py`: add method to wrap `numpy.ndarray` graph inputs into `NumpyNdarrayVariable`, by calling `torch.numpy` in the proxy.
* `misc.py`: `numpy` API calls goes into `NumpyVariable` and we find the function with the same name in `torch_np` module, then wrap it with the wrapper defined in `utils.py`.
* `tensor.py`, `torch.py`: proxy `tensor.numpy()` to be `torch.detach()` but wrap it with `NumpyNdarrayVariable`. Similarly, `torch.from_numpy()` -> `torch.detach()` but wrap it with `TensorVariable`. In `NumpyNdarrayVariable`, do the similar `torch_np.ndarray` to `torch.Tensor` wrapping for attributes.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/100839
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
On top of #95849 this PR is trying to handle the special case when dealing with numpy.
Consider the following example:
```
def f(x: torch.Tensor) -> np.ndarray:
a = x.numpy()
return a.T
```
In previous PR this will error out because we translate `a.T` to be a method call on `torch_np.ndarray.T` which is also a `torch_np.ndarray`.
This PR handles this case, by conditionally converting a `torch_np.ndarray` to `np.ndarray` before returning, to match the original behavior.
The compiled version will be:
```
def f(x):
___tmp_0 = __compiled_fn_0(x)
if isinstance(___tmp_0, torch_np.ndarray):
return ___tmp_0.tensor.numpy()
else:
return ___tmp_0
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/99560
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel, https://github.com/yanboliang
Issue: #93684
# Problem
Reduce graph breaks when dynamo compiles python functions containing numpy functions and ndarray operations.
# Design (as I know it)
* Use torch_np.ndarray(a wrapper of tensor) to back a `VariableTracker`: `NumpyTensorVariable`.
* Translate all attributes and methods calls, on ndarray, to torch_np.ndarray equivalent.
This PR adds `NumpyTensorVariable` and supports:
1. tensor to ndarray, ndarray to tensor
2. numpy functions such as numpy.meshgrid()
3. ndarray attributes such as `itemsize`, `stride`
Next PR will handle returning `np.ndarray` and add support for ndarray methods
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/95849
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
It's common to call ```dict()``` or ```collections.OrderedDict()``` inside of ```forward``` function, so we should not graph break.
This pattern has been used in many places including:
* The use case in [torchvision](
928b05cad3/torchvision/models/_utils.py (L66-L73)).
* It causes ~100 model failures(nopython=True) in the 14k github models.
* Also it hits several Meta internal use cases.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/95250
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
**Background:** Before this PR, support in dynamo for tensor attributes (e.g. `x.H`, `x.T`, ...) need to be individually implemented one-by-one. This could potentially lead to errors, e.g. if the implementation in [variables/tensor.py](21c7c7c72f/torch/_dynamo/variables/tensor.py (L160)) differs from the implementation from a direct call to the attribute. For attributes that were not special-cased in tensor.py, dynamo tracing would fail. This PR adds generic support for tensor attributes that return tensors without needing to specially handle them. (Notably, for x.real and x.imag, which previously weren't supported).
**In this PR:** This directly creates a proxy node for a `"call_function"` node with `target=getattr`, and feeds it into wrap_fx_proxy. This will produce a TensorVariable for the attribute returned.
This also removes the implementations for H, T, mH, mT which were broken (previously `torch.relu(x.T)` would fail). They now fall back to this default implementation (for which `torch.relu(x.T)` passes).
**Further context**:
* Ed's original suggestion in [90463](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90463#discussion_r1043398340) is to use `torch.Tensor.H.__get__(x)`. I wasn't able to get this to work; fx compilation fails with `getset_descriptor does not have attribute __module__`. Basically, the `__module__` attribute which is available on most python attributes, is not available on `getset_descriptor` objects. (i.e., these are implemented in C++ as attributes on torch.Tensor, so they don't obey some assumptions made by fx)
* Although both tensor attributes and methods (like `x.relu()`) both go through this, this PR should only handle attributes (e.g. see the `"getset_descriptor"` in variables/tensor.py). Methods are handled already by by GetAttrVariable.
* Prior to this PR, we already returned GetAttrVariables for unsupported attrs: the parent caller would catch the NotImplementedError and fallback to returning a GetAttrVariable. But if this GetAttrVariable was ever passed into a torch.\* function (as it could quite possibly be, since most of these attrs are tensors), it would fail because its proxy node would be missing an [example_value](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/torch/_dynamo/utils.py#L1017). So: before, for some tensor x, `x.real` would work fine; but `torch.relu(x.real)` would fail.
**Testing**: added tests in test_misc.py for x.real, x.imag, x.T, x.real.T.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/91840
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
for some tensor x, x.type(torch.FloatTensor) will essentially do the same thing as x.to(torch.float). x.type can be called with at least 3 types of inputs:
* a string "torch.FloatTensor"
* a dtype torch.float
* a tensor type torch.FloatTensor
the third option (torch.FloatTensor) fails in fx, because fx cannot trace torch.FloatTensor objects. So this PR will replace the torch.FloatTensor type with a string "torch.FloatTensor"
Why not fix this in fx? Well, it's possible, but I'm not sure a nice way to do it. We would want to update [torch.fx.node.BaseArgumentTypes](d88bc38b0c/torch/fx/node.py (L17)) to contain torch.FloatTensor etc. We could hard-code a list of tensor types there (the types vary depending on build type, e.g. whether or not cuda tensors are available), but that's not great in case our hardcoded list differs from the actual list registered by python_tensor.cpp. Another option is to dynamically populate the list of types with `Union[tuple(...)])`, and fill the tuple with `torch._tensor_classes` (which is directly populated by python_tensor.cpp), but apparently this breaks most typecheckers.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/93043
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Handle tensor default func/method args when inlining
Previously, when inlining a function, its default arguments
were only wrapped with VariableTrackers if non-tensor. Now,
tensor default args are also handled by adding them to the
parent InstructionTranslator as an attribute.
- also patches up a missing source in nnmodule call_function,
needed to properly guard on a default arg in its methods
- adds new 'DefaultsSource' type which guards either a `__defaults__`
or `__kwdefaults__` entry on a function
Fixes#90361https://github.com/pytorch/torchdynamo/issues/1968
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90575
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
Rewrite inplace addcdiv to a div, mul and inplace add to avoid graph break
Rewrite inplace add to a mul and inplace add to avoid graph break
Needed to close optimizer graph breaks
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90330
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
Fix errors from [7k github models](https://github.com/pytorch/torchdynamo/issues/1884)
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/scratch/ybliang/work/repos/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1062, in get_fake_value
return wrap_fake_exception(
File "/scratch/ybliang/work/repos/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 739, in wrap_fake_exception
return fn()
File "/scratch/ybliang/work/repos/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1063, in <lambda>
lambda: run_node(tx.output, node, args, kwargs, nnmodule)
File "/scratch/ybliang/work/repos/pytorch/torch/_dynamo/utils.py", line 1112, in run_node
raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: Failed running call_function <function einsum at 0x7fd8f246a4c0>(*('i,j->ij', FakeTensor(FakeTensor(..., device='meta', size=(4,)), cpu), FakeTensor(FakeTensor(..., device='meta', size=(2,)), cuda:0)), **{}):
Unhandled FakeTensor Device Propagation for aten.mul.Tensor, found two different devices cpu, cuda:0
(scroll up for backtrace)
```
The root cause is: ```tensor.type()``` should return ```torch.cuda.FloatTensor``` rather than ```torch.FloatTensor``` if it's on GPU.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/90021
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
This is a group of bug fixes for [7k github models](https://github.com/pytorch/torchdynamo/issues/1884), it would fix 30+ model tests.
* Support ```tensor.type()```.
* Support ```tensor.get_device()```.
* Support ```torch.nn.functional._Reduction.get_enum```.
* Support ```torch._utils._get_device_index()```.
* Fallback ```tensor.data_ptr()```.
* ```FakeTensor``` always returns 0
* For no fake tensor propagation, we ```clone``` the input tensor, which makes no sense to track the original ```data_ptr```. And I don't think this is a very popular API.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/89486
Approved by: https://github.com/jansel
**Introduces symbolic shape guards into dynamo.**
In this PR, we take the existing fake tensor infra and plumbing in dynamo and we start passing a shape_env around. This shape_env does not get plumbed down to middle layers / backend yet - it only collects expressions from frontend invocations at the moment. We then translate these expressions into guards at the point where we take other guards installed throughout dynamo - and add them to check_fn.
Part 1 of https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QJ-M4zfMkD-fjHIqW089RptjLl9EgozZGCceUbvmgfY/edit#
cc @jansel @lezcano @fdrocha @mlazos @soumith @yanboliang @penguinwu @anijain2305
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/87570
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
