Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/47745
This is a relatively small codegen. Reintroduced 'simple_type' to preserve
old codegen output.
It depends on some methods defined in gen_python_functions.py - next PR will
clean up the remaining Declarations.yaml methods in gen_python_functions.py.
Confirmed byte-for-byte compatible with the old codegen:
```
Run it before and after this PR:
.jenkins/pytorch/codegen-test.sh <baseline_output_dir>
.jenkins/pytorch/codegen-test.sh <test_output_dir>
Then run diff to compare the generated files:
diff -Naur <baseline_output_dir> <test_output_dir>
```
Differential Revision: D24885068
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ezyang
Pulled By: ljk53
fbshipit-source-id: c0fbd726bcc450c3c7fe232c23e5b31779d0b65f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46978
Refactored and added type annotations to the most part of the file.
Some top-level codegen functions are called by other codegen scripts.
Will migrate them in subsequent PRs.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D24589210
Pulled By: ljk53
fbshipit-source-id: e0c7e5b3672b41983f321400c2e2330d1462e76e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/47002
There was no good reason for TypeDerived.h (CPUType.h) codegen
to exist after static dispatch was deleted, and now that we
have Math alias key TypeDefault.h header is not needed either.
Sorry to anyone who was using these out of tree.
I didn't entirely delete TypeDefault.h as it has a use in
a file that I can't conveniently compile test locally. Will
kill it entirely in a follow up.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D24596583
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: b5095d3509098ff74f836c5d0c272db0b2d226aa
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46977
Clean up a few TODOs in the new python binding codegen.
Get rid of the _simple_type() hack and the uses of cpp_type_str.
Now python argument type strings and PythonArgParser unpacking methods
are directly generated from the original Type model.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D24589209
Pulled By: ljk53
fbshipit-source-id: b2a6c3911d58eae49c031d319c8ea6f804e2cfde
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46976
Technically, it's not semantic preserving, e.g.: emition of
'requires_grad' is no longer gated by 'has_tensor_return' - there is no
guarantee that is_like_or_new_function should all have tensor return.
But the output is identical so there might be some invariant - could
also add assertion to fail loudly when it's broken.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D24589211
Pulled By: ljk53
fbshipit-source-id: 47c7e43b080e4e67a526fde1a8a53aae99df4432
Summary:
Follow-up of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/46461 with a similar goal
Makes them more readable and possibly faster. Care has to be taken because `map` applies the function immediately while `(x for x in xs)` is a generator expression which gets evaluated later. This is a benefit in some cases where it is not required to actually create the list of values in memory (e.g. when passing to `tuple` or `extend` or `join`)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46462
Reviewed By: zou3519
Differential Revision: D24422343
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 252e33499c92ac0b15238f2df32681dbbda2b237
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/46244
- What does the generated binding code do?
The Python binding codegen produces code that takes the input list of
PyObjects, finds the matching ATen C++ function using PythonArgParser,
converts the PyObjects into C++ types and calls the ATen C++ function:
```
+--------+ parsing +------------------------+ binding +-----------------------+
| PyObjs | ---------> | PythonArgParser Output | ---------> | Cpp Function Dispatch |
+--------+ +------------------------+ +-----------------------+
```
- Are Python arguments 1-1 mapped to C++ arguments?
Python arguments might be reordered, packed, unpacked when binding to
C++ arguments, as illustrated below:
```
// Binding - Reorder & Packing
// aten::empty.names(int[] size, *, Dimname[]? names, ScalarType? dtype=None, Layout? layout=None,
Device? device=None, bool? pin_memory=None, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None) -> Tensor
Python Args Cpp Args
-----------------------------------------------------------
0: size size
1: names names
2: memory_format -------+
3: dtype -----+-|--> options
4: layout / |
5: device / +--> memory_format
6: pin_memory /
7: requires_grad -+
// Binding - Unpacking
// aten::max.names_dim(Tensor self, Dimname dim, bool keepdim=False) -> (Tensor values, Tensor indices)
Python Args Cpp Args
-----------------------------------------------------------
+----> max
/-----> max_values
0: input / self
1: dim / dim
2: keepdim / keepdim
3: out -----+
```
- Why do we want to rewrite the python binding codegen?
The old codegen takes Declarations.yaml as input. It doesn't distinguish
between Python arguments and C++ arguments - they are all mixed together
as a bag of non-typed dict objects. Different methods process these arg
objects and add new attributes for various different purposes. It's not so
obvious to figure out the semantics of these attributes. The complicated
binding logic happens implicitly and scatteredly.
```
+--------------------+
| Native Functions |
+--------------------+
|
|
v
+--------------------+
| Cpp Signatures |
+--------------------+
|
|
v
+--------------------+
| Declarations.yaml |
+--------------------+
| +-------------------------------------+
| +-------> | PythonArgParser Schema |
| | +-------------------------------------+
| | .
| | .
v | .
+--------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
| NonTyped Args Objs | --> | PythonArgParser -> Cpp Args Binding |
+--------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
| .
| .
| .
| +-------------------------------------+
+-------> | Cpp Function Dispatch |
+-------------------------------------+
```
This PR leverages the new immutable data models introduced in the new
aten codegen. It introduces dedicated data models for python schema.
This way, we can not only avoid subtle Declaration.yaml conversions but
also decouple the generation of python schema, python to c++ binding and
c++ function call.
The ultimate state will be like the following diagram:
```
+-------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
+-------> | Python Signatures | --> | PythonArgParser Schema |
| +-------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
| | .
| | .
| | .
+------------------+ | +-------------------------------------+
| Native Functions | +-------> | PythonArgParser -> Cpp Args Binding |
+------------------+ | +-------------------------------------+
| | .
| | .
| | .
| +-------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
+-------> | Cpp Signatures | --> | Cpp Function Dispatch |
+-------------------+ +-------------------------------------+
```
This PR has migrated the core binding logic from
tools/autograd/gen_python_functions.py to tools/codegen/api/python.py.
It produces the byte-for-byte same results (tested with #46243).
Will migrate the rest of gen_python_functions.py in subsequent PRs.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bhosmer
Differential Revision: D24388874
Pulled By: ljk53
fbshipit-source-id: f88b6df4e917cf90d868a2bbae2d5ffb680d1841
Summary:
The record_stream method was hard coded for CUDA device. Define the record_stream in the native_functions.yaml to enable the dynamic dispatch to different end device.
Fixes https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/36556
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44301
Reviewed By: glaringlee
Differential Revision: D23763954
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: e6d24f5e7892b56101fa858a6cad2abc5cdc4293
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45990
In #45890 we introduced the concept of a CppSignature, which bundled
up all of the information necessary to declare a C++ signature for
the cpp API. This PR introduces analogous concepts for dispatcher
and native: DispatcherSignature and NativeSignature.
The three interfaces are not particularly well coupled right now,
but they do have some duck typing coincidences:
- defn() which renders the C++ definition "bool f(int x)"
- decl() which renders the C++ declaration "bool f(int x = 2)"
- type() which renders the C++ function type "bool(int)"
Maybe at some point we'll introduce a Protocol, or a supertype.
Many other methods (like arguments()) have varying types. These
signatures also have some helper methods that forward back to real
implementations in the api modules. Something to think about is
whether or not we should attempt to reduce boilerplate here or
not; I'm not too sure about it yet.
The net effect is we get to reduce the number of variables we
have to explicitly write out in the codegen, since now these are all
bundled together into a signature. Something extra special happens
in BackendSelect, where we now dynamically select between dispatcher_sig
and native_sig as "how" the backend select is implemented.
A little bit of extra cleanup:
- Some places where we previously advertised Sequence, we now advertise
a more informative Tuple.
- defn() may take an optional positional parameter overriding the entire
name, or a kwarg-only prefix parameter to just add a prefix to the
name.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: smessmer
Differential Revision: D24223100
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: f985eced08af4a60ba9641d125d0f260f8cda9eb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45974
The term "legacy dispatcher" caused a bunch of confusion between
me and Sebastian when discussing what the intended semantics of
legacy dispatcher argument is. Legacy dispatcher argument implies
that you ought NOT to use it when you have use_c10_dispatcher: full;
but that's not really what's going on; legacy dispatcher API describes
the API that you write native:: functions (NativeFunctions.h) to.
Renaming it here makes this more clear.
I applied these seds:
```
git grep -l 'legacy_dispatcher' | xargs sed -i 's/legacy_dispatcher/native/g'
git grep -l 'legacydispatcher' | xargs sed -i 's/legacydispatcher/native/g'
git grep -l 'LegacyDispatcher' | xargs sed -i 's/LegacyDispatcher/Native/g'
```
and also grepped for "legacy" in tools/codegen and fixed documentation.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: smessmer
Differential Revision: D24223101
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: d1913b8b823b3b95e4546881bc0e876acfa881eb
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45890
This rewrite is as per my comments at https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44087#issuecomment-701664506
I did the rewrite by reverting #44087 and then reimplementing it on top.
You may find it easier to review by diffing against master with only #44087
reverted.
There are two main ideas.
First, we now factor cpp argument processing into two phases operating
on three representations of data:
1. `FunctionSchema` - this is the source from native_functions.yaml
2. `Union[Argument, ThisArgument, TensorOptionsArgument]` - this is
the arguments after doing some basic semantic analysis to group
them (for TensorOptions) or identify the this argument (if this
is a method). There is only ever one of these per functions.
3. `Union[CppArgument, CppThisArgument, CppTensorOptionsArgument]` -
this is the arguments after we've elaborated them to C++. There
may be multiple of these per actual C++ signature.
You can think of (2) as common processing, whereas (3) bakes in specific
assumptions about whether or not you have a faithful or non-faithful
signature.
Second, we now have CppSignature and CppSignatureGroup representing
the *total* public C++ API signature. So those dataclasses are what
know how to render definitions/declarations, and you no longer have
to manually type it out in the Functions/TensorMethods codegen.
Here is an exhaustive accounting of the changes.
tools.codegen.api.types
- CppSignature and CppSignatureGroup got moved to tools.codegen.api.types
- Add new CppThisArgument and CppTensorOptionsArguments (modeled off
of ThisArgument and TensorOptionsArguments) so that we can retain
high level semantic structure even after elaborating terms with C++
API information. Once this is done, we can refine
CppArgument.argument to no longer contain a ThisArgument (ThisArgument
is always translated to CppThisArgument. Note that this doesn't
apply to TensorOptionsArguments, as those may be expanded or not
expanded, and so you could get a single CppArgument for 'options')
- Add no_default() functional mutator to easily remove default arguments
from CppArgument and friends
- Add an explicit_arguments() method to CppArgument and friends to
extract (flat) argument list that must be explicitly written in the signature.
This is everything except (Cpp)ThisArgument, and is also convenient
when you don't care about the extra structure of
CppTensorOptionsArguments
tools.codegen.api.cpp
- group_arguments is back, and it doesn't send things directly to a
CppSignatureGroup; instead, it moves us from representation (1) to (2)
(perhaps it should live in model). Here I changed my mind from my
PR comment; I discovered it was not necessary to do classification at
grouping time, and it was simpler and easier to do it later.
- argument got split into argument_not_this/argument/argument_faithful.
argument and argument_faithful are obvious enough what they do,
and I needed argument_not_this as a more refined version of argument
so that I could get the types to work out on TensorOptionsArguments
tools.codegen.api.dispatcher
- Here we start seeing the payoff. The old version of this code had a
"scatter" mode and a "gather" mode. We don't need that anymore:
cppargument_exprs is 100% type-directed via the passed in cpp
arguments. I am able to write the functions without any reference
to use_c10_dispatcher
tools.codegen.gen
- Instead of having exprs_str and types_str functions, I moved these to
live directly on CppSignature, since it seemed pretty logical.
- The actual codegen for TensorMethods/Functions is greatly simplified,
since (1) all of the heavy lifting is now happening in
CppSignature(Group) construction, and (2) I don't need to proxy one
way or another, the new dispatcher translation code is able to handle
both cases no problem. There is a little faffing about with ordering
to reduce the old and new diff which could be removed afterwards.
Here are codegen diffs. For use_c10_dispatcher: full:
```
+// aten::_cudnn_init_dropout_state(float dropout, bool train, int dropout_seed, *, ScalarType? dtype=None, Layout? layout=None, Device? device=None, bool? pin_memory=False) -> Tensor
Tensor _cudnn_init_dropout_state(double dropout, bool train, int64_t dropout_seed, const TensorOptions & options) {
- return _cudnn_init_dropout_state(dropout, train, dropout_seed, optTypeMetaToScalarType(options.dtype_opt()), options.layout_opt(), options.device_opt(), options.pinned_memory_opt());
+ static auto op = c10::Dispatcher::singleton()
+ .findSchemaOrThrow("aten::_cudnn_init_dropout_state", "")
+ .typed<Tensor (double, bool, int64_t, c10::optional<ScalarType>, c10::optional<Layout>, c10::optional<Device>, c10::optional<bool>)>();
+ return op.call(dropout, train, dropout_seed, optTypeMetaToScalarType(options.dtype_opt()), options.layout_opt(), options.device_opt(), options.pinned_memory_opt());
}
```
Otherwise:
```
+// aten::empty_meta(int[] size, *, ScalarType? dtype=None, Layout? layout=None, Device? device=None, bool? pin_memory=None, MemoryFormat? memory_format=None) -> Tensor
Tensor empty_meta(IntArrayRef size, c10::optional<ScalarType> dtype, c10::optional<Layout> layout, c10::optional<Device> device, c10::optional<bool> pin_memory, c10::optional<MemoryFormat> memory_format) {
- return empty_meta(size, TensorOptions().dtype(dtype).layout(layout).device(device).pinned_memory(pin_memory), memory_format);
+ static auto op = c10::Dispatcher::singleton()
+ .findSchemaOrThrow("aten::empty_meta", "")
+ .typed<Tensor (IntArrayRef, const TensorOptions &, c10::optional<MemoryFormat>)>();
+ return op.call(size, TensorOptions().dtype(dtype).layout(layout).device(device).pinned_memory(pin_memory), memory_format);
}
```
Things that I probably did not get right:
- The Union[Argument, TensorOptionsArguments, ThisArgument] and
the Cpp variants are starting to get a little unwieldy. Not sure if
this means I should add a supertype (or at the very least an
alias); in some cases I do purposely omit one of these from the Union
- Code may not necessarily live in the most logical files. There isn't
very much rhyme or reason to it.
- The fields on CppSignature. They're not very well constrained and
it will be better if people don't use them directly.
- Disambiguation. We should do this properly in #44087 and we don't
need special logic for deleting defaulting for faithful signatures;
there is a more general story here.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: smessmer
Differential Revision: D24144035
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: a185f8bf9df8b44ca5718a7a44dac23cefd11c0a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45742
Add a new flag to native_functions.yaml: `use_c10_dispatcher: hacky_wrapper_for_legacy_signatures`
and the codegen only wraps kernels in the aforementioned wrapper if that flag is set.
Apart from that, `use_c10_dispatcher: hacky_wrapper_for_legacy_signatures` is equivalent to `full`,
i.e. it has full boxing and unboxing support.
This greatly reduces the number of ops we apply the hacky_wrapper to, i.e. all ops marked as `use_c10_dispatcher: full` don't have it anymore.
ghstack-source-id: 113982139
Test Plan:
waitforsandcastle
vs fbcode:
https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/214511705/
vs base diff:
https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/214693207/
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D23328718
fbshipit-source-id: be120579477b3a05f26ca5f75025bfac37617620
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/45665Fixes#43944
Note that the codegen doesn't use a proper parser so, in the same way as with lists, the string `, ` cannot appear in defaults or it will be interpreted as a splitting point between arguments.
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: albanD
Differential Revision: D24141835
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 578127861fd2504917f4486c44100491a2c40343
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44087
Each op taking a TensorOptions argument now has an additional overload in the C++ frontend where it takes scattered ScalarType, Layout, Device, bool instead of one TensorOptions argument.
If it is a c10-full op, then the scattered version calls into the dispatcher and the gathered version is a proxy calling into the scattered version.
If it is a non-c10-full op, then the gathered version calls into the dispatcher and the scattered version is a proxy calling into the gathered version.
This should minimize the amount of gathering and scattering needed.
This PR is also a prerequisite to remove the re-gathering of arguments that is currently happening in VariableKernel. Currently, VariableKernels gather arguments into a TensorOptions object
to call into the C++ API. In a PR stacked on top of this, VariableKernel will just directly call into the scattered C++ API introduced here and avoid the gathering step.
ghstack-source-id: 113355689
Test Plan:
waitforsandcastle
vs master: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/216169815/
vs previous diff: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/216169957/
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D23492188
fbshipit-source-id: 3e84c467545ad9371e98e09075a311bd18411c5a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/44062
Previously, BackendSelect kernels were still written in the legacy way, i.e. they took one TensorOptions argument instead of scattered dtype, layout, device, pin_memory, and they used hacky_wrapper to be callable. This caused a re-wrapping step. Calling into a BackencSelect kernel required taking the individual scattered arguments, packing them into a TensorOptions, and the kernel itself then gathered them again for redispatch.
Now with this PR, BackendSelect kernels are written in the new way and no hacky_wrapper or rewrapping is needed for them.
ghstack-source-id: 112825789
Test Plan:
vs master: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/216117032/
vs previous diff: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/fblearner/details/216170194/
Reviewed By: ezyang
Differential Revision: D23484192
fbshipit-source-id: e8fb49c4692404b6b775d18548b990c4cdddbada
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/42629
How to approach reviewing this diff:
- The new codegen itself lives in `tools/codegen`. Start with `gen.py`, then read `model.py` and them the `api/` folder. The comments at the top of the files describe what is going on. The CLI interface of the new codegen is similar to the old one, but (1) it is no longer necessary to explicitly specify cwrap inputs (and now we will error if you do so) and (2) the default settings for source and install dir are much better; to the extent that if you run the codegen from the root source directory as just `python -m tools.codegen.gen`, something reasonable will happen.
- The old codegen is (nearly) entirely deleted; every Python file in `aten/src/ATen` was deleted except for `common_with_cwrap.py`, which now permanently finds its home in `tools/shared/cwrap_common.py` (previously cmake copied the file there), and `code_template.py`, which now lives in `tools/codegen/code_template.py`. We remove the copying logic for `common_with_cwrap.py`.
- All of the inputs to the old codegen are deleted.
- Build rules now have to be adjusted to not refer to files that no longer exist, and to abide by the (slightly modified) CLI.
- LegacyTHFunctions files have been generated and checked in. We expect these to be deleted as these final functions get ported to ATen. The deletion process is straightforward; just delete the functions of the ones you are porting. There are 39 more functions left to port.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Test Plan: Imported from OSS
Reviewed By: bhosmer
Differential Revision: D23183978
Pulled By: ezyang
fbshipit-source-id: 6073ba432ad182c7284a97147b05f0574a02f763
