* Improve Function interface
* Undo tracer changes
* Fix bug in VariableType.set_history
* Rename function_counter and sequence_number to sequence_nr
* Clarify Function documentation
* Replace swap_next_edges with next_edges() getter
* Bring back set_gradient_edge
* Simplify special.cpp
* add_gradient_edge -> create_gradient_edge
* Add mutable getters for pre/post hooks
* Use make_variable with Edge
* Remove remove_gradient_edge in favor of detach_
* Fix documentation and remove create_gradient_edge friend method
* Canonicalize some includes
The Tensor and Variable classes are being merged.
autograd.Function.forward is now called on Variables, but with "no-grad"
mode (torch.no_grad()) enabled.
One benefit is that we no longer have to explicitly track shared
storages.
Replace None grad_inputs with zero tensors in some cases
In Python-implemented autograd functions, we sometimes return None as
the grad_input if the output is marked "non-differentiable". This
replaces those None values with zero-filled Variables if the
corresponding input has requires_grad=True.
C++ implemented autograd functions expect the input (grad_outputs) to
be defined if they're executed. They always return non-null grad_inputs
if should_compute_output(i) is true. This could lead to segfaults if a
subsequent Python-implemented function returned None.
See #3412, #3241
Variable is now a subclass of at::Tensor backed by a VariableImpl* pImpl. The implementation of the ATen functions is defined in the auto-generated VariableType.h/cpp file.
Currently, only functions which fall through to the base type, such as sizes() and isCuda() are implemented. Differentiable ops like add() and mul() will be added in a subsequent PR.
It is not an /expression/ we trace, but it is a /graph/: that is,
a closed expression which knows its parameters. Knowing the list
of parameters is helpful and helps remove a hack when interpreting.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Previously, our AST was a DAG, where shared Nodes indicated a computation
should be reused. This commit rewrites the IR into a new functional
representation which represents sharing explicitly using variable
bindings.
We offer a few justifications for this new style:
1. The new representation is not all that different from the
old one; it is about as easy to construct, and the lack of an
explicit graph doesn't negatively impact our ability to interpret
the graph, since we've chosen, as a matter of design, to NOT have
the IR participate in the actual execution of a graph.
2. The new let-binding representation has an implicit ordering,
which we can use to conveniently keep track of the original order
the trace showed up as. This automatically gives us a topsort,
and gives us an easier to read textual representation of our
IR:
%14 = Embedding %11, %0, -1, None, 2, False, False
%15 = Dropout %14, 0.2, True, False
%16 = Index %12, 0
%17 = Index %12, 1
%18 = Index %13, 0
%19 = Index %13, 1
%20 = Index %15, 0
%21 = Linear %20, %1, %3
%22 = Linear %16, %2, %4
3. It moves us closer to a Futhark style language
(http://futhark-lang.org/publications/pldi17.pdf).
Major aspects of the diff
- Node is replaced with Expr and Arg, a pair of mutually recursive
structures which represent our new language. In BNF, the language
looks like this:
a ::= c | %i
e ::= %i, ... = e
| PyOp e, ...
| Ret %i, ...
Technically, Ret is not actually a return (no control flow is involved),
it just tuples up a series of tensors (identified by variables).
One important invariant is that locals are always tensors; they
are never constants (this is asymmetric with Args.)
- Arguments support Python constants. This is an important piece because
many operators take extra Python literals like integers and tuples in
order to specify extra parameters about how an operator operates. Adding
this was essential to getting word_language_model to work.
- As both Expr and Arg have multiple variants, there is new infrastructure
for doing case on the variants using ExprVisitor and ArgVisitor. The
strategy here is adapted from WebAssembly's visitors, although we have
generalized to permit arbitrary argument forwarding, which is necessary
to support tail-recursive visitor calls. TCO is important because our
interpreter may recurse arbitrarily deep into a stack of nested lets.
If users wish, they can also manually case on the type tag.
- Tracing is now turned on and off using _tracer_enter/_tracer_exit in
torch._C. _tracer_enter accepts a list of variables which are to be
treated as arguments; _tracer_exit accepts the list of traced variables
which should be returned when you reexecute the trace, and returns
the trace expression which can be reexecuted. GlobalTracingState
is a global variable which tracks whether or not we are tracing or not.
- You use run_forward to execute a trace on some set of parameters.
- When under tracing, variables keep track, via trace_local, what the
name of their variables in the IR are.
Here is a simple runner which leaks memory but can be used to JIT models:
import torch.autograd.function as F
import torch._C
def jit(model):
import types
real_forward = model.forward
def forward(self, *args):
def flatten(x):
return tuple(F._iter_variables(x))
if not hasattr(self, "saved_trace"):
torch._C._tracer_enter(tuple(self.parameters()) + flatten(args))
out = real_forward(*args)
self.saved_trace = torch._C._tracer_exit(flatten(out))
self.saved_outs = out
return out
else:
flat_out = Variable._execution_engine.run_forward(self.saved_trace, tuple(self.parameters()) + flatten(args))
return F._unflatten(flat_out, self.saved_outs)
Major problems:
- Sanity checking is spotty at best, especially when users pass in variables.
- The interpreter leaks tensor memory from the store. When we add back def-use
we should be able to deallocate tensors as soon as we know they are no longer
necessary.
- The interpreter needs to reach feature parity with the old execution engine.
From there, we need to see if backwards can be subsumed as well.
- I still have no confidence in having memory managed everything correctly.
This requires a close look.
- Rather than return an *open* expression as a trace, we should return a
*lambda* instead, which knows about how many formal parameters it
requires.
- The IR is not introspectable from Python at the moment, but this is simply a
matter of implementing all the binding code.
- The tracer is NOT reentrant (you can't trace while you're inside a trace.)
Furthermore, no sanity checking is done if you try to incorrectly reuse
things from one trace in another.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Simple test:
import torch
from torch.autograd import Variable
import torch._C as _C
x = Variable(torch.Tensor([4]), requires_grad=True)
y = Variable(torch.Tensor([7]), requires_grad=True)
z = x * y
z.sum().backward()
print(x.grad)
print(y.grad)
x.data[0] = 2
y.data[0] = 3
(z,) = z._execution_engine.run_forward((x, y), (z,))
z.sum().backward()
print(x.grad)
print(y.grad)
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
* Implement BatchNorm double backwards as a python function called directly from C++.
This will be converted to C++ code once ATen is integrated with autograd.
* Some performance improvements via inplace ops and reusing calculations.
* Fix gc_refs assertion failure
Ensure that each THPVariable -> THPFunction reference contributes one
ref count to the THPFunction by creating a new shared_ptr for each ref.
Because multiple shared_ptrs can again manage a single THPFunction, it's
not safe to use std::weak_ptr where it may point to a PyFunction. It's
still safe to use weak_ptr for grad_accumulator since these are never
PyFunctions.
Fixes#1626
* Remove stale comment
The core autograd Variable, Function, and Engine no longer depend on the
Python API. This let's us implement functions in C++. In the future, we
can also multithread engine and release the GIL for most of the
non-Python backwards.
